Terje Skjærpe

Superior Cardiovascular Effect of Aerobic Interval Training Versus Moderate Continuous Training in Heart Failure Patients A Randomized Study

Background— Exercise training reduces the symptoms of chronic heart failure. Which exercise intensity yields maximal beneficial adaptations is controversial. Furthermore, the incidence of chronic heart failure increases with advanced age; it has been reported that 88% and 49% of patients with a first diagnosis of chronic heart failure are >65 and >80 years old, respectively. Despite this, most previous studies have excluded patients with an age >70 years. Our objective was to compare training programs with moderate versus high exercise intensity with regard to variables associated with cardiovascular function and prognosis in patients with postinfarction heart failure. Methods and Results— Twenty-seven patients with stable postinfarction heart failure who were undergoing optimal medical treatment, including &bgr;-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (aged 75.5±11.1 years; left ventricular [LV] ejection fraction 29%; &OV0312;o2peak 13 mL · kg−1 · min−1) were randomized to either moderate continuous training (70% of highest measured heart rate, ie, peak heart rate) or aerobic interval training (95% of peak heart rate) 3 times per week for 12 weeks or to a control group that received standard advice regarding physical activity. &OV0312;o2peak increased more with aerobic interval training than moderate continuous training (46% versus 14%, P<0.001) and was associated with reverse LV remodeling. LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes declined with aerobic interval training only, by 18% and 25%, respectively; LV ejection fraction increased 35%, and pro-brain natriuretic peptide decreased 40%. Improvement in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (endothelial function) was greater with aerobic interval training, and mitochondrial function in lateral vastus muscle increased with aerobic interval training only. The MacNew global score for quality of life in cardiovascular disease increased in both exercise groups. No changes occurred in the control group. Conclusions— Exercise intensity was an important factor for reversing LV remodeling and improving aerobic capacity, endothelial function, and quality of life in patients with postinfarction heart failure. These findings may have important implications for exercise training in rehabilitation programs and future studies.

Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND Hyperlipidemia has been suggested as a risk factor for stenosis of the aortic valve, but lipid-lowering studies have had conflicting results. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial involving 1873 patients with mild-to-moderate, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. The patients received either 40 mg of simvastatin plus 10 mg of ezetimibe or placebo daily. The primary outcome was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including death from cardiovascular causes, aortic-valve replacement, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris, heart failure, coronary-artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, and nonhemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes were events related to aortic-valve stenosis and ischemic cardiovascular events. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 52.2 months, the primary outcome occurred in 333 patients (35.3%) in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group and in 355 patients (38.2%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.12; P=0.59). Aortic-valve replacement was performed in 267 patients (28.3%) in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group and in 278 patients (29.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.18; P=0.97). Fewer patients had ischemic cardiovascular events in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group (148 patients) than in the placebo group (187 patients) (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.97; P=0.02), mainly because of the smaller number of patients who underwent coronary-artery bypass grafting. Cancer occurred more frequently in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group (105 vs. 70, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Simvastatin and ezetimibe did not reduce the composite outcome of combined aortic-valve events and ischemic events in patients with aortic stenosis. Such therapy reduced the incidence of ischemic cardiovascular events but not events related to aortic-valve stenosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00092677.)

Real-Time Strain Rate Imaging of the Left Ventricle by Ultrasound

The regional function of the left ventricle can be visualized in real-time using the new strain rate imaging method. Deformation or strain of a tissue segment occurs over time during the cardiac cycle. The rate of this deformation, the strain rate, is equivalent to the velocity gradient, and can be estimated using the tissue Doppler technique. We present the strain rate as color-coded 2-dimensional cine-loops and color M-modes showing the strain rate component along the ultrasound beam axis. We tested the method in 6 healthy subjects and 6 patients with myocardial infarction. In the healthy hearts, a spatially homogeneous distribution of the strain rate was found. In the infarcted hearts, all the infarcted areas in this study showed up as hypokinetic or akinetic, demonstrating that this method may be used for imaging of regional dysfunction. Shortcomings of the method are discussed, as are some possible future applications of the method.

Outcome of Patients With Low-Gradient “Severe” Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background— Retrospective studies have suggested that patients with a low transvalvular gradient in the presence of an aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 and normal ejection fraction may represent a subgroup with an advanced stage of aortic valve disease, reduced stroke volume, and poor prognosis requiring early surgery. We therefore evaluated the outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” stenosis (defined as aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 and mean gradient ⩽40 mm Hg) in the prospective Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study. Methods and Results— Outcome in patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis was compared with outcome in patients with moderate stenosis (aortic valve area 1.0 to 1.5 cm2; mean gradient 25 to 40 mm Hg). The primary end point of aortic valve events included death from cardiovascular causes, aortic valve replacement, and heart failure due to aortic stenosis. Secondary end points were major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death. In 1525 asymptomatic patients (mean age, 67±10 years; ejection fraction, ≥55%), baseline echocardiography revealed low-gradient severe stenosis in 435 patients (29%) and moderate stenosis in 184 (12%). Left ventricular mass was lower in patients with low-gradient severe stenosis than in those with moderate stenosis (182±64 versus 212±68 g; P<0.01). During 46 months of follow-up, aortic valve events occurred in 48.5% versus 44.6%, respectively (P=0.37; major cardiovascular events, 50.9% versus 48.5%, P=0.58; cardiovascular death, 7.8% versus 4.9%, P=0.19). Low-gradient severe stenosis patients with reduced stroke volume index (⩽35 mL/m2; n=223) had aortic valve events comparable to those in patients with normal stroke volume index (46.2% versus 50.9%; P=0.53). Conclusions— Patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction have an outcome similar to that in patients with moderate stenosis.

