Teresa Bastante

Effect of Early Metoprolol on Infarct Size in ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) Trial

Background —The effect of β-blockers on infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We hypothesize that metoprolol reduces infarct size when administered early (intravenously [i.v.] before reperfusion). Methods and Results —Patients with Killip-class ≤II anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI within 6 hours of symptoms onset were randomized to receive i.v. metoprolol (n=131) or not (control, n=139) pre-reperfusion. All patients without contraindications received oral metoprolol within 24 hours. The pre-defined primary endpoint was infarct size on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 5-7 days after STEMI. MRI was performed in 220 patients (81%). Mean (±SD) infarct size by MRI was smaller after i.v. metoprolol compared to control (25.6±15.3 vs. 32.0±22.2 grams; adjusted difference, -6.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.39 to -1.78; P=0.012). In patients with pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 0/1, the adjusted treatment difference in infarct size was -8.02; 95% CI, -13.01 to -3.02; P=0.0029. Infarct size estimated by peak and area under the curve creatine-kinase release was measured in all study population and was significantly reduced by i.v. metoprolol. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the i.v. metoprolol group (adjusted difference 2.67%; 95% CI, 0.09% to 5.21%; P=0.045). The composite of death, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, atrioventricular block and reinfarction at 24 hours in the i.v. metoprolol and control groups respectively was 7.1% vs. 12.3%, p=0.21. Conclusions —In patients with anterior Killip-class ≤II STEMI undergoing primary PCI, early i.v. metoprolol before reperfusion reduced infarct size and increased LVEF with no excess of adverse events during the first 24 hours after STEMI. Clinical Trial Registration Information —ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: [NCT01311700][1] & EUDRACT Number 2010-019939-35. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01311700&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2Fearly%2F2013%2F09%2F03%2FCIRCULATIONAHA.113.003653.atomBackground— The effect of &bgr;-blockers on infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. We hypothesize that metoprolol reduces infarct size when administered early (intravenously before reperfusion). Methods and Results— Patients with Killip class II or less anterior ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 hours of symptoms onset were randomized to receive intravenous metoprolol (n=131) or not (control, n=139) before reperfusion. All patients without contraindications received oral metoprolol within 24 hours. The predefined primary end point was infarct size on magnetic resonance imaging performed 5 to 7 days after STEMI. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 220 patients (81%). Mean±SD infarct size by magnetic resonance imaging was smaller after intravenous metoprolol compared with control (25.6±15.3 versus 32.0±22.2 g; adjusted difference, −6.52; 95% confidence interval, −11.39 to −1.78; P=0.012). In patients with pre–percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0 to 1 flow, the adjusted treatment difference in infarct size was −8.13 (95% confidence interval, −13.10 to −3.16; P=0.0024). Infarct size estimated by peak and area under the curve creatine kinase release was measured in all study populations and was significantly reduced by intravenous metoprolol. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the intravenous metoprolol group (adjusted difference, 2.67%; 95% confidence interval, 0.09–5.21; P=0.045). The composite of death, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, atrioventricular block, and reinfarction at 24 hours in the intravenous metoprolol and control groups was 7.1% and 12.3%, respectively (P=0.21). Conclusions— In patients with anterior Killip class II or less ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, early intravenous metoprolol before reperfusion reduced infarct size and increased left ventricular ejection fraction with no excess of adverse events during the first 24 hours after STEMI. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01311700. EUDRACT number: 2010-019939-35.

