Theodora P. M. Vliet Vlieland

EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis

The objective was to develop evidence -based recommendations and a research and educational agenda for the non-pharmacological management of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). The multidisciplinary task force comprised 21 experts: nurses, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, rheumatologists, orthopaedic surgeons, general practitioner, psychologist, dietician, clinical epidemiologist and patient representatives. After a preliminary literature review, a first task force meeting and five Delphi rounds, provisional recommendations were formulated in order to perform a systematic review. A literature search of Medline and eight other databases was performed up to February 2012. Evidence was graded in categories I–IV and agreement with the recommendations was determined through scores from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Eleven evidence-based recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee OA were developed, concerning the following nine topics: assessment, general approach, patient information and education, lifestyle changes, exercise, weight loss, assistive technology and adaptations, footwear and work. The average level of agreement ranged between 8.0 and 9.1. The proposed research agenda included an overall need for more research into non-pharmacological interventions for hip OA, moderators to optimise individualised treatment, healthy lifestyle with economic evaluation and long-term follow-up, and the prevention and reduction of work disability. Proposed educational activities included the required skills to teach, initiate and establish lifestyle changes. The 11 recommendations provide guidance on the delivery of non-pharmacological interventions to people with hip or knee OA. More research and educational activities are needed, particularly in the area of lifestyle changes.

Efficacy of multidisciplinary team care programs in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of multidisciplinary team care programs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Data were obtained by a Medline and a manual search of the literature through January 1997. Both the design and analysis aspects of controlled trials were evaluated. RESULTS Forty-two papers reporting on 35 clinical trials of multidisciplinary team care were initially identified. Fifteen trials had a controlled design, nine of which were randomized. Patient characteristics, interventions, end point measures, and presentation of the data varied widely among the controlled studies. In 12 trials, inpatient (n = 6) or outpatient (n = 6) multidisciplinary programs were compared with regular outpatient care. Inpatient programs (average duration, 10 to 28 days) had a direct favorable effect on disease activity, lasting up to 1 year. The effect of outpatient programs (average duration, 1 to 2 years) was less marked, with greater improvement of functional status at the end of the treatment program shown in one study. In three trials, inpatient multidisciplinary programs were compared with similar outpatient programs. One study showed that inpatient care was more effective, whereas in two studies similar results were obtained in both groups. CONCLUSION Favorable effects on disease activity were seen in most trials comparing short inpatient team care with regular outpatient care. Proof of efficacy of prolonged outpatient team care is scanty. Results of trials comparing inpatient with outpatient team care remain inconclusive.

Are patients with rheumatoid arthritis less physically active than the general population

Background:Although promoting physical activity (PA) and exercise among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is highly advocated nowadays, little is known about actual PA levels of these patients. In particular, the literature investigating how these PA levels are in proportion to the levels among the general population is scarce. Objective:To compare the self-reported PA levels of patients with RA with those of the general Dutch population. Methods:A sample of 400 RA patients were sent the Short QUestionnaire to ASsess Health-Enhancing PA comprising 10 questions about PA. From these data the proportions meeting the Dutch public health recommendation for PA (i.e., moderate PA for 30 minutes on ≥5 days/wk) and the total number of minutes of PA per week were calculated. These data were compared with similar data from a representative sample of the general Dutch population. Results:Two hundred fifty-two patients returned the questionnaire (response 63%). The proportions of RA patients meeting the PA recommendation were similar to those of the general population (57% in categories 45–64 years; 59% in categories ≥65 years, and 58% in the total groups). The average number of minutes of PA per week was significantly lower in the RA population compared with the general population in the category 45 to 64 years (1836 vs. 2199, respectively, P = 0.001), whereas the difference in the category ≥65 years was not significant (1115 vs. 1218 minutes, respectively, P = 0.33). Conclusions:The proportion of RA patients meeting the Dutch PA recommendation was similar to the general Dutch population. However, with respect to the average number of minutes of PA per week, the RA patients were less physically active. Because patients with RA have an increased risk of chronic conditions such as osteoporosis or cardiovascular diseases along with their arthritis, it remains a matter of utmost importance for health care professionals such as rheumatologists, physical therapists, and clinical nurse specialists to promote PA in daily clinical practice and guide patients in achieving and maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Measuring educational needs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis using the Dutch version of the Educational Needs Assessment Tool (DENAT)

