Tara M. Cox
Duke University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tara M. Cox.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Rebecca L. Lewison; Larry B. Crowder; Bryan P. Wallace; Jeffrey E. Moore; Tara M. Cox; Ramunas Zydelis; Sara L. McDonald; Andrew D. DiMatteo; Daniel C. Dunn; Connie Y. Kot; Rhema Bjorkland; Shaleyla Kelez; Candan U. Soykan; Kelly R. Stewart; Michelle Sims; Andre M. Boustany; Andrew J. Read; Patrick N. Halpin; Wallace J. Nichols; Carl Safina
Significance Loss of megafauna, termed trophic downgrading, has been found to affect biotic interactions, disturbance regimes, species invasions, and nutrient cycling. One recognized cause in air-breathing marine megafauna is incidental capture or bycatch by fisheries. Characterizing megafauna bycatch patterns across large ocean regions is limited by data availability but essential to direct conservation and management resources. We use empirical data to identify the global distribution and magnitude of seabird, marine mammal, and sea turtle bycatch in three widely used fishing gears. We identify taxa-specific hotspots and find evidence of cumulative impacts. This analysis provides an unprecedented global assessment of the distribution and magnitude of air-breathing megafauna bycatch, highlighting its cumulative nature and the urgent need to build on existing mitigation successes. Recent research on ocean health has found large predator abundance to be a key element of ocean condition. Fisheries can impact large predator abundance directly through targeted capture and indirectly through incidental capture of nontarget species or bycatch. However, measures of the global nature of bycatch are lacking for air-breathing megafauna. We fill this knowledge gap and present a synoptic global assessment of the distribution and intensity of bycatch of seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles based on empirical data from the three most commonly used types of fishing gears worldwide. We identify taxa-specific hotspots of bycatch intensity and find evidence of cumulative impacts across fishing fleets and gears. This global map of bycatch illustrates where data are particularly scarce—in coastal and small-scale fisheries and ocean regions that support developed industrial fisheries and millions of small-scale fishers—and identifies fishing areas where, given the evidence of cumulative hotspots across gear and taxa, traditional species or gear-specific bycatch management and mitigation efforts may be necessary but not sufficient. Given the global distribution of bycatch and the mitigation success achieved by some fleets, the reduction of air-breathing megafauna bycatch is both an urgent and achievable conservation priority.
Biological Conservation | 2004
Tara M. Cox; Andrew J. Read; Dave Swanner; Kim W. Urian; Danielle M. Waples
Along the east coast of the United States, by-catches of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in gillnet fisheries exceed removal levels set under the US Marine Mammal Protection Act. One measure proposed to reduce this mortality is the use of acoustic alarms, or pingers, which have proven effective in reducing by-catches of other small cetaceans, but have not been tested with bottlenose dolphins. We examined the responses of bottlenose dolphins to a commercial gillnet equipped with functional (active) and non-functional (control) Dukane NetMark 1 1000 alarms near Fort Macon, NC. Between 5 April and 10 May 2001 we used a theodolite to track 59 groups of dolphins around the net. Choice of treatment was random each day and the two shore-based observers were unaware of whether alarms were active (13 days) or controls (9 days). There were no significant differences in the number of groups observed (P=0.315; 1� � =0.835) or in the closest observed approach to the net (P=0.307; 1� � =0.828) between treatments. However, dolphins entered a circular buffer approximately 100 m around the net more frequently with control than active alarms (P=0.015). We conclude that some dolphins responded to the alarms by avoiding the net, but caution that the potential efficacy of alarms is confounded by dolphin behavior. Most dolphins were aware of the net, regardless of the status of alarms, and some dolphins fed on fish in the net or discarded by the fishing vessel. We believe that it would be unwise to use pingers in these fisheries because of the limited behavioral responses we observed in our experiment. Furthermore, the responses we observed are likely to diminish or change over time as dolphins habituate or sensitize to these alarms. Further research is required to understand the behavior responsible for entanglement. # 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Ecological Applications | 2008
Michelle Sims; Tara M. Cox; Rebecca L. Lewison
Fisheries bycatch, or incidental take, of large vertebrates such as sea turtles, seabirds, and marine mammals, is a pressing conservation and fisheries management issue. Identifying spatial patterns of bycatch is an important element in managing and mitigating bycatch occurrences. Because bycatch of these taxa involves rare events and fishing effort is highly variable in space and time, maps of raw bycatch rates (the ratio of bycatch to fishing effort) can be misleading. Here we show how mapping bycatch can be enhanced through the use of Bayesian hierarchical spatial models. We compare model-based estimates of bycatch rates to raw rates. The model-based estimates were more precise and fit the data well. Using these results, we demonstrate the utility of this approach for providing information to managers on bycatch probabilities and cross-taxa bycatch comparisons. To illustrate this approach, we present an analysis of bycatch data from the U.S. gill net fishery for groundfish in the northwest Atlantic. The goals of this analysis are to produce more reliable estimates of bycatch rates, assess similarity of spatial patterns between taxa, and identify areas of elevated risk of bycatch.