Outcome of Patients With Low-Gradient “Severe” Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction The Heart Strategies Concentrating on Risk Evaluation (Heart SCORE) Study

Background— Retrospective studies have suggested that patients with a low transvalvular gradient in the presence of an aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 and normal ejection fraction may represent a subgroup with an advanced stage of aortic valve disease, reduced stroke volume, and poor prognosis requiring early surgery. We therefore evaluated the outcome of patients with low-gradient “severe” stenosis (defined as aortic valve area <1.0 cm2 and mean gradient ⩽40 mm Hg) in the prospective Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study. Methods and Results— Outcome in patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis was compared with outcome in patients with moderate stenosis (aortic valve area 1.0 to 1.5 cm2; mean gradient 25 to 40 mm Hg). The primary end point of aortic valve events included death from cardiovascular causes, aortic valve replacement, and heart failure due to aortic stenosis. Secondary end points were major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death. In 1525 asymptomatic patients (mean age, 67±10 years; ejection fraction, ≥55%), baseline echocardiography revealed low-gradient severe stenosis in 435 patients (29%) and moderate stenosis in 184 (12%). Left ventricular mass was lower in patients with low-gradient severe stenosis than in those with moderate stenosis (182±64 versus 212±68 g; P<0.01). During 46 months of follow-up, aortic valve events occurred in 48.5% versus 44.6%, respectively (P=0.37; major cardiovascular events, 50.9% versus 48.5%, P=0.58; cardiovascular death, 7.8% versus 4.9%, P=0.19). Low-gradient severe stenosis patients with reduced stroke volume index (⩽35 mL/m2; n=223) had aortic valve events comparable to those in patients with normal stroke volume index (46.2% versus 50.9%; P=0.53). Conclusions— Patients with low-gradient “severe” aortic stenosis and normal ejection fraction have an outcome similar to that in patients with moderate stenosis.

Mechanical Dispersion Assessed by Myocardial Strain in Patients After Myocardial Infarction for Risk Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmia

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate whether myocardial strain echocardiography can predict ventricular arrhythmias in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) is insufficient for selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy after MI. Electrical dispersion in infarcted myocardium facilitates malignant arrhythmia. Myocardial strain by echocardiography can quantify detailed regional and global myocardial function and timing. We hypothesized that electrical abnormalities in patients after MI will lead to LV mechanical dispersion, which can be measured as regional heterogeneity of contraction by myocardial strain. METHODS We prospectively included 85 post-MI patients, 44 meeting primary and 41 meeting secondary ICD prevention criteria. After 2.3 years (range 0.6 to 5.5 years) of follow-up, 47 patients had no and 38 patients had 1 or more recorded arrhythmias requiring appropriate ICD therapy. Longitudinal strain was measured by speckle tracking echocardiography. The SD of time to maximum myocardial shortening in a 16-segment LV model was calculated as a parameter of mechanical dispersion. Global strain was calculated as average strain in a 16-segment LV model. RESULTS The EF did not differ between ICD patients with and without arrhythmias occurring during follow-up (34 +/- 11% vs. 35 +/- 9%, p = 0.70). Mechanical dispersion was greater in ICD patients with recorded ventricular arrhythmias compared with those without (85 +/- 29 ms vs. 56 +/- 13 ms, p < 0.001). By Cox regression, mechanical dispersion was a strong and independent predictor of arrhythmias requiring ICD therapy (hazard ratio: 1.25 per 10-ms increase, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 1.4, p < 0.001). In patients with an EF >35%, global strain showed better LV function in those without recorded arrhythmias (-14.0% +/- 4.0% vs. -12.0 +/- 3.0%, p = 0.05), whereas the EF did not differ (44 +/- 8% vs. 41 +/- 5%, p = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS Mechanical dispersion was more pronounced in post-MI patients with recurrent arrhythmias. Global strain was a marker of arrhythmias in post-MI patients with relatively preserved ventricular function. These novel parameters assessed by myocardial strain may add important information about susceptibility for ventricular arrhythmias after MI.

