Tamjeed Ahmed
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tamjeed Ahmed.
Lancet Oncology | 2017
Angela Tatiana Alistar; Bonny Morris; Rodwige Desnoyer; Heidi D. Klepin; Keyanoosh Hosseinzadeh; Clancy J. Clark; Amy Cameron; John R. Leyendecker; Ralph B. D'Agostino; Umit Topaloglu; Lakmal W. Boteju; Asela R Boteju; Rob Shorr; Zuzana Zachar; Paul M. Bingham; Tamjeed Ahmed; Sandrine Crane; Riddhishkumar Shah; John J Migliano; Timothy S. Pardee; Lance D. Miller; Gregory A. Hawkins; Guangxu Jin; Wei Zhang; Boris Pasche
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer statistics are dismal, with a 5-year survival of less than 10%, and more than 50% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Metabolic reprogramming is an emerging hallmark of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. CPI-613 is a novel anticancer agent that selectively targets the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumour cells, causing changes in mitochondrial enzyme activities and redox status that lead to apoptosis, necrosis, and autophagy of tumour cells. We aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose of CPI-613 when used in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (comprising oxaliplatin, leucovorin, irinotecan, and fluorouracil) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. METHODS In this single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trial, we recruited adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma from the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center (Winston-Salem, NC, USA). Patients had good bone marrow, liver and kidney function, and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status 0-1). We studied CPI-613 in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin at 65 mg/m2, leucovorin at 400 mg/m2, irinotecan at 140 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus followed by 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h). We applied a two-stage dose-escalation scheme (single patient and traditional 3+3 design). In the single-patient stage, one patient was accrued per dose level. The starting dose of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m2 per day; the dose level was then escalated by doubling the previous dose if there were no adverse events worse than grade 2 within 4 weeks attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613. The traditional 3+3 dose-escalation stage was triggered if toxic effects attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613 were grade 2 or worse. The dose level for CPI-613 for the first cohort in the traditional dose-escalation stage was the same as that used in the last cohort of the single-patient dose-escalation stage. The primary objective was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of CPI-613 (as assessed by dose-limiting toxicities). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01835041, and is closed to recruitment. FINDINGS Between April 22, 2013, and Jan 8, 2016, we enrolled 20 patients. The maximum tolerated dose of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m2. The median number of treatment cycles given at the maximum tolerated dose was 11 (IQR 4-19). Median follow-up of the 18 patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose was 378 days (IQR 250-602). Two patients enrolled at a higher dose of 1000 mg/m2, and both had a dose-limiting toxicity. Two unexpected serious adverse events occurred, both for the first patient enrolled. Expected serious adverse events were: thrombocytopenia, anaemia, and lymphopenia (all for patient number 2; anaemia and lymphopenia were dose-limiting toxicities); hyperglycaemia (in patient number 7); hypokalaemia, hypoalbuminaemia, and sepsis (patient number 11); and neutropenia (patient number 20). No deaths due to adverse events were reported. For the 18 patients given the maximum tolerated dose, the most common grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse events were hyperglycaemia (ten [55%] patients), hypokalaemia (six [33%]), peripheral sensory neuropathy (five [28%]), diarrhoea (five [28%]), and abdominal pain (four [22%]). The most common grade 3-4 haematological adverse events were neutropenia (five [28%] of 18 patients), lymphopenia (five [28%]), anaemia (four [22%], and thrombocytopenia in three [17%]). Sensory neuropathy (all grade 1-3) was recorded in 17 (94%) of the 18 patients and was managed with dose de-escalation or discontinuation per standard of care. No patients died while on active treatment; 11 study participants died, with cause of death as terminal pancreatic cancer. Of the 18 patients given the maximum tolerated dose, 11 (61%) achieved an objective (complete or partial) response. INTERPRETATION A maximum tolerated dose of CPI-613 was established at 500 mg/m2 when used in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The findings of clinical activity will require validation in a phase 2 trial. FUNDING Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.Background Pancreatic cancer statistics are dismal, with a five-year survival of less than 10%, and over 50% of patients presenting with metastatic disease. Metabolic reprogramming is an emerging hallmark of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, including aerobic glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, glutaminolysis, lipogenesis and lipolysis, autophagic status, and anti-oxidative stress. CPI-613 is a novel anti-cancer agent that selectively targets the altered form of mitochondrial energy metabolism in tumor cells, causing changes in mitochondrial enzyme activities and redox status which lead to apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy of tumor cells. Methods This is a phase 1 study to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of CPI-613 when used in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin at 65 mg/m2 and irinotecan at 140 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h) in combination with CPI-613 in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma with good bone marrow, liver and kidney function and