Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Terry Slevin is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Terry Slevin.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2013

Seven-year trends in sun protection and sunburn among Australian adolescents and adults

Angela Volkov; Suzanne Dobbinson; Melanie Wakefield; Terry Slevin

Aims : To examine the change in sun protective behaviours and sunburn of Australians over a seven‐year period, in the context of sustained skin cancer prevention campaigns and programs.


British Journal of Cancer | 2013

The Association Between Different Night Shiftwork Factors and Breast Cancer: a Case–Control Study

Lin Fritschi; Thomas C. Erren; Deborah Catherine Glass; Jennifer Girschik; Alana Thomson; Christobel Saunders; Terry Boyle; Sonia El-Zaemey; Pierra Rogers; Susan Peters; Terry Slevin; A. D'Orsogna; F. de Vocht; Roel Vermeulen; Jane Heyworth

Background:Research on the possible association between shiftwork and breast cancer is complicated because there are many different shiftwork factors, which might be involved including: light at night, phase shift, sleep disruption and changes in lifestyle factors while on shiftwork (diet, physical activity, alcohol intake and low sun exposure).Methods:We conducted a population-based case–control study in Western Australia from 2009 to 2011 with 1205 incident breast cancer cases and 1789 frequency age-matched controls. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect demographic, reproductive, and lifestyle factors and lifetime occupational history and a telephone interview was used to obtain further details about the shiftwork factors listed above.Results:A small increase in risk was suggested for those ever doing the graveyard shift (work between midnight and 0500 hours) and breast cancer (odds ratio (OR)=1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.97–1.39). For phase shift, we found a 22% increase in breast cancer risk (OR=1.22, 95% CI=1.01–1.47) with a statistically significant dose–response relationship (P=0.04). For the other shiftwork factors, risks were marginally elevated and not statistically significant.Conclusion:We found some evidence that some of the factors involved in shiftwork may be associated with breast cancer but the ORs were low and there were inconsistencies in duration and dose–response relationships.


Cancer Causes & Control | 2008

Deaths from non-melanoma skin cancer in Western Australia

Jennifer Girschik; Lin Fritschi; Timothy Threlfall; Terry Slevin

ObjectivesNon-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is common, slow growing, and rarely metastasizes. However, there are still nearly 400 deaths from NMSC in Australia annually. We aimed to investigate the accuracy of NMSC death coding and to describe the characteristics of these deaths and the potential for prevention.MethodsHistology reports for all deaths coded as NMSC (ICD-10 C44.0-C44.9) by the Western Australian Cancer Registry for the years 1996–2005 were reviewed for type of cancer, body site (primary tumor and metastases), and level of available documentation.ResultsOf 368 deaths recorded as being due to NMSC only 3 were found to be miscoded. An additional 53 deaths contained inadequate information to confirm NMSC as the cause of death. Of the confirmed cases, 219 were due to squamous cell carcinoma, 53 to Merkel cell carcinomas, and 40 to other skin cancers. Cases were mainly males and were elderly. Most of the primary squamous and Merkel cell carcinomas were in areas of maximum sun exposure (face, ears, and hands, and scalp in males).ConclusionsMisclassification of NMSC deaths in WA was minimal. The majority of NMSC deaths were due to squamous cell carcinomas; had primary sites associated with significant sun exposure; and occurred in older men.


BMC Public Health | 2014

Developing cancer warning statements for alcoholic beverages

Simone Pettigrew; Michelle Jongenelis; Tanya Chikritzhs; Terry Slevin; Iain S. Pratt; David Glance; Wenbin Liang

BackgroundThere is growing evidence of the increased cancer risk associated with alcohol consumption, but this is not well understood by the general public. This study investigated the acceptability among drinkers of cancer warning statements for alcoholic beverages.MethodsSix focus groups were conducted with Australian drinkers to develop a series of cancer-related warning statements for alcohol products. Eleven cancer warning statements and one general health warning statement were subsequently tested on 2,168 drinkers via an online survey. The statements varied by message frame (positive vs negative), cancer reference (general vs specific), and the way causality was communicated (‘increases risk of cancer’ vs ‘can cause cancer’).ResultsOverall, responses to the cancer statements were neutral to favorable, indicating that they are unlikely to encounter high levels of negative reaction from the community if introduced on alcoholic beverages. Females, younger respondents, and those with higher levels of education generally found the statements to be more believable, convincing, and personally relevant. Positively framed messages, those referring to specific forms of cancer, and those using ‘increases risk of cancer’ performed better than negatively framed messages, those referring to cancer in general, and those using the term ‘can cause cancer’.ConclusionCancer warning statements on alcoholic beverages constitute a potential means of increasing awareness about the relationship between alcohol consumption and cancer risk.


BMJ Open | 2015

Using a mass media campaign to raise women's awareness of the link between alcohol and cancer: cross-sectional pre-intervention and post-intervention evaluation surveys

Helen Dixon; Iain S. Pratt; Maree Scully; Jessica R Miller; Carla Patterson; Rebecca Hood; Terry Slevin

Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a population-based, statewide public health intervention designed to improve womens awareness and knowledge of the link between alcohol and cancer. Design Cross-sectional tracking surveys conducted pre-intervention and post-intervention (waves I and III of campaign). Setting Western Australia. Participants Cross-sectional samples of Western Australian women aged 25–54 years before the campaign (n=136) and immediately after wave I (n=206) and wave III (n=155) of the campaign. Intervention The ‘Alcohol and Cancer’ mass media campaign ran from May 2010 to May 2011 and consisted of three waves of paid television advertising with supporting print advertisements. Main outcome measures Campaign awareness; knowledge of drinking guidelines and the link between alcohol and cancer; intentions towards drinking. Results Prompted recognition of the campaign increased from 67% following wave I to 81% following wave III (adjusted OR (adj OR)=2.31, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.00, p=0.003). Improvements in womens knowledge that drinking alcohol on a regular basis increases cancer risk were found following wave I (adj OR=2.60, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.30, p<0.001) and wave III (adj OR=4.88, 95% CI 2.55 to 9.36, p<0.001) compared with baseline. Knowledge of the recommended number of standard drinks for low risk in the long term increased between baseline and wave I (adj OR=1.68, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.76, p=0.041), but not baseline and wave III (adj OR=1.42, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.39, p=0.191). Among women who drink alcohol, the proportion expressing intentions to reduce alcohol consumption increased significantly between baseline and wave III (adj OR=2.38, 95% CI 1.11 to 5.12, p=0.026). However, no significant reductions in recent drinking behaviour were found following the campaign. Conclusions Results indicate a population-based mass media campaign can reach the target audience and raise awareness of links between alcohol and cancer, and knowledge of drinking guidelines. However, a single campaign may be insufficient to measurably curb drinking behaviour in a culture where pro-alcohol social norms and product marketing are pervasive.


BMC Research Notes | 2014

Beliefs and perceptions about the causes of breast cancer: a case-control study

Allyson Thomson; Jane Heyworth; Jennifer Girschik; Terry Slevin; Christobel Saunders; Lin Fritschi

BackgroundAttributions of causality are common for many diseases, including breast cancer. The risk of developing breast cancer can be reduced by modifications to lifestyle and behaviours to minimise exposure to specific risk factors, such as obesity. However, these modifications will only occur if women believe that certain behaviours/lifestyle factors have an impact on the development of breast cancer.MethodThe Breast Cancer, Environment and Employment Study is a case-control study of breast cancer conducted in Western Australia between 2009 and 2011. As part of the study 1109 women with breast cancer and 1633 women without the disease completed a Risk Perception Questionnaire in which they were asked in an open-ended question for specific cause/s to the development of breast cancer in themselves or in others. The study identified specific causal beliefs, and assessed differences in the beliefs between women with and without breast cancer.ResultsThe most common attributions in women without breast cancer were to familial or inherited factors (77.6%), followed by lifestyle factors, such as poor diet and smoking (47.1%), and environmental factors, such as food additives (45.4%). The most common attributions in women with breast cancer were to mental or emotional factors (46.3%), especially stress, followed by lifestyle factors (38.6%) and physiological factors (37.5%), particularly relating to hormonal history.ConclusionsWhile the majority of participants in this study provided one or more causal attributions for breast cancer, many of the reported risk factors do not correspond to those generally accepted by the scientific community. These misperceptions could be having a significant impact on the success of prevention and early detection programs that seek to minimise the pain and suffering caused by this disease. In particular, women who have no family history of the disease may not work to minimise their exposure to the modifiable risk factors.


Health Promotion Journal of Australia | 2014

Public perceptions of cancer risk factors: A Western Australian study

Anna MacTiernan; Lin Fritschi; Terry Slevin; Geoffrey Jalleh; Robert J. Donovan; Jane Heyworth

ISSUE ADDRESSED Peoples perceptions of risk may influence health-related behaviours. The aim of this study was to investigate the perception of cancer risk factors among Western Australian adults in order to inform health promotion policies. METHODS Cross-sectional surveys of 2094 adults were undertaken in 2007/2008 in which respondents were asked whether they thought factors increased or decreased the risk of cancer. Factors included both established and unestablished risk factors for cancer. The distribution of perceptions was compared according to age and sex. RESULTS The study found high levels of endorsement for some unestablished risk factors (74-91%) and comparatively lower levels of endorsement for many established risk factors (33-80%). The established risk factors of smoking and asbestos received high levels of endorsement (94-98%). CONCLUSION It appears that the alignment between scientifically established risk factors and the Western Australian publics perception of cancer risk factors could be improved. SO WHAT? Health promotion strategies are needed to improve the publics awareness of cancer risk factors. The high levels of endorsement attributed to unestablished risk factors highlight the need to dispel myths surrounding cancer and to reinforce the key factors in cancer prevention. Ongoing assessment of the alignment between community perceptions of cancer risk and the scientific evidence for cancer risk is important for guiding prioritisation within public health organisations.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2014

Optimising the expansion of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program

Dayna R. Cenin; D James B St John; Melissa Ledger; Terry Slevin; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar

Objectives: To estimate the impact of various expansion scenarios of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) on the number of bowel cancer deaths prevented; and to investigate the impact of the expansion scenarios on colonoscopy demand.


BMC Public Health | 2015

Employers’ views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing: a qualitative study

Melanie Pescud; Renee Teal; Trevor Shilton; Terry Slevin; Melissa Ledger; Phillippa Waterworth; Michael Rosenberg

BackgroundThe evidence surrounding the value of workplace health promotion in positively influencing employees’ health and wellbeing via changes to their health behaviours is growing. The aim of the study was to explore employers’ views on the promotion of workplace health and wellbeing and the factors affecting these views.MethodsUsing a qualitative phenomenological approach, 10 focus groups were conducted with employers selected from a range of industries and geographical locations within Western Australia. The total sample size was 79.ResultsThree factors were identified: employers’ conceptualization of workplace health and wellbeing; employers’ descriptions of (un)healthy workers and perceptions surrounding the importance of healthy workers; and employers’ beliefs around the role the workplace should play in influencing health.ConclusionsProgress may be viable in promoting health and wellbeing if a multifaceted approach is employed taking into account the complex factors influencing employers’ views. This could include an education campaign providing information about what constitutes health and wellbeing beyond the scope of occupational health and safety paradigms along with information on the benefits of workplace health and wellbeing aligned with perceptions relating to healthy and unhealthy workers.


Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health | 2010

Beliefs about bowel cancer among the target group for the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia

Geoffrey Jalleh; Robert J. Donovan; Chad Lin; Terry Slevin; Cassandra Clayforth; Iain S. Pratt; Melissa Ledger

Objective: To assess awareness of and intentions and self‐reported participation in the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) in Australia and the programs impact on knowledge of and beliefs about bowel cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Terry Slevin's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christobel Saunders

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Trevor Shilton

National Heart Foundation of Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Chad Lin

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Dixon

Cancer Council Victoria

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge