Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem.


The Journal of Pathology | 2013

Use of multivariate analysis to suggest a new molecular classification of colorectal cancer

Enric Domingo; Rajarajan Ramamoorthy; Dahmane Oukrif; Daniel Rosmarin; Michal Presz; Haitao Wang; Hannah Pulker; Helen Lockstone; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Treena Cranston; Håvard E. Danielsen; Marco Novelli; Brian R. Davidson; Zheng Zhou Xu; Peter L. Molloy; Elaine Johnstone; Christopher Holmes; Rachel Midgley; David Kerr; Oliver M. Sieber; Ian Tomlinson

Molecular classification of colorectal cancer (CRC) is currently based on microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS or BRAF mutation and, occasionally, chromosomal instability (CIN). Whilst useful, these categories may not fully represent the underlying molecular subgroups. We screened 906 stage II/III CRCs from the VICTOR clinical trial for somatic mutations. Multivariate analyses (logistic regression, clustering, Bayesian networks) identified the primary molecular associations. Positive associations occurred between: CIN and TP53 mutation; MSI and BRAF mutation; and KRAS and PIK3CA mutations. Negative associations occurred between: MSI and CIN; MSI and NRAS mutation; and KRAS mutation, and each of NRAS, TP53 and BRAF mutations. Some complex relationships were elucidated: KRAS and TP53 mutations had both a direct negative association and a weaker, confounding, positive association via TP53–CIN–MSI–BRAF–KRAS. Our results suggested a new molecular classification of CRCs: (1) MSI+ and/or BRAF‐mutant; (2) CIN+ and/or TP53– mutant, with wild‐type KRAS and PIK3CA; (3) KRAS‐ and/or PIK3CA‐mutant, CIN+, TP53‐wild‐type; (4) KRAS– and/or PIK3CA‐mutant, CIN–, TP53‐wild‐type; (5) NRAS‐mutant; (6) no mutations; (7) others. As expected, group 1 cancers were mostly proximal and poorly differentiated, usually occurring in women. Unexpectedly, two different types of CIN+ CRC were found: group 2 cancers were usually distal and occurred in men, whereas group 3 showed neither of these associations but were of higher stage. CIN+ cancers have conventionally been associated with all three of these variables, because they have been tested en masse. Our classification also showed potentially improved prognostic capabilities, with group 3, and possibly group 1, independently predicting disease‐free survival. Copyright


British Journal of Cancer | 2014

Prognostic impact of genomic instability in colorectal cancer.

Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Marianne A. Merok; Maria E. Pretorius; M. Novelli; M. S. Bævre; Ole H. Sjo; N. Clinch; Knut Liestøl; Aud Svindland; Ragnhild A. Lothe; Arild Nesbakken; Håvard E. Danielsen

Background:The prognostic impact of an indication of chromosomal instability (CIN) is evaluated in a consecutive series of 952 colorectal cancer patients treated at Aker University Hospital, Norway, during 1993–2003. Microsatellite instability (MSI) in this case series has recently been reported and made it possible to find the co-occurrence and compare the prognostic significance of CIN and MSI.Methods:Data sets for overall survival (OS; n=855) and time to recurrence (TTR; n=579) were studied. To reveal CIN we used automated image cytometry (ICM). Non-diploid histograms were taken as indicative of the presence of CIN. PCR-based measures of MSI in this material have already been described.Results:As with MSI, CIN was found to be an independent predictor of early relapse and death among stage II patients (TTR: n=278: HR 2.19 (95% CI: 1.35–3.55), P=0.002). Of the MSI tumours (16%), 71% were found to be DNA diploid, 21% were DNA tetraploid and 8% were DNA aneuploid. Among microsatellite stable tumours, 24% were DNA diploid, 15% were DNA tetraploid and 61% were DNA aneuploid.Conclusion:For patients presenting with stage II disease, genomic instability as detected by DNA image cytometry has the potential to provide a useful biomarker for relapse and cancer-related death following surgery with curative intent.


British Journal of Cancer | 2011

Comparison of nuclear texture analysis and image cytometric DNA analysis for the assessment of dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus

Jason M. Dunn; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Maria E. Pretorius; Dahmane Oukrif; Birgitte Nielsen; Fritz Albregtsen; Laurence Lovat; Marco Novelli; Håvard E. Danielsen

Background:Dysplasia is a marker of cancer risk in Barretts oesophagus (BO), but this risk is variable and diagnosis is subject to inter-observer variability. Cancer risk in BO is increased when chromosomal instability is present. Nucleotyping (NT) is a new method that uses high-resolution digital images of nuclei to assess chromatin organisation both quantitatively and qualitatively. We aimed to evaluate NT as a marker of dysplasia in BO and compare with image cytometric DNA analysis (ICM).Methods:In all, 120 patients with BO were studied. The non-dysplastic group (n=60) had specialised intestinal metaplasia only on two consecutive endoscopies after 51 months median follow-up (IQR=25–120 months). The dysplastic group (n=60) had high-grade dysplasia or carcinoma in situ. The two groups were then randomly assigned to a training set and a blinded test set in a 1 : 1 ratio. Image cytometric DNA analysis and NT was then carried out on Feulgen-stained nuclear monolayers.Results:The best-fit model for NT gave a correct classification rate (CCR) for the training set of 83%. The test set was then analysed using the same textural features and yielded a CCR of 78%. Image cytometric DNA analysis alone yielded a CCR of 73%. The combination of ICM and NT yielded a CCR of 84%.Conclusion:Nucleotyping differentiates dysplastic and non-dysplastic BO, with a greater sensitivity than ICM. A combination score based on both techniques performed better than either test in isolation. These data demonstrate that NT/ICM on nuclear monolayers is a very promising single platform test of genomic instability, which may aid pathologists in the diagnosis of dysplasia and has potential as a biomarker in BO.


British Journal of Cancer | 2017

Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research

Karolina Cyll; Elin Ersvær; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Manohar Pradhan; Wanja Kildal; Marte Avranden Kjær; Andreas Kleppe; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Birgitte Carlsen; Silje Gill; Sven Löffeler; Erik Skaaheim Haug; Håkon Wæhre; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Håvard E. Danielsen

Background:The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model.Methods:We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6–12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies.Results:Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens.Conclusions:Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions.


Cytometry Part A | 2015

Entropy-based adaptive nuclear texture features are independent prognostic markers in a total population of uterine sarcomas

Birgitte Nielsen; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Wanja Kildal; Vera M. Abeler; Gunnar B. Kristensen; Fritz Albregtsen; Håvard E. Danielsen

Nuclear texture analysis measures the spatial arrangement of the pixel gray levels in a digitized microscopic nuclear image and is a promising quantitative tool for prognosis of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of entropy‐based adaptive nuclear texture features in a total population of 354 uterine sarcomas. Isolated nuclei (monolayers) were prepared from 50 µm tissue sections and stained with Feulgen‐Schiff. Local gray level entropy was measured within small windows of each nuclear image and stored in gray level entropy matrices, and two superior adaptive texture features were calculated from each matrix. The 5‐year crude survival was significantly higher (P < 0.001) for patients with high texture feature values (72%) than for patients with low feature values (36%). When combining DNA ploidy classification (diploid/nondiploid) and texture (high/low feature value), the patients could be stratified into three risk groups with 5‐year crude survival of 77, 57, and 34% (Hazard Ratios (HR) of 1, 2.3, and 4.1, P < 0.001). Entropy‐based adaptive nuclear texture was an independent prognostic marker for crude survival in multivariate analysis including relevant clinicopathological features (HR = 2.1, P = 0.001), and should therefore be considered as a potential prognostic marker in uterine sarcomas.


British Journal of Cancer | 2015

DNA ploidy in curettage specimens identifies high-risk patients and lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer

Tormund Salvesen Njølstad; Jone Trovik; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Marna Lill Kjæreng; Wanja Kildal; Manohar Pradhan; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Solveig Tingulstad; Anne Cathrine Staff; Hans Kristian Haugland; Runar Eraker; Klaus Oddenes; Jan Anders Rokne; Jostein Tjugum; Margaret Sævik Lode; Frédéric Amant; Henrica Maria Johanna Werner; Helga B. Salvesen; Håvard E. Danielsen

Background:Preoperative risk stratification is essential in tailoring endometrial cancer treatment, and biomarkers predicting lymph node metastasis and aggressive disease are aspired in clinical practice. DNA ploidy assessment in hysterectomy specimens is a well-established prognostic marker. DNA ploidy assessment in preoperative curettage specimens is less studied, and in particular in relation to the occurrence of lymph node metastasis.Methods:Curettage image cytometry DNA ploidy in relation to established clinicopathological variables and outcome was investigated in 785 endometrial carcinoma patients prospectively included in the MoMaTEC multicentre trial.Results:Diploid curettage status was found in 72.0%, whereas 28.0% were non-diploid. Non-diploid status significantly correlated with traditional aggressive postoperative clinicopathological features, and was an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis among FIGO stage I–III patients in multivariate analysis (OR 1.94, P=0.033). Non-diploid status was related to shorter disease-specific survival (5-year DSS of 74.4% vs 88.8% for diploid curettage, P<0.001). When stratifying by FIGO stage and lymph node status, the prognostic effect remained. However, in multivariate regression analysis, preoperative histological risk classification was a stronger predictor of DSS than DNA ploidy.Conclusions:Non-diploid curettage is significantly associated with aggressive clinicopathological phenotype, lymph node metastasis, and poor survival in endometrial cancer. The prognostic effect was also observed among subgroups with (presumably) less aggressive traits, such as low FIGO stage and negative lymph node status. Our results indicate curettage DNA ploidy as a possible supplement to existing parameters used to tailor surgical treatment.


Translational Oncology | 2016

Prostate Cancer Prognosis Defined by the Combined Analysis of 8q, PTEN and ERG

Maria Cecília de Paula Silva; João D. Barros-Silva; Elin Ersvær; Wanja Kildal; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Manohar Pradhan; Joana Vieira; Manuel R. Teixeira; Håvard E. Danielsen

Overtreatment is a major concern in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined prognostic role of three frequent molecular alterations in prostate cancer, namely relative 8q gain, ERG overexpression, and loss of PTEN expression, in a series of 136 patients with prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy and with a long follow-up. Fluorescent in situ hybridization was used to detect the relative copy number of 8q and immunohistochemistry was used for quantitative assessment of ERG and PTEN expression. During a median follow-up period of 117.8 months, 66 (49%) patients had disease recurrence. Relative 8q gain, ERG overexpression, and loss of PTEN expression were observed in 18%, 56%, and 33% of the cases, respectively. No association with patient recurrence-free survival was found for relative 8q gain or ERG overexpression on their own, whereas loss of PTEN expression was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (P = .006). Interestingly, in the subgroup of patients with normal PTEN expression, we found that the combined relative 8q gain/ERG overexpression is associated with high risk of recurrence (P = .008), suggesting that alternative mechanisms exist for progression into clinically aggressive disease. Additionally, in intermediate-risk patients with normal PTEN expression in their tumors, the combination of 8q gain/ERG overexpression was associated with a poor recurrence-free survival (P < .001), thus indicating independent prognostic value. This study shows that the combined analysis of 8q, ERG and PTEN contributes to an improved clinical outcome stratification of prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy.


Lancet Oncology | 2018

Chromatin organisation and cancer prognosis: a pan-cancer study

Andreas Kleppe; Fritz Albregtsen; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Manohar Pradhan; Birgitte Nielsen; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; H. A. Askautrud; Gunnar B. Kristensen; Arild Nesbakken; Jone Trovik; Håkon Wæhre; Ian Tomlinson; Neil A. Shepherd; Marco Novelli; David Kerr; Håvard E. Danielsen

Summary Background Chromatin organisation affects gene expression and regional mutation frequencies and contributes to carcinogenesis. Aberrant organisation of DNA has been correlated with cancer prognosis in analyses of the chromatin component of tumour cell nuclei using image texture analysis. As yet, the methodology has not been sufficiently validated to permit its clinical application. We aimed to define and validate a novel prognostic biomarker for the automatic detection of heterogeneous chromatin organisation. Methods Machine learning algorithms analysed the chromatin organisation in 461 000 images of tumour cell nuclei stained for DNA from 390 patients (discovery cohort) treated for stage I or II colorectal cancer at the Aker University Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The resulting marker of chromatin heterogeneity, termed Nucleotyping, was subsequently independently validated in six patient cohorts: 442 patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in the Gloucester Colorectal Cancer Study (UK); 391 patients with stage II colorectal cancer in the QUASAR 2 trial; 246 patients with stage I ovarian carcinoma; 354 patients with uterine sarcoma; 307 patients with prostate carcinoma; and 791 patients with endometrial carcinoma. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. Findings In all patient cohorts, patients with chromatin heterogeneous tumours had worse cancer-specific survival than patients with chromatin homogeneous tumours (univariable analysis hazard ratio [HR] 1·7, 95% CI 1·2–2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·8, 1·0–3·0, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·2, 1·1–4·5, in the QUASAR 2 validation cohort; 3·1, 1·9–5·0, in the ovarian carcinoma cohort; 2·5, 1·8–3·4, in the uterine sarcoma cohort; 2·3, 1·2–4·6, in the prostate carcinoma cohort; and 4·3, 2·8–6·8, in the endometrial carcinoma cohort). After adjusting for established prognostic patient characteristics in multivariable analyses, Nucleotyping was prognostic in all cohorts except for the prostate carcinoma cohort (HR 1·7, 95% CI 1·1–2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·9, 1·1–3·2, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·6, 1·2–5·6, in the QUASAR 2 cohort; 1·8, 1·1–3·0, for ovarian carcinoma; 1·6, 1·0–2·4, for uterine sarcoma; 1·43, 0·68–2·99, for prostate carcinoma; and 1·9, 1·1–3·1, for endometrial carcinoma). Chromatin heterogeneity was a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival in microsatellite unstable (HR 2·9, 95% CI 1·0–8·4) and microsatellite stable (1·8, 1·2–2·7) stage II colorectal cancer, but microsatellite instability was not a significant predictor of outcome in chromatin homogeneous (1·3, 0·7–2·4) or chromatin heterogeneous (0·8, 0·3–2·0) stage II colorectal cancer. Interpretation The consistent prognostic prediction of Nucleotyping in different biological and technical circumstances suggests that the marker of chromatin heterogeneity can be reliably assessed in routine clinical practice and could be used to objectively assist decision making in a range of clinical settings. An immediate application would be to identify high-risk patients with stage II colorectal cancer who might have greater absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of using Nucleotyping to guide treatment decisions in multiple clinical settings. Funding The Research Council of Norway, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust.


British Journal of Cancer | 2016

Chromatin changes predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; Andreas Kleppe; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Elin Ersvær; Håkon Wæhre; Birgitte Nielsen; Marte Avranden Kjær; Manohar Pradhan; Rolf Anders Syvertsen; John Arne Nesheim; Knut Liestøl; Fritz Albregtsen; Håvard E. Danielsen

Background:Pathological evaluations give the best prognostic markers for prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy, but the observer variance is substantial. These risk assessments should be supported and supplemented by objective methods for identifying patients at increased risk of recurrence. Markers of epigenetic aberrations have shown promising results in several cancer types and can be assessed by automatic analysis of chromatin organisation in tumour cell nuclei.Methods:A consecutive series of 317 prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy at a national hospital between 1987 and 2005 were followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range, 7–14). On average three tumour block samples from each patient were included to account for tumour heterogeneity. We developed a novel marker, termed Nucleotyping, based on automatic assessment of disordered chromatin organisation, and validated its ability to predict recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Results:Nucleotyping predicted recurrence with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.1–5.1). With adjustment for clinical and pathological characteristics, the HR was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5–4.1). An updated stratification into three risk groups significantly improved the concordance with patient outcome compared with a state-of-the-art risk-stratification tool (P<0.001). The prognostic impact was most evident for the patients who were high-risk by clinical and pathological characteristics and for patients with Gleason score 7.Conclusion:A novel assessment of epigenetic aberrations was capable of improving risk stratification after radical prostatectomy.


Histopathology | 2015

Computerized image analysis of the Ki-67 proliferation index in mantle cell lymphoma

Yngvild Nuvin Blaker; Marianne Brodtkorb; John Maddison; Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem; John Arne Nesheim; Hans Martin Mohn; Arne Kolstad; Christian H. Geisler; Knut Liestøl; Erlend B. Smeland; Harald Holte; Jan Delabie; Håvard E. Danielsen

Manual counting of the fraction of Ki‐67‐positive cells (the Ki‐67 index) in 1000 tumour cells is considered the ‘gold standard’ to predict prognosis in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This time‐consuming method is replaced by the faster, but less accurate, semiquantitative estimation in routine practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the use of computerized image analysis software for scoring of Ki‐67 in MCL.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tarjei Sveinsgjerd Hveem's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marco Novelli

University College London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jone Trovik

Haukeland University Hospital

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge