Theo van der Sluis
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Theo van der Sluis.
Landscape Ecology | 2007
Paul Arens; Theo van der Sluis; Wendy van’t Westende; Ben Vosman; C.C. Vos; M.J.M. Smulders
We studied the effects of landscape structure, habitat loss and fragmentation on genetic differentiation of Moor frog populations in two landscapes in The Netherlands (Drenthe and Noord-Brabant). Microsatellite data of eight loci showed small to moderate genetic differentiation among populations in both landscapes (FST values 0.022 and 0.060, respectively). Both heterozygosity and population differentiation indicate a lower level of gene flow among populations in Noord-Brabant, where populations were further apart and have experienced a higher degree of fragmentation for a longer period of time as compared to populations in Drenthe. A significant isolation-by-distance pattern was found in Drenthe, indicating a limitation in dispersal among populations due to geographic distance. In Noord-Brabant a similar positive correlation was obtained only after the exclusion of a single long-time isolated population. After randomised exclusion of populations a significant additional negative effect of roads was found but not of other landscape elements. These results are discussed in view of improving methodology of assessing the effects of landscape elements on connectivity.
Landscape Ecology | 2014
Stefan Schindler; Zita Sebesvari; Christian Damm; Katrin Euller; Volker Mauerhofer; Anna Schneidergruber; Marianna Biró; Franz Essl; Robert Kanka; Sophie G. Lauwaars; Christiane Schulz-Zunkel; Theo van der Sluis; Michaela Kropik; Viktor Gasso; Andreas Krug; Martin T. Pusch; Klaus Peter Zulka; Werner Lazowski; Christa Hainz-Renetzeder; Klaus Henle; Thomas Wrbka
The concept of green infrastructure has been recently taken up by the European Commission for ensuring the provision of ecosystem services (ESS). It aims at the supply of multiple ESS in a given landscape, however, the effects of a full suite of management options on multiple ESS and landscape multifunctionality have rarely been assessed. In this paper we use European floodplain landscapes as example to develop an expert based qualitative conceptual model for the assessment of impacts of landscape scale interventions on multifunctionality. European floodplain landscapes are particularly useful for such approach as they originally provided a high variety and quantity of ESS that has declined due to the strong human impact these landscapes have experienced. We provide an overview of the effects of floodplain management options on landscape multifunctionality by assessing the effects of 38 floodplain management interventions on 21 relevant ESS, as well as on overall ESS supply. We found that restoration and rehabilitation consistently increased the multifunctionality of the landscape by enhancing supply of provisioning, regulation/maintenance, and cultural services. In contrast, conventional technical regulation measures and interventions related to extraction, infrastructure and intensive land use cause decrease in multifunctionality and negative effects for the supply of all three aspects of ESS. The overview of the effects of interventions shall provide guidance for decision makers at multiple governance levels. The presented conceptual model could be effectively applied for other landscapes that have potential for a supply of a high diversity of ESS.
Biodiversity and Conservation | 2016
Stefan Schindler; Fionnuala H. O’Neill; Marianna Biró; Christian Damm; Viktor Gasso; Robert Kanka; Theo van der Sluis; Andreas Krug; Sophie G. Lauwaars; Zita Sebesvari; Martin T. Pusch; Boris Baranovsky; Thomas Ehlert; Bernd Neukirchen; James R. Martin; Katrin Euller; Volker Mauerhofer; Thomas Wrbka
Floodplain ecosystems are biodiversity hotspots and supply multiple ecosystem services. At the same time they are often prone to human pressures that increasingly impact their intactness. Multifunctional floodplain management can be defined as a management approach aimed at a balanced supply of multiple ecosystem services that serve the needs of the local residents, but also those of off-site populations that are directly or indirectly impacted by floodplain management and policies. Multifunctional floodplain management has been recently proposed as a key concept to reconcile biodiversity and ecosystem services with the various human pressures and their driving forces. In this paper we present biophysics and management history of floodplains and review recent multifunctional management approaches and evidence for their biodiversity effects for the six European countries Ireland, the Netherlands, Germany, Slovakia, Hungary and the Ukraine. Multifunctional use of floodplains is an increasingly important strategy in some countries, for instance in the Netherlands and Hungary, and management of floodplains goes hand in hand with sustainable economic activities resulting in flood safety and biodiversity conservation. As a result, biodiversity is increasing in some of the areas where multifunctional floodplain management approaches are implemented. We conclude that for efficient use of management resources and ecosystem services, consensual solutions need to be realized and biodiversity needs to be mainstreamed into management activities to maximize ecosystem service provision and potential human benefits. Multifunctionality is more successful where a broad range of stakeholders with diverse expertise and interests are involved in all stages of planning and implementation.
Landscape Research | 2018
Theo van der Sluis; Bas Arts; Kasper Kok; M.M.B. Bogers; Anne Gravsholt Busck; Kalev Sepp; Isabel Loupa-Ramos; Vangelis Pavlis; Nicoleta Geamana; Emilie Crouzat
Abstract Understanding complex processes of landscape change is crucial to guide the development of future landscapes and land resources. Through Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping, we studied the processes of landscape change of six different environmental zones in Europe. Results show that landscapes are complex systems, with many interactions. Except for one, all regions show a strong decline in landscape quality. Dominant drivers are EU policy and the global economy, sometimes in conjunction with environmental drivers or the governance system. The process of change differs for all cases, through urbanisation or land abandonment in some cases, and agricultural intensification in others. The (un)intended effects of policies are difficult to predict. Although some EU Policies directly improve landscape quality, their indirect effects as well as other EU policies outweigh this positive influence and jointly result in a decrease of landscape quality. To counter these negative side effects, targeted landscape policies are urgently needed.
Conservation Biology | 2003
Geert W. T. A. Groot Bruinderink; Theo van der Sluis; D.R. Lammertsma; Paul Opdam; R. Pouwels
Land Use Policy | 2016
Theo van der Sluis; Bas Pedroli; Søren Pilgaard Kristensen; Georgia Cosor; Evangelos S. Pavlis
River Research and Applications | 2004
Noël Geilen; Hans Jochems; Laurence Krebs; Serge Muller; Bas Pedroli; Theo van der Sluis; Kris Van Looy; Sabine Van Rooij
Land Use Policy | 2016
Søren Pilgaard Kristensen; Anne Gravsholt Busck; Theo van der Sluis; Veronika Gaube
Land Use Policy | 2017
Pia Frederiksen; Theo van der Sluis; Angheluta Vadineanu; Theano S. Terkenli; Veronika Gaube; Anne Gravsholt Busck; Jens Peter Vesterager; Nicoleta Geamana; Despoina Schistou; Bas Pedroli
Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History | 2016
Leon Tobias Hauser; Theo van der Sluis; Mendel Giezen