Thomas C. Duxbury
George Mason University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas C. Duxbury.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2001
David E. Smith; Maria T. Zuber; Herbert V. Frey; James B. Garvin; James W. Head; Duane O. Muhleman; Gordon H. Pettengill; Roger J. Phillips; Sean C. Solomon; H. Jay Zwally; W. Bruce Banerdt; Thomas C. Duxbury; Matthew P. Golombek; Frank G. Lemoine; Gregory A. Neumann; David D. Rowlands; Oded Aharonson; Peter G. Ford; A. Ivanov; C. L. Johnson; Patrick J. McGovern; James B. Abshire; Robert S. Afzal; Xiaoli Sun
The Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA), an instrument on the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft, has measured the topography, surface roughness, and 1.064-μm reflectivity of Mars and the heights of volatile and dust clouds. This paper discusses the function of the MOLA instrument and the acquisition, processing, and correction of observations to produce global data sets. The altimeter measurements have been converted to both gridded and spherical harmonic models for the topography and shape of Mars that have vertical and radial accuracies of ~1 m with respect to the planets center of mass. The current global topographic grid has a resolution of 1/64° in latitude × 1/32° in longitude (1 × 2 km^2 at the equator). Reconstruction of the locations of incident laser pulses on the Martian surface appears to be at the 100-m spatial accuracy level and results in 2 orders of magnitude improvement in the global geodetic grid of Mars. Global maps of optical pulse width indicative of 100-m-scale surface roughness and 1.064-μm reflectivity with an accuracy of 5% have also been obtained.
Science | 1976
Michael H. Carr; Harold Masursky; William A. Baum; K. R. Blasius; Geoffrey A. Briggs; James A. Cutts; Thomas C. Duxbury; Ronald Greeley; John E. Guest; Bradford A. Smith; Laurence A. Soderblom; Joseph Veverka; John B. Wellman
During its first 30 orbits around Mars, the Viking orbiter took approximately 1000 photographic frames of the surface of Mars with resolutions that ranged from 100 meters to a little more than 1 kilometer. Most were of potential landing sites in Chryse Planitia and Cydonia and near Capri Chasma. Contiguous high-resolution coverage in these areas has led to an increased understanding of surface processes, particularly cratering, fluvial, and mass-wasting phenomena. Most of the surfaces examined appear relatively old, channel features abound, and a variety of features suggestive of permafrost have been identified. The ejecta patterns around large craters imply that fluid flow of ejecta occurred after ballistic deposition. Variable features in the photographed area appear to have changed little since observed 5 years ago from Mariner 9. A variety of atmospheric phenomena were observed, including diffuse morning hazes, both stationary and moving discrete white clouds, and wave clouds covering extensive areas.
AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit | 2004
Philip Knocke; Geoffrey Wawrzyniak; Brian M. Kennedy; Prasun N. Desai; Timothy Jay Parker; Matthew P. Golombek; Thomas C. Duxbury; David Michael Kass
Landing dispersion estimates for the Mars Exploration Rover missions were key elements in the site targeting process and in the evaluation of landing risk. This paper addresses the process and results of the landing dispersion analyses performed for both Spirit and Opportunity. The several contributors to landing dispersions (navigation and atmospheric uncertainties, spacecraft modeling, winds, and margins) are discussed, as are the analysis tools used. JPLs MarsLS program, a MATLAB-based landing dispersion visualization and statistical analysis tool, was used to calculate the probability of landing within hazardous areas. By convolving this with the probability of landing within flight system limits (in-spec landing) for each hazard area, a single overall measure of landing risk was calculated for each landing ellipse. In-spec probability contours were also generated, allowing a more synoptic view of site risks, illustrating the sensitivity to changes in landing location, and quantifying the possible consequences of anomalies such as incomplete maneuvers. Data and products required to support these analyses are described, including the landing footprints calculated by NASA Langleys POST program and JPLs AEPL program, cartographically registered base maps and hazard maps, and flight system estimates of in-spec landing probabilities for each hazard terrain type. Various factors encountered during operations, including evolving navigation estimates and changing atmospheric models, are discussed and final landing points are compared with approach estimates.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2014
Thomas C. Duxbury; P. R. Christensen; David E. Smith; Gregory A. Neumann; R. L. Kirk; M. A. Caplinger; A. A. Albee; N. V. Seregina; G. Neukum; Brent A. Archinal
The small crater Airy-0 was selected from Mariner 9 images to be the reference for the Mars prime meridian. Initial analyses in the year 2000 tied Viking Orbiter and Mars Orbiter Camera images of Airy-0 to the evolving Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter global digital terrain model to update the location of Airy-0. Based upon this tie and radiometric tracking of landers/rovers from Earth, new expressions for the Mars spin axis direction, spin rate, and prime meridian epoch value were produced to define the orientation of the Martian surface in inertial space over time. Since the Mars Global Surveyor mission and Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter global digital terrain model were completed some time ago, a more exhaustive study has been performed to determine the accuracy of the Airy-0 location and orientation of Mars at the standard epoch. Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) IR image cubes of the Airy and Gale crater regions were tied to the global terrain grid using precision stereo photogrammetric image processing techniques. The Airy-0 location was determined to be about 0.001° east of its predicted location using the currently defined International Astronomical Union (IAU) prime meridian location. Information on this new location and how it was derived will be provided to the NASA Mars Exploration Program Geodesy and Cartography Working Group for their assessment. This NASA group will make a recommendation to the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements to update the expression for the Mars spin axis direction, spin rate, and prime meridian location.
Science | 1999
David E. Smith; Maria T. Zuber; Sean C. Solomon; Roger J. Phillips; James W. Head; James B. Garvin; W. Bruce Banerdt; Duane O. Muhleman; Gordon H. Pettengill; Gregory A. Neumann; Frank G. Lemoine; James B. Abshire; Oded Aharonson; C. David Brown; Steven A. Hauck; A. Ivanov; Patrick J. McGovern; H. Jay Zwally; Thomas C. Duxbury
Science | 1998
Maria T. Zuber; David Eugene Smith; Sean C. Solomon; James B. Abshire; Robert S. Afzal; Oded Aharonson; Kathryn Elspeth Fishbaugh; Peter G. Ford; Herbert V. Frey; James B. Garvin; James W. Head; A. Ivanov; C. L. Johnson; Duane O. Muhleman; Gregory A. Neumann; Gordon H. Pettengill; Roger J. Phillips; Xiaoli Sun; H. Jay Zwally; W. Bruce Banerdt; Thomas C. Duxbury
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1979
Peter C. Thomas; J. Veverka; A. Bloom; Thomas C. Duxbury
Earth and Planetary Science Letters | 2010
Konrad Willner; Jürgen Oberst; Hauke Hussmann; Bernd Giese; Harald Hoffmann; Klaus-Dieter Matz; Thomas Roatsch; Thomas C. Duxbury
Nature | 1978
Peter C. Thomas; Joseph Veverka; Thomas C. Duxbury
Journal of Geophysical Research | 1979
Kenneth P. Klaasen; Thomas C. Duxbury; Joseph Veverka