Thierry Aymard

Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.

OBJECTIVE Aortic valve replacement using a tissue valve is controversial for patients younger than 60 years old. The long-term survival in this age group, the expected event rates during long-term follow-up, and valve-related complications are not clearly determined. METHODS From January 2000 to December 2009, overall survival, valve-related events, and echocardiographic outcomes were analyzed in all patients younger than 60 years of age, who underwent biologic aortic valve replacement. Patients who received a Perimount Carpentier-Edwards pericardial tissue valve (n = 103) were selected and compared with a propensity matched group of 103 patients who received aortic valve replacement using a mechanical bileaflet valve. The mean follow-up was 33 ± 24 months (range, 2-120), and the mean age at implantation was 50.6 ± 8.8 years (bioprosthesis, 55 ± 8.9 years; mechanical valve, 50 ± 8.6 years; P = .03). RESULTS Survival was significantly reduced in patients after biologic aortic valve replacement (90.3% vs 98%; P = .038). Freedom from all valve-related complications (bioprosthesis, 54.5%; mechanical valve, 51.6%; P = NS) and freedom from reoperation (bioprostheses, 100%; mechanical valve, 98%; P = NS) were comparable in both groups. The average transvalvular mean (11.2 ± 4.2 mm Hg vs 10.5 ± 6.0 mm Hg, P = .05) and peak (19.9 ± 6.7 mm Hg vs 16.7 ± 8.0 mm Hg, P = .03) gradients were greater after biologic aortic valve replacement. Regression of the left ventricular mass index was more pronounced after mechanical valve replacement (118.5 ± 24.9 g/m(2) vs 126.5 ± 38.5 g/m(2); P = NS). The echocardiographic patient-prosthesis mismatch was greater at follow-up after biological aortic valve replacement (0.876 ± 0.2 cm(2)/m(2) vs 1.11 ± 0.4 cm(2)/m(2); P = .01). Oral anticoagulation was a protective factor for survival among the bioprosthetic valve patients (P = .024). CONCLUSIONS In the present limited cohort of patients younger than 60 years old, biologic aortic valve replacement was associated with reduced mid-term survival compared with survival after mechanical aortic valve replacement. Despite similar valve-related event rates in both groups, the better hemodynamic performance of the mechanical valves and/or protective effect of oral anticoagulation seemed to improve the outcome. The transcatheter valve-in-valve intervention as potential treatment of tissue valve degeneration should not be considered the sole bailout strategy for younger patients because no evidence is available that this would improve the outcome.

Clinical experience with the second-generation 3f Enable sutureless aortic valve prosthesis

OBJECTIVE The 3f Enable aortic bioprosthesis (ATS Medical, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) represents a new generation of equine pericardial self-expanding valve designed for sutureless implantation. This study evaluated technical aspects of implantation and safety and effectiveness of the valve in the short term. METHODS In an outcome analysis of a consecutive series of 28 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with the 3f Enable during an 18-month period, mean age was 75.7 +/- 6.6 years, 18 patients were female (64.2%), and mean EuroSCORE was 7.1% +/- 1.7%. RESULTS Most implanted valves were 23 mm in diameter (19-27 mm). Mean aortic crossclamp time was 39 +/- 15 minutes (29-103 minutes), mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 58 +/- 20 minutes (41-127 minutes), mean hospital stay was 11 days (7-22 days), and 30-day mortality was 3.5%. Mean and peak intraoperative transvalvular pressure gradients were 6.1 +/- 2.6 and 18 +/- 5 mm Hg, respectively. Trivial and mild paravalvular leaks were observed in 1 patient each. One patient underwent reoperative aortic valve replacement 4 months after initial surgery for severe valve-unrelated paravalvular leakage. Five patients (18.5%) required permanent pacemakers. No patients were unavailable for follow-up. One-year survival was 86.2%. CONCLUSIONS The 3-f Enable aortic bioprosthesis can be implanted safely with favorable early hemodynamics. The self-expanding stent allows sutureless implantation with a large valve area. The procedure was fast, although not as fast as expected. This experience has led to continued design and procedural enhancements to facilitate and accelerate future implantation.

Preliminary results following reinforcement of the pulmonary autograft to prevent dilatation after the Ross procedure

OBJECTIVE The Ross operation remains a controversially discussed procedure, because concern exists regarding late dilatation of the neoaortic root and progressive regurgitation of the autograft valve. We present our early experience with an external reinforcement of the autograft, which is inserted into a prosthetic Dacron graft with an artificial aortic root configuration. This detail should help to prevent neoaortic root dilatation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 2006 and 2007, 12 patients (mean age 16 +/- 38 years; range 15-38 years) underwent a Ross procedure by this technique. Indications were aortic regurgitation (n = 2), aortic stenosis (n = 5), and combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency (n = 5). A bicuspid aortic valve was present in 9 patients. Balloon valvuloplasty had been performed in 7 patients. Follow-up was performed by clinical and echocardiographic examinations. RESULTS No early or late deaths occurred in this small series, and freedom from reoperation is 100%. Echocardiographic follow-up confirmed absence of aortic insufficiency in 11 patients after a mean of 11 months (range 2-30 months). In 1 patient, a small asymmetric regurgitation jet was already observed at discharge echocardiography. As expected, no neoaortic root dilatation was observed during follow-up. All patients are in New York Heart Association class I. CONCLUSIONS The present technique is a simple and reproducible technical step that does not require significant additional time. Inclusion of the autograft within a root prosthesis may be especially indicated in situations known for late autograft dilatation, namely, bicuspid aortic valve, predominant aortic insufficiency, and ascending aortic enlargement.

Absence of prosthesis–patient mismatch with the new generation of Edwards stented aortic bioprosthesis☆

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) remains a controversial issue with the most recent stented biological valves. We analyzed the incidence of PPM after implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease aortic valve (PMEAV) bioprosthesis and assessed the early clinical outcome. Two hundred and seventy consecutive patients who received a PMEAV bioprosthesis between January 2007 and July 2008 were analyzed. Pre-, peri- and postoperative data were assessed and echocardiographic as well as clinical follow-up was performed. Mean age was 72+/-9 years, 168 (62.2%) were males. Fifty-seven patients (21.1%) were below 65 years of age. Absence of PPM, corresponding to an indexed effective orifice area >0.85 cm(2)/m(2), was 99.5%. Observed in-hospital mortality was 2.2% (six patients), with a predicted mortality according to the additive EuroSCORE of 7.6+/-3.1%. At echocardiographic assessment after a mean follow-up period of 150+/-91 days, mean transvalvular gradient was 11.8+/-4.8 mmHg (all valve sizes). No paravalvular leakage was seen. Nine patients died during follow-up. The Carpentier-Edwards PMEAV bioprosthesis shows excellent hemodynamic performance. This valve can be implanted in all sizes with an incidence of severe PPM below 0.5%.

The Freedom Solo pericardial stentless valve: Single-center experience, outcomes, and long-term durability

OBJECTIVES To report our institutional experience and long-term results with the Freedom Solo bovine pericardial stentless bioprosthesis (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy). METHODS Between January 2005 and November 2009, 149 patients (mean age, 73.6 ± 8.7 years; 68 [45.6%] female) underwent isolated (n = 75) or combined (n = 74) aortic valve replacement (AVR) using the Solo in our institution. Follow-up was 100% complete with an average follow-up time of 5.9 ± 2.6 years (maximum, 9.6 years) and a total of 885.3 patient years. RESULTS Operative (30-day) mortality was 2.7% (1.3% for isolated AVR [n = 1] and 4.0% for combined procedures [n = 3]). All causes of death were not valve-related. Preoperative peak (mean) gradients of 74.2 ± 23.0 mm Hg (48.6 ± 16.3 mm Hg) decreased to 15.6 ± 5.4 mm Hg (8.8 ± 3.0 mm Hg) after AVR, and remained low for up to 9 years. The postoperative effective orifice area was 1.6 ± 0.57 cm(2), 1.90 ± 0.45 cm(2), 2.12 ± 0.48 cm(2), and 2.20 ± 0.66 cm(2) for the valve sizes 21, 23, 25, and 27, respectively, with absence of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch and 0.7% (n = 1) experienced moderate prosthesis-patient mismatch. During follow-up, 26 patients experienced structural valve deterioration (SVD) and 14 patients underwent explantation. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from death, explantation, and SVD at 9 years averaged 0.57 (range, 0.47-0.66), 0.82 (range, 0.69-0.90), and 0.70 (range, 0.57-0.79), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Freedom Solo stentless aortic valve is safe to implant and shows excellent early and midterm hemodynamic performance. However, SVD was observed in a substantial number of patients after only 5-6 years and the need for explantation increased markedly, suggesting low durability.

