Tatjana Seizova-Cajic

Tactile and kinesthetic perceptual processes within the taxonomy of human cognitive abilities

Abstract The vast majority of research in psychology has been preoccupied with understanding visual and auditory processes. Clearly, however, other perceptual mechanisms generate meaningful individual differences, which might be related to intelligent functioning. The present study extends the results of a recent multivariate investigation examining certain critical features of the tactile and kinesthetic modalities. Participants (N=116) were administered eight traditional psychometric instruments and 14 measures of tactile and kinesthetic perceptual processes. The results are consistent with earlier findings in demonstrating that visual–spatial processes are difficult to separate from complex measures of tactile and kinesthetic processing. However, structural equation modeling provided evidence for independent kinesthetic and tactile factors that were (differentially) correlated with fluid intelligence (Gf). The first factor — kinesthetic sensitivity (KS) — exemplifies an ability to determine (or remember) the position of the arm, or the trajectory of arm movements, without using vision. The second factor — tactile sensitivity (TS) — represents an ability to discriminate and infer the form of stimuli applied to the skin. These tactile and kinesthetic processes appear narrower than other perceptual constructs such that they are encapsulated by first-order (rather than broad intellective) factors.

Proprioceptive Movement Illusions Due to Prolonged Stimulation: Reversals and Aftereffects

Background Adaptation to constant stimulation has often been used to investigate the mechanisms of perceptual coding, but the adaptive processes within the proprioceptive channels that encode body movement have not been well described. We investigated them using vibration as a stimulus because vibration of muscle tendons results in a powerful illusion of movement. Methodology/Principal Findings We applied sustained 90 Hz vibratory stimulation to biceps brachii, an elbow flexor and induced the expected illusion of elbow extension (in 12 participants). There was clear evidence of adaptation to the movement signal both during the 6-min long vibration and on its cessation. During vibration, the strong initial illusion of extension waxed and waned, with diminishing duration of periods of illusory movement and occasional reversals in the direction of the illusion. After vibration there was an aftereffect in which the stationary elbow seemed to move into flexion. Muscle activity shows no consistent relationship with the variations in perceived movement. Conclusion We interpret the observed effects as adaptive changes in the central mechanisms that code movement in direction-selective opponent channels.

Illusory motion reversals from unambiguous motion with visual, proprioceptive, and tactile stimuli

While viewing an unambiguously rotating circular array of bars for an extended period, most perceive the array to occasionally move in the direction opposite to its true motion. We find that this alternation in perception has similar dynamics to rivalry, including little correlation among the durations of successive percepts. We also describe analogous reversals in touch and in proprioception. In the proprioceptive case, biceps vibration induces illusory forearm extension. Occasionally, although the same stimulation continues, reversals occur-flexion is perceived rather than extension. Temporal sampling is often invoked to explain the visual reversals but it cannot explain these proprioceptive reversals. Instead, after initial adaptation to the stimulus, rivalry between signals indicating the opposing directions could potentially explain reversals in all three modalities.

Biases in judgments of separation and orientation of elements belonging to different clusters.

If two demarcated dots are embedded in separate clusters of similar dots in off centre positions, their perceived separation is biased towards the separation between the centres of the clusters (Morgan, Hole, & Glennerster, 1990). We replicated these results and went on to determine whether a similar bias is present for orientation judgments, using a staircase method and a range of cluster orientations and separations. A complex pattern of biases was found including biases for targets at centroids. Orientation attraction towards tangents to the clusters seemed to be involved. We conclude that orientation is subject to different contextual constraints from separation, and that bias towards the edges of clusters needs to be included in models of position coding.

A visual distracter task during adaptation reduces the proprioceptive movement aftereffect

Visual processing of basic perceptual attributes depends on attention. This has been well documented since the surprising initial report on attentional modulation of the visual motion aftereffect (Chaudhuri 1990). Here, we investigate proprioception and show for the first time that attention modulates adaptation to perceived limb movement. We used biceps vibration to induce illusory forearm extension in 10 participants and measured the aftereffect—perceived movement in the opposite direction. The aftereffect was largest when participants focused on the illusory extension during the adaptation period. To divert attention away from the illusory extension, a rapid serial visual presentation task was performed during the adaptation. The aftereffect was much smaller in this condition, indicating interference between the visual task and proprioceptive adaptation. In tests of an analogous interaction between audition and vision, earlier research found no effect. We suggest that conscious proprioception requires more attention than conscious processing of visual or auditory input.

Size perception by vision and kinesthesia

When two sizes, one perceived by vision and the other by kinesthesia, are apparently equal, the physical relationship between them varies: The sizes may be equal, or the visual size may be larger than the kinesthetic size, or vice versa. In this study, the method of cross-modal matching and the method of magnitude production were used to explore the relationship between apparently equal sizes (5–40 cm) perceived by vision and by kinesthesia. The sizes were linear or circular, and the mode of standard presentation was visual, kinesthetic, or verbal. The size and the direction of the intermodal mismatch varied with the size of the standard. It was also found that an apparent length of movement varied with the direction of movement. In all conditions, the relationship between apparently equal visual and kinesthetic sizes was well approximated by a power function.

Somatosensory space abridged: rapid change in tactile localization using a motion stimulus.