Long-term benefit of early pre-reperfusion metoprolol administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the METOCARD-CNIC trial (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction)

OBJECTIVES The goal of this trial was to study the long-term effects of intravenous (IV) metoprolol administration before reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical events. BACKGROUND Early IV metoprolol during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS The METOCARD-CNIC (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial recruited 270 patients with Killip class ≤II anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset (<6 h) and randomized them to pre-reperfusion IV metoprolol or control group. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 202 patients (101 per group) 6 months after STEMI. Patients had a minimal 12-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the 6 months MRI was higher after IV metoprolol (48.7 ± 9.9% vs. 45.0 ± 11.7% in control subjects; adjusted treatment effect 3.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44% to 6.55%; p = 0.025). The occurrence of severely depressed LVEF (≤35%) at 6 months was significantly lower in patients treated with IV metoprolol (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). The proportion of patients fulfilling Class I indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (7% vs. 20%, p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 2 years, occurrence of the pre-specified composite of death, heart failure admission, reinfarction, and malignant arrhythmias was 10.8% in the IV metoprolol group versus 18.3% in the control group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.04; p = 0.065. Heart failure admission was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.95; p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS In patients with anterior Killip class ≤II STEMI undergoing pPCI, early IV metoprolol before reperfusion resulted in higher long-term LVEF, reduced incidence of severe LV systolic dysfunction and ICD indications, and fewer heart failure admissions. (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The METOCARD-CNIC Trial; NCT01311700).

Long term benefit of early pre-reperfusion metoprolol administration in patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the METOCARD-CNIC trial.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this trial was to study the long-term effects of intravenous (IV) metoprolol administration before reperfusion on left ventricular (LV) function and clinical events. BACKGROUND Early IV metoprolol during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been shown to reduce infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS The METOCARD-CNIC (Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial recruited 270 patients with Killip class ≤II anterior STEMI presenting early after symptom onset (<6 h) and randomized them to pre-reperfusion IV metoprolol or control group. Long-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 202 patients (101 per group) 6 months after STEMI. Patients had a minimal 12-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the 6 months MRI was higher after IV metoprolol (48.7 ± 9.9% vs. 45.0 ± 11.7% in control subjects; adjusted treatment effect 3.49%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44% to 6.55%; p = 0.025). The occurrence of severely depressed LVEF (≤35%) at 6 months was significantly lower in patients treated with IV metoprolol (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.006). The proportion of patients fulfilling Class I indications for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (7% vs. 20%, p = 0.012). At a median follow-up of 2 years, occurrence of the pre-specified composite of death, heart failure admission, reinfarction, and malignant arrhythmias was 10.8% in the IV metoprolol group versus 18.3% in the control group, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26 to 1.04; p = 0.065. Heart failure admission was significantly lower in the IV metoprolol group (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.015 to 0.95; p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS In patients with anterior Killip class ≤II STEMI undergoing pPCI, early IV metoprolol before reperfusion resulted in higher long-term LVEF, reduced incidence of severe LV systolic dysfunction and ICD indications, and fewer heart failure admissions. (Effect of METOprolol in CARDioproteCtioN During an Acute Myocardial InfarCtion. The METOCARD-CNIC Trial; NCT01311700).

Secondary forms of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A whole different prognosis.

