Te Hung Chen

Indication for Splenectomy in the Era of Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

Although end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is often associated with splenomegaly and thrombocytopenia, splenectomy is not necessary in liver transplantation (OLT) except in special situations. In this paper, we examined the indications for splenectomy in the era of living-donor living transplantation. Six of 46 patients underwent splenectomies. Among them, one received a cadaveric graft. Three splenectomies were performed at 6, 7, and 44 days after OLT because of a huge spleen, massive ascites, or impaired liver function. The other two patients received simultaneous splenectomy during OLT to prevent rejection of ABO-incompatible grafts with a positive anti-T-cell test; and one, for postoperative therapy of hepatitis C. All six patients had a good response to splenectomy. We concluded that splenectomy may be indicated for recipients with severe thrombocytopenia, small-for-size syndrome, ABO incompatibility with positive anti-T/B-cell tests and post-OLT therapy for hepatitis C.

Hepatic Artery Reconstruction in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Running Suture Under Surgical Loupes by Cardiovascular Surgeons in 180 Recipients

OBJECTIVES The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes of hepatic artery (HA) reconstruction by cardiovascular surgeons in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT). METHODS From April 2007 to April 2011, 187 recipients underwent A-A LDLT. After excluding seven ABO-incompatible transplant recipients, we reviewed the courses of 180 patients including 125 men and 55 women of mean age 52.5±9.2 years (range=23-71). One hundred seventy-seven patients received right-lobe grafts with inclusion of middle hepatic vein (MHV); two, right-lobe grafts without MHV; and one, left-lobe graft. A continuous, single-stitch, running suture with the parachute technique was used for HA reconstruction. The anastomosis was performed by cardiovascular surgeons employing surgical loupes with 4.5× magnification. RESULTS The mean time for an arterial reconstruction was 10.7±4.0 minutes (median=10, range=4-30). Hepatic arterial thrombosis (HAT) was encountered in 3 (1.66%) patients. One HAT that developed on postoperative day 1 was successfully rescued by the intra-arterial infusion of urokinase. Another patient required reoperation due to a redundant kinked HA. A third HAT patient underwent successful retransplantation with a cadaveric graft on postoperative day 6. In our series, no delayed HAT was detected and no recipient deaths were related to HAT. CONCLUSION HA reconstruction with a running suture under surgical loupes is a feasible technique in A-A LDLT. A speedy reconstruction can be performed by an experienced cardiovascular surgeon with a low incidence of HAT.

A high model for end-stage liver disease score should not be considered a contraindication to living donor liver transplantation

OBJECTIVE To analyze the outcomes of patients with high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores who underwent adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation (A-A LDLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS From September 2002 to October 2010, a total of 152 adult patients underwent A-A LDLT in our institution. Recipients were stratified into a low MELD score group (Group L; MELD score≤30) and a high MELD score group (Group H; MELD score>30) to compare short-term and long-term outcomes. RESULTS Of the 152 adult patients who underwent A-A LDLT, 9 were excluded from the analysis because they received ABO-incompatible grafts. Group H comprised 23 and Group L 120 patients. The median follow-up was 21.5 months (range, 3 to 102 m). The mean MELD score was 15.6 in Group L and 36.7 in Group H. There were no significant differences in the mean length of stay in the intensive care unit (Group L: 3.01 days vs Group H: 3.09 days, P=.932) or mean length of hospital stay (Group L: 17.89 days vs. Group H: 19.91 days, P=0.409). There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, or 5-year survivals between patients in Groups L versus H (91.5% vs 94.7%; 86.4% vs 94.7%; and 86.4% vs 94.7%; P=.3476, log rank). CONCLUSION The short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with high MELD scores who underwent A-A LDLT were similar to those of patients with low MELD scores. Therefore, we suggest that high MELD scores are not a contraindication to LDLT.

