Tamás Csanádi

Processing and Properties of High-Entropy Ultra-High Temperature Carbides

Bulk equiatomic (Hf-Ta-Zr-Ti)C and (Hf-Ta-Zr-Nb)C high entropy Ultra-High Temperature Ceramic (UHTC) carbide compositions were fabricated by ball milling and Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). It was found that the lattice parameter mismatch of the component monocarbides is a key factor for predicting single phase solid solution formation. The processing route was further optimised for the (Hf-Ta-Zr-Nb)C composition to produce a high purity, single phase, homogeneous, bulk high entropy material (99% density); revealing a vast new compositional space for the exploration of new UHTCs. One sample was observed to chemically decompose; indicating the presence of a miscibility gap. While this suggests the system is not thermodynamically stable to room temperature, it does reveal further potential for the development of new in situ formed UHTC nanocomposites. The optimised material was subjected to nanoindentation testing and directly compared to the constituent mono/binary carbides, revealing a significantly enhanced hardness (36.1 ± 1.6 GPa,) compared to the hardest monocarbide (HfC, 31.5 ± 1.3 GPa) and the binary (Hf-Ta)C (32.9 ± 1.8 GPa).

Nanoindentation and AFM Studies on Tungsten Carbide Crystals in WC-Co Hardmetal

The room temperature elastic and plastic properties of the WC grains of WC-9%Co hardmetal were investigated by nanoindentation and atomic force microscope (AFM). Two easily distinguishable crystallographic planes (using EBSD analyses) were investigated, namely the basal and prismatic planes, on which nanoindentation tests were performed with different applied loads from 1 mN to 50 mN to determine the hardness and reduced-modulus, respectively. The results deriving from nanoindentation show significantly higher indentation hardness on basal planes (HIT=28.9±0.1 GPa) than on prismatic ones (HIT=21.9±0.1 GPa) over 10 mN load. For loads below that the results were inconsistent. The corresponding indents were checked by AFM and correct values of hardness were found. The discrepancies indicate the inaccuracy of the built-in evaluation procedure (Oliver-Pharr method) in this low load, or more precisely in the low indentation depth range. It is pointed out that below 50 nm contact depth the applied built-in contact area-contact depth function is not appropriate and a new correct contact area-contact depth function is proposed, thus the resulting recalculated hardness values are in good agreement with the AFM measurements.