Tami Guerrier

Factors Associated With Discharge to Home Versus Discharge to Institutional Care After Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE To examine sociodemographic and clinical characteristics independently associated with discharge home compared with discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after acute inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Three tertiary accredited acute care rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients with stroke (N=2085). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Not applicable. RESULTS Of 2085 patients with stroke treated at 3 centers over a 4-year period, 78.2% (n=1631) were discharged home and 21.8% (n=454) discharged to an SNF. Findings from a multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that patients were less likely to be discharged home if they were older (odds ratio [OR], .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .96-.99), separated or divorced (compared with married; OR, .61; 95% CI, .48-.79), or with Medicare health insurance (compared with private insurance; OR, .69; 95% CI, .55-.88), or had dysphagia (OR, .83; 95% CI, .71-.98) or cognitive deficits (OR, .79; 95% CI, .77-.81). The odds of being discharged home were higher for those admitted with a higher motor FIM score (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11). The following were not associated with discharge disposition: sex, race, prestroke vocational status, availability of secondary health insurance, number of days from stroke onset to rehabilitation facility admission, stroke type, impairment group, cognitive FIM on admission, other stroke deficits (aphasia, ataxia, neglect, or speech disturbance), stroke complications of hyponatremia or urinary tract infection, or comorbid conditions. CONCLUSIONS One in 5 patients with stroke were discharged to an SNF after inpatient rehabilitation. On admission, several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were identified that could be considered as important factors in early discussions for discharge planning.

Group Therapy Use and Its Impact on the Outcomes of Inpatient Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury: Data From Traumatic Brain Injury–Practice Based Evidence Project

OBJECTIVES To describe the amount and content of group therapies provided during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury (TBI), and to assess the relations of group therapy with patient, injury, and treatment factors and outcomes. DESIGN Prospective observational cohort. SETTING Inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS Consecutive admissions (N=2130) for initial TBI rehabilitation at 10 inpatient rehabilitation facilities (9 in the United States, 1 in Canada) from October 2008 to September 2011. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of sessions that were group therapy (≥2 patients were treated simultaneously by ≥1 clinician); proportion of patients receiving group therapy; type of activity performed and amount of time spent in group therapy, by discipline; rehabilitation length of stay; discharge location; and FIM cognitive and motor scores at discharge. RESULTS Of the patients, 79% received at least 1 session of group therapy, with group therapy accounting for 13.7% of all therapy sessions and 15.8% of therapy hours. On average, patients spent 2.9h/wk in group therapy. The greatest proportion of treatment time in group format was in therapeutic recreation (25.6%), followed by speech therapy (16.2%), occupational therapy (10.4%), psychology (8.1%), and physical therapy (7.9%). Group therapy time and type of treatment activities varied among admission FIM cognitive subgroups and treatment sites. Several factors appear to be predictive of receiving group therapy, with the treatment site being a major influence. However, group therapy as a whole offered little explanation of differences in the outcomes studied. CONCLUSIONS Group therapy is commonly used in TBI rehabilitation, to varying degrees among disciplines, sites, and cognitive impairment subgroups. Various therapeutic activities take place in group therapy, indicating its perceived value in addressing many domains of functioning. Variation in outcomes is not explained well by overall percentage of therapy time delivered in groups.

Does history of substance use disorder predict acute traumatic brain injury rehabilitation outcomes

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The study explored whether premorbid substance use disorder (SUD) predicts acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. METHODS 143 participants with moderate (34.2%) and severe (65.8%) TBI were enrolled at two Level 1 trauma center inpatient brain injury rehabilitation units. Acute outcomes were measured with the Disability Rating Scale (DRS), the FIMTM; self and informant ratings of the Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS); self and family rating of the Frontal Systems Behavioral Scale (FrSBe), and the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale-Revised (NRS-R). RESULTS Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that SUD history significantly predicted trajectories of PCRS clinician ratings, PCRS self-family and PCRS self-clinician discrepancy scores, and more negative FrSBE family ratings. These findings indicate comparatively greater post-injury executive functions (EF) impairments, particularly self-awareness (SA) of injury-related deficits, for those with SUD history. No significant SUD*time interaction effect was found for FIM or NRS-R scores. CONCLUSIONS SUD history and TBI are associated with impaired SA and EF but their co-occurrence is not a consistent predictor of acute post-injury functional outcomes. Pre-morbid patient characteristics and rater expectations and biases may moderate associations between SA and recovery after TBI.

Depression and Functional Status Among African American Stroke Survivors in Inpatient Rehabilitation

PURPOSE To examine the prevalence of poststroke depression (PSD) among African American stroke survivors and the association of depression with functional status at inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) discharge. METHODS Secondary data analysis was conducted of a patient cohort who received care at 3 IRFs in the United States from 2009 to 2011. Functional status was measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations of PSD and FIM motor and cognitive scores. RESULTS Of 458 African American stroke survivors, 48.5% were female, 84% had an ischemic stroke, and the mean age was 60.8 ± 13.6 years. Only 15.4% (n = 71) had documentation of PSD. Bivariate analyses to identify factors associated with depression identified a higher percentage of patients with depression than without who were retired due to disability (17.1% versus 11.6%) or employed (31.4% versus 19.6%) prestroke (P = .041). Dysphagia, cognitive deficits, and a lower admission motor FIM score were also significantly more common among those with depression. There was no significant relationship between depression and functional status after adjusting for patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS In this study, 15% of the African Americans who received rehabilitation after a stroke had documentation of PSD but this was not associated with functional status at discharge.