Terry A. Hedderson
University of Cape Town
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Terry A. Hedderson.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2009
Peter M. Hollingsworth; Laura L. Forrest; John L. Spouge; Mehrdad Hajibabaei; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Michelle van der Bank; Mark W. Chase; Robyn S. Cowan; David L. Erickson; Aron J. Fazekas; Sean W. Graham; Karen E. James; Ki Joong Kim; W. John Kress; Harald Schneider; Jonathan van AlphenStahl; Spencer C. H. Barrett; Cássio van den Berg; Diego Bogarín; Kevin S. Burgess; Kenneth M. Cameron; Mark A. Carine; Juliana Chacón; Alexandra Clark; James J. Clarkson; Ferozah Conrad; Dion S. Devey; Caroline S. Ford; Terry A. Hedderson; Michelle L. Hollingsworth
DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF–atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK–psbI spacer, and trnH–psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL+matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.
Nature | 2007
Félix Forest; G Richard; R Mathieu; T.J. Davies; Richard M. Cowling; D. P Faith; Andrew Balmford; J. C Manning; S Proches; M van der Bank; G. Reeves; Terry A. Hedderson; Savolainen
One of the biggest challenges for conservation biology is to provide conservation planners with ways to prioritize effort. Much attention has been focused on biodiversity hotspots. However, the conservation of evolutionary process is now also acknowledged as a priority in the face of global change. Phylogenetic diversity (PD) is a biodiversity index that measures the length of evolutionary pathways that connect a given set of taxa. PD therefore identifies sets of taxa that maximize the accumulation of ‘feature diversity’. Recent studies, however, concluded that taxon richness is a good surrogate for PD. Here we show taxon richness to be decoupled from PD, using a biome-wide phylogenetic analysis of the flora of an undisputed biodiversity hotspot—the Cape of South Africa. We demonstrate that this decoupling has real-world importance for conservation planning. Finally, using a database of medicinal and economic plant use, we demonstrate that PD protection is the best strategy for preserving feature diversity in the Cape. We should be able to use PD to identify those key regions that maximize future options, both for the continuing evolution of life on Earth and for the benefit of society.
Nature | 2004
Cornelia Klak; G. Reeves; Terry A. Hedderson
The Succulent Karoo is an arid region, situated along the west coast of southern Africa. Floristically this region is part of the Greater Cape Flora and is considered one of the Earths 25 biodiversity hotspots. Of about 5,000 species occurring in this region, more than 40% are endemic. Aizoaceae (ice plants) dominate the Succulent Karoo both in terms of species numbers (1,750 species in 127 genera) and density of coverage. Here we show that a well-supported clade within the Aizoaceae, representing 1,563 species almost exclusively endemic to southern Africa, has diversified very recently and very rapidly. The estimated age for this radiation lies between 3.8 and 8.7 million years (Myr) ago, yielding a per-lineage diversification rate of 0.77–1.75 per million years. Both the number of species involved and the tempo of evolution far surpass those of any previously postulated continental or island plant radiation. Diversification of the group is closely associated with the origin of several morphological features and one anatomical feature. Because species-poor clades lacking these features occur over a very similar distribution area, we propose that these characteristics are key innovations that facilitated this radiation.
