Tatsuhiko Abo

Ribosome rescue by Escherichia coli ArfA (YhdL) in the absence of trans-translation system

Although SsrA(tmRNA)‐mediated trans‐translation is thought to maintain the translation capacity of bacterial cells by rescuing ribosomes stalled on messenger RNA lacking an in‐frame stop codon, single disruption of ssrA does not crucially hamper growth of Escherichia coli. Here, we identified YhdL (renamed ArfA for alternative ribosome‐rescue factor) as a factor essential for the viability of E. coli in the absence of SsrA. The ssrA–arfA synthetic lethality was alleviated by SsrADD, an SsrA variant that adds a proteolysis‐refractory tag through trans‐translation, indicating that ArfA‐deficient cells require continued translation, rather than subsequent proteolysis of the truncated polypeptide. In accordance with this notion, depletion of SsrA in the ΔarfA background led to reduced translation of a model protein without affecting transcription, and puromycin, a codon‐independent mimic of aminoacyl‐tRNA, rescued the bacterial growth under such conditions. That ArfA takes over the role of SsrA was suggested by the observation that its overexpression enabled detection of the polypeptide encoded by a model non‐stop mRNA, which was otherwise SsrA‐tagged and degraded. In vitro, purified ArfA acted on a ribosome‐nascent chain complex to resolve the peptidyl‐tRNA. These results indicate that ArfA rescues the ribosome stalled at the 3′ end of a non‐stop mRNA without involving trans‐translation.

Escherichia coli YaeJ protein mediates a novel ribosome‐rescue pathway distinct from SsrA‐ and ArfA‐mediated pathways

Accumulation of stalled ribosomes at the 3′ end of mRNA without a stop codon (non‐stop mRNA) is supposed to be toxic to bacterial cells. Escherichia coli has at least two distinct systems to rescue such stalled ribosomes: SsrA‐dependent trans‐translation and ArfA‐dependent ribosome rescue. Combination of the ssrA and arfA mutations is synthetically lethal, suggesting the significance of ribosome rescue. In this study, we identified the E. coli yaeJ gene, encoding a peptide‐release factor homologue with GGQ motif, as a multicopy suppressor of the lethal phenotype of ssrA arfA double mutant. The YaeJ protein was shown to bind to ribosomes. Both in vivo and in vitro, YaeJ showed the ribosome‐rescue activity and promoted the hydrolysis of peptidyl‐tRNA residing in the stalled ribosome. Missense mutation in the GGQ motif or deletion of the C‐terminal unstructured tail abolished both the suppressor activity for ssrA arfA synthetic lethality and the ribosome‐rescue activity, suggesting the importance of these structural features. On the basis of these observations, we propose that YaeJ acts as a stop codon‐independent peptidyl‐tRNA hydrolysing factor through binding to ribosomes stalled at the 3′ end of non‐stop mRNAs. It was also suggested that ArfA and YaeJ rescue the stalled ribosomes by distinct mechanisms.

EAL Domain Protein YdiV Acts as an Anti-FlhD4C2 Factor Responsible for Nutritional Control of the Flagellar Regulon in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium

Flagellar operons are divided into three classes with respect to their transcriptional hierarchy in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The class 1 gene products FlhD and FlhC act together in an FlhD(4)C(2) heterohexamer, which binds upstream of the class 2 promoters to facilitate binding of RNA polymerase. In this study, we showed that flagellar expression was much reduced in the cells grown in poor medium compared to those grown in rich medium. This nutritional control was shown to be executed at a step after class 1 transcription. We isolated five Tn5 insertion mutants in which the class 2 expression was derepressed in poor medium. These insertions were located in the ydiV (cdgR) gene or a gene just upstream of ydiV. The ydiV gene is known to encode an EAL domain protein and to act as a negative regulator of flagellar expression. Gene disruption and complementation analyses revealed that the ydiV gene is responsible for nutritional control. Expression analysis of the ydiV gene showed that its translation, but not transcription, was enhanced by growth in poor medium. The ydiV mutation did not have a significant effect on either the steady-state level of flhDC mRNA or that of FlhC protein. Purified YdiV protein was shown in vitro to bind to FlhD(4)C(2) through interaction with FlhD subunit and to inhibit its binding to the class 2 promoter, resulting in inhibition of FlhD(4)C(2)-dependent transcription. Taking these data together, we conclude that YdiV is a novel anti-FlhD(4)C(2) factor responsible for nutritional control of the flagellar regulon.

ArfA recruits release factor 2 to rescue stalled ribosomes by peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis in Escherichia coli.

