Terence A. Ketter

Mood Disorders in the Medically Ill: Scientific Review and Recommendations

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this review is to assess the relationship between mood disorders and development, course, and associated morbidity and mortality of selected medical illnesses, review evidence for treatment, and determine needs in clinical practice and research. DATA SOURCES Data were culled from the 2002 Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance Conference proceedings and a literature review addressing prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. This review also considered the experience of primary and specialty care providers, policy analysts, and patient advocates. The review and recommendations reflect the expert opinion of the authors. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION Reviews of epidemiology and mechanistic studies were included, as were open-label and randomized, controlled trials on treatment of depression in patients with medical comorbidities. Data on study design, population, and results were extracted for review of evidence that includes tables of prevalence and pharmacological treatment. The effect of depression and bipolar disorder on selected medical comorbidities was assessed, and recommendations for practice, research, and policy were developed. CONCLUSIONS A growing body of evidence suggests that biological mechanisms underlie a bidirectional link between mood disorders and many medical illnesses. In addition, there is evidence to suggest that mood disorders affect the course of medical illnesses. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtms) improves mood in depression

Converging evidence points to hypofunction of the left prefrontal cortex in depression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) activates neurons near the surface of the brain. We questioned whether daily left prefrontal rTMS might improve mood in depressed subjects and report a pilot study of such treatment in six highly medication-resistant depressed inpatients. Depression scores significantly improved for the group as a whole (Hamilton Depression Scores decreased from 23.8 ± 4.2 (s.d.) at baseline to 17.5 ± 8.4 after treatment; t = 3.03, 5DF, p = 0.02, two-tailed paired t-test). Two subjects showed robust mood improvement which occurred progressively over the course of several weeks. In one subject, depression symptoms completely remitted for the first time in 3 years. Daily left prefrontal rTMS appears to be safe, well tolerated and may alleviate depression.

Rationale, design, and methods of the systematic treatment enhancement program for bipolar disorder (STEP-BD)

The Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) was conceived in response to a National Institute of Mental Health initiative seeking a public health intervention model that could generate externally valid answers to treatment effectiveness questions related to bipolar disorder. STEP-BD, like all effectiveness research, faces many design challenges, including how to do the following: recruit a representative sample of patients for studies of readily available treatments; implement a common intervention strategy across diverse settings; determine outcomes for patients in multiple phases of illness; make provisions for testing as yet undetermined new treatments; integrate adjunctive psychosocial interventions; and avoid biases due to subject drop-out and last-observation-carried-forward data analyses. To meet these challenges, STEP-BD uses a hybrid design to collect longitudinal data as patients make transitions between naturalistic studies and randomized clinical trials. Bipolar patients of every subtype with age >/= 15 years are accessioned into a study registry. All patients receive a systematic assessment battery at entry and are treated by a psychiatrist (trained to deliver care and measure outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder) using a series of model practice procedures consistent with expert recommendations. At every follow-up visit, the treating psychiatrist completes a standardized assessment and assigns an operationalized clinical status based on DSM-IV criteria. Patients have independent evaluations at regular intervals throughout the study and remain under the care of the same treating psychiatrist while making transitions between randomized care studies and the standard care treatment pathways. This article reviews the methodology used for the selection and certification of the clinical treatment centers, training study personnel, the general approach to clinical management, and the sequential treatment strategies offered in the STEP-BD standard and randomized care pathways for bipolar depression and relapse prevention.

A placebo-controlled study of lamotrigine and gabapentin monotherapy in refractory mood disorders.

There is a pressing need for additional treatment options for refractory mood disorders. This controlled comparative study evaluated the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and gabapentin (GBP) monotherapy versus placebo (PLC). Thirty-one patients with refractory bipolar and unipolar mood disorders participated in a double-blind, randomized, crossover series of three 6-week monotherapy evaluations including LTG, GBP, and PLC. There was a standardized blinded titration to assess clinical efficacy or to determine the maximum tolerated daily dose (LTG 500 mg or GBP 4,800 mg). The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impressions Scale (CGI) for Bipolar Illness as supplemented by other standard rating instruments. The mean doses at week 6 were 274 +/- 128 mg for LTG and 3,987 +/- 856 mg for GBP. Response rates (CGI ratings of much or very much improved) were the following: LTG, 52% (16/31); GBP, 26% (8/31); and PLC, 23% (7/31) (Cochrans Q = 6.952, df = 2, N = 31, p = 0.031). Post hoc Q differences (df = 1, N = 31) were the following: LTG versus GBP (Qdiff = 5.33, p = 0.011); LTG versus PLC (Qdiff = 4.76, p = 0.022); and GBP versus PLC (Qdiff = 0.08, p = 0.70). With respect to anticonvulsant dose and gender, there was no difference between the responders and the nonresponders. The agents were generally well tolerated. This controlled investigation preliminarily suggests the efficacy of LTG in treatment-refractory affectively ill patients. Further definition of responsive subtypes and the role of these medications in the treatment of mood disorders requires additional study.