Cladistics | 2006
Timothy M. Crowe; Rauri C. K. Bowie; Paulette Bloomer; Tshifhiwa G. Mandiwana; Terry A. Hedderson; Ettore Randi; Sérgio Luiz Pereira; Julia L. Wakeling
The phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and classification of, and morpho‐behavioral (M/B) evolution in, gamebirds (Aves: Galliformes) are investigated. In‐group taxa (rooted on representatives of the Anseriformes) include 158 species representing all suprageneric galliform taxa and 65 genera. The characters include 102 M/B attributes and 4452 nucleic acid base pairs from mitochondrial cytochrome b (CYT B), NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2), 12S ribosomal DNA (12S) and control region (CR), and nuclear ovomucoid intron G (OVO‐G). Analysis of the combined character data set yielded a single, completely resolved cladogram that had the highest levels of jackknife support, which suggests a need for a revised classification for the phasianine galliforms. Adding 102 M/B characters to the combined CYT B and ND2 partitions (2184 characters) decisively overturns the topology suggested by analysis of the two mtDNA partitions alone, refuting the view that M/B characters should be excluded from phylogenetic analyses because of their relatively small number and putative character state ambiguity. Exclusion of the OVO‐G partition (with > 70% missing data) from the combined data set had no effect on cladistic structure, but slightly lowered jackknife support at several nodes. Exclusion of third positions of codons in an analysis of a CYT B + ND2 partition resulted in a massive loss of resolution and support, and even failed to recover the monophyly of the Galliformes with jackknife support. A combined analysis of putatively less informative, “non‐coding” characters (CYT B/ND2 third position sites + CR +12S + OVO‐G sequences) yielded a highly resolved consensus cladogram congruent with the combined‐evidence cladogram. Traditionally recognized suprageneric galliform taxa emerging in the combined cladogram are: the families Megapodiidae (megapodes), Cracidae (cracids), Numididae (guineafowls), Odontophoridae (New World quails) and Phasianidae (pheasants, pavonines, partridges, quails, francolins, spurfowls and grouse) and the subfamilies Cracinae (curassows, chachalacas and the horned guan), Penelopinae (remaining guans), Pavoninae sensu lato (peafowls, peacock pheasants and argus pheasants), Tetraoninae (grouse) and Phasianinae (pheasants minus Gallus). The monophyly of some traditional groupings (e.g., the perdicinae: partridges/quails/francolins) is rejected decisively, contrasted by the emergence of other unexpected groupings. The most remarkable phylogenetic results are the placement of endemic African galliforms as sisters to geographically far‐distant taxa in Asia and the Americas. Biogeographically, the combined‐data cladogram supports the hypothesis that basal lineages of galliforms diverged prior to the Cretaceous/Tertiary (K‐T) Event and that the subsequent cladogenesis was influenced by the break‐up of Gondwana. The evolution of gamebirds in Africa, Asia and the Americas has a far more complicated historical biogeography than suggested to date. With regard to character evolution: spurs appear to have evolved at least twice within the Galliformes; a relatively large number of tail feathers (≥ 14) at least three times; polygyny at least twice; and sexual dimorphism many times.
The Bryologist | 2000
Angela E. Newton; Cymon J. Cox; Jeffrey G. Duckett; John A. Wheeler; Bernard Goffinet; Terry A. Hedderson; Brent D. Mishler
Abstract Evolutionary relationships of mosses are still poorly understood, with family, order, and subclass circumscription and relationships remaining especially obscure. Over the past decade, a considerable body of data has accumulated, including information on morphological, developmental, anatomical, and ultrastructural characteristics, as well as nucleotide sequences for a number of nuclear and plastid genes. We have combined data from these different sources to provide an overview of the relationships of the major lineages of mosses. We analyzed a data set that includes 33 moss species and ten outgroup taxa drawn from the liverworts, hornworts, and vascular plants. Molecular data consisted of nucleotide sequences from four DNA regions, (rbcL, trnL-trnF, rps4 and 18S). Morphological data included 41 characters of which many were derived from published anatomical and ultra-structural studies. Combining morphological and molecular data in the analyses showed that mosses, including Sphagnum, Takakia, Andreaea and Andreaeobryum, form a monophyletic group, provided improved resolution of higher level relationships, and further insight into evolutionary patterns in morphology.
Plant Systematics and Evolution | 1996
Terry A. Hedderson; Russell L. Chapman; W. L. Rootes
We investigate phylogenetic relationships among hornworts, liverworts and mosses, and their relationships to other green plant groups, by analysis of nucleotide variation in complete 18s rRNA gene sequences of three green algae, two hornworts, seven liverworts, nine mosses, and six tracheophytes. Parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses yield a single optimal tree in which the hornworts are resolved as the basal group among land plants, and the liverworts and mosses are sister taxa that together form the sister clade to the tracheophytes. This phylogeny is internally robust as indicated by decay indices and by comparison (using both parsimony and likelihood criteria) to topologies representing five alternative hypotheses of bryophyte relationships. We discuss some possible reasons for differences between the phylogeny inferred from the rRNA data and those inferred from other character sets.
