Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Terrance Creighton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Terrance Creighton.


Journal of Endourology | 2015

Learning curves for robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Michael Hanzly; Ariel Frederick; Terrance Creighton; Kris Atwood; Diana Mehedint; Eric Kauffman; Hyung L. Kim; Thomas Schwaab

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the learning curve of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) between two surgeons at a single institution. METHODS A prospectively maintained, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved kidney surgery database was reviewed retrospectively and the first 116 consecutive LPNs performed by one surgeon (Hyung Kim) and 116 consecutive RPNs performed by a second surgeon (Thomas Schwaab) were identified. The learning curve was evaluated by examining the operative times, warm ischemia times (WITs), estimated blood loss, the postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and intra- and postoperative complications in the quartiles of 29 patients. The LPNs performed by Hyung Kim were done following completion of a minimally invasive fellowship. Thomas Schwaab had minimal experience with LPN and no fellowship training before starting RAPN. RESULTS The RAPN and LPN groups had similar patient and tumor characteristics. The RAPN group had a higher preoperative eGFR (74.1±22.04 vs. 80.95±21.25 mL/minutes, p=0.015) and a worse Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG 1+ in 12% vs. 2.6%, p<0.001) compared with the LPN group. Rates of intraoperative (p=0.203) and postoperative (p=0.193) complications were similar. In the RAPN group, operating room (OR) time (161±51 vs. 203±55 minutes, p<0.001) and WIT (17.7±14.8 vs. 21.8±9.1 minutes, p<0.001) were shorter. Postoperative stay was longer in the RAPN group (2.4±2.2 vs. 1.67±1.1 days, p<0.001). The percentage decrease in postoperative eGFR was lower in the RAPN group versus the LPN (9.6% vs. 10%). The learning curves differed for log tumor size, log WIT, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS The variables of the learning curve for RAPN can be obtained earlier than the same variables for LPN. RAPN had a shorter OR time and WITs. The shorter WITs, earlier in the series, led to consistently lower fluctuations in GFR and preservation of the renal function. The learning curves for each procedure need to be re-evaluated at longer intervals to ensure their accuracy.


The Journal of Urology | 2015

Comparative Analysis of Smoking as a Risk Factor among Renal Cell Carcinoma Histological Subtypes

Neel H. Patel; Kristopher Attwood; Michael Hanzly; Terrance Creighton; Diana Mehedint; Thomas Schwaab; Eric C. Kauffman

PURPOSE Smoking is the best established modifiable risk factor for renal cell carcinoma. However, the risks of individual renal cell carcinoma histological subtypes are unknown. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between smoking and renal cell carcinoma subtype. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cigarette smoking data were prospectively collected from 816 consecutive patients with nonfamilial renal cell carcinoma (705) or benign pathology (111) undergoing nephrectomy at a single National Comprehensive Cancer Network® cancer center, and were retrospectively tested for an association with histological diagnosis on univariable and propensity adjusted analyses. RESULTS Smoking was reported by 51% of patients, including 21% active smokers and 30% former smokers. Active smoking was more common with clear cell (23%) or papillary (26%) renal cell carcinoma than benign histology (14%, p <0.05 each), yet strikingly less common with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (6%, p <0.05 vs clear cell or papillary). Any smoking history (active or former) was also relatively uncommon with chromophobe (26%) vs clear cell (53%, p = 0.003) or papillary (58%, p = 0.001) histology. Smoking extent based on mean pack-years was significantly greater with clear cell (15.3 mean pack-years) or papillary (15.2 mean pack-years) renal cell carcinoma but not chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (9.4 mean pack-years) compared to benign histology (9.4 mean pack-years, p ≤0.05, p <0.05, p = 1.0, respectively). On propensity analyses adjusting for multiple variables, clear cell (OR 2.2, p <0.05) and papillary (OR 2.4, p <0.05) histologies but not chromophobe histology remained independently associated with active smoking. CONCLUSIONS Traditional understanding of smoking as a renal cell carcinoma risk factor applies to clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma but not the chromophobe subtype. These findings underscore distinct carcinogenic mechanisms underlying the various renal cell carcinoma subtypes.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2018

Identification and Validation of Radiographic Enhancement for Reliable Differentiation of CD117(+) Benign Renal Oncocytoma and Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Jay Amin; Bo Xu; Shervin Badkhshan; Terrance Creighton; Daniel Abbotoy; Christine Murekeyisoni; Kristopher Attwood; Thomas Schwaab; Craig Hendler; Michael Petroziello; Charles Roche; Eric C. Kauffman

