Tamzin Tanner

The Hinge Region Regulates DNA Binding, Nuclear Translocation, and Transactivation of the Androgen Receptor

The androgen receptor (AR) encoding gene can undergo mutations during the development and treatment of prostate cancer. Even in hormone-independent stages, mutations in the receptor paradoxically seem to result in an increased AR function. Two such point mutations have been described in the part of the AR involved in DNA binding and nuclear translocation, namely the hinge region. Despite a decreased nuclear translocation, these mutant ARs display increased transactivating potencies. Through detailed analysis of the hinge region, we found that deletion of residues 629 to 636 resulted in a stronger androgen response on different reporters, although this mutant displays an extremely low in vitro affinity for androgen response elements. This superactivity is independent of nuclear localization and can be inhibited by antiandrogens. Surprisingly, the AR activation functions, AF1 and AF2, are not dramatically affected when the inhibitory region (629-RKLKKLGN-636) is deleted, although cotransfected p160 coactivator TIF2 had a stronger potentiating effect in the absence of this motif. The ligand-dependent interaction between the amino-terminal domain and the ligand-binding domain (N/C interaction) plays an important role in transactivation by the AR. We found that this interaction is strongly enhanced by deletion of the inhibitory region. In conclusion, the description of prostate cancer mutations has led to the discovery of a complex role of the hinge region in nuclear localization, DNA binding, coactivator recruitment, and N/C interaction of the AR.

A 629RKLKK633 motif in the hinge region controls the androgen receptor at multiple levels

The androgen receptor protein has specific domains involved in DNA binding, ligand binding, and transactivation, whose activities need to be integrated during transcription activation. The hinge region, more particular a 629RKLKK633 motif, seems to play a crucial role in this process. Indeed, although the motif is not part of the DNA-binding domain, its positive residues are involved in optimal DNA binding and nuclear translocation as shown by mutation analysis. When the mutated ARs are forced into the nucleus, however, the residues seem to play different roles in transactivation. Moreover, we show by FRAP analysis that during activation, the AR is distributed in the nucleus in a mobile and two immobile fractions, and that mutations in the 629RKLKK633 motif affect the distribution of the AR over these three intranuclear fractions. Taken together, the 629RKLKK633 motif is a multifunctional motif that integrates nuclear localization, receptor stability, DNA binding, transactivation potential and intranuclear mobility.

The androgen receptor DNA-binding domain determines androgen selectivity of transcriptional response

The AR (androgen receptor) is a hormone-dependent transcription factor that translates circulating androgen hormone levels into a physiological cellular response by directly regulating the expression of its target genes. It is the key molecule in e.g. the development and maintenance of the male sexual characteristics, spermatocyte production and prostate gland development and growth. It is also a major factor in the onset and maintenance of prostate cancer and a first target for pharmaceutical action against the further proliferation of prostate cancer cells. The AR is a member of the steroid hormone receptors, a group of steroid-inducible transcription factors sharing an identical consensus DNA-binding motif. The problem of how specificity in gene activation is achieved among the different members of this nuclear receptor subfamily is still unclear. In this report, we describe our investigations on how the AR can specifically activate its target genes, while the other steroid hormone receptors do not, despite having the same consensus monomeric DNA-binding motif. In this respect, we describe how the AR interacts with a newly identified class of steroid-response elements to which only the AR and not, for example, the glucocorticoid receptor can bind.

The Hinge Region of the Androgen Receptor Plays a Role in Proteasome-Mediated Transcriptional Activation

Abstract: To investigate the function of the hinge region in transcriptional activation by the androgen receptor, we compared the actions of the wild‐type receptor with a mutant receptor, deleted of amino acids 628–646 of the hinge. The role of the proteasome on the expression and activity of these two proteins was investigated. The deletion mutant demonstrated a threefold increase in transcriptional activity when compared to the wild‐type receptor protein. Furthermore, we found that hormone‐dependent stabilization of the receptor protein was more enhanced for the deletion mutant. In addition, experiments using the proteasome inhibitor, MG132, demonstrated that the deletion mutant is more sensitive to proteasome‐mediated degradation than the wild‐type receptor. However, inhibition of the proteasome had a negative effect on the transcriptional activity of the deletion mutant. Taken together, our results suggest that the hinge region not only plays an important role in controlling the transactivation potential of the androgen receptor but also in determining the influence of the proteasome on androgen receptor‐mediated transcriptional activation.

