Tanya S. Surawicz

The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma.

The incidence of craniopharyngioma in the United States was estimated from two population-based cancer registries that include brain tumors of benign and borderline malignancy: the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) and Los Angeles county. Information on additional pediatric tumors was available from the Greater Delaware Valley Pediatric Tumor Registry (GDVPTR). The overall incidence of craniopharyngioma was 0.13 per 100,000 person years and did not vary by gender or race. A bimodal distribution by age was noted with peak incidence rates in children (aged 5-14 years) and among older adults (aged 65-74 years in CBTRUS and 50-74 years in Los Angeles county). Survival information was available from GDVPTR and the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a hospital-based reporting system. In the NCDB, the 5-year survival rate was 80% and decreased with older age at diagnosis. Survival is higher among children and has improved in recent years. Approximately 338 cases of craniopharyngiomas are expected to occur annually in the United States, with 96 occurring in children from 0 to 14 years of age.

Descriptive epidemiology of primary brain and CNS tumors: Results from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 1990-1994

The Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States (CBTRUS) obtained 5 years of incidence data (1990-1994)--including reports on all primary brain and CNS tumors--from 11 collaborating state cancer registries. Data were available for 20,765 tumors located in the brain, meninges, and other CNS sites, including the pituitary and pineal glands. The average annual incidence was estimated at 11.5 cases per 100,000 person-years. The higher incidence of tumors in male patients (12.1 per 100,000 person-years) than in female patients (11.0 per 100,000 person-years) was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the higher incidence in whites (11.6 per 100,000 person-years) compared with blacks (7.8 per 100,000 person-years) was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The most frequently reported histologies were meningiomas (24.0%) and glioblastomas (22.6%). Higher rates for glioblastomas, anaplastic astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas, anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, ependymomas, mixed gliomas, astrocytomas not otherwise specified, medulloblastomas, lymphomas, and germ cell tumors in male than in female patients were statistically significant (P < 0.05), with relative risks (RR) ranging from 1.3 to 3.4. Meningiomas were the only tumors with a significant excess in females (RR = 0.5). We noted higher occurrence rates in whites than in blacks for the following histologies: diffuse astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas, glioblastomas, oligodendrogliomas, ependymomas, mixed gliomas, astrocytomas NOS, medulloblastomas, nerve sheath tumors, hemangioblastomas, and germ cell tumors, with RRs ranging from 1.5 to 3.4. Racial differences in occurrence rates were not observed for predominately benign meningiomas or pituitary tumors. This study represents the largest compilation of data on primary brain and CNS tumors in the United States. Standard reporting definitions and practices must be universally adopted to improve the quality and use of cancer registry data.

Brain tumor survival: Results from the National Cancer Data Base

Hospital-based data reported to the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) were available for over 60,000 patients with a primary brain tumor diagnosed from 1985–1988 and 1990–1992. The most common histologies were glioblastomas, astrocytomas and meningiomas. Five-year survival rates for these tumors were 2%, 30% and 70% respectively. Histology, age at diagnosis, behavior, and location were important variables in estimating survival. Comparisons with population-based registry data suggest that the malignant tumors are well represented in NCDB, but the benign histologies are under-reported. Survival estimates for the malignant tumors are comparable to previously reported studies. The NCDB provides recent information on brain tumor distribution and survival patterns not available in other large databases.

Prevalence estimates for primary brain tumors in the United States by behavior and major histology groups

Prevalence rates are used to supplement descriptions of disease and are unavailable for all primary brain tumors in the United States. Data from two population-based tumor registries were obtained from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and used to compute age-specific incidence rates (1985-1994) and survival curves for further use in a statistical model to estimate prevalence rates. Prevalence rates were then used to estimate the number of individuals living with a brain tumor diagnosis in the U.S. population for the year 2000. The overall incidence rate in these regions is 13.8 per 100,000 with 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of 58%, 49%, and 38%, respectively. The prevalence rate for all primary brain tumors is 130.8 per 100,000 with approximately 350,000 individuals estimated to be living with this diagnosis in the United States in 2000. The prevalence rate for malignant tumors, 29.5 per 100,000, is similar to previous reports. The prevalence rate for benign tumors, 97.5 per 100,000, is new. Unlike incidence data, the proportion (and expected number) of existing benign tumors (75%, 267,000) is considerably greater than that for malignant tumors (23%, 81,000), reflecting the better prognosis of benign tumors diagnosed in individuals younger than 60 years old. These data underscore the impact of primary brain tumors in the U.S. health care system and emphasize the need for quality-of-life considerations, particularly for those long-term survivors of benign tumors.

Trends in incidence of primary brain tumors in the United States,1985-1994

Brain tumor incidence has increased over the last 20 years in all age groups, both overall and for specific histologies. Reasons attributed to these increases include increase in lymphoma due to HIV/AIDS, introduction of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, and changes in coding/classification. The purpose of this study was to describe overall and histologic-specific incidence trends in a population-based series of primary benign and malignant brain tumors. Data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States from 1985 through 1994 were used to determine incidence trends in the broad age groups 0-19, 20-64, and > or = 65 years, both overall and for selected histologies. Poisson regression was used to express trends as average annual percentage change. Overall, incidence increased modestly (annual percentage change 0.9%, 95% confidence interval, 0.4, 1.4). When lymphomas were excluded, this result was not statistically significant (annual percentage change 0.5%, 95% confidence interval, -0.1, 1.1). Specific histologies that were increasing were lymphomas in individuals aged 20 to 64 years and in males aged 65 years or older, ependymomas in the population aged 20 to 64 years, nerve sheath tumors in males, and pituitary tumors in females. Increases that were not specific to any population subgroup were seen for glioblastoma, oligodendrogliomas, and astrocytomas, excluding not otherwise specified (NOS) tumors. Corresponding decreases were noted for NOS, astrocytoma NOS, and glioma NOS. Increasing incidence trends for lymphomas were consistent with previous literature. Improvements in diagnostic technology in addition to changes in classification and coding were likely to be responsible for decreases seen in incidence of NOS subgroups and corresponding increases in glioma subgroups. In contrast, the increases identified for ependymomas, nerve sheath tumors, and pituitary tumors were less likely to be artifacts of improvements in diagnosis, and they warrant further study.

Consensus Conference on Brain Tumor Definition for Registration

The Consensus Conference on Brain Tumor Definition was facilitated by the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and held on November 10, 2000, in Chicago, Illinois, to reach multidisciplinary agreement on a standard definition of brain tumors for collecting and comparing data in the U.S. The Brain Tumor Working Group, convened in 1998 to determine the status of brain tumor collection in the U.S., outlined 4 recommendations of which the first 2 guided the discussion for the Consensus Conference: (1) standardization of a definition of primary brain tumors that is based on site alone, rather than on site and behavior, and that can be used by surveillance organizations in collecting these tumors; and (2) development of a reporting scheme that can be used for comparing estimates of primary brain tumors across registries. Consensus was reached on the collection of all primary brain tumor histologies found and reported in the brain or CNS ICD-O site codes (C70.0-C72.9 and C75.1-C75.3), including those coded benign and uncertain as well as those coded malignant. In addition, a comprehensive listing of histologies occurring in the brain and CNS, based on the CBTRUS grouping scheme, was formulated to provide a template for reporting in accordance with the second recommendation of the Brain Tumor Working Group. With consensus achieved on the first 2 recommendations, the stage is set to move forward in estimating additional resources necessary for the collection of these tumors, including funding, training for cancer registrars, identifying quality control measures, and developing computerized edit checks, as outlined in the last 2 recommendations of the Brain Tumor Working Group.

Consistency of Primary Brain Tumor Diagnoses and Codes in Cancer Surveillance Systems

High-quality cancer registry data are essential for assessing trends in incidence rates. This study evaluated the consistency of brain tumor surveillance data using a random sample of cases from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Three neuropathologists independently and blindly reviewed tumor slides from 204 cases and a nosologist blindly reviewed and assigned International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O) codes to 326 cases. For the pathology review, absolute concordance was as high as 81% for all primary brain tumors. Absolute concordance rates were high for nerve sheath (89%), meningioma (95%), and pituitary (95%) tumors. Rates were much lower for malignant tumors. ICD-O coding of malignant brain tumors is of relatively high quality with the exception of mixed gliomas and unspecified tumors. A high level of consistency for nonmalignant brain tumor diagnoses suggests that rates for these tumors, when actively reported to a surveillance system, can be of high quality.

Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA): Design of a Prospective, Multicenter Trial of Diagnostic Tests

Background and Relevance: Intracranial atherosclerosis is responsible for 70,000 ischemic strokes each year in the USA. Noninvasive testingsuch as transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) to identify intracranial atherosclerosis is in widespread use, but has not been rigorously validated against the gold standard, catheter angiography. The recently NIH-funded Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) trial will compare warfarin with aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis. WASID requires performance of angiography along with TCD and MRA, providing an opportunity to critically evaluate these noninvasive tests. Main Objective: The purpose of the Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) study is to develop the noninvasive diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerosis. The primary aim of SONIA is to define velocity values on TCD and anatomic abnormalities on MRA that identify severe (50–99%) intracranial stenosis of large, proximal arteries seen on catheter angiography. SONIA will define the criteria, or ‘cutpoints’, for an abnormal TCD or MRA and show that they perform with a reliable positive predictive value (PPV). Study Design: SONIA will be conducted in collaboration with WASID. Study-wide cutpoints defining positive TCD and MRA have been developed and reviewed by the site investigators of WASID. Hard copy angiography, TCD and MRA generated in WASID will be centrally read in SONIA. TCD and MRA cutpoints seek to achieve a target PPV of 80% for the identification of severe intracranial stenosis on angiography. Conclusions: Central readings will be used to validate the cutpoints and to develop measures of negative predictive value, and inter- and intra-observer variability. Sensitivity and specificity will be determined after adjustment for verification bias and employed in receiver-operator characteristic analyses. SONIA will use these techniques to develop TCD and MRA cutpoints that minimize the clinical consequences of test errors occurring in the noninvasive evaluation of patients with suspected intracranial atherosclerosis.

The Rationale for Standardized Registration and Reporting of Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors in Population-Based Cancer Registries

Most population-based statistical reports of brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors are limited to data of primary malignant tumors and to summary estimates of all tumor locations and histologies. We argue that data of benign brain and CNS tumors should also be included in registry reports and that standard definitions for the reporting of all brain and CNS tumors by site and histology should exist. We demonstrate current inconsistencies in the definitions of brain and CNS tumor sites used in reports. Grouping of brain and CNS tumors by subtype--which integrates the current World Health Organization classification scheme with the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology coding system used in cancer registries--is proposed. Adoption of standard tumor site and behavior codes for annual reports would aid the comparison of rates of brain and CNS tumors between geographic regions, allow for the evaluation of trends over time, and provide new estimates of tumor subtypes in a more clinically relevant format. A consensus among cancer registries and neuroscientists is needed to adopt standard definitions so that accurate and clinically relevant brain and CNS tumor data are available.

Consensus Conference on Brain Tumor Definition for registration. November 10, 2000.

The Consensus Conference on Brain Tumor Definition was facilitated by the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States and held on November 10, 2000, in Chicago, Illinois, to reach multidisciplinary agreement on a standard definition of brain tumors for collecting and comparing data in the U.S. The Brain Tumor Working Group, convened in 1998 to determine the status of brain tumor collection in the U.S., outlined 4 recommendations of which the first 2 guided the discussion for the Consensus Conference: (1) standardization of a definition of primary brain tumors that is based on site alone, rather than on site and behavior, and that can be used by surveillance organizations in collecting these tumors; and (2) development of a reporting scheme that can be used for comparing estimates of primary brain tumors across registries. Consensus was reached on the collection of all primary brain tumor histologies found and reported in the brain or CNS ICD-O site codes (C70.0-C72.9 and C75.1-C75.3), including those coded benign and uncertain as well as those coded malignant. In addition, a comprehensive listing of histologies occurring in the brain and CNS, based on the CBTRUS grouping scheme, was formulated to provide a template for reporting in accordance with the second recommendation of the Brain Tumor Working Group. With consensus achieved on the first 2 recommendations, the stage is set to move forward in estimating additional resources necessary for the collection of these tumors, including funding, training for cancer registrars, identifying quality control measures, and developing computerized edit checks, as outlined in the last 2 recommendations of the Brain Tumor Working Group.