Strain Rate Imaging by Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Regional Dysfunction of the Left Ventricle

Background: Regional strain rate in the left ventricle can be assessed by tissue Doppler velocity gradient and color mapped in real time. Regional contractility thus can be visualized and graded. To validate the method, we made a comparison with standard echocardiography. Methods and Results: Fifteen patients with recent myocardial infarction were examined with the use of strain rate imaging (SRI). Velocity gradients were mapped by color. Gray‐scale imaging was performed using the second harmonic mode. Cine loops of two‐dimensional echocardiography (2‐D echo) and SRI images from three standard apical planes were analyzed offline. A four‐grade scale in 16 segments was used to score wall motion by 2‐D echo and by SRI. Of a total of 236 segments, 235 segments were analyzable by 2‐D echo and 218 segments were analyzable by SRI. Correlation of wall motion score index with ejection fraction was – 0.84 by 2‐D echo and – 0.92 by SRI. One hundred fourteen segments had an equal score by the two methods: 51 segments differed by 1 degree and 14 segments differed by 2 degrees (K = 0.45). Conclusions: SRI agrees well with echocardiography in grading regional wall function, and the method can be seen as validated in a clinical setting for assessment of regional systolic wall function and is demonstrated to be applicable for semiquantitative wall motion assessment. SRI has theoretical advantages and may be a valuable addition to standard echocardiography, especially in the field of stress echocardiography.

The Velocity Distribution in the Aortic Anulus in Normal Subjects: A Quantitative Analysis of Two-dimensional Doppler Flow Maps

The velocity distribution in the aortic anulus is commonly assumed to be uniform. A skewed velocity profile may have consequences for the accuracy of volume flow estimates by the Doppler echocardiographic technique. To assess this issue, the velocity distribution in the aortic anulus in 12 normal subjects was studied by computer analysis of digital velocity data from two-dimensional Doppler ultrasound flow maps. The velocity profiles in the aortic anulus were found to be flat but slightly skewed, with the highest velocities toward the septum. There was little interindividual variation. Our findings imply that the centerline velocity is the best estimate for the spatial mean velocity at the aortic anulus in normal subjects. The importance of this finding in patients is unknown. In normal subjects, the results suggest that stroke volume might be overestimated by approximately 15% by Doppler echocardiography if the cross-sectional velocity profile is not accounted for.

Exercise hemodynamics in small (≤21 mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography☆

Exercise Doppler echocardiography was used to assess hemodynamics in 25 patients with a < or = 21 mm aortic valve prosthesis (14 with a Medtronic-Hall 21 mm valve, three with a Medtronic-Hall 20 mm valve, three with a Sorin 21 mm valve, one with a Duromedics 21 mm valve, and four with a Carpentier-Edwards 21 mm valve). A symptom-limited upright bicycle exercise test was performed, and Doppler gradients were recorded during exercise. Gradients increased with exercise from 30 +/- 8/16 +/- 4 mm Hg (peak/mean) at rest to 46 +/- 12/24 +/- 7 mm Hg during exercise; both p < 0.001. Mean exercise gradient exceeded 30 mm Hg in five patients, and the highest mean gradient recorded was 37 mm Hg. Within the group of mechanical valves, gradients at exercise were similar for different types of valves. A linear relationship was found between gradients at rest and during exercise (peak r = 0.75, mean r = 0.77; both p < 0.001). Additional findings were midventricular velocities exceeding 1.5 m/sec in late systole in 10 patients (40%) and intraventricular flow (> or = 0.2 m/sec) toward the apex during isovolumic relaxation in 11 patients (44%). The patients with these velocity patterns had significantly smaller left ventricular cavities (end-diastolic diameter 39.8 +/- 4.8 vs 46.5 +/- 4.2 mm, p < 0.01; end-systolic diameter 24.2 +/- 3.0 vs 28.5 +/- 4.5 mm, p = 0.013).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Impact of Baseline Severity of Aortic Valve Stenosis on Effect of Intensive Lipid Lowering Therapy (from the SEAS Study)

Retrospective studies have suggested a beneficial effect of lipid-lowering treatment on the progression of aortic stenosis (AS) in milder stages of the disease. In the randomized, placebo-controlled Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in Aortic Stenosis (SEAS) study, 4.3 years of combined treatment with simvastatin 40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg did not reduce aortic valve events (AVEs), while ischemic cardiovascular events (ICEs) were significantly reduced in the overall study population. However, the impact of baseline AS severity on treatment effect has not been reported. Baseline and outcomes data in 1,763 SEAS patients (mean age 67 years, 39% women) were used. The study population was divided into tertiles of baseline peak aortic jet velocity (tertile 1: ≤ 2.8 m/s; tertile 2: > 2.8 to 3.3 m/s; tertile 3: > 3.3 m/s). Treatment effect and interaction were tested in Cox regression analyses. The rates of AVEs and ICEs increased with increasing baseline severity of AS. In Cox regression analyses, higher baseline peak aortic jet velocity predicted higher rates of AVEs and ICEs in all tertiles (all p values < 0.05) and in the total study population (p < 0.001). Simvastatin-ezetimibe treatment was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in AVEs in any individual tertile. A significant quantitative interaction between the severity of AS and simvastatin-ezetimibe treatment effect was demonstrated for ICEs (p < 0.05) but not for AVEs (p = 0.10). In conclusion, the SEAS study results demonstrate a strong relation between baseline the severity of AS and the rate of cardiovascular events but no significant effect of lipid-lowering treatment on AVEs, even in the group with the mildest AS.