The natural compound atraric acid is an antagonist of the human androgen receptor inhibiting cellular invasiveness and prostate cancer cell growth

Extracts from Pygeum africanum are used in the treatment of prostatitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer (Pca), major health problems of men in Western countries. The ligand‐activated human androgen receptor (AR) supports the growth of the prostate gland. Inhibition of human AR by androgen ablation therapy and by applying synthetic anti‐androgens is therefore the primary goal in treatment of patients. Here, we show that atraric acid (AA) isolated from bark material of Pygeum africanum has anti‐androgenic activity, inhibiting the transactivation mediated by the ligand‐activated human AR. This androgen antagonistic activity is receptor specific and does not inhibit the closely related glucocorticoid or progesterone receptors. Mechanistically, AA inhibits nuclear transport of AR. Importantly, AA is able to efficiently repress the growth of both the androgen‐dependent LNCaP and also the androgen‐independent C4–2 Pca cells but not that of PC3 or CV1 cells lacking AR. In line with this, AA inhibits the expression of the endogenous prostate specific antigen gene in both LNCaP und C4–2 cells. Analyses of cell invasion revealed that AA inhibits the invasiveness of LNCaP cells through extracellular matrix. Thus, this study provides a molecular insight for AA as a natural anti‐androgenic compound and may serve as a basis for AA derivatives as a new chemical lead structure for novel therapeutic compounds as AR antagonists, that can be used for prophylaxis or treatment of prostatic diseases.

NBBS isolated from Pygeum africanum bark exhibits androgen antagonistic activity, inhibits AR nuclear translocation and prostate cancer cell growth

SummaryExtracts from Pygeum africanum are used in the treatment of prostatitis, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa). The ligand-activated human androgen receptor (AR) is known to control the growth of the prostate gland. Inhibition of human AR is therefore a major goal in treatment of patients. Here, we characterize the compound N-butylbenzene-sulfonamide (NBBS) isolated from P. africanum as a specific AR antagonist. This antihormonal activity inhibits AR- and progesterone receptor- (PR) mediated transactivation, but not the related human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) or the estrogen receptors (ERα or ERβ). Importantly, NBBS inhibits both endogenous PSA expression and growth of human PCa cells. Mechanistically, NBBS binds to AR and inhibits its translocation to the cell nucleus. Furthermore, using a battery of chemically synthesized derivatives of NBBS we revealed important structural aspects for androgen antagonism and have identified more potent AR antagonistic compounds. Our data suggest that NBBS is one of the active compounds of P. africanum bark and may serve as a naturally occurring, novel therapeutic agent for treatment of prostatic diseases. Thus, NBBS and its derivatives may serve as novel chemical platform for treatment prostatitis, BPH and PCa.

Molecular biology of the androgen responses

The androgen receptor is a ligand-inducible transcription factor with very specific target genes. This definition implies the activation by the cognate ligand through the ligand-binding domain, the recognition of the target genes by means of the DNA-binding domain and the transcriptional activation through different activation functions. When the first androgen-responsive genes were cloned, we identified receptor-binding sites by means of a DNAcellulose competition assay with partially purified androgen receptor from rat prostate (Claessens et al., 1990). Once the receptor cDNA was cloned, the separate DNAbinding domain was expressed and shown to have similar, if not identical DNA recognition properties as the full size receptor. The binding sites were proven functional in transient transfection experiments with reporter genes cloned downstream of these sites (Claessens et al., 1993). The motifs which are recognized by the receptor are called androgen response elements (ARE), and a consensus of the first identified AREs pointed out that it is very similar to the glucocorticoid/progesterone response element (GRE/PRE) consensus 5¢-GGTACAnnnTGTTCT-3¢. Not surprisingly, these AREs also act as GRE/PRE in transient transfections. The probasin promoter region also contains two AR-binding sites, but in contrast to what was observed for the earlier AREs, these are not recognized by the glucocorticoid receptor. Later on, several other selective AREs were characterized in the slp and sc enhancers (Verrijdt et al., 2000). A comparison of the DNA-binding domains of the androgen and glucocorticoid receptors revealed specific residues which are involved in the recognition of these selective AREs, but not in the recognition of the classical AREs. These residues are not situated within the first zinc-coordinated module or zinc finger, but rather in the second one, as well as in a carboxy-terminal extension of the DNA-binding motif (Schoenmakers et al., 2000). This hinted to us that the recognition of the selective AREs occurs through an alternative dimerization of the DNA-binding domain that would be specific for the androgen receptor. Indeed, when the direct repeat nature of the selective AREs was changed into inverted repeat nature, the selectivity of the AREs and of the enhancers, of which they form part, was lost (Verrijdt et al., 2000). The silico screening of human genome has led to the definition of several additional selective AREs. In collaboration with the group of Daniel Gewirth, we were able to solve a crystal structure of the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor complexed to a perfect direct repeat of the 5¢TGTTCT-3¢ hexamer (Shaffer et al., 2004). This revealed that the domain is folded into two zinc-coordinated modules very similar to what has been described for other nuclear receptors. The two monomers are organized in a head-to-head configuration. Specific for the androgen receptor is the increased strength of the dimerisation interface due to an enlarged contact surface as well as to three additional hydrogen bonds. A functional analysis of the carboxyterminal extension of the DBD, which is part of the hinge region, revealed that it has more functions besides contributing to selective DNA binding. It overlaps with part of a nuclear localization signal and it is involved in the control of transactivation. Indeed, opposite to what is expected, deletions within this region result in a superactive androgen receptor, even when DNA binding in band shifts becomes difficult to demonstrate. The transcription activation by the androgen receptor is complex in the sense that different domains are contributing to it. For all steroid receptors, two activation functions have been described: the activation function 1 (AF1) in the amino-terminal domain and activation function 2 (AF2) in the ligand-binding domain. The androgen receptor is an exception since the AF2 is weak and in most experiments difficult to demonstrate. A possible explanation for this was found in a strong interaction between the ligand-binding domain and the amino-terminal domain of the androgen receptor. This occurs through a motif at the amino-terminal end of the receptor that interacts with AF2, described as a hydrophobic cleft on the surface of the ligand-binding domain. This interaction seems to prevent recruitment of the known p160 co-activators to

Multitasking and Interplay Between the Androgen Receptor Domains

The androgen receptor, like the other nuclear receptors, consists of three canonical domains: the aminoterminal domain (NTD), the DNA-binding domain (DBD) and the ligand-binding domain (LBD). The flexible hinge between the DBD and LBD can also be considered as a separate entity. Each of these domains has multiple functions. The NTD harbors two interdependent transactivation functions Tau-1 and Tau-5, two SUMOylation sites that seem to control cooperativity of the AR, and an 23FQNLF27 motif that interacts with high affinity with the ligand-binding domain. The DBD is involved in the correct interactions of the AR with its response elements, but it also contains a nuclear export signal as well as a nuclear translocation signal. The hinge region controls the interactions of the AR with selective AREs. It harbors an acetylation and a phosphorylation acceptor site, overlaps with the nuclear translocation signal, and seems involved in the control of the steady state of the AR. The LBD binds its natural agonists with high affinity; it interacts with heat-shock protein complexes when unbound and with a series of coregulators when bound by agonists. Many of these coregulators harbor motifs that resemble the 23FQNLF27-motif of the NTD.