Theodore D. Satterthwaite
University of Pennsylvania
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Theodore D. Satterthwaite.
NeuroImage | 2013
Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Mark A. Elliott; Raphael T. Gerraty; Kosha Ruparel; James Loughead; Monica E. Calkins; Simon B. Eickhoff; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur; Daniel H. Wolf
Several recent reports in large, independent samples have demonstrated the influence of motion artifact on resting-state functional connectivity MRI (rsfc-MRI). Standard rsfc-MRI preprocessing typically includes regression of confounding signals and band-pass filtering. However, substantial heterogeneity exists in how these techniques are implemented across studies, and no prior study has examined the effect of differing approaches for the control of motion-induced artifacts. To better understand how in-scanner head motion affects rsfc-MRI data, we describe the spatial, temporal, and spectral characteristics of motion artifacts in a sample of 348 adolescents. Analyses utilize a novel approach for describing head motion on a voxelwise basis. Next, we systematically evaluate the efficacy of a range of confound regression and filtering techniques for the control of motion-induced artifacts. Results reveal that the effectiveness of preprocessing procedures on the control of motion is heterogeneous, and that improved preprocessing provides a substantial benefit beyond typical procedures. These results demonstrate that the effect of motion on rsfc-MRI can be substantially attenuated through improved preprocessing procedures, but not completely removed.
NeuroImage | 2012
Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Daniel H. Wolf; James Loughead; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A. Elliott; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur
It has recently been reported (Van Dijk et al., 2011) that in-scanner head motion can have a substantial impact on MRI measurements of resting-state functional connectivity. This finding may be of particular relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth, confounding analyses to the extent that motion and subject age are related. Furthermore, while Van Dijk et al. demonstrated the effect of motion on seed-based connectivity analyses, it is not known how motion impacts other common measures of connectivity. Here we expand on the findings of Van Dijk et al. by examining the effect of motion on multiple types of resting-state connectivity analyses in a large sample of children and adolescents (n=456). Following replication of the effect of motion on seed-based analyses, we examine the influence of motion on graphical measures of network modularity, dual-regression of independent component analysis, as well as the amplitude and fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation. In the entire sample, subject age was highly related to motion. Using a subsample where age and motion were unrelated, we demonstrate that motion has marked effects on connectivity in every analysis examined. While subject age was associated with increased within-network connectivity even when motion was accounted for, controlling for motion substantially attenuated the strength of this relationship. The results demonstrate the pervasive influence of motion on multiple types functional connectivity analysis, and underline the importance of accounting for motion in studies of neurodevelopment.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2014
Madhura Ingalhalikar; Alex J. Smith; Drew Parker; Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Mark A. Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E. Gur; Ruben C. Gur; Ragini Verma
Significance Sex differences are of high scientific and societal interest because of their prominence in behavior of humans and nonhuman species. This work is highly significant because it studies a very large population of 949 youths (8–22 y, 428 males and 521 females) using the diffusion-based structural connectome of the brain, identifying novel sex differences. The results establish that male brains are optimized for intrahemispheric and female brains for interhemispheric communication. The developmental trajectories of males and females separate at a young age, demonstrating wide differences during adolescence and adulthood. The observations suggest that male brains are structured to facilitate connectivity between perception and coordinated action, whereas female brains are designed to facilitate communication between analytical and intuitive processing modes. Sex differences in human behavior show adaptive complementarity: Males have better motor and spatial abilities, whereas females have superior memory and social cognition skills. Studies also show sex differences in human brains but do not explain this complementarity. In this work, we modeled the structural connectome using diffusion tensor imaging in a sample of 949 youths (aged 8–22 y, 428 males and 521 females) and discovered unique sex differences in brain connectivity during the course of development. Connection-wise statistical analysis, as well as analysis of regional and global network measures, presented a comprehensive description of network characteristics. In all supratentorial regions, males had greater within-hemispheric connectivity, as well as enhanced modularity and transitivity, whereas between-hemispheric connectivity and cross-module participation predominated in females. However, this effect was reversed in the cerebellar connections. Analysis of these changes developmentally demonstrated differences in trajectory between males and females mainly in adolescence and in adulthood. Overall, the results suggest that male brains are structured to facilitate connectivity between perception and coordinated action, whereas female brains are designed to facilitate communication between analytical and intuitive processing modes.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2016
T G M van Erp; Derrek P. Hibar; Jerod Rasmussen; David C. Glahn; Godfrey D. Pearlson; Ole A. Andreassen; Ingrid Agartz; Lars T. Westlye; Unn K. Haukvik; Anders M. Dale; Ingrid Melle; Cecilie B. Hartberg; Oliver Gruber; Bernd Kraemer; David Zilles; Gary Donohoe; Sinead Kelly; Colm McDonald; Derek W. Morris; Dara M. Cannon; Aiden Corvin; Marise W J Machielsen; Laura Koenders; L. de Haan; Dick J. Veltman; Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Daniel H. Wolf; R.C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur; Steve Potkin
The profile of brain structural abnormalities in schizophrenia is still not fully understood, despite decades of research using brain scans. To validate a prospective meta-analysis approach to analyzing multicenter neuroimaging data, we analyzed brain MRI scans from 2028 schizophrenia patients and 2540 healthy controls, assessed with standardized methods at 15 centers worldwide. We identified subcortical brain volumes that differentiated patients from controls, and ranked them according to their effect sizes. Compared with healthy controls, patients with schizophrenia had smaller hippocampus (Cohen’s d=−0.46), amygdala (d=−0.31), thalamus (d=−0.31), accumbens (d=−0.25) and intracranial volumes (d=−0.12), as well as larger pallidum (d=0.21) and lateral ventricle volumes (d=0.37). Putamen and pallidum volume augmentations were positively associated with duration of illness and hippocampal deficits scaled with the proportion of unmedicated patients. Worldwide cooperative analyses of brain imaging data support a profile of subcortical abnormalities in schizophrenia, which is consistent with that based on traditional meta-analytic approaches. This first ENIGMA Schizophrenia Working Group study validates that collaborative data analyses can readily be used across brain phenotypes and disorders and encourages analysis and data sharing efforts to further our understanding of severe mental illness.
NeuroImage | 2014
Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Mark A. Elliott; Kosha Ruparel; James Loughead; Karthik Prabhakaran; Monica E. Calkins; Ryan Hopson; Chad T. Jackson; Jack R. Keefe; Marisa Riley; Frank D. Mentch; Patrick Sleiman; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Hakon Hakonarson; Ruben C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur
The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) is a large-scale, NIMH funded initiative to understand how brain maturation mediates cognitive development and vulnerability to psychiatric illness, and understand how genetics impacts this process. As part of this study, 1445 adolescents ages 8-21 at enrollment underwent multimodal neuroimaging. Here, we highlight the conceptual basis for the effort, the study design, and the measures available in the dataset. We focus on neuroimaging measures obtained, including T1-weighted structural neuroimaging, diffusion tensor imaging, perfusion neuroimaging using arterial spin labeling, functional imaging tasks of working memory and emotion identification, and resting state imaging of functional connectivity. Furthermore, we provide characteristics regarding the final sample acquired. Finally, we describe mechanisms in place for data sharing that will allow the PNC to become a freely available public resource to advance our understanding of normal and pathological brain development.
Neuron | 2014
Adriana Di Martino; Damien A. Fair; Clare Kelly; Theodore D. Satterthwaite; F. Xavier Castellanos; Moriah E. Thomason; R. Cameron Craddock; Beatriz Luna; Bennett L. Leventhal; Xi-Nian Zuo; Michael P. Milham
The vast majority of mental illnesses can be conceptualized as developmental disorders of neural interactions within the connectome, or developmental miswiring. The recent maturation of pediatric in vivo brain imaging is bringing the identification of clinically meaningful brain-based biomarkers of developmental disorders within reach. Even more auspicious is the ability to study the evolving connectome throughout life, beginning in utero, which promises to move the field from topological phenomenology to etiological nosology. Here, we scope advances in pediatric imaging of the brain connectome as the field faces the challenge of unraveling developmental miswiring. We highlight promises while also providing a pragmatic review of the many obstacles ahead that must be overcome to significantly impact public health.
NeuroImage | 2013
Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Daniel H. Wolf; Kosha Ruparel; Guray Erus; Mark A. Elliott; Simon B. Eickhoff; Efstathios D. Gennatas; Chad T. Jackson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Alex R. Smith; Hakon Hakonarson; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Raquel E. Gur; Ruben C. Gur
Several independent studies have demonstrated that small amounts of in-scanner motion systematically bias estimates of resting-state functional connectivity. This confound is of particular importance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth because motion is strongly related to subject age during this period. Critically, the effects of motion on connectivity mimic major findings in neurodevelopmental research, specifically an age-related strengthening of distant connections and weakening of short-range connections. Here, in a sample of 780 subjects ages 8-22, we re-evaluate patterns of change in functional connectivity during adolescent development after rigorously controlling for the confounding influences of motion at both the subject and group levels. We find that motion artifact inflates both overall estimates of age-related change as well as specific distance-related changes in connectivity. When motion is more fully accounted for, the prevalence of age-related change as well as the strength of distance-related effects is substantially reduced. However, age-related changes remain highly significant. In contrast, motion artifact tends to obscure age-related changes in connectivity associated with segregation of functional brain modules; improved preprocessing techniques allow greater sensitivity to detect increased within-module connectivity occurring with development. Finally, we show that subjects age can still be accurately estimated from the multivariate pattern of functional connectivity even while controlling for motion. Taken together, these results indicate that while motion artifact has a marked and heterogeneous impact on estimates of connectivity change during adolescence, functional connectivity remains a valuable phenotype for the study of neurodevelopment.
NeuroImage | 2017
Rastko Ciric; Daniel H. Wolf; Jonathan D. Power; David R. Roalf; Graham L. Baum; Kosha Ruparel; Russell T. Shinohara; Mark A. Elliott; Simon B. Eickhoff; Christos Davatzikos; Ruben C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur; Danielle S. Bassett; Theodore D. Satterthwaite
&NA; Since initial reports regarding the impact of motion artifact on measures of functional connectivity, there has been a proliferation of participant‐level confound regression methods to limit its impact. However, many of the most commonly used techniques have not been systematically evaluated using a broad range of outcome measures. Here, we provide a systematic evaluation of 14 participant‐level confound regression methods in 393 youths. Specifically, we compare methods according to four benchmarks, including the residual relationship between motion and connectivity, distance‐dependent effects of motion on connectivity, network identifiability, and additional degrees of freedom lost in confound regression. Our results delineate two clear trade‐offs among methods. First, methods that include global signal regression minimize the relationship between connectivity and motion, but result in distance‐dependent artifact. In contrast, censoring methods mitigate both motion artifact and distance‐dependence, but use additional degrees of freedom. Importantly, less effective de‐noising methods are also unable to identify modular network structure in the connectome. Taken together, these results emphasize the heterogeneous efficacy of existing methods, and suggest that different confound regression strategies may be appropriate in the context of specific scientific goals. HighlightsWe evaluate 14 participant‐level de‐noising pipelines for functional connectivity.Pipeline performance is markedly heterogeneous.GSR minimizes the impact of motion but introduces distance dependence.Censoring reduces motion and improves network identifiability.
Molecular Psychiatry | 2016
Derrek P. Hibar; Lars T. Westlye; T G M van Erp; Jerod Rasmussen; Cassandra D. Leonardo; Joshua Faskowitz; Unn K. Haukvik; Cecilie B. Hartberg; Nhat Trung Doan; Ingrid Agartz; Anders M. Dale; Oliver Gruber; Bernd Krämer; Sarah Trost; Benny Liberg; Christoph Abé; C J Ekman; Martin Ingvar; Mikael Landén; Scott C. Fears; Nelson B. Freimer; Carrie E. Bearden; Emma Sprooten; David C. Glahn; Godfrey D. Pearlson; Louise Emsell; Joanne Kenney; C. Scanlon; Colm McDonald; Dara M. Cannon
Considerable uncertainty exists about the defining brain changes associated with bipolar disorder (BD). Understanding and quantifying the sources of uncertainty can help generate novel clinical hypotheses about etiology and assist in the development of biomarkers for indexing disease progression and prognosis. Here we were interested in quantifying case–control differences in intracranial volume (ICV) and each of eight subcortical brain measures: nucleus accumbens, amygdala, caudate, hippocampus, globus pallidus, putamen, thalamus, lateral ventricles. In a large study of 1710 BD patients and 2594 healthy controls, we found consistent volumetric reductions in BD patients for mean hippocampus (Cohen’s d=−0.232; P=3.50 × 10−7) and thalamus (d=−0.148; P=4.27 × 10−3) and enlarged lateral ventricles (d=−0.260; P=3.93 × 10−5) in patients. No significant effect of age at illness onset was detected. Stratifying patients based on clinical subtype (BD type I or type II) revealed that BDI patients had significantly larger lateral ventricles and smaller hippocampus and amygdala than controls. However, when comparing BDI and BDII patients directly, we did not detect any significant differences in brain volume. This likely represents similar etiology between BD subtype classifications. Exploratory analyses revealed significantly larger thalamic volumes in patients taking lithium compared with patients not taking lithium. We detected no significant differences between BDII patients and controls in the largest such comparison to date. Findings in this study should be interpreted with caution and with careful consideration of the limitations inherent to meta-analyzed neuroimaging comparisons.
The Journal of Neuroscience | 2013
Theodore D. Satterthwaite; Daniel H. Wolf; Guray Erus; Kosha Ruparel; Mark A. Elliott; Efstathios D. Gennatas; Ryan Hopson; Chad R. Jackson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Warren B. Bilker; Monica E. Calkins; James Loughead; Alex J. Smith; David R. Roalf; Hakon Hakonarson; Ragini Verma; Christos Davatzikos; Ruben C. Gur; Raquel E. Gur
Adolescence is characterized by rapid development of executive function. Working memory (WM) is a key element of executive function, but it is not known what brain changes during adolescence allow improved WM performance. Using a fractal n-back fMRI paradigm, we investigated brain responses to WM load in 951 human youths aged 8–22 years. Compared with more limited associations with age, WM performance was robustly associated with both executive network activation and deactivation of the default mode network. Multivariate patterns of brain activation predicted task performance with a high degree of accuracy, and also mediated the observed age-related improvements in WM performance. These results delineate a process of functional maturation of the executive system, and suggest that this process allows for the improvement of cognitive capability seen during adolescence.