Ideal site for ventricular anchoring of artificial chordae in mitral regurgitation

OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of mitral leaflet prolapse using artificial neochordae shows excellent outcomes. Upcoming devices attempt the same treatment in a minimally invasive way but target the left ventricular apex as an anchoring point, rather than the tip of the corresponding papillary muscle. In this study, cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to compare these 2 different anchoring positions and their dynamic relationship with the mitral leaflets. METHODS Eleven healthy volunteers (mean age, 31 years; 6 female; mean ejection fraction, 62%) were examined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (3 Tesla, cine steady free precession technique with retrospective gating), whereby dedicated software enabled assessment of the physiologic distances among 3 anchoring sites (anterior papillary muscle, posterior papillary muscle, and apex) and the plane of the mitral annulus at the level of leaflet coaptation. These distances were measured in systole and diastole, and the performance of virtual neochordae was analyzed for the 3 potential anchoring sites. RESULTS Length difference between systole and diastole for the 3 measured distances were 0.19 ± 0.11 cm (5.9% ± 3.4%) for the anterior papillary muscle, 0.19 ± 0.09 cm (6.7% ± 3.6%) for the posterior papillary muscle, and 1.52 ± 0.18 cm (17.8% ± 2.8%) for the left ventricular apex (P = .001). Virtual neochordae between the leaflet and the left ventricular apex were first adjusted in systole to achieve leaflet coaptation. Leaflet tear in diastole can only be avoided if the width of the attached leaflet is larger than the systole-diastole length difference. On the other hand, if virtual neochordae are adjusted in diastole to avoid leaflet tear, residual leaflet prolapse during systole can result. Because the systole-diastole length difference for papillary muscle anchored chordae is smaller than for apical chordae by a factor 10, there is a strongly reduced risk of prolapse or tearing and the leaflet width is unimportant. Furthermore, if the neochordae attached to the anterior mitral leaflet uses the apex as a distal anchoring site, the angle α between the aortic valve plane and this mitral leaflet is significantly reduced in diastole and therefore increases the risk of systolic anterior motion. CONCLUSIONS Anchoring of neochordae at the papillary muscles, thereby mimicking the real anatomy, should be preferred over the left ventricular apex. Further analysis of dilated hearts and papillary muscle displacement is necessary to include the whole spectrum of pathologies.

Effect on false-lumen status of a combined vascular and endovascular approach for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to evaluate midterm results with regard to false-lumen status of a combined vascular and endovascular approach for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS We performed ascending/hemiarch replacement during hypothermic circulatory arrest with additional open implantation of the Djumbodis Dissection System (non-self-expanding bare metal stent) to readapt the dissected layers in the arch and the proximal descending aorta in a consecutive series of 15 patients (mean age 61 years, 20% female) suffering from acute type A aortic dissections. The primary end point was the status of the false lumen at the level of the stent. RESULTS We observed three in-hospital deaths (20%). Complete thrombosis of the false lumen was observed in one patient (8%). In 25% of patients, partial thrombosis of the false lumen was observed. The remaining patients had continuing antegrade perfusion. Surgical conversion during a mean follow-up of 37 months was required in two patients (16%) due to continuing enlargement of the distal arch and the proximal descending aorta. No late deaths were observed. CONCLUSION Additional implantation of the Djumbodis Dissection System to readapt the dissected layers in the arch and the proximal descending aorta does not seem to have additive value as an adjunct to standard ascending/hemiarch replacement with regard to closure of the false lumen in the arch and the proximal descending aorta. The most limiting factor seems to be the non-self-expanding capability of the device.

The History of Research on Percutaneous, Transapical, and Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement

A large number of scientific inventions evolved from research in different fields of interest. Only a few people with a visionary mind are able to see the future practical implications that transform a good idea into revolutionary process. For over 30 years the surgical replacement of a diseased aortic valve represented the golden standard of curative treatment for severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis and significant regurgitation. Only recently has the operative risk declined crucially and the functional results are excellent. Long-term survival is very satisfactory, even for patients >80 years of age and has become close to that of non-operated patients of the same age. Despite these excellent results, surgery was found to be practiced preferentially in patients in good condition, whereas a substantial proportion of patients were not referred to surgery because the perioperative risk was estimated to be high owing to advanced age or significant comorbidities [1]. These patients would need an alternative technique to replace the diseased valve in order to re-establish normal valvular function. Recently, the development of two new techniques has changed the approach of patients considered to be at high risk of being refused conventional intervention: the insertion of a sutureless prosthesis and thus reducing substantially the surgery time and the transcatheter technique known as transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) allowing a tremendous decrease in the invasiveness of surgery. This new concept could profit from the already well-established method of cardiac catheterization.