Terry Zheutlin

Amiodarone in Patients with Previous Drug-Mediated Torsade de Pointes: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy

The safety and efficacy of long-term amiodarone therapy were examined in 12 patients who had previously developed torsade de pointes as a complication of previous antiarrhythmic therapy. The QTc intervals were determined at the time of torsade de pointes (570 +/- 40 ms), after 7 days of amiodarone loading (490 +/- 70 ms), and after 3 months of chronic amiodarone administration (580 +/- 80 ms). Compared to a drug-free control period, QTc was significantly prolonged (P less than 0.05) at the time of torsade de pointes, after amiodarone loading, and after 3 months of amiodarone therapy. The QTc intervals at the time of torsade de pointes and after chronic amiodarone treatment were not significantly different. At 16 +/- 7 months of follow-up, all patients remained free of subsequent torsade de pointes, syncope, or sudden death. In addition, 5 of 6 patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia remained free from arrhythmic recurrence despite persistence of inducible ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation studies done before discharge. We conclude that amiodarone can often be used safely and effectively in patients who have previously had an episode of drug-mediated torsade de pointes. Amiodarone-induced QTc prolongation, even when marked, does not predict recurrent torsade de pointes. These observations also suggest that the propensity for a drug to produce this arrhythmia is dependent on other electrophysiologic effects in addition to its ability to simply lengthen repolarization.

Ventricular tachycardia induced by biventricular pacing in patient with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a new alternative which affords symptomatic improvement in two‐thirds of patients who exhibit medically refractory congestive heart failure (CHF) as well as significant prolongation of the QRS duration (>135 msec). As more experience with CRT accrues, unexpected complications of this promising therapy may become apparent. Herein, we describe a patient with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy and refractory CHF who developed incessant ventricular tachycardia (VT) after the initiation of biventricular pacing.

Safety and efficacy of sotalol in patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

The safety and efficacy of oral sotalol, an investigational beta-adrenergic blocker with class III antiarrhythmic drug properties, were examined in a multicenter study in 236 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In 104 patients, the index arrhythmia was a cardiac arrest, and all patients had undergone at least 3 previous unsuccessful antiarrhythmic trials (mean = 5 per patient). In the 106 patients assessed by programmed electrical stimulation, sotalol completely suppressed induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 33 (31%) and rendered VT slower (greater than 100 ms prolongation of cycle length) or more difficult to induce in 29 (27%). Using continuous 24-hour ambulatory monitoring methods, sotalol complete- and partial-response rates were 51 and 12%, respectively. Of the 236 acute-phase patients, 151 were discharged receiving long-term sotalol therapy. The median sotalol dose was 480 mg/day. At a mean follow-up of 346 +/- 92 days, 27 patients (18%) had recurrence of sustained arrhythmia; 9, sudden death; 11, sustained VT; 5, automatic defibrillator discharge; and 2, syncope. Adverse effects forced discontinuation of therapy in 10 patients (7%): 6 secondary to symptomatic bradyarrhythmia, 2 due to refractory heart failure, 1 due to torsades de pointes, and 1 from bronchospasm. Life-table analysis of sotalols overall long-term efficacy at 6, 12 and 18 months were 80, 76 and 72%, respectively. Although mean follow-up was short (less than 1 year), neither acute-phase programmed stimulation nor 24-hour ambulatory monitoring responses were significantly predictive of subsequent arrhythmic outcome. Proarrhythmia was documented in 18 patients (7%), 17 during the acute phase and 1 during long-term follow-up.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Safety and efficacy of oral sotalol for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to other antiarrhythmic agents

The safety and efficacy of oral sotalol were evaluated in 481 patients with drug-refractory sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) in an open-label multicenter study. After drug-free baseline evaluations, therapy was initiated at 80 mg every 12 hours, with upward dose titrations of 160 mg/day being allowed at intervals of 72 hours to a maximum dose of 480 mg every 12 hours. Efficacy determinations were made by either programmed electrical stimulation (PES) or Holter monitoring responses. Of the 481 patients enrolled, 473 underwent acute-phase titration. Of the 269 patients assessable by PES, 94 (34.9%) exhibited complete response (suppression of inducible VT), with an additional 67 patients (24.9%) exhibiting partial response. Of the 109 patients assessable by Holter monitoring, 43 (39.4%) exhibited a complete response. There were no significant differences between responders and nonresponders with regard to left ventricular ejection fraction. Although response rates tended to improve as the sotalol dose was increased to 640 mg/day, efficacy was most commonly achieved at a sotalol dose of 320 mg/day. Sotalol was discontinued because of adverse effects in 42 (8.9%) of the acute-phase patients. The most common adverse effect was proarrhythmia, which was observed in 23 patients (4.9%). Proarrhythmia took the form of torsades de pointes in 12 patients and an increase in VT episodes in 11. In 3 acute-phase patients (0.6%), sotalol was discontinued because of the emergence of congestive heart failure. A total of 286 patients entered the long-term phase. Life-table estimates of the proportion of patients who remained free of recurrence of arrhythmia at 12, 18, and 27 months were 0.76, 0.72, and 0.66, respectively. There were no significant differences in time to recurrence of arrhythmia as related to PES response, Holter monitor response, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, or history of congestive heart failure. Among the 70 patients (24.5%) in whom there was recurrence of arrhythmia, sudden death occurred in 17 and sustained VT in 41. Sotalol was discontinued owing to presumed adverse effects in 21 (7.3%) of the long-term patients, including 8 with proarrhythmia; proarrhythmia consisted of torsades de pointes in 3 patients and increased episodes of VT in 5. These findings suggest that sotalol is an effective drug for the long-term treatment of patients with drug-refractory sustained VT. Proarrhythmia was observed in only 6.4% of the study population and tended to occur during the acute titration phase. The need to discontinue therapy because of congestive heart failure was uncommon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Programmed electrical stimulation to determine the need for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with complex ventricular ectopic activity

Patients with complex ventricular ectopy (greater than or equal to Lown grade III) and organic heart disease (OHD) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Despite this fact, many such patients will remain free of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia and thus are unnecessarily exposed to antiarrhythmic drug toxicity and arrhythmic potentiation. Programmed stimulation (PS) was used to direct therapy in 88 patients with asymptomatic ventricular ectopy complicating OHD. Thirty-three had inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) and underwent treatment. The 55 patients without inducible VT (less than or equal to 6 repetitive ventricular responses) are the focus of this study. Three patients required treatment for persistent cardiac awareness. The remaining 52 have been followed for 22 months off antiarrhythmic drugs and all have remained free of subsequent major arrhythmic events. Therefore, in patients with complex ventricular ectopy, OHD, and absence of prior symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia, PS identifies patients at low risk for future disabling or life-threatening arrhythmic episodes and patients with absence of inducible VT can usually be managed without antiarrhythmic drugs.

Exercise-provoked distal atrioventricular block.

Abstract Spontaneous or pacing-induced nonfunctional atrioventricular (AV) block occurring distal to the His bundle recording site is associated with a high probability of subsequent syncope or progression to high grade AV block.1 Accordingly, a reliable noninvasive method that could potentially unmask distal His-Purkinje block would be helpful in identifying patients in whom invasive conduction system studies should be undertaken. We report 3 patients in whom the occurrence of second-degree AV block during exercise testing unmasked serious underlying conduction system disease, which would have otherwise gone undetected by routine ambulatory monitoring and resting electrocardiograms. Subsequent evaluation of their conduction systems by electrophysiologic studies revealed marked prolongation of the HV interval and AV block distal to the His bundle in response to rapid atrial pacing.

Long-term arrhythmic outcome in survivors of ventricular fibrillation with absence of inducible ventricular tachycardia

While programmed electrical stimulation of the heart is useful in directing therapy in cardiac arrest survivors who exhibit inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT), controversy exists as to the risk of recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) and need for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients without inducible VT during drug-free control programmed stimulation studies. In this study, the clinical features and arrhythmic outcome of 43 survivors of VF without inducible VT at control programmed stimulation were examined. In 38 patients, factors that may have played a potentiating role in the genesis of VF included ischemia in 15, proarrhythmia in 18, rapid rate response to atrial fibrillation in 3 and acute alcoholism in 2. Three patients required antiarrhythmic drugs for supraventricular tachyarrhythmia and 40 patients were discharged without antiarrhythmic therapy. At 32 +/- 21 months (range 1 to 82), 37 (92%) have remained free of arrhythmic recurrence while 3 have had sustained subsequent major arrhythmic events (syncope 1 patient, VF 1, sudden cardiac death 1). Thus, survivors of VF without inducible VT at drug-free control programmed stimulation are characterized by (1) potentiating factors--often identifiable and correctable--that may be important to the genesis of VF; (2) generally low risk of arrhythmic recurrence; and (3) effective long-term management often achieved without the use of additional antiarrhythmic drugs or antitachycardia/defibrillation devices.

The proarrhythmic effects of amiodarone

P ROARRHYTHMIA is a term used to describe the apparent paradoxical exacerbation or development of new arrhythmia by antiarrhythmic drugs. In its most liberal interpretation this would include drug-induced bradyarrhythmia as well as tachyarrhythmia and increases in complexity or frequency of asymptomatic atria1 or ventricular ectopic activity (VEA). Programmed electrical stimulation (PES) studies can also detect atria1 or ventricular proarrhythmic effects using various criteria. What is of most interest clinically, however, is the drug-related potentiation of symptomatic arrhythmia by the production of a hemodynamitally poorly tolerated tachycardia. Finally, antiarrhythmic drugs may increase the minimum energy required for defibrillation, thus rendering implantable cardioverter defibrillators or external DC cardioversion less effective. Amiodarone is a recently approved Class III antiarrhythmic agent which is capable of producing almost all of these proarrhythmic effects.

Observations on the safety and effectiveness of dofetilide in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and normal left ventricular function.

Dofetilide is currently recommended as second-tier therapy to maintain sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and normal left ventricular function, yet limited data support this recommendation. We examined the safety and efficacy of dofetilide in this setting through a retrospective chart review. We evaluated patients who had symptomatic PAF, normal left ventricular function, and no significant valvular disease. The end points were complete suppression of symptomatic PAF and subjective symptomatic improvement with dofetilide treatment. Over a 3-year period, 34 patients who had failed previous antiarrhythmic therapy were included. Of these, 3 discontinued dofetilide treatment before discharge. Of the remaining 31 who continued treatment after discharge, it was eventually discontinued in 13. At 12 months, symptomatic improvement was observed in 18 of 31 patients, 6 of whom remained asymptomatic. Treatment with dofetilide in this study was successful in less than 1 in 5 patients. Despite careful precautions, serious proarrhythmias, the major limiting side effect of dofetilide, still occurred during long-term follow-up.

Reproducibility of programmed electrical stimulation responses in patients with ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation associated with coronary artery disease

Invasive electrophysiologic studies were performed in 102 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) using an aggressive programmed electrical stimulation (PES) protocol. The study was repeated after 2.0 +/- 2.9 days in all patients with no intercurrent changes in antiarrhythmic therapy. Patients with coronary artery disease (n = 72) were identified and PES results of these patients were analyzed and compared with results of patients without coronary artery disease. Multiple clinical and electrophysiologic factors were analyzed to determine any association with concordance of PES responses. No significant difference in concordance of PES responses was found in the 2 groups of patients. PES responses were groups into 3 categories: (1) noninducible, (2) nonsustained VT, and (3) sustained VT. Kappa values of PES responses of noninducible and sustained VT in both groups were higher and therefore the PES responses were more reproducible than nonsustained VT. The induction of sustained monomorphic VT was more reproducible than a PES response of nonsustained or sustained polymorphic VT. Inducible sustained VT with a rate of greater than or equal to 250 beats/min was less reproducible than induction of sustained VT with a rate less than 250 beats/min. Induction of VT by 3 extrastimuli was less reproducible than with any other mode. This short-term variability may account for false negatives associated with PES-directed antiarrhythmic therapy. Because of these findings, it is recommended that nonsustained VT and sustained polymorphic or rapid polymorphic VT should not be used as PES end points to guide antiarrhythmic therapy.