The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Task Force Report on Antidepressant Use in Bipolar Disorders

OBJECTIVE The risk-benefit profile of antidepressant medications in bipolar disorder is controversial. When conclusive evidence is lacking, expert consensus can guide treatment decisions. The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) convened a task force to seek consensus recommendations on the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorders. METHOD An expert task force iteratively developed consensus through serial consensus-based revisions using the Delphi method. Initial survey items were based on systematic review of the literature. Subsequent surveys included new or reworded items and items that needed to be rerated. This process resulted in the final ISBD Task Force clinical recommendations on antidepressant use in bipolar disorder. RESULTS There is striking incongruity between the wide use of and the weak evidence base for the efficacy and safety of antidepressant drugs in bipolar disorder. Few well-designed, long-term trials of prophylactic benefits have been conducted, and there is insufficient evidence for treatment benefits with antidepressants combined with mood stabilizers. A major concern is the risk for mood switch to hypomania, mania, and mixed states. Integrating the evidence and the experience of the task force members, a consensus was reached on 12 statements on the use of antidepressants in bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS Because of limited data, the task force could not make broad statements endorsing antidepressant use but acknowledged that individual bipolar patients may benefit from antidepressants. Regarding safety, serotonin reuptake inhibitors and bupropion may have lower rates of manic switch than tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants and norepinephrine-serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The frequency and severity of antidepressant-associated mood elevations appear to be greater in bipolar I than bipolar II disorder. Hence, in bipolar I patients antidepressants should be prescribed only as an adjunct to mood-stabilizing medications.

Psychiatric phenomenology of child and adolescent bipolar offspring.

OBJECTIVE To establish prodromal signs of and risk factors for childhood bipolar disorder (BD) by characterizing youths at high risk for BD. METHOD Structured diagnostic interviews were performed on 60 biological offspring of at least one parent with BD. Demographics, family histories, and parental history of childhood disruptive behavioral disorders were also assessed. RESULTS Fifty-one percent of bipolar offspring had a psychiatric disorder, most commonly attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), major depression or dysthymia, and BD. BD in offspring tended to be associated with earlier parental symptom onset when compared with offspring without a psychiatric diagnosis. Bipolar parents with a history of childhood ADHD were more likely to have children with BD, but not ADHD. Offspring with bilineal risk had increased severity of depressed and irritable mood, lack of mood reactivity, and rejection sensitivity, while severity of grandiosity, euphoric mood, and decreased need for sleep were not preferentially associated with such offspring. CONCLUSIONS Bipolar offspring have high levels of psychopathology. Parental history of early-onset BD and/or childhood ADHD may increase the risk that their offspring will develop BD. Prodromal symptoms of childhood BD may include more subtle presentations of mood regulation difficulties and less presence of classic manic symptoms.

Volumetric neuroimaging investigations in mood disorders: bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND As patients with mood disorders manifest heterogeneity in phenomenology, pathophysiology, etiology, and treatment response, a biological classification of mental disease is urgently needed to advance research. Patient and methodological variability complicates the comparison of neuroimaging study results and limits heuristic model development and a biologically-based diagnostic schema. OBJECTIVE We have critically reviewed and compared the magnetic resonance neuroimaging literature to determine the degree and directionality of volumetric changes in brain regions putatively implicated in the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD) versus bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS A total of 140 published magnetic resonance imaging investigations evaluating subjects with BD or MDD were selected to provide a summary and interpretation of volumetric neuroimaging results in MDD and BD. Further commentary on the pathophysiological implications, and putative cellular and pharmacological mechanisms, is also provided. RESULTS While whole brain volumes of patients with mood disorders do not differ from those of healthy controls, regional deficits in the frontal lobe, particularly in the anterior cingulate and the orbitofrontal cortex, appear to consistently differentiate subjects with mood disorders from the general population. Preliminary findings also suggest that subcortical structures, particularly the striatum, amygdala, and hippocampus, may be differentially affected in MDD and BD. CONCLUSIONS Structural neuroimaging studies have consistently identified regional abnormalities in subjects with mood disorders. Future studies should strive to definitively establish the influence of age and medication.

Effects of mood and subtype on cerebral glucose metabolism in treatment-resistant bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND Functional brain imaging studies in unipolar and secondary depression have generally found decreased prefrontal cortical activity, but in bipolar disorders findings have been more variable. METHODS Forty-three medication-free, treatment-resistant, predominantly rapid-cycling bipolar disorder patients and 43 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects had cerebral glucose metabolism assessed using positron emission tomography and fluorine-18-deoxyglucose. RESULTS Depressed bipolar disorder patients compared to control subjects had decreased global, absolute prefrontal and anterior paralimbic cortical, and increased normalized subcortical (ventral striatum, thalamus, right amygdala) metabolism. Degree of depression correlated negatively with absolute prefrontal and paralimbic cortical, and positively with normalized anterior paralimbic subcortical metabolism. Increased normalized cerebello-posterior cortical metabolism was seen in all patient subgroups compared to control subjects, independent of mood state, disorder subtype, or cycle frequency. CONCLUSIONS In bipolar depression, we observed a pattern of prefrontal hypometabolism, consistent with observations in primary unipolar and secondary depression, suggesting this is part of a common neural substrate for depression independent of etiology. In contrast, the cerebello-posterior cortical normalized hypermetabolism seen in all bipolar subgroups (including euthymic) suggests a possible congenital or acquired trait abnormality. The degree to which these findings in treatment-resistant, predominantly rapid-cycling patients pertain to community samples remains to be established.

Decreased dorsolateral prefrontal N-acetyl aspartate in bipolar disorder.

Background: N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) is an amino acid present in high concentrations in neurons and is thus a putative neuronal marker. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) studies have shown lower NAA concentrations in patients with various neurodegenerative disorders, suggesting decreased neuronal number, size, or function. Dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) NAA has not been extensively assessed in bipolar disorder patients, but it could be decreased in view of consistent reports of decreased DLPF cerebral blood flow and metabolism in mood disorders. We measured DLPF NAA in patients with bipolar disorder and healthy control subjects using in vivo 1H MRS. Methods: We obtained ratios of NAA, choline, and myoinositol (mI) to creatine-phosphocreatine (Cr-PCr) in bilateral DLPF 8-mL voxels of 20 bipolar patients (10 Bipolar I, 10 Bipolar II) and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects using 1H MRS. Results: DLPF NAA/Cr-PCr ratios were lower on the right hemisphere(p < .03) and the left hemisphere (p < .003) in bipolar disorder patients compared with healthy control subjects. Conclusions: These preliminary data suggest that bipolar disorder patients have decreased DLPF NAA/Cr-PCr. This finding could represent decreased neuronal density or neuronal dysfunction in the DLPF region.

Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop

The Stroop interference test requires a person to respond to specific elements of a stimulus while suppressing a competing response. Previous positron emission tomography (PET) work has shown increased activity in the right anterior cingulate gyrus during the Stroop test. It is unclear, however, whether the anterior cingulate participates more in the attentional rather than the response selection aspects of the task or whether different interference stimuli might activate different brain regions. We sought to determine (1) whether the Stroop interference task causes increased activation in the right anterior cingulate as previously reported, (2) whether this activation varied as a function of response time, (3) what brain regions were functionally linked to the cingulate during performance of the Stroop, and (4) whether a modified Stroop task involving emotionally distracting words would activate the cingulate and other limbic and paralimbic regions. Twenty‐one healthy volunteers were scanned with H215O PET while they performed the Stroop interference test (standard Stroop), a modified Stroop task using distracting words with sad emotional content (sad Stroop), and a control task of naming colors. These were presented in a manner designed to maximize the response selection aspects of the task. Images were stereotactically normalized and analyzed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Predictably, subjects were significantly slower during the standard Stroop than the sad Stroop or the control task. The left mideingulate region robustly activated during the standard Stroop compared to the control task. The sad Stroop activated this same region, but to a less significant degree. Correlational regional network analysis revealed an inverse relationship between activation in the left mideingulate and the left insula and temporal lobe. Additionally, activity in different regions of the cingulate gyrus correlated with performance speed during the standard Stroop. These results suggest that the left midcingulate is likely to be part of a neural network activated when one attempts to override a competing verbal response. Finally, the left midcingulate region appears to be functionally coupled to the left insula, temporal, and frontal cortex during cognitive interference tasks involving language. These results underscore the important role of the cingulate gyrus in selecting appropriate and suppressing inappropriate verbal responses.