Thomas A. Bickle

Type III restriction endonucleases translocate DNA in a reaction driven by recognition site-specific ATP hydrolysis.

Type III restriction/modification systems recognize short non‐palindromic sequences, only one strand of which can be methylated. Replication of type III‐modified DNA produces completely unmethylated recognition sites which, according to classical mechanisms of restriction, should be signals for restriction. We have shown previously that suicidal restriction by the type III enzyme EcoP15I is prevented if all the unmodified sites are in the same orientation: restriction by EcoP15I requires a pair of unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites. We have now addressed the molecular mechanism of site orientation‐specific DNA restriction. EcoP15I is demonstrated to possess an intrinsic ATPase activity, the potential driving force of DNA translocation. The ATPase activity is uniquely recognition site‐specific, but EcoP15I‐modified sites also support the reaction. EcoP15I DNA restriction patterns are shown to be predetermined by the enzyme‐to‐site ratio, in that site‐saturating enzyme levels elicit cleavage exclusively between the closest pair of head‐to‐head oriented sites. DNA restriction is blocked by Lac repressor bound in the intervening sequence between the two EcoP15I sites. These results rule out DNA looping and strongly suggest that cleavage is triggered by the close proximity of two convergently tracking EcoP15I‐DNA complexes.

Characterization and mutational analysis of the RecQ core of the bloom syndrome protein

Bloom syndrome protein forms an oligomeric ring structure and belongs to a group of DNA helicases showing extensive homology to the Escherichia coli DNA helicase RecQ, a suppressor of illegitimate recombination. After over-production in E.coli, we have purified the RecQ core of BLM consisting of the DEAH, RecQ-Ct and HRDC domains (amino acid residues 642-1290). The BLM(642-1290) fragment could function as a DNA-stimulated ATPase and as a DNA helicase, displaying the same substrate specificity as the full-size protein. Gel-filtration experiments revealed that BLM(642-1290) exists as a monomer both in solution and in its single-stranded DNA-bound form, even in the presence of Mg(2+) and ATPgammaS. Rates of ATP hydrolysis and DNA unwinding by BLM(642-1290) showed a hyperbolic dependence on ATP concentration, excluding a co-operative interaction between ATP-binding sites. Using a lambda Spi(-) assay, we have found that the BLM(642-1290) fragment is able to partially substitute for the RecQ helicase in suppressing illegitimate recombination in E.coli. A deletion of 182 C-terminal amino acid residues of BLM(642-1290), including the HRDC domain, resulted in helicase and single-stranded DNA-binding defects, whereas kinetic parameters for ATP hydrolysis of this mutant were close to the BLM(642-1290) values. This confirms the prediction that the HRDC domain serves as an auxiliary DNA-binding domain. Mutations at several conserved residues within the RecQ-Ct domain of BLM reduced ATPase and helicase activities severely as well as single-stranded DNA-binding of the enzyme. Together, these data define a minimal helicase domain of BLM and demonstrate its ability to act as a suppressor of illegitimate recombination.

Type III DNA restriction and modification systems EcoP1 and EcoP15: nucleotide sequence of the EcoP1 operon, the EcoP15mod gene and some EcoP1mod mutants

This paper presents the nucleotide sequence of the mod-res operon of phage P1, which encodes the two structural genes for the EcoP1 type III restriction and modification system. We have also sequenced the mod gene of the allelic EcoP15 system. The mod gene product is responsible for binding the system-specific DNA recognition sequences in both restriction and modification; it also catalyses the modification reaction. A comparison of the two mod gene product sequences shows that they have conserved amino and carboxyl ends but have completely different sequences in the middle of the molecules. Two alleles of the EcoP1 mod gene that are defective in modification but not in restriction were also sequenced. The mutations in both alleles lie within the non-conserved regions.

The DNA sequence of an IS1-flanked transposon coding for resistance to chloramphenicol and fusidic acid

(ii) The transposon appeared too small to code for the chloramphenicol resistance gene product (22-24 X lo3 mol. wt [4]), a protein for fusidic acid resistance and a putative ‘transposase’ [5] which would be involved in transposition. Since the expression of chloramphenicol resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is under the control of catabolite repression [6], the sequence of the non-coding regions of the DNA should contain a catabolite repressor binding site (CAP site) which could be compared with the 3 published CAP sites controlling the lac, gal and ara operons of Escherichia coli [7-91. The results indicate that: (a) A gene for a putative ‘transposase’ does not exist; (b) The gene(s) for resistance to chloramphenicol and fusidic acid are either identical or overlap in the same reading frame; (c) A probable CAP site was found N 120 basepairs preceding the initiation of transcription.

Basis for changes in DNA recognition by the EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 type I DNA restriction and modification enzymes

EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 are type I DNA restriction and modification systems. The EcoR124/3 system arose from the EcoR124 system some 15 years ago and at the electron microscopic DNA heteroduplex level the genes for both systems are still apparently identical. We have shown that the DNA sequences recognized by the two systems are GAA(N6)RTCG for EcoR124 and GAA(N7)RTCG for EcoR124/3. The sequences thus differ only in the length of the non-specific spacer. This difference nevertheless places the two specific domains of the EcoR124/3 recognition sequence 0.34 nm further apart and rotates them 36 degrees with respect to those of EcoR124, which implies major structural differences in the proteins recognizing these sequences. We have now determined the nucleotide sequences of the hsdS and hsdM genes of both systems and of the hsdR gene of EcoR124/3. The hsdS gene products provide DNA sequence specificity in both restriction and modification, the hsdM gene products are necessary for modification and all three hsd gene products are required for restriction. The only difference that we have detected between the two systems is that a 12 base-pair sequence towards the middle of the hsdS gene is repeated twice in the EcoR124 gene and three times in the EcoR124/3 gene. We have deleted one of the repeats in the EcoR124/3 gene and shown that this changes the specificity to that of EcoR124. Thus, the extra four amino acids in the middle of the EcoR124/3 hsdS gene product, which in an alpha-helical configuration would extend 0.6 nm, are sufficient to explain the differences in sequence recognition. We suggest that the EcoR124/3 system was generated by an unequal crossing over and argue that this kind of specificity change should not be rare in Nature.

Recombination of constant and variable modules alters DNA sequence recognition by type IC restriction-modification enzymes.

EcoR124 and EcoDXXI are allelic type I restriction‐modification (R‐M) systems whose specificity genes consist of common structural elements: two variable regions are separated by a constant, homologous region containing a number of repetitive sequence elements. In vitro recombination of variable and constant elements has led to fully active, hybrid R‐M systems exhibiting new and predictable target site specificities. Methylation of synthetic DNA sequences with purified, hybrid modification methylases was used to confirm the proposed recognition sequences. The results clearly demonstrate the correlation between protein domains and target site specificity. Our data suggest that a bacterial population may switch the recognition sequences of its type I R‐M system by single recombination events and thus is able to maintain a prokaryotic analogue of the immune system of variable specificity.

DNA translocation blockage, a general mechanism of cleavage site selection by type I restriction enzymes

Type I restriction enzymes bind to a specific DNA sequence and subsequently translocate DNA past the complex to reach a non‐specific cleavage site. We have examined several potential blocks to DNA translocation, such as positive supercoiling or a Holliday junction, for their ability to trigger DNA cleavage by type I restriction enzymes. Introduction of positive supercoiling into plasmid DNA did not have a significant effect on the rate of DNA cleavage by EcoAI endonuclease nor on the enzymes ability to select cleavage sites randomly throughout the DNA molecule. Thus, positive supercoiling does not prevent DNA translocation. EcoR124II endonuclease cleaved DNA at Holliday junctions present on both linear and negatively supercoiled substrates. The latter substrate was cleaved by a single enzyme molecule at two sites, one on either side of the junction, consistent with a bi‐directional translocation model. Linear DNA molecules with two recognition sites for endonucleases from different type I families were cut between the sites when both enzymes were added simultaneously but not when a single enzyme was added. We propose that type I restriction enzymes can track along a DNA substrate irrespective of its topology and cleave DNA at any barrier that is able to halt the translocation process.

DNA restriction--modification enzymes of phage P1 and plasmid p15B. Subunit functions and structural homologies.

We have purified the type III restriction enzymes EcoP1 and EcoP15 to homogeneity from bacteria that contain the structural genes for the enzymes cloned on small, multicopy plasmids and which overproduce the enzymes. Both of the enzymes contain two different subunits. The molecular weights of the subunits are the same for both enzymes and antibodies prepared against one enzyme cross-react with both subunits of the other. Bacteria containing a plasmid derivative in which a large part of one of the structural genes has been deleted have a restriction- modification+ phenotype and contain only the smaller of the two subunits. This subunit therefore must be the one that both recognizes the specific DNA sequence and methylates it in the modification reaction (the restriction enzyme itself also acts as a modification methylase). We have purified the P1 and P15 modification subunits from these deletion derivatives and have shown that in vitro they have the expected properties: they are sequence-specific modification methylases. In addition, we have demonstrated that strains carrying the full restriction/modification system also contain a pool of free modification subunits that might be responsible for in vivo modification.

EcoA: The first member of a new family of type I restriction modification systems: Gene organization and enzymatic activities

The characterization of the EcoA restriction-modification enzymes from Escherichia coli 15T- is described. The reactions catalysed by these enzymes are very similar to those catalysed by the classical type I restriction and modification enzymes, a family of genetically related proteins. The detailed mechanisms, particularly for DNA modification, differ. The genetic and transcriptional organizations are also very similar to those of the classical systems, despite the fact that EcoA is not allelic to the others. We demonstrate that the expression of the EcoA genes is controlled following conjugative transfer to other strains in such a way that no lethality is observed, probably because the recipient chromosome is completely modified before restriction activity is expressed.

DNA recognition and cleavage by the EcoP15 restriction endonuclease.

Abstract Eco P15 is a restriction-modification enzyme coded by the P15 plasmid of Escherichia coli . We have determined the sites recognized by this enzyme on pBR322 and simian virus 40 DNA. The enzyme recognizes the sequence: In restriction, the enzyme cleaves the DNA 25 to 26 base-pairs 3′ to this sequence to leave single-stranded 5′ protrusions two bases long.