good performance status (NCT01835041 – closed to recruitment). A two-stage dose-escalation scheme (single patient and traditional 3+3 design) was applied. In the single patient stage, one patient was accrued per dose level. The starting dose of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m2/day; the dose level was then escalated by doubling the previous dose if there was no toxicity greater than Grade 2 within 4 weeks attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613. The traditional 3+3 dose-escalation stage was triggered if toxicity attributed as probably or definitely related to CPI-613 was ≥ Grade 2. The dose level for CPI-613 for the first cohort in the traditional dose-escalation stage was the same as used in the last cohort of the single patient dose-escalation stage. Secondary objectives were safety, preliminary efficacy, and tissue collection for future analyses. Response rates, progression-free survival and overall survival data were assessed in the patients treated at the MTD. Findings Twenty patients were enrolled April 22, 2013 – January 8, 2016. The MTD of CPI-613 was 500 mg/m2. The median number of treatment cycles administered at the MTD was 11 (interquartile range, 4–19). Two patients enrolled at a higher dose (1000 mg/m2) both experienced a DLT (dose limiting toxicity). There were 2 unexpected serious adverse events (SAEs), both for the first patient enrolled: 1) possible leaching due to infusion of CPI-613 via non-PVC tubing, and 2) the patient re- accessed her port at home after accidental de-access. Neither incident resulted in a negative clinical outcome. Expected SAEs were: thrombocytopenia, anemia and lymphopenia (all for Patient #2, with anemia and lymphopenia being a DLT); hyperglycemia (Patient #7); hypokalemia, hypoalbuminemia and sepsis (Patient #11); and neutropenia (Patient #20). There was no grade 5 toxicity. For the 18 patients treated at the MTD, the most common Grade 3–4 toxicities were hypokalemia (6/18, 33%), diarrhea (5/18, 28%) and abdominal pain (4/18, 22%). Sensorial neuropathy (17/18, 94%) was managed with dose de-escalation or discontinuation per standard of care. None of the patients experienced grade 4 or 5 neuropathy. No patients died while on active treatment; 11 study participants died, with cause of death as terminal pancreatic cancer. Among the 18 patients treated with the MTD, there were 3 patients with a complete response (CR), 1 with a non-CR/non-progressive disease, 7 with a partial response (PR), 3 with stable disease, and 4 with PD. The partial + complete response rate was 61% (11/18). Interpretation The treatment was well tolerated and all end points were met. The intriguing signal of efficacy will require validation in a phase 2 study. Funding Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Leukemia Research | 2015
Tamjeed Ahmed; Scott Holwerda; Heidi D. Klepin; Scott Isom; Leslie R. Ellis; Susan Lyerly; Megan Manuel; Sarah Dralle; Dmitriy Berenzon; Bayard L. Powell; Timothy S. Pardee
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy that affects older patients. The role of salvage therapy in the elderly is controversial and there is little data on efficacy. Outcomes for 94 relapsed or refractory AML patients who received salvage HAMA therapy were analyzed. Of the 94 patients 66 were ≥60, including 26 patients ≥70, and 28 were <60 years old. Early mortality (30-day) was 14% (4%<60, 18%≥60 years old). Overall, 27% of patients died during hospitalization or were discharged to hospice (11%<60, 33%≥60 years old). CR/CRi was achieved in 41% of patients (61%<60, 33%≥60 years old). Median survival was 6.1 months (15.7<60, 5.2≥60). Patients ≥60 who achieved a CR/CRi had a median survival of 11.7 months. At 12 months 56% of patients <60 were alive versus 24% of patients ≥60. At 24 months these numbers fell to 40% and 2% respectively. In those <60 years old, 50% went on to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) whereas 14% of patients in the ≥60 cohort did so. In conclusion, HAMA salvage therapy results in a 33% response rate in patients ≥60 years old with acceptable toxicity.
Journal of Neurology | 2018
Sarah Mancone; Thomas Lycan; Tamjeed Ahmed; Umit Topaloglu; Andrew Dothard; W.J. Petty; Roy E. Strowd
BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a promising class of anticancer drugs associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). In registration studies of selected cancer populations, neurologic IRAEs were rare. Post-marketing experience describing their prevalence in clinical practice continues to be reported.MethodsA retrospective cohort of patients treated at our institution with ICIs from 2005 to 2017 was identified. Patients with new neurologic ICD codes documented during or after ICI treatment were enrolled. Comprehensive medical record review identified patients with neurologic IRAEs causally linked to ICIs. This study focused on CTCAE grade 2–4 IRAEs.Results526 patients were screened; 55 candidate patients were identified; 5 cases met criteria for neurologic IRAEs, an incidence of 0.95% (n = 5/526). IRAEs identified were transverse myelopathy, demyelinating sensorimotor polyneuropathy, oculomotor nerve palsy, sensory neuropathy, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. ICIs were held in three patients, rechallenged in one, and dose-reduced in one. Corticosteroids were given in three patients, and response varied from complete symptom resolution to minimal response and ultimately death. Other treatments were based on IRAE presentation, including gabapentin, antihypertensives, and IV immunoglobulin. Patients with combination therapy appeared to suffer more severe IRAEs producing more substantial long-term morbidity and mortality.ConclusionIn this clinical practice study, the incidence of neurologic IRAEs from ICIs was 0.95%. Although rare, neurologic IRAEs can be highly variable and severe, and patients with combination immunotherapy appeared to suffer more severe IRAEs. Neurologists play an important role in the early identification and management of IRAEs to reduce long-term morbidity and mortality.