The ribosomes stalled at the end of non‐stop mRNAs must be rescued for productive cycles of cellular protein synthesis. Escherichia coli possesses at least three independent mechanisms that resolve non‐productive translation complexes (NTCs). While tmRNA (SsrA) mediates trans‐translation to terminate translation, ArfA (YhdL) and ArfB (YaeJ) induce hydrolysis of ribosome‐tethered peptidyl‐tRNAs. ArfB is a paralogue of the release factors (RFs) and directly catalyses the peptidyl‐tRNA hydrolysis within NTCs. In contrast, the mechanism of the ArfA action had remained obscure beyond its ability to bind to the ribosome. Here, we characterized the ArfA pathway of NTC resolution in vitro and identified RF2 as a factor that cooperates with ArfA to hydrolyse peptidyl‐tRNAs located in the P‐site of the stalled ribosome. This reaction required the GGQ (Gly–Gly–Gln) hydrolysis motif, but not the SPF (Ser–Pro–Phe) codon–recognition sequence, of RF2 and was stimulated by tRNAs. From these results we suggest that ArfA binds to the vacant A‐site of the stalled ribosome with possible aid from association with a tRNA, and then recruits RF2, which hydrolyses peptidyl‐tRNA in a GGQ motif‐dependent but codon‐independent manner. In support of this model, the ArfA‐RF2 pathway did not act on the SecM‐arrested ribosome, which contains an aminoacyl‐tRNA in the A‐site.

Two DNA Invertases Contribute to Flagellar Phase Variation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Strain LT2

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain LT2 possesses two nonallelic structural genes, fliC and fljB, for flagellin, the component protein of flagellar filaments. Flagellar phase variation occurs by alternative expression of these two genes. This is controlled by the inversion of a DNA segment, called the H segment, containing the fljB promoter. H inversion occurs by site-specific recombination between inverted repetitious sequences flanking the H segment. This recombination has been shown in vivo and in vitro to be mediated by a DNA invertase, Hin, whose gene is located within the H segment. However, a search of the complete genomic sequence revealed that LT2 possesses another DNA invertase gene that is located adjacent to another invertible DNA segment within a resident prophage, Fels-2. Here, we named this gene fin. We constructed hin and fin disruption mutants from LT2 and examined their phase variation abilities. The hin disruption mutant could still undergo flagellar phase variation, indicating that Hin is not the sole DNA invertase responsible for phase variation. Although the fin disruption mutant could undergo phase variation, fin hin double mutants could not. These results clearly indicate that both Hin and Fin contribute to flagellar phase variation in LT2. We further showed that a phase-stable serovar, serovar Abortusequi, which is known to possess a naturally occurring hin mutation, lacks Fels-2, which ensures the phase stability in this serovar.

Nascentome analysis uncovers futile protein synthesis in escherichia coli

Although co-translational biological processes attract much attention, no general and easy method has been available to detect cellular nascent polypeptide chains, which we propose to call collectively a “nascentome.” We developed a method to selectively detect polypeptide portions of cellular polypeptidyl-tRNAs and used it to study the generality of the quality control reactions that rescue dead-end translation complexes. To detect nascent polypeptides, having their growing ends covalently attached to a tRNA, cellular extracts are separated by SDS-PAGE in two dimensions, first with the peptidyl-tRNA ester bonds preserved and subsequently after their in-gel cleavage. Pulse-labeled nascent polypeptides of Escherichia coli form a characteristic line below the main diagonal line, because each of them had contained a tRNA of nearly uniform size in the first-dimension electrophoresis but not in the second-dimension. The detection of nascent polypeptides, separately from any translation-completed polypeptides or degradation products thereof, allows us to follow their fates to gain deeper insights into protein biogenesis and quality control pathways. It was revealed that polypeptidyl-tRNAs were significantly stabilized in E. coli upon dysfunction of the tmRNA-ArfA ribosome-rescuing system, whose function had only been studied previously using model constructs. Our results suggest that E. coli cells are intrinsically producing aberrant translation products, which are normally eliminated by the ribosome-rescuing mechanisms.

ArfA recognizes the lack of mRNA in the mRNA channel after RF2 binding for ribosome rescue

Although trans-translation mediated by tmRNA-SmpB has long been known as the sole system to relieve bacterial stalled ribosomes, ArfA has recently been identified as an alternative factor for ribosome rescue in Escherichia coli. This process requires hydrolysis of nascent peptidyl-tRNA by RF2, which usually acts as a stop codon-specific peptide release factor. It poses a fascinating question of how ArfA and RF2 recognize and rescue the stalled ribosome. Here, we mapped the location of ArfA in the stalled ribosome by directed hydroxyl radical probing. It revealed an ArfA-binding site around the neck region of the 30S subunit in which the N- and C-terminal regions of ArfA are close to the decoding center and the mRNA entry channel, respectively. ArfA and RF2 sequentially enter the ribosome stalled in either the middle or 3′ end of mRNA, whereas RF2 induces a productive conformational change of ArfA only when ribosome is stalled at the 3′ end of mRNA. On the basis of these results, we propose that ArfA functions as the sensor to recognize the target ribosome after RF2 binding.

The fail-safe system to rescue the stalled ribosomes in Escherichia coli

Translation terminates at stop codon. Without stop codon, ribosome cannot terminate translation properly and reaches and stalls at the 3′-end of the mRNA lacking stop codon. Bacterial tmRNA-mediated trans-translation releases such stalled ribosome and targets the protein product to degradation by adding specific “degradation tag.” Recently two alternative ribosome rescue factors, ArfA (YhdL) and ArfB (YaeJ), have been found in Escherichia coli. These three ribosome rescue systems are different each other in terms of molecular mechanism of ribosome rescue and their activity, but they are mutually related and co-operate to maintain the translation system in shape. This suggests the biological significance of ribosome rescue.