Tetsuya Yoshizaki

Disseminated nocardiosis during systemic steroid therapy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection

An 85‐year‐old man underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for a large superficial esophageal epithelial neoplasm, which required removal of 95% of the circumference of the esophageal mucosa. Steroids were given orally to prevent esophageal stricture starting on day 3 postoperatively. In the 6th week of steroid treatment, he developed high fever without other symptoms. Chest computed tomography revealed a nodular lesion in the lung. Sputum sample showed Gram‐positive, branching, filamentous bacteria, and a diagnosis of nocardiosis was suspected. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple focal lesions which indicated dissemination of nocardiosis. Trimethoprim‐sulfamethoxazole was immediately started, which led to the disappearance of pulmonary and cerebral nocardiosis with alleviation of fever. Recently, oral steroid treatment has been widely used for the prevention of esophageal stricture. However, the present case indicates the risk of life‐threatening infection and the importance of close monitoring of this treatment.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection of cecal lesions in proximity to the appendiceal orifice

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is performed for treatment of various gastrointestinal lesions; however, the cecum in proximity to the appendiceal orifice remains a challenging area. We reviewed our experience with cecal ESD near the appendiceal orifice in order to clarify whether this procedure is a safe and effective therapeutic option. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed ESD for lesions within approximately 12 mm of the appendiceal orifice at Kobe University Hospital and an affiliated hospital between January 2003 and December 2014. Lesions were classified as: Type 0, proximity to the appendiceal orifice but does not reach it; Type 1, reaches border of the appendix, but does not enter orifice; Type 2, enters orifice, and transition to normal appendiceal mucosa is discernible on inspection of the appendiceal lumen; and Type 3, enters orifice deeply and tumor edge cannot be observed. ESD was not performed for Type 3 lesions unless appendectomy was performed prior to ESD. RESULTS A total of 76 lesions satisfied the inclusion criteria (47 Type 0 lesions, 20 Type 1, 6 Type 2, and 3 Type 3). En bloc resection was achieved in 72 lesions (94.7 %). Median specimen size was 49 mm (range 15 - 114 mm), and median tumor size was 35.5 mm (10 - 110 mm). One patient experienced postoperative bleeding, which was treated by endoscopic hemostasis. Another patient who experienced intraoperative perforation and was treated by clip closure later developed appendicitis; he underwent emergency ileocecal surgical resection. Another patient experienced postoperative appendicitis and recovered with antibiotic treatment. CONCLUSIONS ESD in close proximity to the appendiceal orifice seems safe and effective.

Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for residual or recurrent superficial colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection

Superficial colorectal tumors can be treated effectively by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Few data are available on using ESD for residual or recurrent tumors after the first endoscopic resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESD for these lesions.

The Effects of Switching to Vonoprazan, a Novel Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, on Gastric Acidity and Reflux Patterns in Patients with Erosive Esophagitis Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors

Background/Aim: The effects of vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) have not yet been compared using multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH). Methods: A total of 8 patients with persistent gastric mucosal injury, despite completing an 8-week standard PPI therapy, were enrolled in the study. While they were on standard PPI therapy, the baseline values of reflux parameters, holding time ratio (HTR) of gastric pH >4, and esophageal pH <4 were obtained by using 24 h MII-pH monitoring. They were re-evaluated after discontinuation of the therapy and 4 weeks of subsequent treatment with vonoprazan 20 mg/day. Results: The patients were found to be CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers and negative for Helicobacter pylori infection. In 7 patients (87.5%), the mucosal lesions had healed completely after vonoprazan therapy. A significant increase in gastric pH >4 HTR was observed, from 26.5 to 78.0% (p = 0.029). A reduction in esophageal pH <4 HTR was also observed but it was not statistically significant. Furthermore, acid clearance time and the total number of reflux events, including acid and proximal reflux events, were significantly reduced. Conclusion: Vonoprazan may be a better therapy for the treatment of patients with PPI-refractory RE.

Risk of stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for large rectal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Improvements in the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) technique have made circumferential ESD in the rectum possible. However, little is known about the clinical course after extensive ESD in the rectum. The aim of this study was to determine the stricture risk in the rectum after total or subtotal circumferential ESD. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 69 patients with 69 rectal tumors that required ≥ 75 % circumferential resection were identified at Kobe University Hospital and an affiliated hospital between April 2005 and May 2014. Among the patients, 61 were available for evaluation of stricture development, either by follow-up colonoscopy or by surgical specimens. The rate and possible risk factors of post-ESD strictures were investigated. RESULTS Post-ESD rectal strictures developed in 12 patients (19.7 %). Patients who underwent total circumferential ESD developed a stricture (5/7, 71.4 %) more frequently than those with subtotal (≥ 90 %) ESD (7/16, 43.8 %). Patients undergoing an ESD procedure that involved < 90 % of the circumference did not develop strictures. The strictures were membranous or < 10 mm long in all cases. Of the patients with stricture, 11 received endoscopic balloon dilation and one received bougie with short-caliber-tip transparent hood; all strictures improved following dilation therapy. Statistical analysis revealed that ≥ 90 % circumferential resection was an independent risk factor for stricture, whereas morphology and size were not. CONCLUSIONS Patients who underwent total or subtotal circumferential ESD of a rectal tumor had a high risk of stricture formation. Dilation helped to alleviate the stenosis.Study registered at University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN 000016559).

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors.

Purpose: Recently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been applied for superficial colorectal neoplasms and the number of publications about it has been increasing, but little is known about the outcomes of colorectal ESD for the lesions >50 mm. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility and safety of colorectal ESD for the lesions >50 mm compared with the lesions <50 mm. Methods: A total of 674 superficial colorectal neoplasms in 629 patients treated by ESD at Kobe University Hospital from July 2008 to July 2013 were included in the analysis. Results: The median operation time (range) in the large lesion group (≥5 cm) was 109 (37 to 596) minutes, and it was 55 (6 to 248) minutes in the small lesion group (<5 cm). Median procedure speed (range) in the large lesion group was 0.28 (0.06 to 0.83) cm2/min, and it was 0.19 (0.04 to 0.83) cm2/min in the small lesion group. The en bloc resection rate and the curative resection rate in the small lesion group was 98.7% and 96.0%, and those were 95.7% and 91.4% in the large lesion group, respectively. In terms of adverse events, perforation, muscle damage, and postoperative bleeding occurred at similar frequency in both groups. Conclusions: ESD on colorectal lesions >50 mm takes longer operation time; however, it is resected time effectively without increasing the risk of adverse events compared with smaller lesions by ESD.

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions involving the ileocecal valve

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been applied to treat early colorectal cancers. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical course of ESD for lesions involving the ileocecal valve (ICV) by evaluating the successful resection rates, and the risk and frequency of adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS The outcome of ESD on 38 ICV lesions was compared with the outcome of 132 cecal lesions that did not involve the ICV or appendiceal orifice during the same study period. The factors related to longer procedure time, postoperative stricture development, and tumor recurrence were investigated for ESD of ICV lesions. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the ICV and non-ICV groups in the en block resection rates. The median procedure time was significantly longer in the ICV group than in the non-ICV group, with a point estimate of the difference of 37 minutes (95 % confidence interval [CI] 20.00 to 56.00; P  < 0.01). None of the patients developed symptomatic post-ESD stricture or tumor recurrence. ESD procedure duration was ≥ 120 minutes in 16 lesions and < 120 minutes in 22 lesions of the ICV group. A specimen diameter of ≥ 40 mm and tumor extension into terminal ileum were factors related to a longer procedure time (odds ratio [OR] 8.40, 95 %CI 1.53 to 46.10, P = 0.01; OR 10.60, 95 %CI 2.17 to 51.40, P  < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS ICV lesions can be resected by ESD without major adverse events or causing symptomatic stricture development. However, ESD for ICV lesions should be performed only by expert endoscopists, as the procedure requires accomplished endoscopic skill and experience.

Efficacy of a new hemostatic forceps during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Currently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted standard treatment for early gastric cancer, but one challenging aspect of ESD is hemostasis.

Electrolyte depletion syndrome (McKittrick–Wheelock syndrome) successfully treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection

A 66-year-old woman presented to us with malaise, anorexia and rectal mucous discharge, and her laboratory data showed severe hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypochloremia and renal failure. Computed tomography revealed massive occupation of the rectum by a large tumor. Colonoscopy revealed a mucus-rich villous tumor in the rectum. As there were no other factors that could cause an electrolyte disorder, she was diagnosed with McKittrick–Wheelock syndrome (MWS). The current standard treatment for MWS is partial surgical colectomy. However, surgeries are invasive and postoperative complications sometimes become an issue. After confirming no signs of submucosal invasion of the tumor by magnifying chromoendoscopic examination, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was indicated. The tumor was completely removed en bloc without adverse events. The histology showed a mucosal adenocarcinoma containing a villous component, 24.5 x 17.0 cm in size. This removal dramatically improved the patient’s symptoms and the electrolyte abnormalities without medication. Although several sessions of endoscopic balloon dilation were required to treat postoperative stricture, she has been symptom-free and had no recurrence for 4 years after treatment. We experienced a case of MWS treated by ESD instead of surgery. ESD should be feasible and beneficial for the treatment of MWS.

Esophageal diverticulum exposed during endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial cancer.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now widely accepted as a strategy to treat superficial esophageal neoplasms. The rate of adverse events, such as perforation, has been decreasing with the improvement of devices and techniques. In this paper, we report a case of esophageal cancer that had a diverticulum under cancerous epithelium. The diverticulum was not detected during preoperative examination, and led to perforation during the ESD procedure. Our case shows that, although rare, some diverticula can exist underneath the mucosal surface without obvious depression. If there is any sign of hidden diverticula during ESD, surgeons should proceed with caution or, depending on the case, the procedure should be discontinued to avoid adverse events.