Taras V Litvin
University of California, Berkeley
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Taras V Litvin.
Optometry and Vision Science | 2014
Taras V Litvin; Glen Y. Ozawa; George H. Bresnick; Jorge Cuadros; Matthew S. Muller; Ann E. Elsner; Thomas Gast
Purpose The purpose of this study was to determine whether hard exudates (HEs) within one disc diameter of the foveola is an acceptable criterion for the referral of diabetic patients suspected of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) in a screening setting. Methods One hundred forty-three adults diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus were imaged using a nonmydriatic digital fundus camera at the Alameda County Medical Center in Oakland, CA. Nonstereo fundus images were graded independently for the presence of HE near the center of the macula by two graders according to the EyePACS grading protocol. The patients also received a dilated fundus examination on a separate visit. Clinically significant macular edema was determined during the dilated fundus examination using the criteria set forth by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Subsequently, the sensitivity and specificity of HEs within one disc diameter of the foveola in nonstereo digital images used as a surrogate for the detection of CSME diagnosed by live fundus examination were calculated. Results The mean (±SD) age of 103 patients included in the analysis was 56 ± 17 years. Clinically significant macular edema was diagnosed in 15.5% of eyes during the dilated examination. For the right eyes, the sensitivity of HEs within one disc diameter from the foveola as a surrogate for detecting CSME was 93.8% for each of the graders; the specificity values were 88.5 and 85.1%. For the left eyes, the sensitivity values were 93.8 and 75% for each of the two graders, respectively; the specificity was 87.4% for both graders. Conclusions This study supports the use of HE within a disc diameter of the center of the macula in nonstereo digital images for CSME detection in a screening setting.
Optometry and Vision Science | 2017
Mastour A. Alhamami; Ann E. Elsner; Victor E. Malinovsky; Christopher A. Clark; Bryan P. Haggerty; Glen Y. Ozawa; Jorge Cuadros; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Thomas Gast; Taras V Litvin; Matthew S. Muller; Shane Brahm; Stuart B Young; Masahiro Miura
ABSTRACT Purpose To investigate whether cysts in diabetic macular edema are better visualized in the red channel of color fundus camera images, as compared with the green channel, because color fundus camera screening methods that emphasize short-wavelength light may miss cysts in patients with dark fundi or changes to outer blood retinal barrier. Methods Fundus images for diabetic retinopathy photoscreening were acquired for a study with Aeon Imaging, EyePACS, University of California Berkeley, and Indiana University. There were 2047 underserved, adult diabetic patients, of whom over 90% self-identified as a racial/ethnic identify other than non-Hispanic white. Color fundus images at nominally 45 degrees were acquired with a Canon Cr-DGi non-mydriatic camera (Tokyo, Japan) then graded by an EyePACS certified grader. From the 148 patients graded to have clinically significant macular edema by the presence of hard exudates in the central 1500 μm of the fovea, we evaluated macular cysts in 13 patients with cystoid macular edema. Age ranged from 33 to 68 years. Color fundus images were split into red, green, and blue channels with custom Matlab software (Mathworks, Natick, MA). The diameter of a cyst or confluent cysts was quantified in the red-channel and green-channel images separately. Results Cyst identification gave complete agreement between red-channel images and the standard full-color images. This was not the case for green-channel images, which did not expose cysts visible with standard full-color images in five cases, who had dark fundi. Cysts appeared more numerous and covered a larger area in the red channel (733 ± 604 μm) than in the green channel (349 ± 433 μm, P < .006). Conclusions Cysts may be underdetected with the present fundus camera methods, particularly when short-wavelength light is emphasized or in patients with dark fundi. Longer wavelength techniques may improve the detection of cysts and provide more information concerning the early stages of diabetic macular edema or the outer blood retinal barrier.
Journal of diabetes science and technology | 2016
Taras V Litvin; Camille R. Weissenberg; Lauren P. Daskivich; Qienyuan Zhou; George H. Bresnick; Jorge Cuadros
Background: Hard exudates (HE) are used as a surrogate marker for sight-threatening diabetic macular edema (DME) in most telemedicine-based screening programs in the world. This study investigates whether proximity of HE to the center of the macula, and extent of HE are associated with greater clinically significant macular edema (CSME) severity. A novel method for associating optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans with CSME was developed. Methods: Eligible subjects were recruited from a DRS program in a community clinic in Oakland, California. Ocular fundus of each subject was imaged using 3-field 45-degree digital retinal photography and scanned using central 7-line spectral domain OCT. Two certified graders separated subjects into 2 groups, those with and without HE within 500 microns from the center of the macula. A modified DME severity scale, developed from Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study data and adapted to OCT thickness measurements, was used to stratify CSME into severe and nonsevere levels for all subjects. Results: The probabilities of severe CSME in groups 1 and 2 were 14.4% (95% CI: 8.2%-23.8%) and 9% (95% CI: 2.4%-25.5%), respectively (P = .556). In post hoc analysis, increase in the number of sectors affected by HE within the central zone of the macula was associated with the increase in the probability of being diagnosed with severe CSME. Conclusion: We have proposed OCT-based classification of DME into severe and nonsevere CSME. Based on this limited analysis, severity of CSME is related more to extent of HE rather than proximity to the center of the macula.
JAMA Ophthalmology | 2017
Taras V Litvin; George H. Bresnick; Jorge Cuadros; Steve Selvin; Kuniyoshi Kanai; Glen Y. Ozawa
Importance Diabetic macular edema is one of the leading causes of vision loss among working-age adults in the United States. Telemedicine screening programs and epidemiological studies rely on monoscopic fundus photography for the detection of clinically significant macular edema (CSME). Improving the accuracy of detecting CSME from monoscopic images could be valuable while recognizing the limitations of such detection in an era of optical coherence tomography detection of diabetic macular edema. Objective To evaluate the screening test accuracy of radially arranged sectors affected by hard exudates in the detection of CSME. Design, Setting, and Participants This investigation was a cross-sectional study of CSME grading in monoscopic images using a sectors approach. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria were used to confirm the presence of CSME by the following 2 methods: stereoscopic fundus photography (method 1) and dilated biomicroscopy in combination with optical coherence tomography (method 2). Participants were recruited at a university-based practice between June 14, 2014, and December 28, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Results A total of 207 eyes from an ethnically/racially diverse group of 207 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [10.8] years; 58.9% [122 of 207] female) were included in the analysis. Twelve eyes (5.8%) were diagnosed as having CSME based on method 1. The intermethod and intergrader agreement for CSME diagnosis and sector count was substantial (&kgr; range, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.47-0.85] to 0.75 [95% CI, 0.53-0.97]; P < .001 for all). Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 93.2% (95% CI, 84.2%-100%) when evaluating a sectors approach against method 1 as a reference test and offered up to an 8.6% (95% CI, 3.0%-14.3%) increase in specificity compared with the existing methods of detection. The positive predictive value was 33.3% (95% CI, 25.6%-45.5%), and the negative predictive value was 98.1% (95% CI, 96.9%-100%). The results were similar when comparing a sectors approach with method 2 as a reference test. Conclusions and Relevance A sectors approach shows good screening test characteristics for the detection of CSME. Its implementation in the existing telemedicine programs would require minimal resources. This approach will have the greatest effect in a setting where implementation of optical coherence tomography, a more objective and sensitive way to detect retinal thickening, is not feasible. The proposed method also may be easily incorporated in the automated diabetic retinopathy detection algorithms.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016
Taras V Litvin; George H. Bresnick; Glen Y. Ozawa; Kuniyoshi Kanai; Jorge Cuadros
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2015
Taras V Litvin; George H. Bresnick; Glen Y. Ozawa; Kuniyoshi Kanai; Jorge Cuadros
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Marilyn E. Schneck; Wayne Verdon; Kavita P. Dhamdhere; Taras V Litvin; Wendy Lam; Marcus A. Bearse; Anthony J. Adams
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Jorge Cuadros; Qienyuan Zhou; Taras V Litvin; Glen Y. Ozawa
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Glen Y. Ozawa; Karthikeyan Baskaran; Taras V Litvin; Ann E. Elsner; Jorge Cuadros; Christopher A. Clark; Shane Brahm; Stuart B Young; Christina M Robinson; Matthew S. Muller
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2014
Karthikeyan Baskaran; Ann E. Elsner; Matthew S. Muller; Bryan P. Haggerty; Joel A. Papay; Thomas Gast; Taras V Litvin; Glen Y. Ozawa; Jorge Cuadros; Benno L. Petrig