Leukemia Research | 2017
Tamjeed Ahmed; Abby L. Koch; Scott Isom; Heidi D. Klepin; Jonathan M. Bishop; Leslie R. Ellis; Dmitriy Berenzon; Dianna Howard; Susan Lyerly; Bayard L. Powell; Timothy S. Pardee
Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) have compromised marrow function and chemotherapy causes further suppression. As a result complications are frequent, and patients may require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). How codes status changes when these events occur and how those changes influence outcome are largely unknown. Outcomes for adult patients with AML, undergoing induction chemotherapy, and transferred to the ICU between January 2000 and December 2013 were analyzed. 94 patients were included. Median survival was 1.3 months. At 3 and 6 months overall survival (OS) was 27% and 18% respectively. Respiratory failure was the most common reason for transfer to ICU (88%), with 63% requiring mechanical ventilation at transfer. Other reasons included: cardiac arrest (18%), septic shock (17%), hypotension (9%), and acute renal failure (9%). The most frequent interventions were mechanical ventilation in 85%, vasopressors in 62%, and hemodialysis in 30%. Following transfer 55 patients (58%) had a change in code status. Overall, 46 patients (49%) changed from Full Code (FC) to Comfort Care (CC), 7 (7%) from FC to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), and 2 (2%) from DNR to CC. For the entire cohort, ICU mortality (IM) was 61% and hospital mortality (HM) was 71%. For FC or DNR patients, IM was 30% and HM was 41%. For CC patients, IM was 90% and HM was 100%. Overall, 27 patients (29%) survived to discharge. Of those discharged, 22 (81%) were alive at 3 months and 17 (63%) were alive at 6 months. In conclusion, patients that required ICU admission during induction chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Code status changed during the ICU stay for the majority of patients and always to a less aggressive status.
Biological Systems: Open Access | 2016
Tamjeed Ahmed; Thomas Lycan; David Warner; Christopher A. Sullivan; Joshua D. Waltonen; Kathryn M. Greven; Bart Frizzell; Mercedes Porosnicu; Katharine Batt; J. Ruiz; Ralph D’Agostino
Background: Concomitant chemo-radiation therapy (CRT) with cisplatin is the mainstay of treatment for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer. Nephrotoxicity is a well-documented adverse effect of cisplatin, which is exacerbated by dehydration, a common complication in this group of patients. This study prospectively assessed the utility of urine specific gravity (USG) as a guide for fluid replacement, and its preventive effect in cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity. Methods: Patients with head and neck cancer who received CRT with weekly cisplatin at our institution were included in the analysis. All patients received 1 L normal saline (NS) with 1 g of magnesium and 10 mEq of potassium pre and post cisplatin. USG was measured weekly, patients with USG>1.020 was considered dehydrated and received 2 L NS twice weekly. Those patients with USG>1.025 while on the twice-weekly regimen were deemed very dehydrated and received 2 L NS daily. The primary objective was renal toxicity of any grade. Results: 44 patients were identified and completed CRT in less than 7.5 weeks. Eighteen of 44 patients (41%) had initial USG>1.020 and were started on NS twice weekly. By week 5, 44 of 44 patients (100%) needed supplemental fluid hydration with only 4 of 44 (9%) requiring daily IV fluids (IVF). No patient experienced renal toxicity of any grade. Five patients (11%) had grade I hypomagnesemia. Conclusion: USG is a very sensitive marker of dehydration and can be used as a guide for fluid replacement which can minimize cisplatin induced nephrotoxicity in this population.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2018
Marcelo Raul Bonomi; Brett Klamer; Tamjeed Ahmed; Safoa Ado; Mitra Kooshki; Jishu Das; Guy N. Brock; Triozzi Pierre
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2018
W. Jeffrey Petty; James J. Urbanic; Tamjeed Ahmed; R.T. Hughes; Beverly Levine; Kyle E. Rusthoven; Michael A. Papagikos; Jimmy Ruiz; Brian E. Lally; Michael Chan; Hollins P. Clark; Ralph B. D'Agostino; A. William Blackstock
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Marcelo Raul Bonomi; Safoa Ado; Mitra Kooshki; Tamjeed Ahmed; Christopher A. Sullivan; Joshua D. Waltonen; Pierre L. Triozzi
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017
Tamjeed Ahmed; James J. Urbanic; Ryan T. Hughes; Ralph B. D'Agostino; Brian E. Lally; Jimmy Ruiz; Michael D. Chan; Payal Gandhi; Andy Dothard; Kyle Rusthoven; Marcelo Raul Bonomi; A. William Blackstock; W.J. Petty
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2017
R.T. Hughes; Tamjeed Ahmed; James J. Urbanic; Ralph B. D'Agostino; A. Dothard; Brian E. Lally; Jimmy Ruiz; W. Hinson; M. Bonomi; Kyle E. Rusthoven; W.J. Petty; A.W. Blackstock