Successful use of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive liver grafts - an effective source for donor organs in endemic areas: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND Due to high prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Taiwan, liver grafts from donors positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) without progressive disease can be effective alternative source of donor organs. This study aims to prove the safety of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using HBsAg-positive liver grafts and its long-term outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS We studied 14 consecutive LDLT recipients that received HBsAg-positive grafts from November 2009 to December 2013 for various indications. All donors were chronic HBsAg carriers with normal liver function tests. Median follow-up was 46 months (range, 35-59). RESULTS All the donors and recipients recovered well post-transplant with no reactivation of HBV to date. Two of the recipients died due to extra-hepatic recurrence of HCC. At median follow-up of 46 months, 4-year cumulative survival of recipients was 77.38%. CONCLUSIONS In endemic areas, HBsAg-positive donor organs can clearly be used effectively under viral immunoprophylaxis. HBV disease reactivation does not appear to be a threat even with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-free antiviral monoprophylaxis regimen. This study thus proves the safety and feasibility of the option of using HBsAg-positive grafts in high-prevalence areas.

Fibrinolysis after reperfusion of liver graft

From September 2012 to March 2013, a total of 63 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantations were performed at our institution. All the patients were monitored for their coagulation functions using rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Tem Innovations GmbH) during the procedure at the following points: preoperative baseline, 5 minutes, 30 minutes, and 120 minutes, respectively, after reperfusion of the liver graft. A total of 84.13% of cases (n = 53) revealed fibrinolysis after reperfusion of the graft and the condition was reversed after 30 minutes without any need for additional treatment. No significant coagulopathy was observed during this period in all of the cases. The result of the ROTEM finding must correlate with the clinical situation before instituting any management to avoid the risk of thrombosis of the hepatic artery.

Innovative Technique to Reconstruct Two Branches of the Right Hepatic Artery in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Hepatic arterial thrombosis is a critical complication in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Two separate branches of the right hepatic artery (RHA) are sometimes observed and addressed by anastomosis of the larger branch first, then checking backflow from the smaller branch. If not good, the smaller branch must be reconstructed. We used the cystic artery as a conduit for the reconstruction. Meticulous dissection was performed to identify all branches of the hepatic artery in the donor operation. The length of cystic artery preserved was as long as possible. The cystic arterial stump was anastomosed to the stump of the posterior branch the of RHA under microscopic guidance on the back table. Patency was checked through the stump of the anterior branch of the RHA. With this technique, only one orifice, the stump of right anterior hepatic artery, was used for hepatic artery reconstruction. We have performed this technique in two patients. Both had good arterial flow after living donor liver transplantation. This innovative technique is easy and safe, and requires only one anastomosis, which, in theory, decreases the adds of developing hepatic arterial thrombosis.

Living Donor Right Hepatectomy With Inclusion of the Middle Hepatic Vein: Outcome in 200 Donors

Venous congestion of segments V and VIII of the graft is observed frequently in right-lobe living donor liver transplants (LDLT) without middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage. It can cause graft dysfunction and failure. Inclusion of the MHV in the right lobe graft allows optimal venous drainage but can pose adverse effects for the donor. From May 2005 to April 2011, we performed 202 right-lobe LDLTs using grafts that all (except two) contained the MHV. The mean duration of donor surgery was 558±132 minutes (median 540, range 332-1100), and estimated blood loss 441±309 mL (median 350, range 35-3200). No donor was admitted to the intensive care unit postoperatively. The mean hospital stay was 8.7±2.1 days (median 8, range 6-22). Postoperatively, 39 donors (19.5%) experienced Clavien grade I and II complications, mostly minor wound infections or massive ascites necessitating diuretic therapy. Seven (3.5%) donors displayed Clavien grade III complications, including five bile leakages requiring endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage and two abdominal wound dehiscences requiring repair under general anesthesia. There was no donor death. In conclusion, inclusion of the MHV in a right-lobe LDLT was safe for most donors.

Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation From Different Living Donors

OBJECTIVES To present our experience with simultaneous living donor liver and kidney (SLK) transplantation from two different living donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed five SLK transplantations from two different living donors from November 2006 to December 2010. Four patients were males and one, female. Their age range was 47 to 66 years (mean, 55 years). The primary liver diseases included hepatitis B virus (n=2), alcoholic liver cirrhosis (n=2), cryptogenic liver disease (n=1), and hepatitis C virus with hepatocellular carcinoma (n=1). All five patients had chronic renal failure: four were on hemodialysis (H/D) and one on chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis for 1 to 20 years. Liver implantation was performed first, followed by kidney transplantation. The liver and kidney teams worked closely to shorten the ischemia time. RESULTS All surgical procedures were performed uneventfully and all recipients and donors survived the operations. Good liver graft function was noted in all five patients. The patient with both anti-T- and anti-B-cell positive crossmatch tests developed hyperacute rejection of the kidney graft requiring its immediate removal. This patient was maintained on regular H/D afterward. The other four patients displayed good renal function. No evidence of severe acute rejection was noted during the follow-up period (range, 9-55 months) among patients treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. CONCLUSION We suggest that SLK transplantation be performed with organs from two different instead of a single live donor.

Assessing the safety of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene synthetic grafts in living donor liver transplantation: Graft migration into hollow viscous organs – Diagnosis and treatment options

Background Our recent studies have highlighted the importance and safety of backtable venoplasty for middle hepatic vein (MHV) and inferior right hepatic veins (IRHV) reconstruction using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts. In this study, we aim to analyze the complications associated with ePTFE graft use and discuss the management of the rare, but, potentially life threatening complications directly related to ePTFE conduits. Material/Methods From January 2012 to October 2015 a total of 397 patients underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The ePTFE vascular grafts were used during the backtable venoplasty for outflow reconstruction in 262 of the liver allografts. Recipients who developed ePTFE-related complications were analyzed. Results ePTFE-related complications developed in 1.52% (4/262) of the patients. One patient (0.38%) developed complete thrombosis with sepsis at 24 months post-transplantation and died due to multiorgan failure. Three patients (1.1%) developed graft migration into the second portion of the duodenum, without overt peritonitis. Surgical exploration and ePTFE graft removal was done in all the patients. One patient died due to overwhelming sepsis. Conclusions ePTFE graft migration into the duodenum causing perforation is a new set of complications that has been recently described in LDLT and can be treated effectively by surgical removal of the infected vascular graft and duodenal perforation closure. Despite of such complications, in our experience, ePTFE use in LDLT continues to have wide safety margin, with a complication rate of only 1.52%.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation using surgical loupes: Achieving low rate of hepatic arterial thrombosis in 741 consecutive recipients—tips and tricks to overcome the poor hepatic arterial flow

The reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) is the most complex step in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because of the smaller diameter of the artery and the increased risk of HA‐related complications. Because of the smaller diameter of the HA, many centers use a microsurgical technique with interrupted sutures for arterial anastomosis. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes after HA reconstruction performed under magnifying loupes using the “parachute technique.” From August 1, 2002 to August 31, 2016, LDLT was performed in 766 recipients. HA reconstruction for the initial 25 LDLT surgeries was performed using a microsurgery technique (era 1). From May 2007 until the end date, HA reconstruction was performed in 741 recipients by a “parachute technique” under surgical loupes (era 2). HA reconstruction was performed using surgical loupes in 737 adults (male:female, 526:211) and 4 pediatric patients (male:female, 3:1). The average diameter of the donor graft HA was 2.8 mm (range, 1‐6.5 mm). The most notable factor in this era was the quick HA anastomosis procedure with a mean time of 10 ± 5 minutes (range, 5‐30 minutes). In era 2, 9 (1.21%) patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), whereas 2 patients developed nonthrombotic HA‐related complications. Extra‐anatomic HA reconstruction was performed in 14 patients due to either primary HA anastomosis failure or a poor caliber recipient HA. The use of magnifying surgical loupes to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields a low incidence of HA‐related complications. The “parachute technique” for HA reconstruction can achieve a speedy reconstruction without increasing the risk of HAT. Liver Transplantation 23 887–898 2017 AASLD.