Background: Takotsubo syndrome (TKS) usually mimics an acute coronary syndrome. However, several clinical forms have been reported. Our aim was to assess if different stressful triggers had prognostic influence on TKS, and to establish a working classification. Methods: We performed an analysis including patients with TKS between 2003–2013 from our prospective local database and the RETAKO National Registry, fulfilling Mayo criteria. Patients were divided in two groups regarding their potential triggers: (a) none/psychic stress as ‘primary forms’ and (b) physical factors (asthma, surgery, trauma, etc.) as ‘secondary forms’. Results: Finally, 328 patients were included, 90.2% women, with a mean age of 69.7 years. Patients were divided into primary TKS (n=265) and 63 secondary TKS groups. Age, gender, previous functional class and cardiovascular risk profile displayed no differences between groups before admission. However, primary-TKS patients suffered a main complaint of chest pain (89.4% vs 50.7%, p<0.0001) with frequent vegetative symptoms. Regarding treatment before admission, there were no differences either. During admission, differences were related to more intensive antithrombotic and anxiolytic drug use in the primary TKS group. Inotropic and mechanical ventilation use was higher in the secondary cohort. After discharge, a more frequent prescription of beta-blockers and statins in primary-TKS patients was seen. Secondary forms displayed more in-hospital stay and evolutive complications: death (hazard ratio (HR): 3.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–10.16, p=0.02), combined event variable (MACE) (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.01–2.6, p=0.04) and recurrences (HR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.06–3.22, p=0.02). Conclusion: Secondary TKS could present or mark worse short and long-term prognoses in terms of mortality, recurrences and readmissions. We propose a simple working nomenclature for TKS.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: new insights into diagnosis and treatment.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) remains an infrequent, elusive, and challenging clinical entity of unknown etiology eight decades after its initial description. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of SCAD, initially limited to information from early pathological studies, case reports, and very short series, has been enriched recently by relatively large contemporary series of patients studied prospectively. The typical presentation involves a young woman without coronary risk factors suffering an acute coronary syndrome but, actually, most patients are middle-aged and have coronary risk factors. A high number of conditions have been related to SCAD, but fibromuscular dysplasia has shown a major intriguing association with potential pathophysiological implications. SCAD may present (a) with an intimal tear and the classic angiographic ‘flap’ leading to the appearance of two lumens (true and false), or (b) without an intimal rupture, as an intramural hematoma. An increased clinical awareness together with new diagnostic tools have led to a major surge in the diagnosis of SCAD. High-resolution intracoronary techniques provide unique diagnostic insights into the underlying pathophysiology and facilitate identification of the disease in patients misdiagnosed previously. After the initial acute ischemic insult, most patients stabilize and have a benign clinical course and eventually experience spontaneous healing of the vessel wall during follow-up. However, recurrences may still occur in up to 10–20% of cases. Accordingly, a conservative medical management (watchful waiting strategy) has been recommended as the initial approach. Revascularization remains particularly challenging and may be associated with suboptimal results, acute complications, and poor long-term outcome. Nevertheless, in patients with ongoing or refractory ischemia and adequate anatomy, revascularization should be attempted. Some novel and attractive coronary interventions have been proposed in this uniquely challenging anatomic scenario. This review aims to present a comprehensive and contemporary update on this elusive and intriguing clinical entity.

Comparison of Iodixanol and Ioversol for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Diabetic Patients After Coronary Angiography or Angioplasty

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES This study was designed to compare differences in the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and changes in serum creatinine (SCr) level following iso-osmolar iodixanol or low-osmolar ioversol administration in diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography, with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A number of studies have indicated that iodixanol reduces the risk of CIN in patients with renal impairment, with or without diabetes. Diabetic patients may have some degree of renal dysfunction despite having a normal SCr level. METHODS The study included 250 consecutive diabetic patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI. Those enrolled during the first 7 months of the study received ioversol and those enrolled during the following 11 months received iodixanol. The primary study endpoint was the incidence of CIN. Secondary objectives were to identify independent predictors of CIN and to determine the mean increase in SCr 72 hours after contrast injection. RESULTS The overall incidence of CIN was 5.6%. The incidence of CIN was significantly lower with iodixanol than with ioversol (2.5% vs. 8.3%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]=0.255; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.068-0.952; P=.047). A low estimated glomerular filtration rate (60.8+/-29 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in those with CIN vs. 75.3+/-25 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in those without; OR=0.975; 95% CI, 0.952-0.997; P=.03) and ioversol use were independent predictors of CIN. CONCLUSIONS In diabetic patients undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography with or without PCI, the iso-osmolar contrast medium iodixanol was associated with a lower incidence of CIN than low-osmolar ioversol.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Balloons in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis (from the RIBS IV and V Randomized Clinical Trials).

Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. This study sought to compare the efficacy of everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) and drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) with paclitaxel in patients with ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS IV) and Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare-Metal Stents: Drug-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent (RIBS V) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data. In both trials, EESs were compared with DEBs in patients with ISR (RIBS V included 189 patients with bare-metal ISR; RIBS IV included 309 patients with drug-eluting ISR). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. A total of 249 patients were allocated to EES and 249 to DEB. Clinical follow-up at 1 year was obtained in all (100%) patients and late angiography (median 249 days) in 91% of eligible patients. Compared with patients treated with DEBs, patients treated with EESs obtained better short-term results (postprocedural minimal lumen diameter 2.28 ± 0.5 vs 2.12 ± 0.4 mm, p <0.0001). At follow-up, patients treated with EESs had larger in-segment minimal lumen diameter (primary end point 2.16 ± 0.7 vs 1.88 ± 0.6 mm, p <0.0001; absolute mean difference 0.28 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.40) and net lumen gain (1.33 ± 0.6 vs 1.00 ± 0.7 mm, p <0.0001) and had lower %diameter stenosis (19 ± 21% vs 28 ± 22%, p <0.0001) and binary restenosis rate (8.7% vs 15.7%, p = 0.02). Consistent results were observed in the in-lesion analysis. No interactions were found between the underlying stent type and treatment effects. At 1-year clinical follow-up, the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization was significantly reduced in the EES arm (8.8% vs 14.5%, p = 0.03; hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.94) mainly driven by a lower need for target vessel revascularization (6% vs 12.4%, p = 0.01, hazard ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.86). This pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized trials demonstrates the superiority of EES over DEB in the treatment of patients with ISR.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Novel Diagnostic Insights From Large Series of Patients

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare clinical entity of unknown cause that classically is thought to occur in young women without traditional coronary risk factors.1–4 An intimal rupture, leading to 2 separate coronary lumens, or an intramural hematoma without an intimal tear, constitutes the underlying pathological substrate. Pressure-driven expansion of the false lumen or bleeding-induced enlargement of the intramural hematoma induce axial propagation of the disease and true lumen compression eventually resulting in myocardial ischemia.2–4 Coronary angiography remains the most widely used diagnostic tool and the presence of a radiolucent intimal flap with contrast staining has been classically considered the hallmark of this disease. Systemic connective tissue disorders, inflammatory/immunologic diseases, the peripartum period and, more recently, fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) have all been associated with SCAD.2–6 These conditions might induce arterial fragility and provide the underlying substrate of a vulnerable coronary vessel wall. Most patients with SCAD present with an acute myocardial infarction. However, after the acute event clinical stabilization frequently ensues and, eventually, most patients have a favorable long-term prognosis.2–5 Actually, recent reports suggest that a conservative initial management strategy seems indicated in most patients with SCAD.7–13 Nevertheless, patients with ongoing or recurrent ischemia may require urgent coronary revascularization. Revascularization, however, is particularly challenging and demanding in this setting because of the underlying disrupted coronary vessel wall.7–13 Finally, the use of intracoronary diagnostic techniques (intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography [OCT]), able to provide an accurate tomographic visualization of the coronary vessel wall, has been recently proposed as instrumental to enhance diagnostic accuracy.14 Articles see p 645 and 656 However, until recently, our understanding of this unique condition has been restricted to the limited and probably biased evidence stemming …

Effect of Early Metoprolol on Infarct Size in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary PCI: The METOCARD-CNIC Trial

