Thomas Büttner

Challenges of automated screening and differentiation of non-organ specific autoantibodies on HEp-2 cells.

Analysis of autoantibodies (AAB) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) remains the hallmark of diagnosing autoimmune diseases despite the introduction of multiplex techniques. Non-organ specific AAB are screened in routine diagnostics by IIF on HEp-2 cells. However, IIF results vary due to objective (e.g., cell fixation) and subjective factors (e.g., expert knowledge). Therefore, inter- and intralaboratory variance is relatively high. Standardisation of AAB testing by IIF remains a critical issue in and between routine laboratories and may be improved by automated interpretation systems. An overview of existing interpretation techniques will be given taking into account own data of the first fully automated reading system AKLIDES. The novel system provides fully automated reading of IIF images and software algorithms for the mathematical description of IIF AAB patterns. It can be used for screening and preclassification of non-organ specific AAB in routine diagnostics regarding systemic autoimmune and autoimmune liver diseases. Furthermore, this system paves the way for economic data processing of cell-based IIF assays and can contribute to the reduction of interlaboratory variance of AAB testing. More sophisticated pattern recognition algorithms and novel calibration systems will improve standardised quantifications of IIF image interpretation.

Identification of GP2, the major zymogen granule membrane glycoprotein, as the autoantigen of pancreatic antibodies in Crohn’s disease

Backround and aims: The aetiopathogenesis of Crohn’s disease, an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is not yet fully understood. Autoimmune mechanisms are thought to play a role in the development of Crohn’s disease, but the target antigens and the underlying pathways have not been sufficiently identified. Methods: Based on data from immunoblotting and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, the major antigenic target of pancreatic autoantibodies (PABs), which are specific for Crohn’s disease, was identified. Specificity of autoantibody reactivity was confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) using purified rat and human recombinant GP2 synthesised in transiently transfected mammalian HEK 293 cells. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (rt-PCR) and IIF were used to detect mRNA and antigen localisation in human colon biopsies. Results: The major zymogen granule membrane glycoprotein 2 (GP2) was identified as the autoantigen of PABs in Crohn’s disease. PAB-positive sera from patients with Crohn’s disease (n = 42) displayed significantly higher IgG reactivity to rat GP2 in ELISA than either PAB-negative sera (n = 31), or sera from patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 49), or sera from blood donors (n = 69) (p<0.0001, respectively). Twenty-eight (66%) and 18 (43%) of 42 PAB-positive sera demonstrated IgG and IgA reactivity to human recombinant GP2 in IIF, respectively. Patients with PAB-negative Crohn’s disease (n = 31) were not reactive. GP2 mRNA transcription was significantly higher in colon biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease (n = 4) compared to patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 4) (p = 0.0286). Immunochemical staining confirmed GP2 expression in human colon biopsies from patients with Crohn’s disease. Conclusion: Anti-GP2 autoantibodies constitute novel Crohn’s disease-specific markers, the quantification of which could significantly improve the serological diagnosis of IBD. The expression of GP2 in human enterocytes suggests an important role for anti-GP2 response in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease.

Automated evaluation of autoantibodies on human epithelial-2 cells as an approach to standardize cell-based immunofluorescence tests

IntroductionAnalysis of autoantibodies (AAB) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) is a basic tool for the serological diagnosis of systemic rheumatic disorders. Automation of autoantibody IIF reading including pattern recognition may improve intra- and inter-laboratory variability and meet the demand for cost-effective assessment of large numbers of samples. Comparing automated and visual interpretation, the usefulness for routine laboratory diagnostics was investigated.MethodsAutoantibody detection by IIF on human epithelial-2 (HEp-2) cells was conducted in a total of 1222 consecutive sera of patients with suspected systemic rheumatic diseases from a university routine laboratory (n = 924) and a private referral laboratory (n = 298). IIF results from routine diagnostics were compared with a novel automated interpretation system.ResultsBoth diagnostic procedures showed a very good agreement in detecting AAB (kappa = 0.828) and differentiating respective immunofluorescence patterns. Only 98 (8.0%) of 1222 sera demonstrated discrepant results in the differentiation of positive from negative samples. The contingency coefficients of chi-square statistics were 0.646 for the university laboratory cohort with an agreement of 93.0% and 0.695 for the private laboratory cohort with an agreement of 90.6%, P < 0.0001, respectively. Comparing immunofluorescence patterns, 111 (15.3%) sera yielded differing results.ConclusionsAutomated assessment of AAB by IIF on HEp-2 cells using an automated interpretation system is a reliable and robust method for positive/negative differentiation. Employing novel mathematical algorithms, automated interpretation provides reproducible detection of specific immunofluorescence patterns on HEp-2 cells. Automated interpretation can reduce drawbacks of IIF for AAB detection in routine diagnostics providing more reliable data for clinicians.

Autoantibodies to GP2, the major zymogen granule membrane glycoprotein, are new markers in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND Crohns disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by reactivity against microbial and self antigens. Zymogen granule glycoprotein 2 (GP2) was identified as the major autoantigen of CD-specific pancreatic autoantibodies (PAB). METHODS Human GP2 was expressed in the Spodoptera frugiperda 9 (Sf9) cell line using the baculovirus system, purified by Ni-chelate chromatography, and used as antigen for anti-GP2 IgA and IgG assessment by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Antibodies to mannan of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA), PAB, and anti-GP2 were investigated in sera of 178 CD patients, 100 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and 162 blood donors (BD). RESULTS Anti-GP2 IgG and IgA were found in 48/72 (66.7%) and 23/72 (31.9%) PAB positive and 5/106 (4.7%) and 1/106 (0.9%) PAB negative CD patients (p<0.0001), respectively. CD patients displayed significantly higher reactivity to GP2 than UC patients and BD (p<0.0001), respectively. Occurrence of anti-GP2 antibodies correlated with PAB reactivity (Spearmens rho=0.493, p<0.00001). There was a significant relationship between the occurrence of ASCA IgG and anti-GP2 IgG (p=0.0307). CONCLUSIONS Anti-GP2 IgG and IgA constitute novel CD specific autoantibodies, the quantification of which could improve the serological diagnosis of IBD.

A novel automated indirect immunofluorescence autoantibody evaluation

Autoantibodies (AAb), especially antinuclear (ANAs) and anticytoplasmatic antibodies (ACyA), are essential diagnosing markers for several autoimmune diseases. The current gold standard method for ANA detection is manual indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on human epithelial-2 (HEp-2) cells. However, this technique is cost and time consuming, and characterized by considerable intra- and interlaboratory variability. Thus, an automated IIF-HEp-2 reader has been developed recently. In the current study, we compared the performance of the automated AAb IIF-HEp-2 interpretation to conventional detection methods. Autoantibody detection by IIF on HEp-2 cells was performed in a total of 260 sera of patients, including 34 with systemic lupus erythematosus, 111 with dermatomyositis or polymyositis, 74 with systemic sclerosis, 41 with rare AAb patterns, and 137 healthy individuals. Visual interpretation and routine immunoassays were compared with a novel automated IIF-HEp-2 system using Aklides pattern recognition algorithms. Positive AAbs were detected in 95–100% of rheumatic patients by automated interpretation, in 74–100% with manual reading, and in 64–100% by immunodot assay. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of fluorescent intensity revealed a high sensitivity and specificity for automated reading of AAb with an agreement ranging from 90% to 95% between manual and automated interpretation (kappa 0.554–0.69) for systemic sclerosis and myositis, respectively. This study demonstrates a good correlation between manual and automated interpretation of AAb including ANA and ACyA in patients with autoimmune diseases. Full automation of HEp-2 cell assay reading may minimize errors in ANA pattern interpretation and thus help in the standardization of ANA assessment.

