Thomas D. Nolin

Comparison of Drug Dosing Recommendations Based on Measured GFR and Kidney Function Estimating Equations

BACKGROUND Kidney disease alters the pharmacokinetic disposition of many medications, requiring dosage adjustment to maintain therapeutic serum concentrations. The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equation is used for pharmacokinetic studies and drug dosage adjustments, but the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation is more accurate and more often reported by clinical laboratories than the CG equation. STUDY DESIGN Diagnostic test study. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS Pooled data set for 5,504 participants from 6 research studies and 4 clinical populations with measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR). INDEX TEST Estimated kidney function using the MDRD Study and CG equations incorporating actual (CG) or ideal body weight (CG(IBW)) and standardized serum creatinine concentrations. REFERENCE TEST Measured GFR assessed by using iodine-125-iothalamate urinary clearance. OUTCOME Concordance of assigned kidney function categories designated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidance for Industry for pharmacokinetic studies and recommended dosages of 15 medications cleared by the kidneys. RESULTS Concordance of kidney function estimates with measured GFR for FDA-assigned kidney function categories was 78% for the MDRD Study equation compared with 73% for the CG equation (P < 0.001) and 66% for the CG(IBW) equation (P < 0.001). Concordance between the MDRD Study equation and CG and CG(IBW) equations was 78% and 75%, respectively (P < 0.001). Concordance of kidney function estimates with measured GFR for recommended drug dosages was 88% for MDRD Study equation compared with 85% for the CG equation (P < 0.001) and 82% for the CG(IBW) equation (P < 0.001), with lower concordance when dosing recommendations for drugs included narrow GFR ranges. Concordance rates between the CG and CG(IBW) equations and MDRD Study equation were 89% and 88%, respectively (P < 0.05). LIMITATIONS Results based on simulation rather than pharmacokinetic studies. Outcome was drug dosage recommendations, rather than observed drug efficacy and safety. CONCLUSIONS The MDRD Study equation can also be used for pharmacokinetic studies and drug dosage adjustments. As more accurate GFR-estimating equations are developed, they should be used for these purposes.

Emerging Evidence of the Impact of Kidney Disease on Drug Metabolism and Transport

Several lines of emerging evidence indicate that kidney disease differentially affects uptake and efflux transporters and metabolic enzymes in the liver and gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and uremic toxins have been implicated as the cause. In patients with kidney disease, even drugs that are eliminated by nonrenal transport and metabolism could lead to important unintended consequences if they are administered without dose adjustment for reduced renal function. This is particularly so in the case of drugs with narrow therapeutic windows and may translate into clinically significant variations in exposure and response.

Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide is Elevated in CKD and Correlates with Coronary Atherosclerosis Burden

Trimethlyamine-N-oxide (TMAO) was recently identified as a promoter of atherosclerosis. Patients with CKD exhibit accelerated development of atherosclerosis; however, no studies have explored the relationship between TMAO and atherosclerosis formation in this group. This study measured serum concentrations and urinary excretion of TMAO in a CKD cohort (n=104), identified the effect of renal transplant on serum TMAO concentration in a subset of these patients (n=6), and explored the cross-sectional relationship between serum TMAO and coronary atherosclerosis burden in a separate CKD cohort (n=220) undergoing coronary angiography. Additional exploratory analyses examined the relationship between baseline serum TMAO and long-term survival after coronary angiography. Serum TMAO concentrations demonstrated a strong inverse association with eGFR (r(2)=0.31, P<0.001). TMAO concentrations were markedly higher in patients receiving dialysis (median [interquartile range], 94.4 μM [54.8-133.0 μM] for dialysis-dependent patients versus 3.3 μM [3.1-6.0 μM] for healthy controls; P<0.001); whereas renal transplantation resulted in substantial reductions in TMAO concentrations (median [min-max] 71.2 μM [29.2-189.7 μM] pretransplant versus 11.4 μM [8.9-20.2 μM] post-transplant; P=0.03). TMAO concentration was an independent predictor for coronary atherosclerosis burden (P=0.02) and predicted long-term mortality independent of traditional cardiac risk factors (hazard ratio, 1.26 per 10 μM increment in TMAO concentration; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.40; P<0.001). In conclusion, serum TMAO concentrations substantially increase with decrements in kidney function, and this effect is reversed by renal transplantation. Increased TMAO concentrations correlate with coronary atherosclerosis burden and may associate with long-term mortality in patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography.

Hemodialysis Acutely Improves Hepatic CYP3A4 Metabolic Activity

The uremic syndrome remains poorly understood despite the widespread availability of dialysis for almost four decades. To date, assessment of the biologic activity of uremic toxins has focused primarily on in vitro effects, rather than on specific biochemical pathways or enzymatic activity in vivo. The activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the most important enzyme in human drug metabolism, is decreased in uremia. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of hemodialysis and hence varying concentrations of uremic toxins on CYP3A4 activity using the 14C-erythromycin breath test and the traditional phenotypic trait measure, 20-min 14CO2 flux. CYP3A4 activity increased by 27% postdialysis (P = 0.002 compared with predialysis) and was significantly inversely related to plasma blood urea nitrogen concentration (rs= -0.50, P = 0.012), but not to several middle molecules. This is the first study in humans characterizing uremia as a state in which hepatic CYP3A4 activity is acutely improved by hemodialysis.

Extracorporeal Therapy for Dabigatran Removal in the Treatment of Acute Bleeding: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor that is Food and Drug Administration-approved for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. No antidote is available for reversal of dabigatrans anticoagulant effect. Despite limited clinical data, hemodialysis has been suggested as a strategy to remove dabigatran during acute bleeding. This work presents five cases, in which extracorporeal therapy was performed for dabigatran removal in acutely bleeding patients. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS The series is comprised of five consecutive cases of patients receiving dabigatran 150 mg per os two times daily who were admitted with life-threatening bleeding between March of 2012 and January of 2013. Dabigatran plasma concentrations ranged from 149 to 1200 ng/ml. Treatment included administration of blood products to all patients and then, high-flux intermittent hemodialysis alone or followed by continuous renal replacement therapy. RESULTS Dabigatran concentrations decreased by 52%-77% during intermittent hemodialysis but rebounded up to 87% within 2 hours after completion of dialysis. Initiation of continuous renal replacement therapy after intermittent hemodialysis attenuated the rebound effect in one patient and contributed to a reduction in dabigatran concentrations of 81% over 30 hours. CONCLUSIONS Extracorporeal therapy lowered dabigatran concentrations, suggesting that it removed the drug and may effectively accelerate total clearance, especially in patients with impaired kidney function. The use of prolonged intermittent hemodialysis or intermittent hemodialysis followed by continuous renal replacement therapy is recommended for the management of life-threatening bleeding in patients receiving dabigatran. The advantage of extracorporeal therapy should be weighed against the risk of bleeding with catheter insertion.

Comparative evaluation of the Cockcroft-Gault Equation and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation for drug dosing: an opinion of the Nephrology Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.

Accurate assessment of kidney function is an important component of determining appropriate drug dosing regimens. Nearly all manufacturer‐recommended dosage adjustments are based on creatinine clearance ranges derived from clinical pharmacokinetic studies performed during the drug development process. The Cockcroft‐Gault (CG) equation provides an estimate of creatinine clearance and is the equation most commonly used to determine drug dosages in patients with impaired kidney function. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation has also been proposed for this purpose. Published studies report that drug dosages determined by the two equations do not agree in 1 0–40% of cases. However, interpretation and comparison of these studies are complicated by the variable creatinine methods used for calculating CG and MDRD estimates, the patient populations studied, and a lack of outcomes data demonstrating the clinical significance of dosing discrepancies. Moreover, the impact of reporting standardized serum creatinine values on the accuracy of the CG equation and corresponding drug dosing regimens have been questioned. Currently, no prospective pharmacokinetic studies have been conducted with use of the MDRD equation to generate dosing recommendations, and limited data are available to support its use in some patient populations representing demographic extremes. Collectively, these issues have resulted in considerable confusion among clinicians and have fueled a healthy debate on whether or not to use the MDRD equation to determine drug dosages. Each of these issues is reviewed, and a proposed algorithm for using creatinine‐based kidney function assessments in drug dosing is provided. Knowledge of the advantages, limitations, and clinical role of each equation will facilitate their safe and effective use in drug dosing.

Simultaneous analysis of multiple aminothiols in human plasma by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection

Aminothiols serve numerous vital functions in biochemistry, including detoxification and regulation of cellular metabolism, enzymatic activity, and protein trafficking and degradation. Plasma aminothiol concentrations are frequently measured for clinical and translational research investigating oxidative stress, and for routine clinical diagnosis and monitoring of vascular injury. Although a variety of techniques are available to measure aminothiol concentrations in plasma, high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FD) is the most widely used. This review summarizes HPLC-FD methods, including pre-analytical considerations, procedures for sample reduction, derivatization, and chromatographic separation of the primary biological aminothiols cysteine, homocysteine, cysteinylglycine, and glutathione in human plasma.

Recommendations for the role of extracorporeal treatments in the management of acute methanol poisoning: a systematic review and consensus statement.

Objective:Methanol poisoning can induce death and disability. Treatment includes the administration of antidotes (ethanol or fomepizole and folic/folinic acid) and consideration of extracorporeal treatment for correction of acidemia and/or enhanced elimination. The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning workgroup aimed to develop evidence-based consensus recommendations for extracorporeal treatment in methanol poisoning. Design and Methods:Utilizing predetermined methods, we conducted a systematic review of the literature. Two hundred seventy-two relevant publications were identified but publication and selection biases were noted. Data on clinical outcomes and dialyzability were collated and a two-round modified Delphi process was used to reach a consensus. Results:Recommended indications for extracorporeal treatment: Severe methanol poisoning including any of the following being attributed to methanol: coma, seizures, new vision deficits, metabolic acidosis with blood pH ⩽7.15, persistent metabolic acidosis despite adequate supportive measures and antidotes, serum anion gap higher than 24 mmol/L; or, serum methanol concentration 1) greater than 700 mg/L (21.8 mmol/L) in the context of fomepizole therapy, 2) greater than 600 mg/L or 18.7 mmol/L in the context of ethanol treatment, 3) greater than 500 mg/L or 15.6 mmol/L in the absence of an alcohol dehydrogenase blocker; in the absence of a methanol concentration, the osmolal/osmolar gap may be informative; or, in the context of impaired kidney function. Intermittent hemodialysis is the modality of choice and continuous modalities are acceptable alternatives. Extracorporeal treatment can be terminated when the methanol concentration is <200 mg/L or 6.2 mmol/L and a clinical improvement is observed. Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning inhibitors and folic/folinic acid should be continued during extracorporeal treatment. General considerations: Antidotes and extracorporeal treatment should be initiated urgently in the context of severe poisoning. The duration of extracorporeal treatment extracorporeal treatment depends on the type of extracorporeal treatment used and the methanol exposure. Indications for extracorporeal treatment are based on risk factors for poor outcomes. The relative importance of individual indications for the triaging of patients for extracorporeal treatment, in the context of an epidemic when need exceeds resources, is unknown. In the absence of severe poisoning but if the methanol concentration is elevated and there is adequate alcohol dehydrogenase blockade, extracorporeal treatment is not immediately required. Systemic anticoagulation should be avoided during extracorporeal treatment because it may increase the development or severity of intracerebral hemorrhage. Conclusion:Extracorporeal treatment has a valuable role in the treatment of patients with methanol poisoning. A range of clinical indications for extracorporeal treatment is provided and duration of therapy can be guided through the careful monitoring of biomarkers of exposure and toxicity. In the absence of severe poisoning, the decision to use extracorporeal treatment is determined by balancing the cost and complications of extracorporeal treatment to that of fomepizole or ethanol. Given regional differences in cost and availability of fomepizole and extracorporeal treatment, these decisions must be made at a local level.

Current Understanding of Drug Disposition in Kidney Disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) represent 13% of the American population. CKD has been shown to significantly alter drug disposition of nonrenally eliminated drugs. Indeed, modifications in the expression and function of intestinal and hepatic drug metabolism enzymes and uptake and efflux transporters have been reported. Uremic toxins, inflammatory cytokines, and parathyroid hormone have been implicated as causes. These changes can have an important clinical impact on drug disposition and lead to unintended toxicity if they are administered without dose adjustment in patients with impaired kidney function. This review summarizes recent preclinical and clinical studies and presents the current understanding of the effect of CKD on drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion.

Mechanisms of drug-induced nephrotoxicity

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common complication of several medications and diagnostic agents. It is seen in both inpatient and outpatient settings with variable presentations ranging from mild, reversible injury to advanced kidney disease. Manifestations of drug-induced nephrotoxicity include acid-base abnormalities, electrolyte imbalances, urine sediment abnormalities, proteinuria, pyuria, hematuria, and, most commonly, a decline in the glomerular filtration rate. The mechanisms of drug-induced nephrotoxicity may differ between various drugs or drug classes, and they are generally categorized based on the histological component of the kidney that is affected. Aminoglycoside antibiotics, radiocontrast media, conventional nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, amphotericin B, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been frequently implicated. This chapter reviews the clinical presentation and basic mechanisms of drug-induced nephrotoxicity.