Purpose: The diagnostic differential for CD117/KIT(+) oncocytic renal tumor biopsies is limited to benign renal oncocytoma versus chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC); however, further differentiation is often challenging and requires surgical resection. We investigated clinical variables that might improve preoperative differentiation of CD117(+) renal oncocytoma versus ChRCC to avoid the need for benign tumor resection. Experimental Design: A total of 124 nephrectomy patients from a single institute with 133 renal oncocytoma or ChRCC tumors were studied. Patients from 2003 to 2012 comprised a retrospective cohort to identify clinical/radiographic variables associated with renal oncocytoma versus ChRCC. Prospective validation was performed among consecutive renal oncocytoma/ChRCC tumors resected from 2013 to 2017. Results: Tumor size and younger age were associated with ChRCC, and multifocality with renal oncocytoma; however, the most reliable variable for ChRCC versus renal oncocytoma differentiation was the tumor:cortex peak early-phase enhancement ratio (PEER) using multiphase CT. Among 54 PEER-evaluable tumors in the retrospective cohort [19 CD117(+), 13 CD117(−), 22 CD117-untested], PEER classified each correctly as renal oncocytoma (PEER >0.50) or ChRCC (PEER ≤0.50), except for four misclassified CD117(−) ChRCC variants. Prospective study of PEER confirmed 100% accuracy of renal oncocytoma/ChRCC classification among 22/22 additional CD117(+) tumors. Prospective interobserver reproducibility was excellent for PEER scoring (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.97) and perfect for renal oncocytoma/ChRCC assignment (ICC = 1.0). Conclusions: In the largest clinical comparison of renal oncocytoma versus ChRCC to our knowledge, we identified and prospectively validated a reproducible radiographic measure that differentiates CD117(+) renal oncocytoma from ChRCC with potentially 100% accuracy. PEER may allow reliable biopsy-based diagnosis of CD117(+) renal oncocytoma, avoiding the need for diagnostic nephrectomy. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3898–907. ©2018 AACR.


Urology case reports | 2014

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Renal Tumors.

Michael Hanzly; Terrance Creighton; Michael Mix; Kevin Zeeck; Simon Fung-Kee-Fung; Anurag K. Singh; Thomas Schwaab

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of actively growing renal masses to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We retrospectively reviewed our institutional review board–approved kidney database and identified 4 patients who underwent SBRT, 15 Gy dose, for their rapidly growing renal masses. Three patients had a decreased tumor size after radiation treatment by 20.8%, 38.1%, and 20%. The other patient had a size gain of 5.6%. This patient maintained a similar tumor growth rate before and after SBRT. Mean follow-up time was 13.8 months. SBRT represents an effective management option in select patients with larger rapidly growing kidney masses.


Urology | 2014

Health-related quality of life outcomes after robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy using a validated bladder-specific instrument: A multi-institutional study

Ahmed Aboumohamed; Syed Johar Raza; Ali Al-Daghmin; Christopher Tallman; Terrance Creighton; Heather Crossley; Stephen Dailey; Aabroo Khan; Rakeeba Din; Diana Mehedint; Katy Wang; Yi Shi; Mohamed Sharif; Gregory E. Wilding; Alon Z. Weizer; Khurshid A. Guru


Urology | 2014

High-dose Interleukin-2 Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Contemporary Experience

Michael Hanzly; Ahmed Aboumohamed; Naveen Yarlagadda; Terrance Creighton; Lorenzo Digiorgio; Ariel Fredrick; Gaurav Rao; Diana Mehedint; Saby George; Kristopher Attwood; Eric C. Kauffman; Deepika Narashima; Nikhil I. Khushalani; Roberto Pili; Thomas Schwaab


Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | 2015

Early identification of asymptomatic brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma

Michael Hanzly; Daniel Abbotoy; Terrance Creighton; Gregory Diorio; Diana Mehedint; Christine Murekeyisoni; Kristopher Attwood; Eric C. Kauffman; Andrew J. Fabiano; Thomas Schwaab


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2017

High-dose interleukin-2 therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A contemporary experience.

Ahmed Aboumohamed; Naveen Yarlagadda; Terrance Creighton; Diana Mehedint; Kristopher Attwood; Eric C. Kauffman; Saby George; Nikhil I. Khushalani; Roberto Pili; Thomas Schwaab


The Journal of Urology | 2015

MP59-06 CONTEMPORARY SERIES UTILIZING MINIMALLY INVASIVE TECHNIQUES FOR ENUCLEATION VS. TRADITIONAL PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY

Michael Hanzly; Daniel Abbotoy; Terrance Creighton; Hyung Chul Kim; Eric Kauffman; Thomas Schwaab


Archive | 2014

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Renal Tumors q

Michael Hanzly; Terrance Creighton; Michael Mix; Kevin Zeeck; Simon Fung-Kee-Fung; Anurag K. Singh; Thomas Schwaab

Collaboration


Dive into the Terrance Creighton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Schwaab

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Diana Mehedint

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Hanzly

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric C. Kauffman

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kristopher Attwood

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmed Aboumohamed

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Daniel Abbotoy

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Aabroo Khan

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ali Al-Daghmin

Roswell Park Cancer Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge