Theo deVos
Epigenomics AG
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Theo deVos.
Clinical Chemistry | 2009
Theo deVos; Reimo Tetzner; Fabian Model; Günter Weiss; Matthias Schuster; Jürgen Distler; Kathryn V. Steiger; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Jens K. Habermann; Phillip Fleshner; Benton Oubre; Robert H. Day; Andrew Sledziewski; Catherine Lofton-Day
BACKGROUND The presence of aberrantly methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is highly correlated with the occurrence of colorectal cancer. We report the development of a new SEPT9 biomarker assay and its validation in case-control studies. The development of such a minimally invasive blood-based test may help to reduce the current gap in screening coverage. METHODS A new SEPT9 DNA methylation assay was developed for plasma. The assay comprised plasma DNA extraction, bisulfite conversion of DNA, purification of bisulfite-converted DNA, quantification of converted DNA by real-time PCR, and measurement of SEPT9 methylation by real-time PCR. Performance of the SEPT9 assay was established in a study of 97 cases with verified colorectal cancer and 172 healthy controls as verified by colonoscopy. Performance based on predetermined algorithms was validated in an independent blinded study with 90 cases and 155 controls. RESULTS The SEPT9 assay workflow yielded 1.9 microg/L (CI 1.3-3.0) circulating plasma DNA following bisulfite conversion, a recovery of 45%-50% of genomic DNA, similar to yields in previous studies. The SEPT9 assay successfully identified 72% of cancers at a specificity of 93% in the training study and 68% of cancers at a specificity of 89% in the testing study. CONCLUSIONS Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA, as measured in the new (m)SEPT9 assay, is a valuable biomarker for minimally invasive detection of colorectal cancer. The new assay is amenable to automation and standardized use in the clinical laboratory.
PLOS ONE | 2008
Robert Grützmann; Béla Molnár; Christian Pilarsky; Jens K. Habermann; Peter M. Schlag; Hans Detlev Saeger; Stephan Miehlke; Thomas Stolz; Fabian Model; Uwe J. Roblick; Hans Peter Bruch; Rainer Koch; Volker Liebenberg; Theo deVos; Xiaoling Song; Robert H. Day; Andrew Sledziewski; Catherine Lofton-Day
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths despite the fact that detection of this cancer in early stages results in over 90% survival rate. Currently less than 45% of at-risk individuals in the US are screened regularly, exposing a need for better screening tests. We performed two case-control studies to validate a blood-based test that identifies methylated DNA in plasma from all stages of CRC. Methodology/Principal Findings Using a PCR assay for analysis of Septin 9 (SEPT9) hypermethylation in DNA extracted from plasma, clinical performance was optimized on 354 samples (252 CRC, 102 controls) and validated in a blinded, independent study of 309 samples (126 CRC, 183 controls). 168 polyps and 411 additional disease controls were also evaluated. Based on the training study SEPT9-based classification detected 120/252 CRCs (48%) and 7/102 controls (7%). In the test study 73/126 CRCs (58%) and 18/183 control samples (10%) were positive for SEPT9 validating the training set results. Inclusion of an additional measurement replicate increased the sensitivity of the assay in the testing set to 72% (90/125 CRCs detected) while maintaining 90% specificity (19/183 for controls). Positive rates for plasmas from the other cancers (11/96) and non-cancerous conditions (41/315) were low. The rate of polyp detection (>1 cm) was ∼20%. Conclusions/Significance Analysis of SEPT9 DNA methylation in plasma represents a straightforward, minimally invasive method to detect all stages of CRC with potential to satisfy unmet needs for increased compliance in the screening population. Further clinical testing is warranted.
BMC Gastroenterology | 2014
Andreas Adler; Sebastian Geiger; Anne Keil; Harald Bias; Philipp Schatz; Theo deVos; Jens Dhein; Mathias Zimmermann; Rudolf Tauber; Bertram Wiedenmann
BackgroundDespite strong recommendations for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, participation rates are low. Understanding factors that affect screening choices is essential to developing future screening strategies. Therefore, this study assessed patient willingness to use non-invasive stool or blood based screening tests after refusing colonoscopy.MethodsParticipants were recruited during regular consultations. Demographic, health, psychological and socioeconomic factors were recorded. All subjects were advised to undergo screening by colonoscopy. Subjects who refused colonoscopy were offered a choice of non-invasive tests. Subjects who selected stool testing received a collection kit and instructions; subjects who selected plasma testing had a blood draw during the office visit. Stool samples were tested with the Hb/Hp Complex Elisa test, and blood samples were tested with the Epi proColon® 2.0 test. Patients who were positive for either were advised to have a diagnostic colonoscopy.Results63 of 172 subjects were compliant to screening colonoscopy (37%). 106 of the 109 subjects who refused colonoscopy accepted an alternative non-invasive method (97%). 90 selected the Septin9 blood test (83%), 16 selected a stool test (15%) and 3 refused any test (3%). Reasons for blood test preference included convenience of an office draw, overall convenience and less time consuming procedure.Conclusions97% of subjects refusing colonoscopy accepted a non-invasive screening test of which 83% chose the Septin9 blood test. The observation that participation can be increased by offering non-invasive tests, and that a blood test is the preferred option should be validated in a prospective trial in the screening setting.
Journal of Clinical Epigenetics | 2017
Theo deVos; Béla Molnár
Screening for colorectal cancer is widely considered a cost effective intervention with strong evidence supporting mortality reduction in the screened population. Despite this, global screening rates remain low, even in developed countries. Blood based screening tests have the potential to overcome resistance to screening, thereby increasing overall participation, and saving lives. Here we review the development of a recently US FDA approved blood based epigenetic screening test for colorectal cancer. The Epi proColon test is based on the Septin 9 (SEPT9) gene promoter methylation status measured in cell free DNA from plasma. While the assessment of DNA methylation has been practiced in laboratories for some time, the approved test provides a standardized and kitted method for isolation of cell free DNA from plasma, reagents and methods for bisulfite conversion and purification of converted DNA (bisDNA) in preparation for DNA methylation analysis by real time PCR. This enables broad dissemination of DNA methylation based testing to laboratories approved to perform standard molecular diagnostics. In clinical trials, the approved Epi proColon test had sensitivity for colorectal cancer of 68-72%, comparable to commonly used stool tests, at a specificity of 80-82%. The test was well received, with 99.5% of patients in a participation trial agreeing to testing, and of these, when the test was positive, 67% scheduled colonoscopy. Finally, 59% of patients who had a colonoscopy in this study had a finding requiring polypectomy or biopsy. Based on these data, the test was approved as a screening test in the US, for patients who are otherwise unscreened, a key advance for molecular diagnostics applications in the field of clinical epigenetics.
Gastroenterology | 2009
Theo deVos; Reimo Tetzner; Fabian Model; Günter Weiss; Matthias Schuster; Juergen Distler; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Jens K. Habermann; Phillip Fleshner; Benton Oubre; Robert W. Day; Andrew Sledziewski; Catherine Lofton-Day
Introduction: The low sensitivity of the fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) based on the guaiac have made to develop new immunochemical tests with an efficiency to detect advanced neoplasia (advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer) still not well established. Aim: Determine the sensitivity and specificity of a FOBT based on the guaiac (FOBTg) with a quantitative immunochemical FOBT (FOBTi) to detect advanced neoplasia. Material and methods: Patients: all individuals with a colonoscopy programmed by any cause (screening, surveillance or symptoms) were included. Individuals with personal history of inflammatory bowel diseases or colorectal cancer were excluded. During the days previous to the exploration three high sensitivity FOBTg and two FOBTi (positive test ≥100ng/ml) were completed. The sample was calculated for demonstrating the superiority of the FOBTi of 15% of sensitivity with a final sample of 700 individuals. Results We presented the results of the first 140 individuals. The colonoscopy was performed for symptoms in 66% of cases and for screening or surveillance in 34% of cases. The colonoscopy detected 16 individuals (11%) with an advanced neoplasia (2 infiltrant carcinoma and 14 advanced adenomes). Other finds were: 20 patients with non advanced adenomes, 11 with polyps not adenomatous and 4 inflammatory colitis. The colonoscopy was normal in 88 (63%) individuals. The percentage of positive test was from 3,5% (5/140) and 16,5% (23/140) for the FOBTg and FOBTi, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value to detect an advanced neoplasia were 12%, 97%, 40% and 89% with the FOBTg and of 62,5%, 89%, 60,8%, 81% for the FOBTi. If considered only the first immunochemical test, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 43,7%, 92,7%, 43,7%, 92,7%, respectively. Conclusion The FOBTi is very superior to the FOBTg to detect advanced neoplasia although the high number of false positives could limit its use. The utilization of one or two FOBTi should be appraised depending on the disposable endoscopic resources.
Archive | 2010
Susan Cottrell; Theo deVos; Juergen Distler; Carolina Haefliger; Ralf Lesche; Achim Plum; Matthias Schuster
Publisher Summary The human genome contains four bases—guanine, adenine, thymine, and cytosine. The cytosines can be either methylated or unmethylated at the fifth carbon position in the pyrimidine ring. In general, they can only be methylated when they are in the context of a CpG dinucleotide that involves a cytosine immediately followed by a guanine. The methylation status of a CpG island is correlated with the chromatin structure and expression levels of nearby genes. CpG islands associated with actively transcribed genes are typically unmethylated. When a CpG island is methylated, methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins recognize the methylated CpG and recruit the necessary factors for chromatin condensation and gene inactivation. This DNA methylation state is maintained during cell division by a family of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases. Cancer was viewed as an accumulation of chromosomal aberrations and, therefore, called a “genetic disease.” However, it has become clear over time that epigenetic changes play a crucial role in carcinogenesis. While attention is focused on methylation in carcinogenesis, a similar groundswell of research is emerging on methylation in other diseases, especially autoimmune and cardiovascular conditions.
Archive | 2010
Susan Cottrell; Theo deVos; Juergen Distler; Carolina Haefliger; Ralf Lesche; Achim Plum; Matthias Schuster
Publisher Summary The human genome contains four bases—guanine, adenine, thymine, and cytosine. The cytosines can be either methylated or unmethylated at the fifth carbon position in the pyrimidine ring. In general, they can only be methylated when they are in the context of a CpG dinucleotide that involves a cytosine immediately followed by a guanine. The methylation status of a CpG island is correlated with the chromatin structure and expression levels of nearby genes. CpG islands associated with actively transcribed genes are typically unmethylated. When a CpG island is methylated, methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins recognize the methylated CpG and recruit the necessary factors for chromatin condensation and gene inactivation. This DNA methylation state is maintained during cell division by a family of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases. Cancer was viewed as an accumulation of chromosomal aberrations and, therefore, called a “genetic disease.” However, it has become clear over time that epigenetic changes play a crucial role in carcinogenesis. While attention is focused on methylation in carcinogenesis, a similar groundswell of research is emerging on methylation in other diseases, especially autoimmune and cardiovascular conditions.
Essentials of Genomic and Personalized Medicine | 2010
Susan Cottrell; Theo deVos; Juergen Distler; Carolina Haefliger; Ralf Lesche; Achim Plum; Matthias Schuster
Publisher Summary The human genome contains four bases—guanine, adenine, thymine, and cytosine. The cytosines can be either methylated or unmethylated at the fifth carbon position in the pyrimidine ring. In general, they can only be methylated when they are in the context of a CpG dinucleotide that involves a cytosine immediately followed by a guanine. The methylation status of a CpG island is correlated with the chromatin structure and expression levels of nearby genes. CpG islands associated with actively transcribed genes are typically unmethylated. When a CpG island is methylated, methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins recognize the methylated CpG and recruit the necessary factors for chromatin condensation and gene inactivation. This DNA methylation state is maintained during cell division by a family of enzymes called DNA methyltransferases. Cancer was viewed as an accumulation of chromosomal aberrations and, therefore, called a “genetic disease.” However, it has become clear over time that epigenetic changes play a crucial role in carcinogenesis. While attention is focused on methylation in carcinogenesis, a similar groundswell of research is emerging on methylation in other diseases, especially autoimmune and cardiovascular conditions.
Clinical Chemistry | 2008
Catherine Lofton-Day; Fabian Model; Theo deVos; Reimo Tetzner; Juergen Distler; Matthias Schuster; Xiaoling Song; Ralf Lesche; Volker Liebenberg; Matthias P.A. Ebert; Béla Molnár; Robert Grützmann; Christian Pilarsky; Andrew Sledziewski
Archive | 2008
Theo deVos; Cathy Lofton-Day; Andrew Sledziewski; Fabian Model; Michael Krouse; Matthias Schuster; Jürgen Distler; Reimo Tetzner; Jesse Ho