Tatiana A. Soboleva

An efficient system for high‐level expression and easy purification of authentic recombinant proteins

Expression of recombinant proteins as fusions to the eukaryotic protein ubiquitin has been found to significantly increase the yield of unstable or poorly expressed proteins. The benefit of this technique is further enhanced by the availability of naturally occurring deubiquitylating enzymes, which remove ubiquitin from the fusion product. However, the versatility of the system has been constrained due to the lack of a robust, easily purified deubiquitylating enzyme. Here we report the development of an efficient expression system, utilizing the ubiquitin fusion technique, which allows convenient high yield and easy purification of authentic protein. An Escherichia coli vector (pHUE) was constructed for the expression of proteins as histidine‐tagged ubiquitin fusions, and a histidine‐tagged deubiquitylating enzyme to cleave these fusions was expressed and purified. The expression system was tested using several proteins varying in size and complexity. These results indicate that this procedure will be suitable for the expression and rapid purification of a broad range of proteins and peptides, and should be amenable to high‐throughput applications.

Using Deubiquitylating Enzymes as Research Tools

Ubiquitin is synthesized in eukaryotes as a linear fusion with a normal peptide bond either to itself or to one of two ribosomal proteins and, in the latter case, enhances the yield of these ribosomal proteins and/or their incorporation into the ribosome. Such fusions are cleaved rapidly by a variety of deubiquitylating enzymes. Expression of heterologous proteins as linear ubiquitin fusions has been found to significantly increase the yield of unstable or poorly expressed proteins in either bacterial or eukaryotic hosts. If expressed in bacterial cells, the fusion is not cleaved due to the absence of deubiquitylating activity and can be purified intact. We have developed an efficient expression system, utilizing the ubiquitin fusion technique and a robust deubiquitylating enzyme, which allows convenient high yield and easy purification of authentic proteins. An affinity purification tag on both the ubiquitin fusion and the deubiquitylating enzyme allows their easy purification and the easy removal of unwanted components after cleavage, leaving the desired protein as the only soluble product. Ubiquitin is also conjugated to epsilon amino groups in lysine side chains of target proteins to form a so-called isopeptide linkage. Either a single ubiquitin can be conjugated or other lysines within ubiquitin can be acceptors for further conjugation, leading to formation of a branched, isopeptide-linked ubiquitin chain. Removal of these ubiquitin moieties or chains in vitro would be a valuable tool in the ubiquitinologists tool kit to simplify downstream studies on ubiquitylated targets. The robust deubiquitylating enzyme described earlier is also very useful for this task.

Histone H2A.Z inheritance during the cell cycle and its impact on promoter organization and dynamics

Although it has been clearly established that well-positioned histone H2A.Z–containing nucleosomes flank the nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) at the transcriptional start site (TSS) of active mammalian genes, how this chromatin-based information is transmitted through the cell cycle is unknown. We show here that in mouse trophoblast stem cells, the amount of histone H2A.Z at promoters decreased during S phase, coinciding with homotypic (H2A.Z–H2A.Z) nucleosomes flanking the TSS becoming heterotypic (H2A.Z–H2A). To our surprise these nucleosomes remained heterotypic at M phase. At the TSS, we identified an unstable heterotypic histone H2A.Z–containing nucleosome in G1 phase that was lost after DNA replication. These dynamic changes at the TSS mirror a global expansion of the NDR at S and M phases, which, unexpectedly, is unrelated to transcriptional activity. Coincident with the loss of histone H2A.Z at promoters, histone H2A.Z is targeted to the centromere when mitosis begins.

Deubiquitinating Enzymes: Their Functions and Substrate Specificity

Conjugation of one or more molecules of ubiquitin to target proteins can signify one of several fates, including degradation by the 26S proteasome, or trafficking via the secretory or endocytic pathways. Whereas much attention in recent years has focussed on the mechanisms of forming these different ubiquitin conjugates, far less is known about the removal of ubiquitin, which is performed by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). While it has been appreciated for some 10 years that DUBs constitute large gene families in eukaryotes, and known for much longer that ubiquitination is a reversible process, information on the exact role of DUBs has been slow in coming. This review will attempt to summarise results from the last few years that shows that DUBs are an essential regulatory step of both protein degradation by the proteasome, and of other ubiquitin-dependent processes, by virtue of their ability to regulate protein ubiquitination in a target-specific manner.

Histone variants at the transcription start-site

The function of a eukaryotic cell crucially depends on accurate gene transcription to ensure the right genes are expressed whereas unrequired genes are repressed. Therefore, arguably, one of the most important regions in the genome is the transcription start-site (TSS) of protein-coding and non-coding genes. Until recently, understanding the mechanisms that define the location of the TSS and how it is created has largely focused on the role of DNA sequence-specific transcription factors. However, within the nucleus of a eukaryotic cell, transcription occurs in a highly compacted nucleosomal environment, and it is becoming clear that accessibility of the TSS is a key controlling step in transcriptional regulation. It has traditionally been thought that transcription can only proceed once the nucleosomes at the TSS have been evicted. New work suggests otherwise, however, and the focus of this review is to challenge this belief.

Clarification of the role of N-glycans on the common β-subunit of the human IL-3, IL-5 and GM-CSF receptors and the murine IL-3 β-receptor in ligand-binding and receptor activation

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin (IL)-3 and IL-5 are related cytokines that play key roles in regulating the differentiation, proliferation, survival and activation of myeloid blood cells. The cell surface receptors for these cytokines are composed of cytokine-specific alpha-subunits and a common beta-receptor (betac), a shared subunit that is essential for receptor signaling in response to GM-CSF, IL-3 and IL-5. Previous studies have reached conflicting conclusions as to whether N-glycosylation of the betac-subunit is necessary for functional GM-CSF, IL-3 and IL-5 receptors. We sought to clarify whether betac N-glycosylation plays a role in receptor function, since all structural studies of human betac to date have utilized recombinant protein lacking N-glycosylation at Asn(328). Here, by eliminating individual N-glycans in human betac and the related murine homolog, beta(IL-3), we demonstrate unequivocally that ligand-binding and receptor activation are not critically dependent on individual N-glycosylation sites within the beta-subunit although the data do not preclude the possibility that N-glycans may exert some sort of fine control. These studies support the biological relevance of the X-ray crystal structures of the human betac domain 4 and the complete ectodomain, both of which lack N-glycosylation at Asn(328).

Histone variant selectivity at the transcription start site: H2A.Z or H2A.Lap1

Considerable attention has been given to the understanding of how nucleosomes are altered or removed from the transcription start site of RNA polymerase II genes to enable transcription to proceed. This has led to the view that for transcriptional activation to occur, the transcription start site (TSS) must become depleted of nucleosomes. However, we have shown that this is not the case with different unstable histone H2A variant-containing nucleosomes occupying the TSS under different physiological settings. For example, during mouse spermatogenesis we found that the mouse homolog of human H2A.Bbd, H2A.Lap1, is targeted to the TSS of active genes expressed during specific stages of spermatogenesis. On the other hand, we observed in trophoblast stem cells, a H2A.Z-containing nucleosome occupying the TSS of genes active in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Notably, this H2A.Z-containing nucleosome was different compared with other promoter specific H2A.Z nucleosomes by being heterotypic rather than being homotypic. In other words, it did not contain the expected two copies of H2A.Z per nucleosome but only one (i.e., H2A.Z/H2A rather than H2A.Z/H2A.Z). Given these observations, we wondered whether the histone variant composition of a nucleosome at an active TSS could in fact vary in the same cell type. To investigate this possibility, we performed H2A.Z ChIP-H2A reChIP assays in the mouse testis and compared this data with our testis H2A.Lap1 ChIP-seq data. Indeed, we find that different promoters involved in the expression of genes involved in distinct biological processes can contain either H2A.Z/H2A or H2A.Lap1. This argues that specific mechanisms exist, which can determine whether H2A.Z or H2A.Lap1 is targeted to the TSS of an active gene.

