Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tatyana B. Nesterova is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tatyana B. Nesterova.


Cell | 2008

Cohesins functionally associate with CTCF on mammalian chromosome arms.

Vania Parelho; Mikhail Spivakov; Marion Leleu; Stephan Sauer; Heather C. Gregson; Adam Jarmuz; Claudia Canzonetta; Zoe Webster; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Bradley S. Cobb; Kyoko Yokomori; Niall Dillon; Luis Aragón; Amanda G. Fisher; Matthias Merkenschlager

Cohesins mediate sister chromatid cohesion, which is essential for chromosome segregation and postreplicative DNA repair. In addition, cohesins appear to regulate gene expression and enhancer-promoter interactions. These noncanonical functions remained unexplained because knowledge of cohesin-binding sites and functional interactors in metazoans was lacking. We show that the distribution of cohesins on mammalian chromosome arms is not driven by transcriptional activity, in contrast to S. cerevisiae. Instead, mammalian cohesins occupy a subset of DNase I hypersensitive sites, many of which contain sequence motifs resembling the consensus for CTCF, a DNA-binding protein with enhancer blocking function and boundary-element activity. We find cohesins at most CTCF sites and show that CTCF is required for cohesin localization to these sites. Recruitment by CTCF suggests a rationale for noncanonical cohesin functions and, because CTCF binding is sensitive to DNA methylation, allows cohesin positioning to integrate DNA sequence and epigenetic state.


Developmental Cell | 2003

Establishment of Histone H3 Methylation on the Inactive X Chromosome Requires Transient Recruitment of Eed-Enx1 Polycomb Group Complexes

Jose Silva; Winifred Mak; Ilona Zvetkova; Ruth Appanah; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Zoe Webster; Antoine H.F.M. Peters; Thomas Jenuwein; Arie P. Otte; Neil Brockdorff

Previous studies have implicated the Eed-Enx1 Polycomb group complex in the maintenance of imprinted X inactivation in the trophectoderm lineage in mouse. Here we show that recruitment of Eed-Enx1 to the inactive X chromosome (Xi) also occurs in random X inactivation in the embryo proper. Localization of Eed-Enx1 complexes to Xi occurs very early, at the onset of Xist expression, but then disappears as differentiation and development progress. This transient localization correlates with the presence of high levels of the complex in totipotent cells and during early differentiation stages. Functional analysis demonstrates that Eed-Enx1 is required to establish methylation of histone H3 at lysine 9 and/or lysine 27 on Xi and that this, in turn, is required to stabilize the Xi chromatin structure.


Cell | 1997

Stabilization of Xist RNA Mediates Initiation of X Chromosome Inactivation

Steven Sheardown; Sarah M. Duthie; Colette M. Johnston; Alistair E. T. Newall; Emma J Formstone; Ruth M Arkell; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Gian-Carlo Alghisi; Sohaila Rastan; Neil Brockdorff

The onset of X inactivation is preceded by a marked increase in the level of Xist RNA. Here we demonstrate that increased stability of Xist RNA is the primary determinant of developmental up-regulation. Unstable transcript is produced by both alleles in XX ES cells and in XX embryos prior to the onset of random X inactivation. Following differentiation, transcription of unstable RNA from the active X chromosome allele continues for a period following stabilization and accumulation of transcript on the inactive X allele. We discuss the implications of these findings in terms of models for the initiation of random and imprinted X inactivation.


Molecular Cell | 2016

Impairment of DNA Methylation Maintenance Is the Main Cause of Global Demethylation in Naive Embryonic Stem Cells

Ferdinand von Meyenn; Mario Iurlaro; Ehsan Habibi; Ning Qing Liu; Ali Salehzadeh-Yazdi; Fátima Santos; Edoardo Petrini; Inês Milagre; Miao Yu; Zhenqing Xie; Leonie I. Kroeze; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Joop H. Jansen; Hehuang Xie; Chuan He; Wolf Reik; Hendrik G. Stunnenberg

Summary Global demethylation is part of a conserved program of epigenetic reprogramming to naive pluripotency. The transition from primed hypermethylated embryonic stem cells (ESCs) to naive hypomethylated ones (serum-to-2i) is a valuable model system for epigenetic reprogramming. We present a mathematical model, which accurately predicts global DNA demethylation kinetics. Experimentally, we show that the main drivers of global demethylation are neither active mechanisms (Aicda, Tdg, and Tet1-3) nor the reduction of de novo methylation. UHRF1 protein, the essential targeting factor for DNMT1, is reduced upon transition to 2i, and so is recruitment of the maintenance methylation machinery to replication foci. Concurrently, there is global loss of H3K9me2, which is needed for chromatin binding of UHRF1. These mechanisms synergistically enforce global DNA hypomethylation in a replication-coupled fashion. Our observations establish the molecular mechanism for global demethylation in naive ESCs, which has key parallels with those operating in primordial germ cells and early embryos.


Cell | 1998

Developmentally Regulated Xist Promoter Switch Mediates Initiation of X Inactivation

Colette M Johnston; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Emma J. Formstone; Alistair E.T Newall; Sarah M. Duthie; Steven A Sheardown; Neil Brockdorff

Developmental regulation of the mouse Xist gene at the onset of X chromosome inactivation is mediated by RNA stabilization. Here, we show that alternate promoter usage gives rise to distinct stable and unstable RNA isoforms. Unstable Xist transcript initiates at a novel upstream promoter, whereas stable Xist RNA is transcribed from the previously identified promoter and from a novel downstream promoter. Analysis of cells undergoing X inactivation indicates that a developmentally regulated promoter switch mediates stabilization and accumulation of Xist RNA on the inactive X chromosome.


Cell Reports | 2015

A Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies Rbm15, Spen, and Wtap as Factors Required for Xist RNA-Mediated Silencing

Benoit Moindrot; Andrea Cerase; Heather Coker; Osamu Masui; Anne Grijzenhout; Greta Pintacuda; Lothar Schermelleh; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Neil Brockdorff

Summary X-chromosome inactivation is the process that evolved in mammals to equalize levels of X-linked gene expression in XX females relative to XY males. Silencing of a single X chromosome in female cells is mediated by the non-coding RNA Xist. Although progress has been made toward identifying factors that function in the maintenance of X inactivation, the primary silencing factors are largely undefined. We developed an shRNA screening strategy to produce a ranked list of candidate primary silencing factors. Validation experiments performed on several of the top hits identified the SPOC domain RNA binding proteins Rbm15 and Spen and Wtap, a component of the m6A RNA methyltransferase complex, as playing an important role in the establishment of Xist-mediated silencing. Localization analysis using super-resolution 3D-SIM microscopy demonstrates that these factors co-localize with Xist RNA within the nuclear matrix subcompartment, consistent with a direct interaction.


Epigenetics & Chromatin | 2008

Dicer regulates Xist promoter methylation in ES cells indirectly through transcriptional control of Dnmt3a.

Tatyana B. Nesterova; Bilyana C Popova; Bradley S Cobb; Sara Norton; Claire E. Senner; Y. Amy Tang; Thomas Spruce; Tristan A. Rodriguez; Takashi Sado; Matthias Merkenschlager; Neil Brockdorff

BackgroundX chromosome inactivation is the mechanism used in mammals to achieve dosage compensation of X-linked genes in XX females relative to XY males. Chromosome silencing is triggered in cis by expression of the non-coding RNA Xist. As such, correct regulation of the Xist gene promoter is required to establish appropriate X chromosome activity both in males and females. Studies to date have demonstrated co-transcription of an antisense RNA Tsix and low-level sense transcription prior to onset of X inactivation. The balance of sense and antisense RNA is important in determining the probability that a given Xist allele will be expressed, termed the X inactivation choice, when X inactivation commences.ResultsHere we investigate further the mechanism of Xist promoter regulation. We demonstrate that both sense and antisense transcription modulate Xist promoter DNA methylation in undifferentiated embryonic stem (ES) cells, suggesting a possible mechanistic basis for influencing X chromosome choice. Given the involvement of sense and antisense RNAs in promoter methylation, we investigate a possible role for the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway. We show that the Xist promoter is hypomethylated in ES cells deficient for the essential RNAi enzyme Dicer, but that this effect is probably a secondary consequence of reduced levels of de novo DNA methyltransferases in these cells. Consistent with this we find that Dicer-deficient XY and XX embryos show appropriate Xist expression patterns, indicating that Xist gene regulation has not been perturbed.ConclusionWe conclude that Xist promoter methylation prior to the onset of random X chromosome inactivation is influenced by relative levels of sense and antisense transcription but that this probably occurs independent of the RNAi pathway. We discuss the implications for this data in terms of understanding Xist gene regulation and X chromosome choice in random X chromosome inactivation.


Genome Biology | 2007

The impact of chromatin modifiers on the timing of locus replication in mouse embryonic stem cells

Helle F. Jørgensen; Véronique Azuara; Shannon Amoils; Mikhail Spivakov; Anna Terry; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Bradley S. Cobb; Bernard Ramsahoye; Matthias Merkenschlager; Amanda G. Fisher

BackgroundThe time of locus replication during S-phase is tightly regulated and correlates with chromatin state. Embryonic stem (ES) cells have an unusual chromatin profile where many developmental regulator genes that are not yet expressed are marked by both active and repressive histone modifications. This poised or bivalent state is also characterized by locus replication in early S-phase in ES cells, while replication timing is delayed in cells with restricted developmental options.ResultsHere we used a panel of mutant mouse ES cell lines lacking important chromatin modifiers to dissect the relationship between chromatin structure and replication timing. We show that temporal control of satellite DNA replication is sensitive to loss of a variety of chromatin modifiers, including Mll, Eed, Dnmt1, Suv39h1/h2 and Dicer. The replication times of many single copy loci, including a 5 Mb contiguous region surrounding the Rex1 gene, were retained in chromatin modifier mutant ES cells, although a subset of loci were affected.ConclusionThis analysis demonstrates the importance of chromatin modifiers for maintaining correct replication of satellite sequences in pluripotent ES cells and highlights the sensitivity of some single copy loci to the influence of chromatin modifiers. Abundant histone acetylation is shown to correlate well with early replication. Surprisingly, loss of DNA methylation or histone methylation was tolerated by many loci, suggesting that these modifications may be less influential for the timing of euchromatin replication.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014

Spatial separation of Xist RNA and polycomb proteins revealed by superresolution microscopy

Andrea Cerase; Daniel Smeets; Y. Amy Tang; Michal R. Gdula; Felix Kraus; Mikhail Spivakov; Benoit Moindrot; Marion Leleu; Anna Tattermusch; Justin Demmerle; Tatyana B. Nesterova; Catherine M. Green; Arie P. Otte; Lothar Schermelleh; Neil Brockdorff

Significance Polycomb repressor proteins are recruited to the inactive X chromosome in mammals, and this has been attributed to a biochemical interaction between the non–protein-coding RNA X-inactive specific transcript (Xist), which initiates the X inactivation process, and core polycomb subunits. We have studied this using a combination of genome mapping analysis and 3D structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) that allows 3D imaging with eightfold volumetric resolution improvement compared with previous state-of-the-art confocal microscopy. Our findings reveal that Xist-mediated recruitment of polycomb repressors does not correlate well with gene silencing and, moreover, that using 3D-SIM, polycomb proteins and Xist RNA show significant spatial separation. These observations challenge prevailing models and prompt a reappraisal of the role of Xist RNA in polycomb recruitment. In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is transcriptionally silenced to equalize X-linked gene dosage relative to XY males, a process termed X chromosome inactivation. Mechanistically, this is thought to occur via directed recruitment of chromatin modifying factors by the master regulator, X-inactive specific transcript (Xist) RNA, which localizes in cis along the entire length of the chromosome. A well-studied example is the recruitment of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), for which there is evidence of a direct interaction involving the PRC2 proteins Enhancer of zeste 2 (Ezh2) and Supressor of zeste 12 (Suz12) and the A-repeat region located at the 5′ end of Xist RNA. In this study, we have analyzed Xist-mediated recruitment of PRC2 using two approaches, microarray-based epigenomic mapping and superresolution 3D structured illumination microscopy. Making use of an ES cell line carrying an inducible Xist transgene located on mouse chromosome 17, we show that 24 h after synchronous induction of Xist expression, acquired PRC2 binding sites map predominantly to gene-rich regions, notably within gene bodies. Paradoxically, these new sites of PRC2 deposition do not correlate with Xist-mediated gene silencing. The 3D structured illumination microscopy was performed to assess the relative localization of PRC2 proteins and Xist RNA. Unexpectedly, we observed significant spatial separation and absence of colocalization both in the inducible Xist transgene ES cell line and in normal XX somatic cells. Our observations argue against direct interaction between Xist RNA and PRC2 proteins and, as such, prompt a reappraisal of the mechanism for PRC2 recruitment in X chromosome inactivation.


Molecular and Cellular Biology | 2013

Epigenetic Functions of Smchd1 Repress Gene Clusters on the Inactive X Chromosome and on Autosomes

Anne Valerie Gendrel; Y. Amy Tang; Masako Suzuki; Jonathan Godwin; Tatyana B. Nesterova; John M. Greally; Edith Heard; Neil Brockdorff

ABSTRACT The Smchd1 gene encodes a large protein with homology to the SMC family of proteins involved in chromosome condensation and cohesion. Previous studies have found that Smchd1 has an important role in CpG island (CGI) methylation on the inactive X chromosome (Xi) and in stable silencing of some Xi genes. In this study, using genome-wide expression analysis, we showed that Smchd1 is required for the silencing of around 10% of the genes on Xi, apparently independent of CGI hypomethylation, and, moreover, that these genes nonrandomly occur in clusters. Additionally, we found that Smchd1 is required for CpG island methylation and silencing at a cluster of four imprinted genes in the Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) locus on chromosome 7 and genes from the protocadherin-alpha and -beta clusters. All of the affected autosomal loci display developmentally regulated brain-specific methylation patterns which are lost in Smchd1 homozygous mutants. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the function of Smchd1 in epigenetic regulation of gene expression.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tatyana B. Nesterova's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Suren M. Zakian

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nina A. Mazurok

Russian Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge