Tamara Holmlund Nelson

Leading Deep Conversations in Collaborative Inquiry Groups

Abstract Collaborative inquiry groups, such as professional learning communities and lesson study groups, are proliferating in schools across the United States. In whatever form, the potential for impacting student learning through this collaborative work is expanded or limited by the nature of teachers’ conversations. Polite, congenial conversations remain superficially focused on sharing stories of practice, whereas collegial dialogue probes more deeply into teaching and learning. Examples of talk taken from collaborative teacher inquiry groups are used to illustrate these important differences. Specific recommendations are provided, including the role that teacher leaders can play in adopting and modeling specific strategies that support the use of more substantive professional conversation.

Knowledge Interactions in Teacher-Scientist Partnerships Negotiation, Consultation, and Rejection

The purpose of this study was to understand how teachers and graduate-level scientists negotiated differing knowledge bases to work together to improve science teaching and learning. Partners’ coparticipation in and dialogue about pedagogical decisions and actions were analyzed. Three theoretical representations of dialogic interactions emerged from this analysis: knowledge negotiation, consultation, and rejection. Knowledge negotiation was a sustained inquiry stance involving intentional actions to understand each other’s knowledge representations. This was theorized as having the most potential for transformation of the cultural resources associated with science education. Only one of the nine partnerships in the study was characterized by knowledge negotiation. To explain this, the extensive support for university partners in creating a dialogic community is contrasted with the lack of support for participating teachers. The existence of power differentials between partners and the relevance of this to knowledge consultation are also discussed.

Requiring Collaboration or Distributing Leadership

Distributed leadership allows teachers to share their expertise and create a collective responsibility for improving student learning — and teaches district leaders the value of inviting teachers into leadership.

Teacher Groups’ Conceptions and Uses of Student-Learning Data

This article measures and discusses six teacher groups’ (a) time spent working with data and (b) time devoted to particular kinds of inquiry activities, and explores various contextual factors that influence these results. The authors make use of a framework useful in describing and analyzing the stance taken by teachers when they engage with student-learning data. Their findings suggest that most teacher groups spend the vast majority of their time collecting and analyzing data, with little time devoted to exploring potential data sources and reflecting on implications of their data analysis. Furthermore, “time on task” is less important than stance in determining the nature of the inquiry activity. Implications of these results are explored.

Making the Hidden Explicit: Learning about Equity in K-8 Preservice Science Education.

Preservice teachers in a K–8 science methods course used guided video reflection to examine their interactions with children during science teaching. This inquiry approach helped preservice teachers identify and respond to gaps between their beliefs and intentions about teaching all children and their enactment of those beliefs. The experience of teaching a science lesson and then viewing it multiple times through a critical framework provided an opportunity for preservice teachers to recognize hidden assumptions, unexamined behaviors, and the unintentional meanings they may have conveyed to children. This encouraged them to think more critically about their roles as teachers in creating spaces where all children have access to quality science learning experiences.

Jumping on the STEM Bandwagon: How Middle Grades Students and Teachers Can Benefit from STEM Experiences.

Abstract Given the current emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education and its key attributes, middle school is an optimal time to implement STEM-based curricula. However, the interdisciplinary and open-ended nature of STEM projects often makes implementation difficult. In this article, we describe a professional development project aimed at preparing middle grades teachers to implement STEM Design Challenges with their students. We discuss the resources that supported project teachers in navigating identified implementation challenges and provide an example of a sixth-grade team’s efforts to engage all learners in STEM experiences. Recommendations and examples in this article can support other middle school teams working to enact STEM education.

Developing an Improving Stance Toward Research in Preservice Teachers

Abstract This chapter explores inquiry-based learning from the prospective of preservice teachers learning to enact classroom-based research. After describing a preservice course focused on practitioner inquiry, a framework for analyzing teachers’ perspectives toward teacher research is provided. The framework focuses on the different ways teachers conceive and make use of student learning data as tools for their own inquiry-based learning. Our study shows that changes to preservice teachers’ perspectives toward inquiry are possible, but often slow to nurture. Discussions of different approaches to research and specific research models appeared to be most impacting. Specifically, the above framework suggests that teacher inquiry that pursues dilemmas and wonderings, often leading to more questions, is much more useful than inquiry that seeks distinctive resolutions. When considering teachers’ classroom-based inquiry as a life-long professional pursuit, the results show promise for developing dispositions and skills for inquiry at this early career level. Implications of the course on preservice teachers and the theoretical model are provided.