Taylor A. Ochalek

Interim Buprenorphine vs. Waiting List for Opioid Dependence

In 50 opioid users on a waiting list for maintenance treatment, those assigned to interim treatment with buprenorphine submitted a higher percentage of urine specimens that were negative for illicit opioids than those in the control group at 4 weeks (88% vs. 0%), 8 weeks (84% vs. 0%), and 12 weeks (68% vs. 0%).

Bridging waitlist delays with interim buprenorphine treatment: Initial feasibility

Despite the effectiveness of agonist maintenance for opioid dependence, individuals can remain on waitlists for months, during which they are at significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Interim dosing, consisting of daily medication without counseling, can reduce these risks. In this pilot study, we examined the initial feasibility of a novel technology-assisted interim buprenorphine treatment for waitlisted opioid-dependent adults. Following buprenorphine induction during Week 1, participants (n=10) visited the clinic at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 to ingest their medication under staff observation, provide a urine specimen and receive their remaining doses via a computerized Med-O-Wheel Secure device. They also received daily monitoring via an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) platform, as well as random call-backs for urinalysis and medication adherence checks. The primary outcome was percent of participants negative for illicit opioids at each 2-week visit, with secondary outcomes of past-month drug use, adherence and acceptability. Participants achieved high levels of illicit opioid abstinence, with 90% abstinent at the Week 2 and 4 visits and 60% at Week 12. Significant reductions were observed in self-reported past-month illicit opioid use (p<.001), opioid withdrawal (p<.001), opioid craving (p<.001) and ASI Drug composite score (p=.008). Finally, adherence with buprenorphine administration (99%), daily IVR calls (97%) and random call-backs (82%) was high. Interim buprenorphine treatment shows promise for reducing patient and societal risks during delays to conventional treatment. A larger-scale, randomized clinical trial is underway to more rigorously examine the efficacy of this treatment approach.

Fentanyl exposure among patients seeking opioid treatment

AIM Overdoses attributed to the potent opioid agonist fentanyl have substantially increased in recent years. Despite these serious public health consequences, many opioid treatment providers do not currently include a fentanyl assay in their urine toxicology testing. As a result, extent of fentanyl exposure and related risks among individuals with opioid use disorder often remains unknown. We examined the prevalence of fentanyl exposure among patients seeking or enrolled in opioid agonist treatment. METHODS Six hundred urine specimens were collected from adults entering (n = 100) or enrolled in (n = 500) opioid agonist treatment and analyzed using the clinics standard opioid panel, supplemented with a 100 ng/ml fentanyl assay. RESULTS Of the 100 specimens collected from patients at treatment intake, 19 (19%) tested positive for fentanyl. Importantly, 17 (90%) of those fentanyl-positive specimens were also positive for heroin. Of the 500 collected from patients in treatment, 17 (3%) of specimens tested positive for fentanyl. Of those, 11 (92%) were also positive for heroin. CONCLUSION These data illustrate a concerning degree of fentanyl exposure among patients seeking treatment and suggest that much of this exposure may have stemmed from fentanyl-containing heroin. Given the unprecedented recent surges in fentanyl-related overdoses, efforts to identify fentanyl exposure are critical. In particular, the point of treatment entry permits a rare systematic opportunity for medical and clinical staff to address fentanyl use and risks with incoming patients.

Feasibility of an interactive voice response system for daily monitoring of illicit opioid use during buprenorphine treatment.

In-person retrospective timeline follow-back (TLFB) interviews are a well-established method for collecting self-reports of drug use from patients. However, this method can require significant staff and patient time. In the context of a randomized clinical trial evaluating interim buprenorphine dosing, we examined the feasibility of an interactive voice response (IVR) system for daily monitoring of illicit opioid use during buprenorphine treatment, with a focus on the agreement of illicit opioid use self-report data collected from the concurrent IVR methodology versus retrospective TLFB interviews. Participants (n = 24) received buprenorphine maintenance for 12 weeks and completed nightly IVR calls in which they reported illicit opioid use in the prior 24 hrs. At approximately weekly visits, they provided in-person TLFB reports of illicit opioid use. Levels of data collection were high for both IVR and TLFB methodologies (94.2% vs. 98.5%, respectively) and did not differ. Overall agreement between the 2 methods was high (97%), whereas Cohen’s kappa was moderate (k = 0.60). When self-report data were compared with urinalysis results for illicit opioid use, IVR and TLFB approaches both showed high specificity (∼99%), although sensitivity was greater for the TLFB method (48% and 69% for IVR and TLFB, respectively; p = .003). These pilot data suggest that an automated IVR approach may offer an efficient alternative for monitoring self-reported opioid use, especially in rural or resource-constrained settings. Additional efforts to understand and improve IVR sensitivity are warranted.

Promoting smoking abstinence among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Initial feasibility

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the U.S., with the majority of COPD deaths attributable to cigarette smoking. Despite this, individuals with COPD have a higher prevalence of smoking, poorer quit rates, and higher relapse rates compared to smokers without a COPD diagnosis. We examined the feasibility of an incentives-based intervention for producing an initial period of biochemically-verified smoking abstinence among daily smokers with COPD. Participants were randomly assigned to a Contingent (n = 13) or Noncontingent (n = 16) incentives condition and visited the clinic for 14 consecutive days. Contingent participants earned vouchers with monetary value contingent on breath carbon monoxide (CO) levels during Study Days 1–5 and urinary cotinine during Days 6–14. Voucher earnings began at

Interim buprenorphine treatment during delays to comprehensive treatment: Changes in psychiatric symptoms.

9.00 and increased by

A novel m Health application for improving HIV and Hepatitis C knowledge in individuals with opioid use disorder: A pilot study

1.50 with each subsequent negative sample for maximum possible of

Interim buprenorphine treatment for reducing illicit opioid use during treatment delays

362.50. Noncontingent participants received vouchers of comparable value independent of smoking status. Differences between conditions varied across study days for daily smoking abstinence (X2 = 45.27, p < 0.0001), CO (F(13, 280) = 1.95, p = 0.025), and cotinine (F(13, 279) = 2.20, p = 0.010), with generally higher rates of abstinence and lower CO and cotinine levels observed in the Contingent vs. Noncontingent conditions. Results from this randomized pilot study support the potential efficacy of an incentives-based intervention for reducing cigarette smoking among individuals with COPD. Further research efforts should seek to promote and evaluate longer-term abstinence and associated changes in respiratory function.

Improvement in psychiatric symptoms during interim buprenorphine treatment

Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and mood disorders among individuals with opioid use disorder far exceeds that of the general population. While psychiatric symptoms often improve upon entry into opioid treatment, this has typically been seen with treatments involving psychosocial counseling. In this secondary analysis, we examined changes in psychiatric symptoms during a randomized clinical trial evaluating an interim buprenorphine treatment without counseling among individuals awaiting entry into comprehensive treatment. Waitlisted adults with opioid use disorder (N = 50) were randomized to one of two 12-week conditions: interim buprenorphine treatment (IBT; n = 25) consisting of buprenorphine maintenance using a computerized medication dispenser, with bimonthly clinic visits and technology-assisted monitoring, or waitlist control (WLC; n = 25), wherein participants remained on the waitlist of their local clinic. All participants completed assessments of psychiatric symptoms at intake and Study Weeks 4, 8, and 12. We examined changes on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II), Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI), and Psychiatric subscale of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Significant group-by-time interactions were observed for all measures of psychiatric severity examined: BAI (p < .05), BDI-II (p < .01), 5 BSI subscales (ps < .05), and the ASI Psychiatric subscale (p < .05). On all measures, IBT participants reported significantly reduced psychiatric severity at the 4-, 8-, and 12-week assessments relative to baseline. In contrast, there were no significant changes in psychiatric symptoms among WLC participants. IBT without counseling may improve psychiatric distress among waitlisted individuals with opioid use disorder.

Within-subject evaluation of interim buprenorphine vs. waitlist on illicit opioid use

AIMS There is a critical need to reduce infectious disease transmission among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). Here we examine the ability of a novel, automated educational intervention, delivered via iPad in a single visit, to improve human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) knowledge among adults with OUD. METHODS Participants were 25 adults enrolled in a 12-week trial evaluating the efficacy of an Interim Buprenorphine Treatment for reducing illicit opioid use and other risk behaviors during delays to opioid treatment. Participants completed baseline HIV and HCV knowledge assessments with corrective feedback. They then completed an interactive HIV flipbook and HCV video followed by a second administration of the knowledge assessments. The knowledge assessments were repeated at post-intake Weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS At baseline, participants answered 69% and 65% of items correctly on the HIV and HCV assessments, respectively. The educational intervention was associated with significant increases in knowledge (86% and 86% correct on the HIV and HCV assessments, respectively; ps<.001). These improvements persisted throughout the study, with scores at Week 4 and 12 significantly greater than baseline (ps<.001). CONCLUSION This HIV+Hepatitis Education intervention was associated with significant and sustained improvements in knowledge of HIV + HCV transmission and risk behaviors in this vulnerable group of individuals with OUD. Given the continuing opioid epidemic, efforts are urgently needed to reduce HIV and HCV contraction and transmission among individuals with OUD. Mobile health educational interventions may offer a time- and cost-effective approach for addressing these risks.