PLOS ONE | 2017
Carolyn Kovacs; Robin M. Perrtree; Tara M. Cox
Both natural and human-related foraging strategies by the common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) have resulted in social segregation in several areas of the world. Bottlenose dolphins near Savannah, Georgia beg at an unprecedented rate and also forage behind commercial shrimp trawlers, providing an opportunity to study the social ramifications of two human-related foraging behaviors within the same group of animals. Dolphins were photo-identified via surveys conducted throughout estuarine waterways around Savannah in the summers of 2009–2011. Mean half-weight indices (HWI) were calculated for each foraging class, and community division by modularity was used to cluster animals based on association indices. Pairs of trawler dolphins had a higher mean HWI (0.20 ± 0.07) than pairs of non-trawler dolphins (0.04 ± 0.02) or mixed pairs (0.02 ± 0.02). In contrast, pairs of beggars, non-beggars, and mixed pairs all had similar means, with HWI between 0.05–0.07. Community division by modularity produced a useful division (0.307) with 6 clusters. Clusters were predominately divided according to trawler status; however, beggars and non-beggars were mixed throughout clusters. Both the mean HWI and social clusters revealed that the social structure of common bottlenose dolphins near Savannah, Georgia was differentiated based on trawler status but not beg status. This finding may indicate that foraging in association with trawlers is a socially learned behavior, while the mechanisms for the propagation of begging are less clear. This study highlights the importance of taking into account the social parameters of a foraging behavior, such as how group size or competition for resources may affect how the behavior spreads. The positive or negative ramifications of homophily may influence whether the behaviors are exhibited by individuals within the same social clusters and should be considered in future studies examining social relationships and foraging behaviors.
Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas | 2016
Jessica Thompson; Mary Carla Curran; Tara M. Cox
ABSTRACT Animal populations are monitored over time to assess the effects of environmental disaster and disease, as well as the efficacy of laws designed to protect them. Determining the abundance of a species within a defined area is one method of monitoring a population. In “Capture” Me if You Can, middle school students will use data collected by biologists at Savannah State University to determine abundance estimates of the common bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. The activity has two parts that provide a platform for students to explore Ocean Literacy Principles, Next Generation Science Standards, and Common Core Mathematics Standards. In Part 1: Are Populations Protected or in Peril?, students will be introduced to threats to common bottlenose dolphins and will learn about a federal law protecting marine mammals from the impacts of humans by reading a scientific article. Students will improve their scientific literacy by expanding their vocabulary while interpreting the article and constructing responses. In Part 2: Not All Data Are Created Equal, students will learn the process of analyzing qualitative (photographic) data and will come to understand that data are not always numbers. Students will also develop visual–spatial skills and use quantitative data to calculate dolphin abundance.
American Biology Teacher | 2011
Sabrina R. Bowen-Stevens; Tara M. Cox; Mary Carla Curran
ABSTRACT All scientists use the scientific method to investigate the unknown by developing a hypothesis, designing an experiment, collecting data, and interpreting findings. The purpose of this activity is to teach middle school students about the scientific method and foraging ecology as they investigate a foraging behavior (strand feeding) of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). We tested this activity on middle school students and found that the activity promoted student inquiry, ingenuity, and critical thinking as the students used the scientific method to answer questions about strand feeding.
Biological Conservation | 2010
Jeffrey E. Moore; Tara M. Cox; Rebecca L. Lewison; Andrew J. Read; Rhema Bjorkland; Sara L. McDonald; Larry B. Crowder; E. Aruna; I. Ayissi; P. Espeut; C. Joynson-Hicks; N. Pilcher; C.N.S. Poonian; B. Solarin; Jeremy Kiszka
Conservation Biology | 2007
Tara M. Cox; Rebecca L. Lewison; Ramūnas Žydelis; Larry B. Crowder; C. Safina; Andrew J. Read
Marine Policy | 2009
Jeffrey E. Moore; Bryan P. Wallace; Rebecca L. Lewison; Ramunas Zydelis; Tara M. Cox; Larry B. Crowder
Archive | 1998
Tara M. Cox; Andrew J. Read; Susan G. Barco; J. Evans; Damon P. Gannon; Heather N. Koopman; William A. McLellan; K. Murray; John R. Nicolas; D. A. Pabst; Charles W. Potter; W. M. Swingle; Victoria G. Thayer; K. M. Touhey; Andrew J. Westgate