Plant Systematics and Evolution | 1999
Cymon J. Cox; Terry A. Hedderson
Parsimony and maximum likelihood analyses of combinedtrnL (UAA) 5′ exon —trnF (GAA) andrps4 exon cpDNA, and 18S nrDNA sequences of 60 arthrodontous moss taxa indicate strong support for the monophyly of a clade containing theSplachnineae, Orthotrichineae, and diplolepideous alternate sub-orders. A clade including theSplachnineae, Meesiaceae andLeptobryum (Bryaceae) is similarly well supported and forms the sister group to a clade comprising theOrthotrichineae and the other diplolepideous alternate mosses. Within this latter clade a number of well supported lineages are identified, but relationships among these remain poorly resolved. These analyses indicate that the Splachnaceous and Orthotrichaceous peristomes have been independently derived from an ancestral ‘perfect’ bryoid peristome.
The Bryologist | 2000
Cymon J. Cox; Bernard Goffinet; Angela E. Newton; A. Jonathan Shaw; Terry A. Hedderson
Abstract The diplolepideous-alternate peristome, when most highly developed, has endostome segments attached to a basal membrane and positioned alternate to the outer exostome teeth, with cilia often present between the segments. This peristome type defines the Bryidae ( sensu Vitt et al. 1998), which includes four orders: the Bryales, Leucodontales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales, of which the latter three are mainly pleurocarpous in their growth form. Chloroplast (rbcL, rps4, and trnL-trnF) and nuclear (18S rRNA) gene sequences have been analyzed using the parsimony optimality criterion to elucidate relationships among the Bryidae. The analyses strongly support the paraphyly of the Bryidae, with the Splachnidae, and possibly the Orthotrichidae, having arisen from ancestors within the Bryidae. The Leucodontales, Hypnales, and Hookeriales form a monophyletic group, as do the pleurocarpous members of the Bryidae. However, the two pleurocarpous clades are not resolved as sister groups, although their non-monophyly is not supported by the bootstrap. The phylogenetic hypothesis provides a context in which to infer evolutionary transitions in some key morphological characters relating to the peristome and the transition from the acrocarpous to pleurocarpous growth forms.
Taxon | 2002
Lizabeth R. Caddick; Paul Wilkin; Paula J. Rudall; Terry A. Hedderson; Mark W. Chase
Analyses of morphological and molecular characters for Dioscoreales Hook, f. (Chase & al., 1995b; Caddick & al., 2000a; Caddick & al., 2002) have redefined the order, which now comprises three families, Burmanniaceae, Dioscoreaceae, and Nartheciaceae. Since recent analyses of morphological and molecular data sets (Caddick & al., 2002) have indicated well-supported relationships within Dioscoreaceae R. Br., a formal reclassification of the family is presented here. Dioscoreaceae now contain four distinct genera, Dioscorea, Stenomeris, Tacca (previously in Taccaceae), and Trichopus. The Malagasy endemic Avetra sempervirens is close sister to Trichopus zeylanicus, and is here reclassified as a second species of this genus. The dioecious Dioscoreaceae genera, Borderea, Epipetrum, Nanarepenta, Rajania, Tamus, and Testudinaria, are nested within Dioscorea in phylogenetic analyses (Caddick & al., 2002), and are therefore sunk into it.
Plant Systematics and Evolution | 1999
William J. Baker; Conny B. Asmussen; Sasha C. Barrow; John Dransfield; Terry A. Hedderson
Phylogenies of the palm family based on DNA sequences from thetrnL —trnF region of the chloroplast genome are presented. Although the region is highly conserved in palms and relatively few sites in the aligned data matrix are parsimony informative, a variety of relationships among members of the family are revealed by the analyses, some of which are congruent with the current classification of the palms, and others which are not. However, consensus trees contain high levels of ambiguosity, partly due to the inadequate numbers of informative characters in the dataset. Additional data are required before well resolved palm phylogenies can be generated.