Taro Nakatsu

Long-Term Survival After Coronary Arterial Grafts in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is known to improve the long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, there are few reports regarding the efficacy of BITA grafting in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. This study investigates the potential benefits of BITA grafting in ESRD patients. METHODS One hundred thirty ESRD patients dependent on chronic hemodialysis underwent isolated CABG in the Kumamoto Central Hospital from 1988 to 2009. The early results and long-term outcomes in 49 patients using BITA (BITA group) were compared with 81 patients using a single ITA (SITA group). The mean follow-up time was 5.2 +/- 3.8 years. RESULTS The mortality rate was 4.9% for the SITA group and 4.1% for the BITA group (p = 0.8215). No differences were seen for the incidence of mediastinitis or a rethoracotomy for bleeding. The 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, and 10-year survival rates in the SITA group were 79.6%, 62.5%, 43.6%, and 22.6%, respectively. The corresponding survival rates in the BITA group were 76.0%, 61.9%, 58.8%, and 33.2%, respectively. There were no statistical differences in survival (p = 0.1636), freedom from cardiac death (p = 0.3205), or freedom from cardiac events (p = 0.4071). In ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus, BITA grafting improves the outcomes concerning cardiac events (p = 0.0143). CONCLUSIONS After a long-term follow-up, CABG with BITA grafts showed no advantages in the long-term outcomes among ESRD patients. However, for ESRD patients without diabetes mellitus, BITA grafting may provide more promising long-term outcomes.

Pulmonary artery obstruction due to a metastatic malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast

A 65-year-old woman with a 9-year surgical history of a left breast phyllodes tumor was admitted with progressive chest pain on effort. Computed tomography showed severe stenosis of the main pulmonary artery, with the mass originating from the ventricular septum. We planned to resect the tumor the next day. However, the next morning a pulmonary artery embolism occurred, and she developed dyspnea and lost consciousness. After carrying out cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we performed a life-saving operation. We successfully resected the huge tumor as far as possible from the right ventricle via a right atrial (RA)-tomy. However, her consciousness did not improve to better than Glasgow Coma Scale grade 7. She died from suffocation caused by metastasis invading her airway despite undergoing tracheotomy on the 77th postoperative day.

Comparison of endovascular repair with branched stent graft and open repair for aortic arch aneurysm

OBJECTIVES Although conventional open repair is our preference for patients with aortic arch aneurysms, we have often chosen thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) with a handmade branched stent graft (bTEVAR) in high-risk patients. The aim of this study was to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of our bTEVAR technique to those of the open repair. METHODS Between January 2007 and December 2014, we treated 129 patients with aortic arch aneurysm by means of either conventional open repair (OPEN, n = 61) or bTEVAR (n = 68) at our institution. RESULTS The mean ages were 70.5 ± 12.7 years in the OPEN group and 72.7 ± 12.5 years in the bTEVAR group (P = 0.32). The aetiologies included true aneurysm in 101 patients (78.3%) and chronic dissection in 26 (20.1%). There were 2 (3.3%) in-hospital deaths in the OPEN group and 3 (4.4%) in the bTEVAR group. The mean follow-up duration was 3.0 ± 2.1 years (2.4 ± 1.9 years in the OPEN group and 3.6 ± 2.3 years in the bTEVAR group). There was no difference in 5-year aneurysm-related mortality between groups (10.7% in OPEN vs 12.8% in bTEVAR, P = 0.50). In terms of late additional procedures, however, none were required in the OPEN group, whereas 10 (15.4%) additional endovascular repairs and 4 (6.2%) open repairs were required in the bTEVAR group. CONCLUSIONS Our bTEVAR could be performed with low early mortality, and it yielded similar midterm aneurysm-related mortality to that of conventional open repair. However, these patients undergoing this technique required more late additional procedures than those undergoing conventional open repair.

A Case of Successful Reopening of Left Main Coronary Artery Occlusion After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

An 86-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis was referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The transfemoral TAVR procedure was conducted under general anesthesia. Aortography during pre-dilatation with a 20-mm balloon demonstrated reduced blood flow through the left main