Thierry Brue

Guidelines of the Pituitary Society for the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas

In June 2005, an ad hoc Expert Committee formed by the Pituitary Society convened during the 9th International Pituitary Congress in San Diego, California. Members of this committee consisted of invited international experts in the field, and included endocrinologists and neurosurgeons with recognized expertise in the management of prolactinomas. Discussions were held that included all interested participants to the Congress and resulted in formulation of these guidelines, which represent the current recommendations on the diagnosis and management of prolactinomas based upon comprehensive analysis and synthesis of all available data.

Clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses in patients with Germ-line AIP mutations and pituitary adenomas : An international collaborative study

CONTEXT AIP mutations (AIPmut) give rise to a pituitary adenoma predisposition that occurs in familial isolated pituitary adenomas and less often in sporadic cases. The clinical and therapeutic features of AIPmut-associated pituitary adenomas have not been studied comprehensively. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to assess clinical/therapeutic characteristics of AIPmut pituitary adenomas. DESIGN This study was an international, multicenter, retrospective case collection/database analysis. SETTING The study was conducted at 36 tertiary referral endocrine and clinical genetics departments. PATIENTS Patients included 96 patients with germline AIPmut and pituitary adenomas and 232 matched AIPmut-negative acromegaly controls. RESULTS The AIPmut population was predominantly young and male (63.5%); first symptoms occurred as children/adolescents in 50%. At diagnosis, most tumors were macroadenomas (93.3%); extension and invasion was common. Somatotropinomas comprised 78.1% of the cohort; there were also prolactinomas (n = 13), nonsecreting adenomas (n = 7), and a TSH-secreting adenoma. AIPmut somatotropinomas were larger (P = 0.00026), with higher GH levels (P = 0.00068), more frequent extension (P = 0.018) and prolactin cosecretion (P = 0.00023), and occurred 2 decades before controls (P < 0.000001). Gigantism was more common in the AIPmut group (P < 0.000001). AIPmut somatotropinoma patients underwent more surgical interventions (P = 0.00069) and had lower decreases in GH (P = 0.00037) and IGF-I (P = 0.028) and less tumor shrinkage with somatostatin analogs (P < 0.00001) vs. controls. AIPmut prolactinomas occurred generally in young males and frequently required surgery or radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AIPmut pituitary adenomas have clinical features that may negatively impact treatment efficacy. Predisposition for aggressive disease in young patients, often in a familial setting, suggests that earlier diagnosis of AIPmut pituitary adenomas may have clinical utility.

Long-term safety of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly: comprehensive review of 1288 subjects in ACROSTUDY.

CONTEXT Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist. The ACROSTUDY is a global safety surveillance study of long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to monitor long-term safety and treatment outcomes. DESIGN ACROSTUDY is open to all patients with acromegaly who are treated with pegvisomant. We report an interim analysis of data captured from 1288 subjects enrolled before a database freeze of December 31, 2009. SETTING This was a global noninterventional surveillance study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Long-term monitoring of safety, including central magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading and treatment outcomes, was measured. RESULTS Subjects (n = 1288) were treated with pegvisomant for a mean of 3.7 yr and followed up in ACROSTUDY for a mean of 2.1 yr. A total of 1147 adverse events (AE) were recorded in 477 subjects (37%), among which 192 AE in 124 subjects (9.6%) were considered to be related to pegvisomant. Serious AE were recorded in 159 subjects (12.3%), whereas pegvisomant-related Serious AE were recorded in 26 subjects (2%). No deaths (15 subjects; 1.2%) were attributed to pegvisomant use. The incidence of increase in pituitary tumor size in the subset with confirmed MRI increases on central reading represented 3.2% of the overall cohort with at least two available MRI (n = 936). Injection-site reactions were reported in 28 cases (2.2%). In 30 patients (2.5%), an elevated aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase of more than 3 times the upper level of normality was reported. There were no reports of liver failure. After 5 yr of pegvisomant treatment, 63.2% of subjects had normal IGF-I levels at a mean dose of 18 mg/d. CONCLUSIONS Data entered and evaluated in ACROSTUDY indicate that pegvisomant is an effective and safe medical treatment in patients with acromegaly. The reported low incidence of pituitary tumor size increase, liver enzyme elevations, and lipodystrophy at the injection site are reassuring.

Temozolomide Treatment in Aggressive Pituitary Tumors and Pituitary Carcinomas: A French Multicenter Experience

CONTEXT To date only 18 patients with aggressive pituitary tumors or carcinomas treated with temozolomide have been reported. Increased expression of O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase (MGMT) has been suggested to predict resistance to temozolomide. OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to describe the antitumoral efficacy and toxicity of temozolomide in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors or carcinomas and evaluate the possible prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation and protein expression. PATIENTS Eight patients, five with pituitary carcinomas (three prolactin (PRL) and two ACTH) and three with aggressive pituitary tumors (one PRL and two ACTH), all treated with temozolomide administered orally for four to 24 cycles, were included in our French multicenter study. DESIGN MGMT expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry and MGMT promoter methylation by pyrosequencing. RESULTS Three of the eight patients (two ACTH adenomas and one PRL carcinoma) responded to temozolomide as demonstrated by significant tumor shrinkage and reduced hormone secretion. Three cycles of temozolomide were sufficient to identify treatment-responsive patients. Additional cycles did not improve treatment efficacy in those not responding, even when associated with carboplatin and vepeside. MGMT expression did not predict tumoral response to temozolomide because it was positive in one responder and negative in two nonresponders. Similarly, MGMT promoter methylation (three of seven tumors) did not predict clinical response. Toxicity remained mild in all patients. CONCLUSION Temozolomide treatment may be an effective option for some aggressive pituitary tumors or carcinomas. Response to a trial of three cycles of treatment seems sufficient to identify responders and more reliable than patient MGMT status.

Long-term results of stereotactic radiosurgery in secretory pituitary adenomas.

CONTEXT To date, no study reported long-term follow-up results of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SR). OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to determine long-term efficacy and adverse effects of SR in secreting pituitary adenomas. DESIGN We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated by SR in the center of Marseille, France, with a follow-up of at least 60 months. PATIENTS A total of 76 patients were treated by SR for acromegaly (n = 43), Cushings disease (CD; n = 18), or prolactinoma (n = 15) as a primary (n = 27) or adjunctive postsurgical treatment (n = 49). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES After withdrawal of antisecretory drugs, patients were considered in remission if they had mean GH levels below 2 ng/ml and normal IGF-I (acromegaly), normal 24-h urinary free cortisol, and cortisol less than 50 nmol/liter after low-dose dexamethasone test (CD) or two consecutive normal samplings of prolactin levels (prolactinoma). RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 96 months, 44.7% of the patients were in remission. Mean time to remission was 42.6 months. Twelve patients presented late remission at least 48 months after SR. Two patients with CD presented late recurrence 72 and 96 months after SR. Forty percent of patients treated primarily with SR were in remission. Target volume and initial hormone levels were significant predictive factors of remission in univariate analysis. Radiation-induced hypopituitarism was observed in 23% patients; in half of them, hypopituitarism was observed after a mean time of 48 to 96 months. Twenty-four patients were followed for more than 120 months; rates of remission and hypopituitarism were similar to the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS SR is an effective and safe primary or adjunctive treatment in selected patients with secreting pituitary adenomas.

Expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) and AHR-interacting protein in pituitary adenomas: pathological and clinical implications

Germline mutations of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-interacting protein (AIP) gene confer a predisposition to pituitary adenomas (PA), usually in the setting of familial isolated PA. To provide further insights into the possible role of AIP in pituitary tumour pathogenesis, the expression of AIP and AHR was determined by real-time RT-PCR and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a large series of PA (n=103), including 17 with AIP mutations (AIP(mut)). Variable levels of AIP and AHR transcripts were detected in all PA, with a low AHR expression (P<0.0001 versus AIP). Cytoplasmic AIP and AHR were detected by IHC in 84.0 and 38.6% of PA respectively, and significantly correlated with each other (P=0.006). Nuclear AHR was detected in a minority of PA (19.7%). The highest AIP expression was observed in somatotrophinomas and non-secreting (NS) PA, and multivariate analysis in somatotrophinomas showed a significantly lower AIP immunostaining in invasive versus non-invasive cases (P=0.019). AIP expression was commonly low in other secreting PA. AIP immunostaining was abolished in a minority of AIP(mut) PA, with a frequent loss of cytoplasmic AHR and no evidence of nuclear AHR. In contrast, AIP overexpression in a subset of NS PA could be accompanied by nuclear AHR immunopositivity. We conclude that down-regulation of AIP and AHR may be involved in the aggressiveness of somatotrophinomas. Overall, IHC is a poorly sensitive tool for the screening of AIP mutations. Data obtained on AHR expression suggest that AHR signalling may be differentially affected according to PA phenotype.

High prevalence of AIP gene mutations following focused screening in young patients with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas

BACKGROUND Aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) mutations (AIPmut) cause aggressive pituitary adenomas in young patients, usually in the setting of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. The prevalence of AIPmut among sporadic pituitary adenoma patients appears to be low; studies have not addressed prevalence in the most clinically relevant population. Hence, we undertook an international, multicenter, prospective genetic, and clinical analysis at 21 tertiary referral endocrine departments. METHODS We included 163 sporadic pituitary macroadenoma patients irrespective of clinical phenotype diagnosed at <30 years of age. RESULTS Overall, 19/163 (11.7%) patients had germline AIPmut; a further nine patients had sequence changes of uncertain significance or polymorphisms. AIPmut were identified in 8/39 (20.5%) pediatric patients. Ten AIPmut were identified in 11/83 (13.3%) sporadic somatotropinoma patients, in 7/61 (11.5%) prolactinoma patients, and in 1/16 non-functioning pituitary adenoma patients. Large genetic deletions were not seen using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Familial screening was possible in the relatives of seven patients with AIPmut and carriers were found in six of the seven families. In total, pituitary adenomas were diagnosed in 2/21 AIPmut-screened carriers; both had asymptomatic microadenomas. CONCLUSION Germline AIPmut occur in 11.7% of patients <30 years with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas and in 20.5% of pediatric patients. AIPmut mutation testing in this population should be considered in order to optimize clinical genetic investigation and management.

Pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumours: merits and pitfalls of temozolomide treatment

Pituitary carcinomas are rare, accounting for about 0·2% of all pituitary tumours. They represent a challenge to clinical practice in both diagnosis and treatment. They may present initially as typical pituitary adenomas, with a delayed appearance of aggressive signs, or as aggressive tumours from the outset. Predicting the pituitary tumour behaviour remains difficult: increased mitotic, Ki‐67 and P53 indices might be associated with tumour aggression. The treatment of pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumours includes surgery, adjuvant medical treatment, external beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Until recently, the treatment of pituitary carcinomas was mainly palliative and did not seem to increase overall survival. Recent case reports have detailed the successful use of temozolomide, an orally administered alkylating agent used to treat malignant gliomas, in the management of pituitary carcinomas and aggressive pituitary tumours. The outcome of treatment might depend on the expression of O 6 ‐methylguanine‐DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), a DNA repair enzyme that potentially interferes with drug efficacy. This review describes the clinical presentation and response to temozolomide in 44 patients with pituitary carcinomas or aggressive pituitary tumours reported in the literature. The results suggest that temozolomide should be considered a drug of major importance in the therapeutic algorithm of aggressive pituitary tumours and pituitary carcinomas. Because of the inconsistency of published data, MGMT expression should probably not be taken as a reason to deny these patients the potential benefit of temozolomide treatment, taking into account the paucity of other available treatments.

Ketoconazole in Cushing's Disease: Is It Worth a Try?

BACKGROUND The use of ketoconazole has been recently questioned after warnings from the European Medicine Agencies and the Food and Drug Administration due to potential hepatotoxicity. However, ketoconazole is frequently used as a drug to lower circulating cortisol levels. Several pharmacological agents have recently been approved for the treatment of Cushings disease (CD) despite limited efficacy or significant side effects. Ketoconazole has been used worldwide for more than 30 years in CD, but in the absence of a large-scale study, its efficacy and tolerance are still under debate. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a French retrospective multicenter study reviewing data from patients treated by ketoconazole as a single agent for CD, with the aim of clarifying efficacy and tolerance to better determine the benefit/risk balance. RESULTS Data from 200 patients were included in this study. At the last follow-up, 49.3% of patients had normal urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels, 25.6% had at least a 50% decrease, and 25.4% had unchanged UFC levels. The median final dose of ketoconazole was 600 mg/d. Forty patients (20%) received ketoconazole as a presurgical treatment; 40% to 50% of these patients showed improvement of hypertension, hypokalemia, and diabetes, and 48.7% had normal UFC before surgery. Overall, 41 patients (20.5%) stopped the treatment due to poor tolerance. Mild (<5N, inferior to 5-fold normal values) and major (>5N, superior to 5-fold normal values) increases in liver enzymes were observed in 13.5% and 2.5% of patients, respectively. No fatal hepatitis was observed. CONCLUSIONS Ketoconazole is an effective drug with acceptable side effects. It should be used under close liver enzyme monitoring. Hepatotoxicity is usually mild and resolves after drug withdrawal.

Prognostic Factors in Prolactin Pituitary Tumors: Clinical, Histological, and Molecular Data from a Series of 94 Patients with a Long Postoperative Follow-Up

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Predicting pituitary tumor behavior remains a challenge. This multiparameter investigation aimed to identify markers for recurrence and progression in prolactin tumors. DESIGN From a cohort of patients treated for prolactin tumors by surgery, we retrospectively studied clinical data, tumor characteristics, clinical outcome, and the expression of nine genes by quantitative RT-PCR. RESULTS This study included 94 patients (62 females and 32 men), with long postoperative follow-up periods (mean, 138 +/- 46 months); 54.3% of patients had a macro or giant adenoma. Tumors were classified into three pathological groups based on their radiological and histological characteristics (noninvasive, 61; invasive, 22; and aggressive-invasive, 11). Immediately after surgery, 60 patients (63.8%) went into remission (prolactin level normalization). Persistently elevated prolactin levels (36.2%) were associated with increasing age, male sex, high preoperative prolactin levels, large tumor size on univariate analysis, and invasion and pathological classification on univariate and multivariate (P = 8 x 10(-10) and 3 x 10(-8)) analysis. During follow-up, 19 patients (20%) had tumors that recurred or progressed under dopamine agonist treatment. Invasion and pathological classification were associated with recurrence or progression on univariate analysis. Seven genes (ADAMTS6, CRMP1, PTTG, ASK, CCNB1, AURKB, and CENPE) were associated with tumor recurrence or progression and five of these (ADAMTS6, CRMP1, ASK, CCNB1, and CENPE) were associated with the pathological classification. CONCLUSION This study identifies both the clinical and histological factors that relate to prolactin tumor recurrence or progression. Molecular markers give additional information for prognosis of such tumors. Altogether, our results could influence the management of patients with pituitary tumors.