Background —The effect of β-blockers on infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. We hypothesize that metoprolol reduces infarct size when administered early (intravenously [i.v.] before reperfusion). Methods and Results —Patients with Killip-class ≤II anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing PCI within 6 hours of symptoms onset were randomized to receive i.v. metoprolol (n=131) or not (control, n=139) pre-reperfusion. All patients without contraindications received oral metoprolol within 24 hours. The pre-defined primary endpoint was infarct size on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 5-7 days after STEMI. MRI was performed in 220 patients (81%). Mean (±SD) infarct size by MRI was smaller after i.v. metoprolol compared to control (25.6±15.3 vs. 32.0±22.2 grams; adjusted difference, -6.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.39 to -1.78; P=0.012). In patients with pre-PCI TIMI flow grade 0/1, the adjusted treatment difference in infarct size was -8.02; 95% CI, -13.01 to -3.02; P=0.0029. Infarct size estimated by peak and area under the curve creatine-kinase release was measured in all study population and was significantly reduced by i.v. metoprolol. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the i.v. metoprolol group (adjusted difference 2.67%; 95% CI, 0.09% to 5.21%; P=0.045). The composite of death, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, atrioventricular block and reinfarction at 24 hours in the i.v. metoprolol and control groups respectively was 7.1% vs. 12.3%, p=0.21. Conclusions —In patients with anterior Killip-class ≤II STEMI undergoing primary PCI, early i.v. metoprolol before reperfusion reduced infarct size and increased LVEF with no excess of adverse events during the first 24 hours after STEMI. Clinical Trial Registration Information —ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: [NCT01311700][1] & EUDRACT Number 2010-019939-35. [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT01311700&atom=%2Fcirculationaha%2Fearly%2F2013%2F09%2F03%2FCIRCULATIONAHA.113.003653.atomBackground— The effect of &bgr;-blockers on infarct size when used in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is unknown. We hypothesize that metoprolol reduces infarct size when administered early (intravenously before reperfusion). Methods and Results— Patients with Killip class II or less anterior ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 hours of symptoms onset were randomized to receive intravenous metoprolol (n=131) or not (control, n=139) before reperfusion. All patients without contraindications received oral metoprolol within 24 hours. The predefined primary end point was infarct size on magnetic resonance imaging performed 5 to 7 days after STEMI. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 220 patients (81%). Mean±SD infarct size by magnetic resonance imaging was smaller after intravenous metoprolol compared with control (25.6±15.3 versus 32.0±22.2 g; adjusted difference, −6.52; 95% confidence interval, −11.39 to −1.78; P=0.012). In patients with pre–percutaneous coronary intervention Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0 to 1 flow, the adjusted treatment difference in infarct size was −8.13 (95% confidence interval, −13.10 to −3.16; P=0.0024). Infarct size estimated by peak and area under the curve creatine kinase release was measured in all study populations and was significantly reduced by intravenous metoprolol. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher in the intravenous metoprolol group (adjusted difference, 2.67%; 95% confidence interval, 0.09–5.21; P=0.045). The composite of death, malignant ventricular arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, atrioventricular block, and reinfarction at 24 hours in the intravenous metoprolol and control groups was 7.1% and 12.3%, respectively (P=0.21). Conclusions— In patients with anterior Killip class II or less ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, early intravenous metoprolol before reperfusion reduced infarct size and increased left ventricular ejection fraction with no excess of adverse events during the first 24 hours after STEMI. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01311700. EUDRACT number: 2010-019939-35.

Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Bare-Metal and Drug-Eluting In-Stent Restenosis Results From a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of the RIBS IV and V Trials

Background—Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is more challenging than that of patients with bare-metal stent ISR. However, the results of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in these distinct scenarios remain unsettled. Methods and Results—A pooled analysis of the RIBS IV (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Drug-Eluting Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) and RIBS V (Restenosis Intra-Stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-Eluting Stent) randomized trials was performed using patient-level data to compare the efficacy of EES in bare-metal stent ISR and DES-ISR. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical in both trials. Results of 94 patients treated with EES for bare-metal stent ISR were compared with those of 155 patients treated with EES for DES-ISR. Baseline characteristics were more adverse in patients with DES-ISR, although they presented later and more frequently with a focal pattern. After intervention, minimal lumen diameter (2.22±0.5 versus 2.38±0.5 mm, P=0.01) was smaller in the DES-ISR group. Late angiographic findings (89.3% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (2.03±0.7 versus 2.36±0.6 mm, P<0.001) and diameter stenosis (23±22 versus 13±17%, P<0.001) were poorer in patients with DES-ISR. Results were consistent in the in-segment and in-lesion analyses. On multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR. Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), mortality (2.6 versus 0%, P<0.01) and need for target vessel revascularization (8 versus 2%, P=0.03) were higher in the DES-ISR group. Conclusions—This patient-level pooled analysis of the RIBS IV and RIBS V randomized clinical trials suggests that EES provide favorable outcomes in patients with ISR. However, the results of EES are less satisfactory in patients with DES-ISR than in those with bare-metal stent ISR. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01239953 and NCT01239940.