Theodore Long
Yale University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Theodore Long.
American Journal of Surgery | 2015
Tasce Bongiovanni; Heather Yeo; Julie Ann Sosa; Peter S. Yoo; Theodore Long; Marjorie S. Rosenthal; David N. Berg; Leslie Curry; Marcella Nunez-Smith
BACKGROUND High rates of attrition from general surgery residency may threaten the surgical workforce. We sought to gain further insight regarding resident motivations for leaving general surgery residency. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews to generate rich narrative data that explored individual experiences. An interdisciplinary team used the constant comparative method to analyze the data. RESULTS Four themes characterized experiences of our 19 interviewees who left their residency program. Participants (1) felt an informal contract was breached when clinical duties were prioritized over education, (2) characterized a culture in which there was no safe space to share personal and programmatic concerns, (3) expressed a scarcity of role models who demonstrated better work-life balance, and (4) reported negative interactions with authority resulting in a profound loss of commitment. CONCLUSIONS As general surgery graduate education continues to evolve, our findings may inform interventions and policies regarding programmatic changes to boost retention in surgical residency.
Journal of Hospital Medicine | 2015
Leora I. Horwitz; Jacqueline N. Grady; Dorothy B. Cohen; Zhenqiu Lin; Mark Volpe; Chi K. Ngo; Andrew L. Masica; Theodore Long; Jessica Wang; Megan Keenan; Julia Montague; Lisa G. Suter; Joseph S. Ross; Elizabeth E. Drye; Harlan M. Krumholz; Susannah M. Bernheim
BACKGROUND It is desirable not to include planned readmissions in readmission measures because they represent deliberate, scheduled care. OBJECTIVES To develop an algorithm to identify planned readmissions, describe its performance characteristics, and identify improvements. DESIGN Consensus-driven algorithm development and chart review validation study at 7 acute-care hospitals in 2 health systems. PATIENTS For development, all discharges qualifying for the publicly reported hospital-wide readmission measure. For validation, all qualifying same-hospital readmissions that were characterized by the algorithm as planned, and a random sampling of same-hospital readmissions that were characterized as unplanned. MEASUREMENTS We calculated weighted sensitivity and specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the algorithm (version 2.1), compared to gold standard chart review. RESULTS In consultation with 27 experts, we developed an algorithm that characterizes 7.8% of readmissions as planned. For validation we reviewed 634 readmissions. The weighted sensitivity of the algorithm was 45.1% overall, 50.9% in large teaching centers and 40.2% in smaller community hospitals. The weighted specificity was 95.9%, positive predictive value was 51.6%, and negative predictive value was 94.7%. We identified 4 minor changes to improve algorithm performance. The revised algorithm had a weighted sensitivity 49.8% (57.1% at large hospitals), weighted specificity 96.5%, positive predictive value 58.7%, and negative predictive value 94.5%. Positive predictive value was poor for the 2 most common potentially planned procedures: diagnostic cardiac catheterization (25%) and procedures involving cardiac devices (33%). CONCLUSIONS An administrative claims-based algorithm to identify planned readmissions is feasible and can facilitate public reporting of primarily unplanned readmissions.
BMJ Open | 2013
Theodore Long; Inginia Genao; Leora I. Horwitz
Objective To gather qualitative data to elucidate the reasons for readmissions in a high-risk population of underserved patients. Design We created an instrument with 27 open-ended questions based on current interventions. Setting Yale-New Haven Hospital. Patients Patients at the Yale Adult Primary Care Center (PCC). Measurements We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews of patients who had four or more admissions in the previous 6 months and were currently readmitted to the hospital. Results We completed 17 interviews and identified themes relating to risk of readmission. We found that patients went directly to the emergency department (ED) when they experienced a change in health status without contacting their primary provider. Reasons for this included poor telephone or urgent care access and the belief that the PCC could not treat acute illness. Many patients could not name their primary provider. Conversely, every patient except one reported being able to obtain medications without undue financial burden, and every patient reported receiving adequate home care services. Conclusions These high-risk patients were receiving the formal services that they needed, but were making the decision to go to the ED because of inadequate access to care and fragmented primary care relationships. Formal transitional care services are unlikely to be adequate in reducing readmissions without also addressing primary care access and continuity.
