Terrance Goldman
Los Alamos National Laboratory
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Terrance Goldman.
PLOS ONE | 2012
J. L. Friar; Terrance Goldman; Juan Pérez–Mercader
Background Data on the number of Open Reading Frames (ORFs) coded by genomes from the 3 domains of Life show the presence of some notable general features. These include essential differences between the Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes, with the number of ORFs growing linearly with total genome size for the former, but only logarithmically for the latter. Results Simply by assuming that the (protein) coding and non-coding fractions of the genome must have different dynamics and that the non-coding fraction must be particularly versatile and therefore be controlled by a variety of (unspecified) probability distribution functions (pdf’s), we are able to predict that the number of ORFs for Eukaryotes follows a Benford distribution and must therefore have a specific logarithmic form. Using the data for the 1000+ genomes available to us in early 2010, we find that the Benford distribution provides excellent fits to the data over several orders of magnitude. Conclusions In its linear regime the Benford distribution produces excellent fits to the Prokaryote data, while the full non-linear form of the distribution similarly provides an excellent fit to the Eukaryote data. Furthermore, in their region of overlap the salient features are statistically congruent. This allows us to interpret the difference between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes as the manifestation of the increased demand in the biological functions required for the larger Eukaryotes, to estimate some minimal genome sizes, and to predict a maximal Prokaryote genome size on the order of 8–12 megabasepairs.These results naturally allow a mathematical interpretation in terms of maximal entropy and, therefore, most efficient information transmission.
arXiv: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology | 2009
Terrance Goldman; G. J. Stephenson; P. M. Alsing; Bruce H. J. McKellar
In a dense cloud of massive fermions interacting by exchange of a light scalar field, the effective mass of the fermion can become negligibly small. As the cloud expands, the effective mass and the total energy density eventually increase with decreasing density. In this regime, the pressure-density relation can approximate that required for dark energy. They apply this phenomenon to the expansion of the Universe with a very light scalar field and infer relations between the parameters available and cosmological observations. Majorana neutrinos at a mass that may have been recently determined, and fermions such as the Lightest Supersymmetric Particle (LSP) may both be consistent with current observations of dark energy.
Archive | 2003
G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman; Bruce H. J. McKellar
Archive | 2002
Bruce H. J. McKellar; M. A. Garbutt; G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman
Archive | 2002
Terrance Goldman; G. J. Stephenson; Bruce H. J. McKellar; M. A. Garbutt
Archive | 2002
G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman; Bruce H. J. McKellar; M. A. Garbutt
Archive | 2001
G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman; Bruce H. J. McKellar; M. A. Garbutt
Archive | 2000
Stephenson; Terrance Goldman; Bruce H. J. McKellar
Archive | 1998
G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman
Archive | 1998
G. J. Stephenson; Terrance Goldman; Anthony W. Thomas; K. Tsushima