Tatyana Feldman

Chemotherapy-Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Indolent B-Cell Malignancies Can Be Effectively Treated With Autologous T Cells Expressing an Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor

PURPOSE T cells can be genetically modified to express an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). We assessed the safety and efficacy of administering autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cells to patients with advanced CD19(+) B-cell malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS We treated 15 patients with advanced B-cell malignancies. Nine patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), two had indolent lymphomas, and four had chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients received a conditioning chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by a single infusion of anti-CD19 CAR T cells. RESULTS Of 15 patients, eight achieved complete remissions (CRs), four achieved partial remissions, one had stable lymphoma, and two were not evaluable for response. CRs were obtained by four of seven evaluable patients with chemotherapy-refractory DLBCL; three of these four CRs are ongoing, with durations ranging from 9 to 22 months. Acute toxicities including fever, hypotension, delirium, and other neurologic toxicities occurred in some patients after infusion of anti-CD19 CAR T cells; these toxicities resolved within 3 weeks after cell infusion. One patient died suddenly as a result of an unknown cause 16 days after cell infusion. CAR T cells were detected in the blood of patients at peak levels, ranging from nine to 777 CAR-positive T cells/μL. CONCLUSION This is the first report to our knowledge of successful treatment of DLBCL with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. These results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of treating chemotherapy-refractory B-cell malignancies with anti-CD19 CAR T cells. The numerous remissions obtained provide strong support for further development of this approach.

Early chemotherapy intensification with BEACOPP in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma patients with a interim-PET positive after two ABVD courses

Interim 2‐[18F]Fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose Positron Emission Tomography performed after two chemotherapy cycles (PET‐2) is the most reliable predictor of treatment outcome in ABVD‐treated Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients. We retrospectively analysed the treatment outcome of a therapeutic strategy based on PET‐2 results: positive patients switched to BEACOPP, while negative patients continued with ABVD. Between January 2006 and December 2007, 219 newly diagnosed HL patients admitted to nine centres were enrolled; 54 patients, unfit to receive this treatment were excluded from the analysis. PET‐2 scans were reviewed by a central panel of nuclear medicine experts, according to the Deauville score ( Meignan, 2009 ). After a median follow up of 34 months (12–52) the 2‐year failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival for the entire cohort of 165 patients were 88% and 98%; the FFS was 65% for PET‐2 positive and 92% for PET‐2 negative patients. For 154 patients in which treatment was correctly given according to PET‐2 review, the 2‐year FFS was 91%: 62% for PET‐2 positive and 95% for PET‐2 negative patients. Conclusions: this strategy, with BEACOPP intensification only in PET‐2 positive patients, showed better results than ABVD‐treated historic controls, sparing BEACOPP toxicity to the majority of patients (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier NCT00877747).

Lymphoma Remissions Caused by Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Are Associated With High Serum Interleukin-15 Levels

Purpose T cells genetically modified to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) targeting CD19 (CAR-19) have potent activity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia, but fewer results supporting treatment of lymphoma with CAR-19 T cells have been published. Patients with lymphoma that is chemotherapy refractory or relapsed after autologous stem-cell transplantation have a grim prognosis, and new treatments for these patients are clearly needed. Chemotherapy administered before adoptive T-cell transfer has been shown to enhance the antimalignancy activity of adoptively transferred T cells. Patients and Methods We treated 22 patients with advanced-stage lymphoma in a clinical trial of CAR-19 T cells preceded by low-dose chemotherapy. Nineteen patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, two patients had follicular lymphoma, and one patient had mantle cell lymphoma. Patients received a single dose of CAR-19 T cells 2 days after a low-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide plus fludarabine. Results The overall remission rate was 73% with 55% complete remissions and 18% partial remissions. Eleven of 12 complete remissions are ongoing. Fifty-five percent of patients had grade 3 or 4 neurologic toxicities that completely resolved. The low-dose chemotherapy conditioning regimen depleted blood lymphocytes and increased serum interleukin-15 (IL-15). Patients who achieved a remission had a median peak blood CAR+ cell level of 98/μL and those who did not achieve a remission had a median peak blood CAR+ cell level of 15/μL ( P = .027). High serum IL-15 levels were associated with high peak blood CAR+ cell levels ( P = .001) and remissions of lymphoma ( P < .001). Conclusion CAR-19 T cells preceded by low-dose chemotherapy induced remission of advanced-stage lymphoma, and high serum IL-15 levels were associated with the effectiveness of this treatment regimen. CAR-19 T cells will likely become an important treatment for patients with relapsed lymphoma.

Front‐line, dose‐escalated immunochemotherapy is associated with a significant progression‐free survival advantage in patients with double‐hit lymphomas: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

‘Double‐hit lymphomas’ (DHL), defined by concurrent MYC and BCL2 (or, alternatively, BCL6) rearrangements, have a very poor outcome compared to standard‐risk, diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Consequently, dose‐intensive (DI) therapies and/or consolidation with high‐dose therapy and transplant have been explored in DHL, although benefit has been debated. This meta‐analysis compared survival outcomes in DHL patients receiving dose‐escalated regimens [DI: R‐Hyper‐CVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) or R‐CODOX‐M/IVAC (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, high dose cytarabine); or intermediate‐dose: R‐EPOCH (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone)] versus standard‐dose regimens (R‐CHOP; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) in the first‐line setting. Data were synthesized to estimate hazard ratios of dose‐escalated treatments versus R‐CHOP using a Weibull proportional hazards model within a Bayesian meta‐analysis framework. Eleven studies examining 394 patients were included. Patients were treated with either front‐line R‐CHOP (n = 180), R‐EPOCH (n = 91), or R‐Hyper‐CVAD/rituximab, methotrexate, cytarabine (R‐M/C), R‐CODOX‐M/R‐IVAC (DI) (n = 123). Our meta‐analysis revealed that median progression‐free survival (n = 350) for the R‐CHOP, R‐EPOCH and DI groups was 12·1, 22·2, and 18·9 months, respectively. First‐line treatment with R‐EPOCH significantly reduced the risk of a progression compared with R‐CHOP (relative risk reduction of 34%; P = 0·032); however, overall survival (n = 374) was not significantly different across treatment approaches. A subset of patients might benefit from intensive induction with/without transplant. Further investigation into the role of transplant and novel therapy combinations is necessary.

Brentuximab Vedotin with Chemotherapy for Stage III or IV Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

BACKGROUND Brentuximab vedotin is an anti‐CD30 antibody–drug conjugate that has been approved for relapsed and refractory Hodgkins lymphoma. METHODS We conducted an open‐label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial involving patients with previously untreated stage III or IV classic Hodgkins lymphoma, in which 664 were assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (A+AVD) and 670 were assigned to receive doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). The primary end point was modified progression‐free survival (the time to progression, death, or noncomplete response and use of subsequent anticancer therapy) as adjudicated by an independent review committee. The key secondary end point was overall survival. RESULTS At a median follow‐up of 24.9 months, 2‐year modified progression‐free survival rates in the A+AVD and ABVD groups were 82.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.7 to 85.0) and 77.2% (95% CI, 73.7 to 80.4), respectively, a difference of 4.9 percentage points (hazard ratio for an event of progression, death, or modified progression, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; P=0.03). There were 28 deaths with A+AVD and 39 with ABVD (hazard ratio for interim overall survival, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.44 to 1.17]; P=0.19). All secondary efficacy end points trended in favor of A+AVD. Neutropenia occurred in 58% of the patients receiving A+AVD and in 45% of those receiving ABVD; in the A+AVD group, the rate of febrile neutropenia was lower among the 83 patients who received primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor than among those who did not (11% vs. 21%). Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 67% of patients in the A+AVD group and in 43% of patients in the ABVD group; 67% of patients in the A+AVD group who had peripheral neuropathy had resolution or improvement at the last follow‐up visit. Pulmonary toxicity of grade 3 or higher was reported in less than 1% of patients receiving A+AVD and in 3% of those receiving ABVD. Among the deaths that occurred during treatment, 7 of 9 in the A+AVD group were associated with neutropenia and 11 of 13 in the ABVD group were associated with pulmonary‐related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS A+AVD had superior efficacy to ABVD in the treatment of patients with advanced‐stage Hodgkins lymphoma, with a 4.9 percentage‐point lower combined risk of progression, death, or noncomplete response and use of subsequent anticancer therapy at 2 years. (Funded by Millennium Pharmaceuticals and Seattle Genetics; ECHELON‐1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01712490; EudraCT number, 2011‐005450‐60.)

Brentuximab vedotin or physician's choice in CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (ALCANZA): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas are rare, generally incurable, and associated with reduced quality of life. Present systemic therapies rarely provide reliable and durable responses. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin versus conventional therapy for previously treated patients with CD30-positive cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. METHODS In this international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial, we enrolled adult patients with CD30-positive mycosis fungoides or primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma who had been previously treated. Patients were enrolled across 52 centres in 13 countries. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by an interactive voice and web response system to receive intravenous brentuximab vedotin 1·8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks, for up to 16 3-week cycles, or physicians choice (oral methotrexate 5-50 mg once per week or oral bexarotene 300 mg/m2 once per day) for up to 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the intention-to-treat population achieving an objective global response lasting at least 4 months per independent review facility. Safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01578499. FINDINGS Between Aug 13, 2012, and July 31, 2015, 131 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a group (66 to brentuximab vedotin and 65 to physicians choice), with 128 analysed in the intention-to-treat population (64 in each group). At a median follow-up of 22·9 months (95% CI 18·4-26·1), the proportion of patients achieving an objective global response lasting at least 4 months was 56·3% (36 of 64 patients) with brentuximab vedotin versus 12·5% (eight of 64) with physicians choice, resulting in a between-group difference of 43·8% (95% CI 29·1-58·4; p<0·0001). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 27 (41%) of 66 patients in the brentuximab vedotin group and 29 (47%) of 62 patients in the physicians choice group. Peripheral neuropathy was seen in 44 (67%) of 66 patients in the brentuximab vedotin group (n=21 grade 2, n=6 grade 3) and four (6%) of 62 patients in the physicians choice group. One of the four on-treatment deaths was deemed by the investigator to be treatment-related in the brentuximab vedotin group; no on-treatment deaths were reported in the physicians choice group. INTERPRETATION Significant improvement in objective response lasting at least 4 months was seen with brentuximab vedotin versus physicians choice of methotrexate or bexarotene. FUNDING Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc (a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd), Seattle Genetics Inc.

Phase I trial of bortezomib in combination with rituximab-HyperCVAD alternating with rituximab, methotrexate and cytarabine for untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) outcomes have improved over the last two decades; however, late relapses occur. Bortezomib has shown single agent activity of 33% in relapsed MCL and has an additive/synergistic effect in vitro when combined with drugs currently used to treat MCL. We hypothesized that a combination of bortezomib with current intense non‐transplant chemoimmunotherapy might prevent late relapses. The toxicity of bortezomib when combined with methotrexate and cytarabine is unknown. Patients aged 18–79 years with untreated aggressive MCL were treated with R‐HyperCVAD (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, dexamethasone) alternating with rituximab‐methotrexate/cytarabine (R‐M/A). Bortezomib was added to the R‐Hyper‐CVAD combination as a fixed dose of 1·3 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 5 and was added to the R‐M/A regimen after rituximab, in increasing doses of 0·7, 1, and 1·3 mg/m2 in cohorts of three patients. Twenty patients were assessed for toxicity of the regimen. The principal toxicity was haematological and did not differ from that observed with a similar regimen without the bortezomib. In particular, there was no pulmonary or neurological dose‐limiting toxicity, showing that bortezomib can be safely combined with R‐HyperCVAD and R‐M/A.

Proteasome Inhibition and Combination Therapy for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Bench to Bedside

Although patients with B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) usually respond to initial conventional chemotherapy, they often relapse and mortality has continued to increase over the last three decades in spite of salvage therapy or high dose therapy and stem cell transplantation. Outcomes vary by subtype, but there continues to be a need for novel options that can help overcome chemotherapy resistance, offer new options as consolidation or maintenance therapy postinduction, and offer potentially less toxic combinations, especially in the elderly population. The bulk of these emerging novel agents for cancer treatment target important biological cellular processes. Bortezomib is the first in the class of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), which target the critical process of intracellular protein degradation or recycling and editing through the proteasome. Bortezomib is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. The mechanisms of proteasome inhibition are very complex by nature (because they affect many pathways) and not fully understood. However, mechanisms of action shared by bortezomib and investigational PIs such as carfilzomib, marizomib, ONX-0912, and MLN9708 are distinct from those of other NHL treatments, making them attractive options for combination therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that the PIs have additive and/or synergistic activity with a large number of agents both in vitro and in vivo, from cytotoxics to new biologicals, supporting a growing number of combination studies currently underway in NHL patients, as reviewed in this article. The results of these studies will help our understanding about how to best integrate proteasome inhibition in the management of NHL and continue to improve patient outcomes.

Post‐treatment (not interim) positron emission tomography‐computed tomography scan status is highly predictive of outcome in mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with R‐HyperCVAD

Although convincing data exist regarding the prognostic utility of positron emission tomographic (PET)‐computed tomographic (CT) imaging in Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma, its prognostic utility both during treatment and immediately after treatment have not been systematically evaluated in a large mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patient cohort to support its use in clinical practice.

Interim results of brentuximab vedotin in combination with nivolumab in patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma

In this phase 1/2 study, brentuximab vedotin (BV) and nivolumab (Nivo) administered in combination were evaluated as initial salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Patients received up to 4 cycles of combination treatment, with BV administered on day 1 and Nivo on day 8 of the first cycle. For cycles 2 to 4, BV and Nivo were both administered on day 1. After study treatment, responses were evaluated by investigators per the 2014 Lugano classification, and patients could proceed to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Sixty-two patients were enrolled; the complete response rate among all treated patients (n = 61) was 61%, with an objective response rate of 82%. Before ASCT, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 98% of patients, mostly grades 1 and 2. Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) occurred in 44% of patients overall, with 41% of patients experiencing an IRR during at least 1 infusion of BV. Five patients (8%) were treated with systemic steroids for immune-related AEs. A reduction of peripheral T-cell subsets including regulatory T cells was observed after the first dose of BV, and reduced serum levels of thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine concurrent with an increase in proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines were seen after the first BV plus Nivo infusions. The combination of BV plus Nivo was an active and well-tolerated first salvage regimen, potentially providing patients with R/R HL an alternative to traditional chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02572167.