Introduction Organization of tactile input into somatotopic maps enables us to localize stimuli on the skin. Temporal relationships between stimuli are important in maintaining the maps and influence perceived locations of discrete stimuli. This points to the spatiotemporal stimulation sequences experienced as motion as a potential powerful organizing principle for spatial maps. We ask whether continuity of the motion determines perceived location of areas in the motion path using a novel tactile stimulus designed to ‘convince’ the brain that a patch of skin does not exist by rapidly skipping over it. Method Two brushes, fixed 9 cm apart, moved back and forth along the forearm (at 14.5 cm s−1), crossing a 10-cm long ‘occluder’, which prevented skin stimulation in the middle of the motion path. Crucially, only one brush contacted the skin at any one time, and the occluder was traversed almost instantaneously. Participants pointed with the other arm towards the felt location of the brush when it was briefly halted during repetitive motion, and also reported where they felt they had been brushed. Results Participants did not report the 10-cm gap in stimulation – the motion path was perceptually completed. Pointing results showed that brush path was ‘abridged’: locations immediately on either side of the occluder, as well as location at the ends of the brush path, were perceived to be >3 cm closer to each other than in the control condition (F(1,9) = 7.19; p = .025 and F(1,9) = 6.02, p = .037 respectively). This bias increased with prolonged stimulation. Conclusions An illusion of completion induced by our Abridging stimulus is accompanied by gross mislocalization, suggesting that motion determines perceived locations. The effect reveals the operation of Gestalt principles in touch and suggests the existence of dynamic maps that quickly adjust to the current input pattern.

Tactile Motion Adaptation Reduces Perceived Speed but Shows No Evidence of Direction Sensitivity

Introduction While the directionality of tactile motion processing has been studied extensively, tactile speed processing and its relationship to direction is little-researched and poorly understood. We investigated this relationship in humans using the ‘tactile speed aftereffect’ (tSAE), in which the speed of motion appears slower following prolonged exposure to a moving surface. Method We used psychophysical methods to test whether the tSAE is direction sensitive. After adapting to a ridged moving surface with one hand, participants compared the speed of test stimuli on the adapted and unadapted hands. We varied the direction of the adapting stimulus relative to the test stimulus. Results Perceived speed of the surface moving at 81 mms−1 was reduced by about 30% regardless of the direction of the adapting stimulus (when adapted in the same direction, Mean reduction = 23 mms−1, SD = 11; with opposite direction, Mean reduction = 26 mms−1, SD = 9). In addition to a large reduction in perceived speed due to adaptation, we also report that this effect is not direction sensitive. Conclusions Tactile motion is susceptible to speed adaptation. This result complements previous reports of reliable direction aftereffects when using a dynamic test stimulus as together they describe how perception of a moving stimulus in touch depends on the immediate history of stimulation. Given that the tSAE is not direction sensitive, we argue that peripheral adaptation does not explain it, because primary afferents are direction sensitive with friction-creating stimuli like ours (thus motion in their preferred direction should result in greater adaptation, and if perceived speed were critically dependent on these afferents’ response intensity, the tSAE should be direction sensitive). The adaptation that reduces perceived speed therefore seems to be of central origin.

Neck muscle vibration in full cues affects pointing.

Vibration of the dorsolateral neck stimulates proprioceptors that are normally active during head movement; this induces a visual illusion of contralateral motion and displacement of a stationary target seen against a homogenous background. The spatial constancy explanation of the illusion argues that it occurs because information about head movement is necessary for accurate egocentric localization of visual objects. Accurate egocentric localization, in turn, is necessary for the success of object-directed motor action, but previous studies failed to find evidence that vibration affects pointing toward visual targets in a normally illuminated, structured field. Our goal was to provide this evidence. Vibration lasting 12 s was applied to either side of the neck while observers (N = 11) pointed at the visual target with an unseen hand. Vibration of the right side of dorsal neck in the illuminated visual field induced a 26-mm lateral bias in pointing responses in comparison to the vibration of the left side. We conclude that the mechanism that takes into account neck proprioceptive signals also operates in full cues. The pointing bias in full cues generally co-occurred with reported stationariness of the visual target, suggesting a conflict between cues used in perception of body-centric position used to guide action, which include neck proprioception, and those used in perception of motion, for which object-relative retinal information is sufficient.

Eye movements cannot explain vibration-induced visual motion and motion aftereffect

Eye movements are thought to account for a number of visual motion illusions involving stationary objects presented against a featureless background or apparent motion of the whole visual field. We tested two different versions of the eye movement account: (a) the retinal slip explanation and (b) the nystagmus-suppression explanation, in particular their ability to account for visual motion experienced during vibration of the neck muscles, and for the visual motion aftereffect following vibration. We vibrated the neck (ventral sternocleidomastoid muscles, bilaterally, or right dorsal muscles) and measured eye movements in conjunction with perceived illusory displacement of an LED presented in complete darkness (N=10). To test the retinal-slip explanation, we compared the direction of slow eye movements to the direction of illusory motion of the visual target. To test the suppression explanation, we estimated the direction of suppressed slow-phase eye movements and compared it to the direction of illusory motion. Two main findings show that neither actual nor suppressed eye movements cause the illusory motion and motion aftereffect. Firstly, eye movements do not reverse direction when the illusory motion reverses after vibration stops. Secondly, there are large individual differences with regards to the direction of eye movements in observers who all experience a similar visual illusion. We conclude that, rather than eye movements, a more global spatial constancy mechanism that takes into account head movement is responsible for the illusion. The results also argue against the notion of a single central signal that determines both perceptual experience and oculomotor behaviour.