A new link between transcriptional initiation and pre-mRNA splicing: The RNA binding histone variant H2A.B

The replacement of histone H2A with its variant forms is critical for regulating all aspects of genome organisation and function. The histone variant H2A.B appeared late in evolution and is most highly expressed in the testis followed by the brain in mammals. This raises the question of what new function(s) H2A.B might impart to chromatin in these important tissues. We have immunoprecipitated the mouse orthologue of H2A.B, H2A.B.3 (H2A.Lap1), from testis chromatin and found this variant to be associated with RNA processing factors and RNA Polymerase (Pol) II. Most interestingly, many of these interactions with H2A.B.3 (Sf3b155, Spt6, DDX39A and RNA Pol II) were inhibited by the presence of endogenous RNA. This histone variant can bind to RNA directly in vitro and in vivo, and associates with mRNA at intron—exon boundaries. This suggests that the ability of H2A.B to bind to RNA negatively regulates its capacity to bind to these factors (Sf3b155, Spt6, DDX39A and RNA Pol II). Unexpectedly, H2A.B.3 forms highly decompacted nuclear subdomains of active chromatin that co-localizes with splicing speckles in male germ cells. H2A.B.3 ChIP-Seq experiments revealed a unique chromatin organization at active genes being not only enriched at the transcription start site (TSS), but also at the beginning of the gene body (but being excluded from the +1 nucleosome) compared to the end of the gene. We also uncover a general histone variant replacement process whereby H2A.B.3 replaces H2A.Z at intron-exon boundaries in the testis and the brain, which positively correlates with expression and exon inclusion. Taken together, we propose that a special mechanism of splicing may occur in the testis and brain whereby H2A.B.3 recruits RNA processing factors from splicing speckles to active genes following its replacement of H2A.Z.

SLY regulates genes involved in chromatin remodeling and interacts with TBL1XR1 during sperm differentiation

Sperm differentiation requires unique transcriptional regulation and chromatin remodeling after meiosis to ensure proper compaction and protection of the paternal genome. Abnormal sperm chromatin remodeling can induce sperm DNA damage, embryo lethality and male infertility, yet, little is known about the factors which regulate this process. Deficiency in Sly, a mouse Y chromosome-encoded gene expressed only in postmeiotic male germ cells, has been shown to result in the deregulation of hundreds of sex chromosome-encoded genes associated with multiple sperm differentiation defects and subsequent male infertility. The underlying mechanism remained, to date, unknown. Here, we show that SLY binds to the promoter of sex chromosome-encoded and autosomal genes highly expressed postmeiotically and involved in chromatin regulation. Specifically, we demonstrate that Sly knockdown directly induces the deregulation of sex chromosome-encoded H2A variants and of the H3K79 methyltransferase DOT1L. The modifications prompted by loss of Sly alter the postmeiotic chromatin structure and ultimately result in abnormal sperm chromatin remodeling with negative consequences on the sperm genome integrity. Altogether our results show that SLY is a regulator of sperm chromatin remodeling. Finally we identified that SMRT/N-CoR repressor complex is involved in gene regulation during sperm differentiation since members of this complex, in particular TBL1XR1, interact with SLY in postmeiotic male germ cells.

RChIP-Seq: Chromatin-Associated RNA Sequencing in Developmentally Staged Mouse Testes

Chromatin is a dynamic macromolecular structure comprised of histones and a wealth of non-histone proteins. Recently, it has become clear that RNA is also an integral component of chromatin playing an important role in regulating its structure and function. Central to the understanding of RNA function is the ability to identify and genomically map interactions between chromatin components and RNA.Here, we describe a new method, RChIP-seq (RNA-associated-Chromatin-Immuno Precipitation followed by next-generation sequencing) that allows the identification of RNA species that are directly bound to specific components of chromatin in the mouse testis.