PLOS ONE | 2014
Krisda H. Chaiyachati; Kirsha Gordon; Theodore Long; Woody Levin; Ali M. Khan; Emily Meyer; Amy C. Justice; Rebecca S. Brienza
Background One major goal of the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is to improve continuity of care between patients and providers and reduce the utilization of non-primary care services like the emergency department (ED). Objective To characterize continuity under the Veterans Health Administration’s PCMH model – the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), at one large Veterans Affair’s (VA’s) primary care clinic, determine the characteristics associated with high levels of continuity, and assess the association between continuity and ED visits. Design Retrospective, observational cohort study of patients at the West Haven VA (WHVA) Primary Care Clinic from March 2011 to February 2012. Patients The 13,495 patients with established care at the Clinic, having at least one visit, one year before March 2011. Main Measures Our exposure variable was continuity of care –a patient seeing their assigned primary care provider (PCP) at each clinic visit. The outcome of interest was having an ED visit. Results The patients encompassed 42,969 total clinic visits, and 3185 (24%) of them had 15,458 ED visits. In a multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with continuity of care – at least one visit with their assigned PCP – had lower ED utilization compared to individuals without continuity (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41, 0.71), controlling for frequency of primary care visits, comorbidities, insurance, distance from the ED, and having a trainee PCP assigned. Likewise, the adjusted rate of ED visits was 544/1000 person-year (PY) for patients with continuity vs. 784/1000 PY for patients without continuity (p = 0.001). Compared to patients with low continuity (<33% of visits), individuals with medium (33–50%) and high (>50%) continuity were less likely to utilize the ED. Conclusions Strong continuity of care is associated with decreased ED utilization in a PCMH model and improving continuity may help reduce the utilization of non-primary care services.
Journal of Interprofessional Care | 2014
Theodore Long; Sarah Dann; Marissa Lynn Wolff; Rebecca S. Brienza
Abstract As the United States faces an impending shortage in the primary care workforce, interprofessional teamwork training to improve clinic efficiency and health outcomes is becoming increasingly important. Currently there is limited integration of interprofessional training in educational models for health professionals. The implementation of Patient Aligned Care Teams at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has provided an opportunity for interprofessional collaboration among trainee and faculty providers within the VA system. However, integration of interprofessional education is also necessary to train future providers in order to provide effective team-based care. We describe a transportable educational model for health professional collaboration from our experience as a VA Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education, including a complementary novel one-year post-Master’s adult nurse practitioner interprofessional clinical fellowship. With growing recognition that interprofessional care can improve efficiency and outcomes, there is an increasing need for programs that train future providers in collaboration and team-based care.
Postgraduate Medical Journal | 2016
Theodore Long; Tasce Bongiovanni; Meir Dashevsky; Andrea Halim; Joseph S. Ross; Robert L. Fogerty; Mark T. Silvestri
Aim Cost awareness has been proposed as a strategy for curbing the continued rise of healthcare costs. However, most physicians are unaware of the cost of diagnostic tests, and interventions have had mixed results. We sought to assess resident physician cost awareness following sustained visual display of costs into electronic health record (EHR) order entry screens. Study Design We completed a preintervention and postintervention web-based survey. Participants were physicians in internal medicine, paediatrics, combined medicine and paediatrics, obstetrics and gynaecology, emergency medicine, and orthopaedic surgery at one tertiary co are academic medical centre. Costs were displayed in the EHR for 1032 unique laboratory orders. We measured attitudes towards costs and estimates of Medicare reimbursement rates for 11 common laboratory and imaging tests. Results We received 209 survey responses during the preintervention period (response rate 71.1%) and 194 responses during the postintervention period (response rate 66.0%). The proportion of residents that agreed/strongly agreed that they knew the costs of tests they ordered increased after the cost display (8.6% vs 38.2%; p<0.001). Cost estimation accuracy among residents increased after the cost display from 24.0% to 52.4% for laboratory orders (p<0.001) and from 37.7% to 49.6% for imaging orders (p<0.001). Conclusions Resident cost awareness and ability to accurately estimate laboratory order costs improved significantly after implementation of a comprehensive EHR cost display for all laboratory orders. The improvement in cost estimation accuracy for imaging orders, which did not have costs displayed, suggested a possible spillover effect generated by providing a cost context for residents.
Education and Health | 2016
Theodore Long; Andrea Uradu; Ronald Castillo; Rebecca S. Brienza
Background: We created a tool to improve communication among health professional trainees in the ambulatory setting. The tool was devised to both inform practice partner teams about high-risk patients and assign patient follow-up issues to team members. Team members were internal medicine residents and nurse practitioner fellows in the VA Connecticut Healthcare System Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education (CoEPCE), an interprofessional training model in primary care. Methods: We used a combination of Likert scale response questions and open ended questions to evaluate trainee attitudes before and after the implementation of the tool, as well as solicited feedback to improve the tool. Results: After using the primary care sign out tool, trainees expressed greater confidence that they could identify high-risk patients that had been cared for by other trainees and that important patient care issues would be followed up by others when they were not in clinic. In terms of areas for improvement, respondents wanted to have the sign out tool posted online. Discussion: Our sign out tool offers a strategy that others can use to improve communication and knowledge of shared patients within teams comprised of interprofessional trainees.
Journal of Graduate Medical Education | 2014
Theodore Long; Krisda H. Chaiyachati; Ali M. Khan; Trishul Siddharthan; Emily Meyer; Rebecca S. Brienza
BACKGROUND Education in health policy and advocacy is recognized as an important component of health professional training. To date, curricula have only been assessed at the medical school level. OBJECTIVE We sought to address the gap in these curricula for residents and other health professionals in primary care. INNOVATION We created a health policy and advocacy curriculum for the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education, an interprofessional, ambulatory-based, training program that includes internal medicine residents, nurse practitioner fellows, health psychology fellows, and pharmacy residents. The policy module focuses on health care finance and delivery, and the advocacy module emphasizes negotiation skills and opinion-based writing. Trainee attitudes were surveyed before and after the course, and using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, relative change was determined. Knowledge acquisition was evaluated with precourse and postcourse examinations using a paired sample t test. RESULTS From July 2011 through June 2013, 16 trainees completed the course. In the postcourse survey, trainees demonstrated improved comfort with understanding health law and the American health care system (Likert mean increased from 2.1 to 3.0, P = .01), as well as with associated advocacy skills (Likert mean increased from 2.0 to 2.9, P = .04). Knowledge-based test scores also showed significant improvement (increasing from 55% to 78% correct, P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS Our curriculum integrating core health policy knowledge with advocacy skills represents a novel approach in postgraduate health professional education and resulted in sustained improvement in knowledge and comfort with health policy and advocacy.
Postgraduate Medical Journal | 2014
Theodore Long
Over the last decade, healthcare spending has increased dramatically all over the world. In 2002, the USA spent 15% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on healthcare. By 2013, this figure had jumped to 18%. At this rate, the USA will be spending 34% of GDP on healthcare by 2040.1 This precipitous increase in spending is not unique to the USA, and neither is the search for a solution. Across the globe, countries are looking at delivery system reform as a way to hold down costs while maintaining quality. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is one care delivery system which has been suggested as a possible solution to this dilemma in the USA.2 The PCMH is a primary care model designed to improve continuity, access, and team-based coordinated care (box 1). However, controversy remains as to whether the PCMH model has been successful, with some studies showing improved outcomes3 ,4 and others no difference.5 ,6 As delivery system reform continues to be developed and trialled across the globe, such as the recent reorganisation of primary care spending in the UKs National Health Service, it is critically important to understand whether the PCMH model in the USA will improve outcomes to save money or whether it will become a sinkhole for spending. If successful in the USA, the PCMH model could have implications for other delivery systems worldwide. Box 1 ### Elements of the patient-centered medical home ▸ Patient-centered access: appointments, 24/7 clinical advice, electronic access ▸ Team-based care: continuity, team care …
Teaching and Learning in Medicine | 2017
Chelsea Messinger; Janet P. Hafler; Ali M. Khan; Theodore Long
ABSTRACT Phenomenon: As an impending shortage of primary care physicians is expected, understanding career trajectories of medical students will be useful in supporting interest in primary care fields and careers. The authors sought to characterize recent trends in primary care interest and career trajectories among medical students at an academic medical institution that did not have a family medicine department. Approach: Match data for 2,477 graduates who matched into resident training programs between 1989 and 2014 were analyzed to determine the proportion entering primary care residency programs. An online search and confirmatory phone call methodology was used to determine primary care career trajectories for the 795 graduates who matched into primary care residency programs between 1989 to 2010. Subanalyses were performed to characterize primary care career entrance among graduates who matched into the three primary care residency programs: Family Medicine, Categorical and Primary Care Internal Medicine, and Categorical and Primary Care Pediatrics. Findings: Between 1989 and 2014, 911 (37%) of all matched graduates matched into primary care residency programs. Of the 795 graduates who matched into these programs between 1989 and 2010, less than half (245; 31%) entered primary care careers. Of the graduates who ultimately entered primary care careers, 82% matched into either internal medicine or pediatrics residency programs and 18% matched into family medicine programs. Although there have been fluctuations in primary care interest that seem to parallel health care trends over the 26-year period, the overall percentage of graduates entering primary care residency programs and careers has remained fairly stable. Between 2006 and 2010, entrance into both primary care residency programs and primary care careers steadily increased. Despite this, the overall percentage of matched graduates who entered primary care careers over the 22-year study period (12%) was less than the national average (16%–18%). Insights: In the 26-year period between 1989 and 2014, primary care career interest increased slightly among medical students at this academic medical institution, with fluctuations that seem to coincide with national health care trends. Year-to-year fluctuations appear to be driven by rising numbers of Categorical Pediatrics and Categorical Internal Medicine matchers pursuing careers in primary care. There may be a need for specialized curricula and strategies to promote and retain interest in primary care at academic medical institutions, especially at institutions without family medicine training programs.