The Educational Needs Assessment Tool (ENAT) was developed in the United Kingdom (UK) to systematically assess the educational needs of patients with arthritis. The aim of the present study was to describe the educational needs of Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using the Dutch version of the ENAT (DENAT). The original UK version of the ENAT, comprising 39 items grouped into seven domains, was translated into Dutch according to international guidelines for cross-cultural translation and adaptation. The DENAT was then sent to a random sample of 319 RA patients registered at the outpatient clinic of a university hospital. For each domain (score range 1–5, equalling low–high educational needs), a median score with the inter-quartile range was computed. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to determine possible associations between educational needs and age, disease duration, gender and educational background. The response rate was 165 out of 319 (52%). The median educational needs scores were 2.5 for “managing pain”, 3.0 for “movement”, 2.0 for “feelings”, 4.0 for “arthritis process”, 4.0 for “treatments from health professionals”, 3.5 for “self-help measures” and 2.5 for “support systems”. Lower age and shorter disease duration were associated with more educational needs in the domain “support systems”. In addition, younger patients had more educational needs regarding managing pain and feelings than older patients. There were no associations between gender or educational background and educational needs. The DENAT has demonstrated its ability to identify individual educational needs of Dutch patients with RA. The lower age and shorter disease duration were associated with more educational needs. The practical applicability of the DENAT needs further research.

Measurement of Morning Stiffness in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE Morning stiffness (MS) is a common problem for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However the clinical evaluation of the symptom has proved to be difficult. The aim of the study was to determine the responsiveness of two methods for measuring MS. METHODS Data from an uncontrolled (n = 63) and a controlled study (n = 80) of inpatient multidisciplinary team care for RA were analyzed. MS was measured by its duration to maximum improvement and by its severity on a visual analog scale (VAS). The responsiveness of both assessment methods was computed by calculating effect sizes and t-statistics, and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with clinical improvement according to the definition of the American College of Rheumatology as an external criterion. RESULTS With respect to the ability to detect a clinical improvement between admission and discharge in the uncontrolled study, and a difference in improvement between the treatment and the control group in the controlled study, the effect sizes and t-values of the VAS for severity of MS were consistently higher than those of the duration of MS. In contrast to the duration, the responsiveness of the VAS for MS compared favorably with the responsiveness of other endpoint measures. The ROC surface area of the VAS was higher than that of the duration. CONCLUSION For the evaluation of MS in RA clinical trials, the assessment of MS by a severity score is more responsive than one based on duration and compares favorably with the performance of other endpoint measures.

Maintenance of physical activity after Internet-based physical activity interventions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES To investigate the maintenance of physical activity 12 months after two 1-year Internet-based physical activity interventions in patients with RA. METHODS This follow-up study was a randomized comparison of an Internet-based individualized training (IT) and a general training (GT) programme in sedentary RA patients. Outcome measures included physical activity (meeting public health recommendations for moderate physical activity, i.e. 30 min for at least 5 days/week; or vigorous physical activity, i.e. 20 min for at least 3 days/week), functional ability and quality of life (QoL). RESULTS Of the 152 RA patients who completed the initial study, 110 (72%) were available at follow-up. At 24 months, the proportions of patients meeting public health recommendations for moderate intensity physical activity were significantly higher compared with baseline in both the IT and GT groups (19 and 24%, respectively, P < 0.05), whereas the proportions of patients meeting the recommendation for vigorous activity was only significantly higher compared with baseline in the IT group (P < 0.05) but not in the GT group. There were no differences between the IT and GT groups concerning proportions of patients meeting moderate or vigorous physical activity recommendations at 24 months. Apart from a significantly higher RAQoL score in the IT group at 24 months compared with baseline, there were no significant differences within or between the programmes regarding functional ability or QoL. CONCLUSION In RA patients, the effectiveness of both an individualized and a general 1-year Internet-based physical activity programme is sustained with respect to moderate intensity physical activity up to 12 months after the interventions.

Non-drug therapies in early rheumatoid arthritis

Non-pharmacological treatment modalities are often used as an adjunct to drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this overview is to summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of these modalities in early RA. The few available randomized controlled trials that have specifically investigated patients with early RA support the effectiveness of dynamic exercise and cognitive behavioural interventions, and to a lesser extent of joint protection programmes and foot orthoses. The effectiveness of multidisciplinary team-care programmes, specialist nurse care, electro-physical modalities (including passive hydrotherapy), wrist orthoses, and dietary interventions have not been studied in patients with early RA. Current recommendations on the usage of non-pharmacological treatment modalities in sets of guidelines on the management of early RA vary with respect to their scope, strength and level of detail. The results of this review indicate a need for further investigation into the most clinically effective and cost-effective strategies to deliver non-pharmacological treatment modalities as well as comprehensive arthritis care models in early RA.

Development of healthcare quality indicators for rheumatoid arthritis in Europe: the eumusc.net project

Background Eumusc.net (http://www.eumusc.net) is a European project supported by the EU and European League Against Rheumatism to improve musculoskeletal care in Europe. Objective To develop patient-centred healthcare quality indicators (HCQIs) for healthcare provision for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods Based on a systematic literature search, existing HCQIs for RA were identified and their contents analysed and categorised referring to a list of 16 standards of care developed within the eumusc.net. An international expert panel comprising 14 healthcare providers and two patient representatives added topics and during repeated Delphi processes by email ranked the topics and rephrased suggested HCQIs with the preliminary set being established during a second expert group meeting. After an audit process by rheumatology units (including academic centres) in six countries (The Netherlands, Norway, Romania, Italy, Austria and Sweden), a final version of the HCQIs was established. Results 56 possible topics for HCQIs were processed resulting in a final set of HCQIs for RA (n=14) including two for structure (patient information and calculation of composite scores), 11 for process (eg, access to care, assessments, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments) and one for outcome (effect of treatment on disease activity). They included definitions to be used in clinical practice and also by patients. Further, the numerators and the denominators for each HCQI were defined. Conclusions A set of 14 patient-centred HCQIs for RA was developed to be used in quality improvement and bench marking in countries across Europe.

Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on the use of physiotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE To assess the quality of guidelines published in peer-reviewed literature concerning the role of physiotherapy in the management of patients with RA. METHODS A systematic literature search for clinical practice guidelines that included physiotherapy interventions was performed in four electronic databases. We assessed the quality of the selected guidelines using the appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE) instrument. In addition, the recommendations of guidelines with the highest quality scores were summarized. RESULTS Eight clinical practice guidelines fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Scope/purpose was the most often adequately addressed AGREE domain (in seven of the eight guidelines) and applicability the least (in two of the eight guidelines). Based on the AGREE domain scores, six guidelines could be recommended or strongly recommended for clinical use. Five out of these six (strongly) recommended guidelines included a recommendation on exercise therapy and/or patient education, with these interventions being recommended in every case. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and thermotherapy were recommended in four of these six guidelines. US, thermotherapy, low-level laser therapy, massage, passive mobilization and balneotherapy were addressed in one or two of these six guidelines. CONCLUSION Six of eight clinical practice guidelines addressing physiotherapy interventions were recommended or strongly recommended according to the AGREE instrument. In general, guideline recommendations on physiotherapy intervention, from both the recommended guidelines as well as from the not recommended guidelines, lacked detail concerning mode of delivery, intensity, frequency and duration.

Return to work after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to describe work status and time to return to work in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine which factors are associated with work status. METHODS A systematic search strategy in various databases through April 2013 was performed. All clinical studies concerning patients undergoing THA or TKA providing quantitative information on work status before and after surgery were eligible for inclusion. Extracted were study characteristics, data on work status and determinants of return to work. The methodological quality was evaluated in three quality aspects (selection bias, information bias and statistical analysis bias). RESULTS Nineteen studies published between 1986 and 2013 were selected (4 on THA, 14 on TKA and 1 on THA and TKA). These studies included 3872 patients with THA and 649 patients with TKA. The proportions of patients returning to work ranged from 25 to 95% at 1-12 months after THA and from 71 to 83% at 3-6 months after TKA. The average time to return to work varied from 1.1 to 13.9 weeks after THA and from 8.0 to 12.0 weeks after TKA. Factors related to work status after THA and TKA included sociodemographic, health and job characteristics. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was moderate to low. CONCLUSION The majority of patients who are employed before THA and TKA return to work postoperatively. Comparisons of work status and the rate and speed of return to work between studies in THA and TKA are hampered by large variations in patient selection and measurement methods, underpinning the need for more standardization.