Autoantibodies to asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) measured by a novel ELISA—Revival of a disease-activity marker in autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND The liver-specific ASGPR is an autoantigen in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) patients. Anti-ASGPR antibody correlates with disease activity, however, only in-house assays have been reported so far. METHODS Rabbit ASGPR was purified by affinity chromatography on galactose-Sepharose and used for standardised detection of anti-ASGPR by ELISA. Anti-ASGPR IgG was measured in sera from 45 patients with AIH, PBC (n=43), alcoholic liver disease (n=13), HBV infection (n=35), HCV infection (n=53), and 118 blood donors. Anti-ASGPR was correlated with biochemical parameters of disease activity in 22 AIH patients with consecutive samples. RESULTS Twenty-one of 30 untreated (70%) and five of 15 treated AIH patients (30%) showed elevated anti-ASGPR at first presentation. Only one blood donor demonstrated anti-ASGPR. ALD and PBC patients were all negative. ROC curve analysis of AIH and disease-control patients revealed a sensitivity of 77.8% and a specificity of 99.4%. Three (8.6%) of 35 HBV and 7 (13.2%) of 53 HCV patients demonstrated elevated anti-ASGPR. In AIH patients, anti-ASPGR correlated with liver-transaminases levels. In 22 follow-up patients, elevation of anti-ASPGR preceded liver-transaminases increase. CONCLUSIONS The novel anti-ASGPR ELISA is a readily available and specific diagnostic tool for anti-ASGPR detection in AIH. Quantification of anti-ASGPR is helpful in monitoring disease activity.

High Sensitive Detection of Double-Stranded DNA Autoantibodies by a Modified Crithidia luciliae Immunofluorescence Test

Anti‐double‐stranded (ds)DNA antibodies are serological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Of all anti‐dsDNA antibody detection methods, the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test (CLIFT) is thought to have the highest specificity for SLE. However, the clinical application is hampered by the low diagnostic sensitivity. A CLIFT with modified assay buffer (mCLIFT) was developed and compared with conventional CLIFT, using sera from 110 patients with SLE, 89 anti‐dsDNA ELISA‐positive patients with other diseases (non‐SLE group A), 157 non‐SLE patients with undetectable anti‐dsDNA antibodies by ELISA (non‐SLE group B), 77 disease controls (non‐SLE group C), and 50 healthy blood donors. Out of the 110 anti‐dsDNA antibody ELISA‐positive SLE patients, 84 (76.4%) demonstrated a positive kinetoplast staining, using the mCLIFT, compared to only 42.3%, using the conventional CLIFT. The diagnostic specificity of mCLIFT was 100% with healthy blood donors and 98.1% with the non‐SLE group C (anti‐nuclear antibodies negative; no signs or symptoms of an autoimmune disease) included. In the non‐SLE groups A and B with various other autoimmune diseases or symptoms of a possible autoimmune disease, positive mCLIFT results were obtained in 33.7% and 3.2%, respectively. In conclusion, by modification of the assay buffer, a significant increase in sensitivity of the CLIFT could be observed while retaining the high specificity for SLE. Further investigation is required to check whether the CLIFT‐positive non‐SLE patients develop SLE and whether anti‐dsDNA antibodies detected by the mCLIFT represent a pathogenetic and diagnostic subgroup of autoantibodies that may improve the early diagnosis of SLE or SLE‐overlap syndromes.

Single-step autoantibody profiling in antiphospholipid syndrome using a multi-line dot assay

IntroductionDiagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) still remains a laboratory challenge due to the great diversity of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and their significance regarding APS-diagnostic criteria.MethodsA multi-line dot assay (MLDA) employing phosphatidylserine (PS), phosphatidylinositol (PI), cardiolipin (CL), and beta2-glycoprotein I (β2 GPI) was used to detect aPL, immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in 85 APS patients, 65 disease controls, and 79 blood donors. For comparison, anti-CL and anti-β2 GPI IgG and IgM were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).ResultsThe level of agreement of both methods was good for anti-CL IgG, moderate for anti-CL IgM, very good for anti-β2 GPI IgG, and moderate for anti-β2 GPI IgM (kappa = 0.641, 0.507, 0.803 and 0.506, respectively). The frequency of observed discrepancies for anti-CL IgG (1.75%), anti-CL IgM (3.93%), anti-β2 GPI IgG (1.75%), and anti-β2 GPI IgM (0.87%) was low (McNemar test, P < 0.05, not-significant, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, positive (+LR) and negative (-LR) likelihood ratios for at least one positive aPL antibody assessed by ELISA were 58.8%, 95.8%, 14.1, and 0.4, respectively, and for at least three positive aPl IgM and/or one positive aPL IgG by MLDA were 67.1%, 96.5%, 19.3, and 0.3, respectively. The frequency of IgM to PI, PS and CL, and combination of three or more aPL IgM detected by MLDA was significantly higher in APS patients with cerebral transient ischemia (P < 0.05, respectively).ConclusionsThe novel MLDA is a readily available, single-step, sensitive diagnostic tool for the multiplex detection of aPL antibodies in APS and a potential alternative for single aPL antibody testing by ELISA.

Antiphospholipid antibodies detected by line immunoassay differentiate among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, with infections and asymptomatic carriers

BackgroundAntiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) can be detected in asymptomatic carriers and infectious patients. The aim was to investigate whether a novel line immunoassay (LIA) differentiates between antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and asymptomatic aPL+ carriers or patients with infectious diseases (infectious diseases controls (IDC)).MethodsSixty-one patients with APS (56 primary, 22/56 with obstetric events only, and 5 secondary), 146 controls including 24 aPL+ asymptomatic carriers and 73 IDC were tested on a novel hydrophobic solid phase coated with cardiolipin (CL), phosphatic acid, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylserine, beta2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI), prothrombin, and annexin V. Samples were also tested by anti-CL and anti-β2GPI ELISAs and for lupus anticoagulant activity. Human monoclonal antibodies (humoAbs) against human β2GPI or PL alone were tested on the same LIA substrates in the absence or presence of human serum, purified human β2GPI or after CL-micelle absorption.ResultsComparison of LIA with the aPL-classification assays revealed good agreement for IgG/IgM aß2GPI and aCL. Anti-CL and anti-ß2GPI IgG/IgM reactivity assessed by LIA was significantly higher in patients with APS versus healthy controls and IDCs, as detected by ELISA. IgG binding to CL and ß2GPI in the LIA was significantly lower in aPL+ carriers and Venereal Disease Research Laboratory test (VDRL) + samples than in patients with APS. HumoAb against domain 1 recognized β2GPI bound to the LIA-matrix and in anionic phospholipid (PL) complexes. Absorption with CL micelles abolished the reactivity of a PL-specific humoAb but did not affect the binding of anti-β2GPI humoAbs.ConclusionsThe LIA and ELISA have good agreement in detecting aPL in APS, but the LIA differentiates patients with APS from infectious patients and asymptomatic carriers, likely through the exposure of domain 1.

Analysis of anti-ganglioside antibodies by a line immunoassay in patients with chronic-inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies (CIDP)

Abstract Background: Unlike for acute immune-mediated neuropathies (IN), anti-ganglioside autoantibody (aGAAb) testing has been recommended for only a minority of chronic IN yet. Thus, we used a multiplex semi-quantitative line immunoassay (LIA) to search for aGAAb in chronic-inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and its clinical variants. Methods: Anti-GAAb to 11 gangliosides and sulfatide (SF) were investigated by LIA in 61 patients with IN (27 typical CIDP, 12 distal-acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy, 6 multifocal-acquired demyelinating sensory/motor polyneuropathy, 10 sensory CIDP, 1 focal CIDP and 5 multifocal-motoric neuropathy), 40 with other neuromuscular disorders (OND) (15 non-immune polyneuropathies, 25 myasthenia gravis), 29 with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 54 healthy controls (HC). Results: In contrast to IgG, positive anti-GAAB IgM against at least one ganglioside/SF was found in 17/61 (27.9%) IN compared to 2/40 (5%) in OND, 2/29 MS (6.9%) and 4/54 (7.4%) in HC (p=0.001). There was a statistically higher prevalence of anti-sulfatide (aSF) IgM in IN compared to OND (p=0.008). Further, aGM1 IgM was more prevalent in IN compared to OND and HC (p=0.009) as well as GD1b in IN compared to HC (p<0.04). The prevalence of aGM1 IgM in CIDP was lower compared to in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) (12% vs. 60%, p=0.027). Patients showing aSF, aGM1 and aGM2 IgM were younger compared to aGAAb negatives (p<0.05). Patients with aSF IgM positivity presented more frequently typical CIDP and MMN phenotypes (p<0.05, respectively). Conclusions: The aGAAb LIA revealed an elevated frequency of at least one aGAAb IgM in CIDP/MMN patients. Anti-SF, aGM1 and aGM2 IgM were associated with younger age and anti-SF with IN phenotypes.