Tessa Keegel

A Systematic Review of the Job-stress Intervention Evaluation Literature, 1990–2005

Abstract Ninety reports of systematic evaluations of job-stress interventions were rated in terms of the degree of systems approach used. A high rating was defined as both organizationally and individually focused, versus moderate (organizational only), and low (individual only). Studies using high-rated approaches represent a growing proportion of the job-stress intervention evaluation literature. Individual-focused, low-rated approaches are effective at the individual level, favorably affecting individual-level outcomes, but tend not to have favorable impacts at the organizational level. Organizationally focused high- and moderate-rated approaches are beneficial at both individual and organizational levels. Further measures are needed to foster the dissemination and implementation of systems approaches to examining interventions for job stress.

Physical Activity and Risks of Proximal and Distal Colon Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Although there is convincing epidemiological evidence that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of colon cancer, it is unclear whether physical activity is differentially associated with the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate this issue. METHODS MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for English-language cohort and case-control studies that examined associations between physical activity and the risks of proximal colon and distal colon cancers. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the summary relative risks (RRs) for the associations between physical activity and the risks of the two cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The summary relative risk of the main results from these studies indicated that the risk of proximal colon cancer was 27% lower among the most physically active people compared with the least active people (RR = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66 to 0.81). An almost identical result was found for distal colon cancer (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.68 to 0.80). CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of both proximal colon and distal colon cancers, and that the magnitude of the association does not differ by subsite. Given this finding, future research on physical activity and colon cancer should focus on other aspects of the association that remain unclear, such as whether sedentary behavior and nonaerobic physical activity are associated with the risk of colon cancer.

Job stress as a preventable upstream determinant of common mental disorders: A review for practitioners and policy-makers

Abstract There is growing recognition of the important role of mental health in the workforce and in the workplace. At the same time, there has been a rapid growth of studies linking job stress and other psychosocial working conditions to common mental disorders, and a corresponding increase in public concern media attention to job stress and its impact upon worker health and well-being. This article provides a summary of the relevant scientific and medical literature on this topic for practitioners and policy-makers. It presents a primer on job stress concepts, an overview of the evidence linking job stress and common mental disorders, a summary of the intervention research on ways to prevent and control job stress, and a discussion of the strengths and weakness of the evidence base. We conclude that there is strong evidence linking job stress and common mental disorders, and that it is a substantial problem on the population level. On a positive note, however, the job stress intervention evidence also shows that the problem is preventable and can be effectively addressed by a combination of work- and worker-directed intervention.

The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis (1990-2007): a systematic review.

Contact dermatitis (CD) is the most common occupational skin disease (OSD) in Western countries, and represents approximately 90–95% of all OSD. 1 CD usually affects the hands, although other sites may be involved. 2 OSD is reported more frequently than occupational contact dermatitis (OCD). The “gold standard” for a diagnosis of OCD includes clinical assessment by an occupational dermatologist using a specific set of diagnostic criteria, 3 patch testing, and, if indicated, radioallergosorbent tests or prick testing. The available statistics generally underestimate the prevalence and incidence of OCD. Access to medical care and compensation varies widely throughout the world. Many workers with OCD may not seek medical advice and/or workers’ compensation, and practitioners do not consistently ask about workplace exposures. 4

The validity and reliability of the occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index

Background:  The occupational contact dermatitis disease severity index (ODDI) was designed to assess the severity and importantly the functional disability caused by occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) of the hands in patients attending our occupational dermatology clinic.

Job strain exposures vs. stress-related workers' compensation claims in Victoria, Australia: developing a public health response to job stress.

We present a comparative analysis of patterns of exposure to job stressors and stress-related workers’ compensation (WC) claims to provide an evaluation of the adequacy of claims-driven policy and practice. We assessed job strain prevalence in a 2003 population-based survey of Victorian [Australia] workers and compared these results with stress-related WC statistics for the same year. Job strain prevalence was higher among females than males, and elevated among lower vs. higher occupational skill levels. In comparison, claims were higher among females than males, but primarily among higher skill-level workers. There was some congruence between exposure and WC claims patterns. Highly exposed groups in lower socio-economic positions were underrepresented in claims statistics, suggesting that the WC insurance perspective substantially underestimates the job stress problems for these groups. Thus to provide a sufficient evidence base for equitable policy and practice responses to this growing public health problem, exposure or health outcome data are needed as an essential complement to claims statistics.

Topical corticosteroid allergy in an urban Australian centre

The reported prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis from topical corticosteroids in clinical populations, in the period 1993–2002, varied from 0.55 to 5.98%. This study is a retrospective analysis of 1153 individuals undergoing routine patch testing in an Occupational Dermatology Clinic in Melbourne, Australia. We report a rate of 0.52% for positive patch test reactions to 5 corticosteroids. Corticosteroids tested were betamethasone‐17‐valerate, budesonide, Diprosone® cream (betamethasone diproprionate 0.05%) (Essex‐Pharma, a division of Schering‐Plough Pty Ltd, Sydney, Australia), tixocortol‐21‐pivalate and triamcinolone acetonide. Population characteristics were described using the MOAHL (M = percentage of males tested; O = occupational; A = atopics; H = patients with hand eczema; L = patients with leg ulcers or stasis eczema) index. Prescribing patterns, rate of referral and rate of relevant positive patch test reactions were characterized for the region. These results were compared to the rates of corticosteroid allergy and patch testing methodologies from published international studies. It was noted that many high‐sensitization potential corticosteroids were not available in our region. Although a low percentage of leg ulcers and stasis dermatitis may be associated with a lower rate of corticosteroid allergy, this association may be confounded by regional factors such as prescribing habits and the local availability of corticosteroids. We conclude that the low rate of topical corticosteroid contact allergy reported by our clinic is associated with regional availability and prescribing practices and the scarcity of stasis dermatitis and leg ulcers in our clinic population.

Incidence and prevalence rates for occupational contact dermatitis in an Australian suburban area

Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) regularly causes high levels of worker morbidity; however, this is often not reflected in available statistics. This study aimed to collect and verify OCD reports/referrals and generate disease estimates for a defined geographical area in Melbourne, Australia. Two methods of data collection were used. In the first method, 30 general practitioners (GPs), 2 dermatologists and 1 dermatology outpatient clinic within a defined area reported each worker with suspected OCD seen as part of routine practice. With the second method, workers living in the area who were referred to a tertiary referral OCD clinic were included in the study. An occupational dermatologist used a gold standard process that included diagnostic patch testing to verify suspected cases. The incidence rate for confirmed cases was 20.5 per 100 000 workers [95% confidence interval (CI): 13–32.1]. The 1‐year‐period prevalence rate was 34.5 per 100 000 (95% CI: 24.4–48.7). The positive predictive value (PPV) was highest for the occupational dermatology clinic referrals [63% (95% CI: 49–76%)] compared with reports from the dermatologists/dermatology outpatient clinic [55% (95% CI: 36–74%)] and from GPs [43% (95% CI: 29–59%)]. This study utilizes reports from GPs and dermatologists to provide OCD disease estimates and validation data for an OCD disease register.

Are material safety data sheets (MSDS) useful in the diagnosis and management of occupational contact dermatitis

Objectives:  This study assesses both the success of medical practitioners in accessing hazardous substances’ information from product manufacturers and the accuracy and clinical usefulness of Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) presented by workers with suspected occupational contact dermatitis (OCD).

Occupational contact dermatitis in Australia: diagnostic and management practices, and severity of worker impairment.

The aims of this study were to compare treatment and referral practices between general practitioners (GPs) and dermatologists and to evaluate predictors for occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) disease severity measured in terms of worker impairment. Data were collected from 181 patients recruited for a larger study of OCD. Information about treatment recommendations and usual referral practices are reported for 123 patients. Data from patients, diagnosed with work‐related skin disease, were modelled for severity of worker impairment. GPs were more likely to treat a patient independently, referring if the patient did not improve, whereas dermatologists were more likely to refer for patch testing on initial presentation. Dermatologists were more likely to recommend gloves and GPs were more likely to recommend soap avoidance/substitution. 2 GPs and no dermatologists reported recommending the best practice combination of moisturizers, topical corticosteroids and soap substitutes. When adjusted for all variables including age, sex, duration and diagnostic subgroup, workers with atopy as a cofactor had the most severe impairment. This study suggests that in Australia, patients with suspected OCD are initially managed within general practice, few clinicians recommend best practice treatments for OCD, and that atopy is associated with severity. These findings have implications for health resource allocation, clinician education, and the pre‐employment counselling of atopic patients.