Thomas G Brewer
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas G Brewer.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2014
Gerald T. Keusch; Donna M. Denno; Robert E. Black; Christopher Duggan; Richard L. Guerrant; James V. Lavery; James P. Nataro; Irwin H. Rosenberg; Edward T. Ryan; Phillip I. Tarr; H. Ward; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Hoosen M. Coovadia; Aldo A. M. Lima; Balakrishnan S. Ramakrishna; Anita K. M. Zaidi; Deborah C. Hay Burgess; Thomas G Brewer
Stunting is common in young children in developing countries, and is associated with increased morbidity, developmental delays, and mortality. Its complex pathogenesis likely involves poor intrauterine and postnatal nutrition, exposure to microbes, and the metabolic consequences of repeated infections. Acquired enteropathy affecting both gut structure and function likely plays a significant role in this outcome, especially in the first few months of life, and serve as a precursor to later interactions of infection and malnutrition. However, the lack of validated clinical diagnostic criteria has limited the ability to study its role, identify causative factors, and determine cost-effective interventions. This review addresses these issues through a historical approach, and provides recommendations to define and validate a working clinical diagnosis and to guide critical research in this area to effectively proceed. Prevention of early gut functional changes and inflammation may preclude or mitigate the later adverse vicious cycle of malnutrition and infection.
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases | 2011
Paul Farmer; Charles P. Almazor; Emily T. Bahnsen; Donna Barry; Junior Bazile; Barry R. Bloom; Niranjan Bose; Thomas G Brewer; Stephen B. Calderwood; John D. Clemens; Alejandro Cravioto; Eddy Eustache; Gregory Jerome; Neha Gupta; Jason B. Harris; Howard H. Hiatt; Cassia van der hoof Holstein; Peter J. Hotez; Louise C. Ivers; Vanessa B. Kerry; Serena P. Koenig; Regina C. LaRocque; Fernet Leandre; Wesler Lambert; Evan Lyon; John J. Mekalanos; Joia S. Mukherjee; Cate Oswald; Jean W. Pape; Anany Gretchko Prosper
Cholera in Haiti: Acute-on-Chronic Long before the devastating earthquake on January 12, 2010, Haiti struggled beneath the burdens of intractable poverty and ill health. The poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, Haiti also faces some of the highest rates of maternal and infant mortality—widely used indicators of the robustness of a health system—in the world ([S1] in Text S1; [2], [3]). The October 2010 cholera outbreak is the most recent of a long series of affronts to the health of Haitis population; it is yet another acute symptom of the chronic weakness of Haitis health, water, and sanitation systems. Water and sanitation conditions highlight these systemic weaknesses. In 2002, Haiti ranked last out of 147 countries for water security [4], [5]. Before the earthquake struck, only half of the population in the capital, Port-au-Prince, had access to latrines or other forms of modern sanitation, and roughly one-third had no access to tap water [6]. Across the country, access to sanitation and clean water is even more limited: only 17% of Haitians had access to adequate sanitation in 2008, and 12% received treated water [7]. Not surprisingly, diarrheal diseases have long been a significant cause of death and disability, especially among children under 5 years of age [6]. The cholera outbreak began less than a year after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake took the lives of more than 300,000 people and left nearly 1.5 million homeless [6]. Almost 1 million Haitians still live in spontaneous settlements known as internally displaced persons (IDP) camps [8]. While post-earthquake conditions in Haiti were ripe for outbreaks of acute diarrheal illness, cholera was deemed “very unlikely to occur” by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and other public health authorities [9]. Cholera had never before been reported in Haiti [S2] [10], [11]; health providers were unprepared for an influx of patients presenting with acute watery diarrhea. The cholera epidemic has been most severe in rural areas and large urban slums. Rural communities were charged with hosting hundreds of thousands of displaced people after the earthquake, placing greater demands on their already-scarce resources, including water. Surface water drawn directly from the source or piped from rivers and streams constitutes the principal supply of drinking water in rural Haiti. The lack of adequate piping, filtration, and water treatment systems (including chlorination) made these rural regions vulnerable to the rapid spread of waterborne disease. While most IDP camps have been supplied with potable water, large urban slums have had to rely on existing water sources—some of them containing Vibrio cholerae—and have therefore been vulnerable to rapid disease spread. Most slums also have poor sanitation infrastructure. Since the first cases were reported in Saint-Marc and Mirebalais, cholera has spread to every department in Haiti, and to other countries, too [S3] [12]–[14]. Public suspicion (ultimately validated by genomic sequence analyses [15]) of the strains link to South Asia, home to a group of United Nations peacekeepers stationed in central Haiti, triggered blame and violence that interfered with response efforts. As we have learned from the global AIDS pandemic and other infectious disease epidemics, cycles of accusation can continue for years, diverting attention and resources from the delivery of care and prevention services [16]. Systemic problems that brought cholera to epidemic levels in Haiti will (unless addressed) continue to facilitate its spread. As a disease of poverty, cholera preys upon the bottom of the social gradient; international trade, migration, and travel—from South Asia or elsewhere—open direct channels for pathogens that follow social fault lines.
Clinical Infectious Diseases | 2004
Douglas S. Walsh; Polrat Wilairatana; Douglas B. Tang; D. Gray Heppner; Thomas G Brewer; Srivicha Krudsood; Udomsak Silachamroon; Weerapong Phumratanaprapin; Duangsuda Siriyanonda; Sornchai Looareesuwan
BACKGROUND Tafenoquine is an 8-aminoquinoline developed as a more effective replacement for primaquine. In a previous dose-ranging study in Thailand, 3 tafenoquine regimens with total doses ranging from 500 mg to 3000 mg prevented relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria in most patients when administered 2 days after receipt of a blood schizonticidal dose of chloroquine. METHODS To improve convenience and to begin comparison of tafenoquine with primaquine, 80 patients with P. vivax infection were randomized to receive 1 of the following 5 treatments 1 day after receiving a blood schizonticidal dose of chloroquine: (A) tafenoquine, 300 mg per day for 7 days (n=18); (B) tafenoquine, 600 mg per day for 3 days (n=19); (C) tafenoquine, 600 mg as a single dose (n=18); (D) no further treatment (n=13); or (E) primaquine base, 15 mg per day for 14 days (n=12). The minimum duration of protocol follow-up was 8 weeks, with additional follow-up to 24 weeks. RESULTS Forty-six of 55 tafenoquine recipients, 10 of 13 recipients of chloroquine only, and 12 of 12 recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine completed at least 8 weeks of follow-up (or had relapse). There was 1 relapse among recipients of chloroquine plus tafenoquine, 8 among recipients of chloroquine only, and 3 among recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine. The rate of protective efficacy (determined on the basis of reduction in incidence density) for all recipients of chloroquine plus tafenoquine, compared with recipients of chloroquine plus primaquine, was 92.6% (95% confidence interval, 7.3%-99.9%; P=.042, by Fishers exact test). CONCLUSIONS Tafenoquine doses as low as a single 600-mg dose may be useful for prevention of relapse of P. vivax malaria in Thailand.
Food and Nutrition Bulletin | 2013
Gerald T. Keusch; Irwin H. Rosenberg; Donna M. Denno; Christopher Duggan; Richard L. Guerrant; James V. Lavery; Philip I. Tarr; H. Ward; Robert E. Black; James P. Nataro; Edward T. Ryan; Zulfiqar A. Bhutta; Hoosen M. Coovadia; Aldo A. M. Lima; Balakrishnan S. Ramakrishna; Anita K. M. Zaidi; Deborah Hay C. Burgess; Thomas G Brewer
Changes in small bowel function early in infancy in developing countries are increasingly being demonstrated, probably accompanied by altered mucosal architecture in most individuals, including reduced enterocyte mass and evidence of immune activation and inflammation in the mucosa. These alterations appear to be the result of factors of uncertain nature in the environment, and may be a cause of growth faltering and stunting in young children. For these reasons, this constellation of findings is being referred to as environmental enteropathy, or as we propose herein, environmental enteric dysfunction. If the causes were known and effective interventions were available, strategies and policies to intervene at—or possibly before—birth could be developed and promoted in order to prevent subsequent malnutrition and recurrent infection, which are known to interact in a cyclical and synergistic manner in a downward clinical course often ending in death. Resources would be mobilized and applied differently, and the emphasis would change from treatment to prevention. In order to move in this highly desired direction, investments in research will be required to establish the criteria to assess environmental enteric dysfunction, determine its predictive value for growth faltering and stunting, identify the causes, and propose and test potential interventions. The concepts and tools are available. What is required is the decision to move forward along this pathway to better health for infants and children in low-income countries.
Gastroenterology | 2012
Mark Donowitz; David H. Alpers; Henry J. Binder; Thomas G Brewer; Jill L. Carrington; Michael J. Grey
Areport is presented of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases–sponsored single topic conference designed to determine scientific advances needed to encourage development of pharmacotherapy for diarrheal diseases. Acute diarrheal diseases are a global public health problem in developing and developed countries. They are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity for children under the age of 5 worldwide and have a major economic impact in developed countries. Although oral rehydration solution (ORS) along with oral zinc therapy has reduced mortality owing to acute diarrheal diseases, there are essentially no other approved, safe, and effective drugs to decrease stool volume and prevent fluid loss. On September 25–27, 2011, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop on Translational Approaches for Pharmacotherapy Development for Acute Diarrhea to assess current treatments for acute diarrhea, to identify common host pathways targeted by infectious agents associated with acute diarrhea, to evaluate which pathophysiologic mechanisms are most clinically relevant as potential targets, and to identify promising areas for translational research.
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition | 2014
Graeme P. Young; Elissa Mortimer; Geetha Gopalsamy; David H. Alpers; Henry J. Binder; Mark J. Manary; Balakrishnan S. Ramakrishna; Ian Brown; Thomas G Brewer
Zinc deficiency is a major cause of childhood morbidity and mortality. The WHO/UNICEF strategy for zinc supplementation as adjunctive therapy for diarrhea is poorly implemented. A conference of experts in zinc nutrition and gastrointestinal disorders was convened to consider approaches that might complement the current recommendation and what research was needed to develop these approaches. Several key points were identified. The design of novel zinc interventions would be facilitated by a better understanding of how disturbed gut function, such as environmental (or tropical) enteropathy, affects zinc absorption, losses, and homeostasis. Because only 10% of zinc stores are able to be rapidly turned over, and appear to be rapidly depleted by acute intestinal illness, they are probably best maintained by complementary regular supplementation in a primary prevention strategy rather than secondary prevention triggered by acute diarrhea. The assessment of zinc status is challenging and complex without simple, validated measures to facilitate field testing of novel interventions. Zinc bioavailability may be a crucial factor in the success of primary prevention strategies, and a range of options, all still inadequately explored, might be valuable in improving zinc nutrition. Some therapeutic actions of zinc on diarrhea seem attributable to pharmacologic effects, whereas others are related to the reversal of deficiency (ie, nutritional). The distinction between these 2 mechanisms cannot be clarified given the insensitivity of serum zinc to identify subclinical deficiency states. Why zinc seems to be less effective than expected at all ages, and ineffective for secondary prevention of diarrhea in children <12 mo of age, remains unclear. It was concluded that a reframing of the current recommendation is warranted with consideration of how to better optimize and deliver zinc and whether to provide a complementary public health primary prevention zinc strategy. This requires careful consideration of the zinc product to be used as well as strategies for its delivery.
The Lancet Global Health | 2018
Christopher Troeger; Danny V. Colombara; Puja C Rao; Ibrahim Khalil; Alexandria Brown; Thomas G Brewer; Richard L. Guerrant; Eric R. Houpt; Karen L. Kotloff; Kavita Misra; William A. Petri; James A. Platts-Mills; Mark S. Riddle; Scott J Swartz; Mohammad H. Forouzanfar; Robert C Reiner; Simon I. Hay; Ali H. Mokdad
Summary Background Diarrhoea is a leading cause of death and illness globally among children younger than 5 years. Mortality and short-term morbidity cause substantial burden of disease but probably underestimate the true effect of diarrhoea on population health. This underestimation is because diarrhoeal diseases can negatively affect early childhood growth, probably through enteric dysfunction and impaired uptake of macronutrients and micronutrients. We attempt to quantify the long-term sequelae associated with childhood growth impairment due to diarrhoea. Methods We used the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study framework and leveraged existing estimates of diarrhoea incidence, childhood undernutrition, and infectious disease burden to estimate the effect of diarrhoeal diseases on physical growth, including weight and height, and subsequent disease among children younger than 5 years. The burden of diarrhoea was measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), a composite metric of mortality and morbidity. We hypothesised that diarrhoea is negatively associated with three common markers of growth: weight-for-age, weight-for-height, and height-for-age Z-scores. On the basis of these undernutrition exposures, we applied a counterfactual approach to quantify the relative risk of infectious disease (subsequent diarrhoea, lower respiratory infection, and measles) and protein energy malnutrition morbidity and mortality per day of diarrhoea and quantified the burden of diarrhoeal disease due to these outcomes caused by undernutrition. Findings Diarrhoea episodes are significantly associated with childhood growth faltering. We found that each day of diarrhoea was associated with height-for-age Z-score (–0·0033 [95% CI −0·0024 to −0·0041]; p=4·43 × 10−14), weight-for-age Z-score (–0·0077 [–0·0058 to −0·0097]; p=3·19 × 10−15), and weight-for-height Z-score (–0·0096 [–0·0067 to −0·0125]; p=7·78 × 10−11). After addition of the DALYs due to the long-term sequelae as a consequence of undernutrition, the burden of diarrhoeal diseases increased by 39·0% (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 33·0–46·6) and was responsible for 55 778 000 DALYs (95% UI 49 125 400–62 396 200) among children younger than 5 years in 2016. Among the 15 652 300 DALYs (95% UI 12 951 300–18 806 100) associated with undernutrition due to diarrhoeal episodes, more than 84·7% are due to increased risk of infectious disease, whereas the remaining 15·3% of long-term DALYs are due to increased prevalence of protein energy malnutrition. The burden of diarrhoea has decreased substantially since 1990, but progress has been greater in long-term (78·7% reduction [95% UI 69·3–85·5]) than in acute (70·4% reduction [95% UI 61·7–76·5]) DALYs. Interpretation Diarrhoea represents an even larger burden of disease than was estimated in the Global Burden of Disease Study. In order to adequately address the burden of its long-term sequelae, a renewed emphasis on controlling the risk of diarrhoea incidence may be required. This renewed effort can help further prevent the potential lifelong cost on child health, growth, and overall potential. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The Lancet Global Health | 2018
Ibrahim Khalil; Christopher Troeger; Puja C Rao; Brigette F. Blacker; Alexandria Brown; Thomas G Brewer; Danny V. Colombara; Eugenio L. de Hostos; Cyril Engmann; Richard L. Guerrant; Rashidul Haque; Eric R. Houpt; Gagandeep Kang; Poonum S. Korpe; Karen L. Kotloff; Aldo A. M. Lima; William A. Petri; James A. Platts-Mills; David A Shoultz; Mohammed H. Forouzanfar; Simon I. Hay; Robert C Reiner; Ali H. Mokdad
Summary Background The protozoan Cryptosporidium is a leading cause of diarrhoea morbidity and mortality in children younger than 5 years. However, the true global burden of Cryptosporidium infection in children younger than 5 years might have been underestimated in previous quantifications because it only took account of the acute effects of diarrhoea. We aimed to demonstrate whether there is a causal relation between Cryptosporidium and childhood growth and, if so, to quantify the associated additional burden. Methods The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study (GBD) 2016 was a systematic and scientific effort to quantify the morbidity and mortality associated with more than 300 causes of death and disability, including diarrhoea caused by Cryptosporidium infection. We supplemented estimates on the burden of Cryptosporidium in GBD 2016 with findings from a systematic review of published and unpublished cohort studies and a meta-analysis of the effect of childhood diarrhoea caused by Cryptosporidium infection on physical growth. Findings In 2016, Cryptosporidium infection was the fifth leading diarrhoeal aetiology in children younger than 5 years, and acute infection caused more than 48 000 deaths (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 24 600–81 900) and more than 4·2 million disability-adjusted life-years lost (95% UI 2·2 million–7·2 million). We identified seven data sources from the scientific literature and six individual-level data sources describing the relation between Cryptosporidium and childhood growth. Each episode of diarrhoea caused by Cryptosporidium infection was associated with a decrease in height-for-age Z score (0·049, 95% CI 0·014–0·080), weight-for-age Z score (0·095, 0·055–0·134), and weight-for-height Z score (0·126, 0·057–0·194). We estimated that diarrhoea from Cryptosporidium infection caused an additional 7·85 million disability-adjusted life-years (95% UI 5·42 million–10·11 million) after we accounted for its effect on growth faltering—153% more than that estimated from acute effects alone. Interpretation Our findings show that the substantial short-term burden of diarrhoea from Cryptosporidium infection on childhood growth and wellbeing is an underestimate of the true burden. Interventions designed to prevent and effectively treat infection in children younger than 5 years will have enormous public health and social development impacts. Funding The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Lancet Infectious Diseases | 2018
Ibrahim Khalil; Christopher Troeger; Brigette F. Blacker; Puja C Rao; Alexandria Brown; Deborah Atherly; Thomas G Brewer; Cyril Engmann; Eric R. Houpt; Gagandeep Kang; Karen L. Kotloff; Myron M. Levine; Stephen P. Luby; Calman A MacLennan; William Pan; Patricia B. Pavlinac; James A. Platts-Mills; Firdausi Qadri; Mark S. Riddle; Edward T. Ryan; David A Shoultz; A. Duncan Steele; Judd L. Walson; John W. Sanders; Ali H. Mokdad; Christopher J. L. Murray; Simon I. Hay; Robert C Reiner
Summary Background Shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) are bacterial pathogens that are frequently associated with diarrhoeal disease, and are a significant cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study 2016 (GBD 2016) is a systematic, scientific effort to quantify the morbidity and mortality due to over 300 causes of death and disability. We aimed to analyse the global burden of shigella and ETEC diarrhoea according to age, sex, geography, and year from 1990 to 2016. Methods We modelled shigella and ETEC-related mortality using a Bayesian hierarchical modelling platform that evaluates a wide range of covariates and model types on the basis of vital registration and verbal autopsy data. We used a compartmental meta-regression tool to model the incidence of shigella and ETEC, which enforces an association between incidence, prevalence, and remission on the basis of scientific literature, population representative surveys, and health-care data. We calculated 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) for the point estimates. Findings Shigella was the second leading cause of diarrhoeal mortality in 2016 among all ages, accounting for 212 438 deaths (95% UI 136 979–326 913) and about 13·2% (9·2–17·4) of all diarrhoea deaths. Shigella was responsible for 63 713 deaths (41 191–93 611) among children younger than 5 years and was frequently associated with diarrhoea across all adult age groups, increasing in elderly people, with broad geographical distribution. ETEC was the eighth leading cause of diarrhoea mortality in 2016 among all age groups, accounting for 51 186 deaths (26 757–83 064) and about 3·2% (1·8–4·7) of diarrhoea deaths. ETEC was responsible for about 4·2% (2·2–6·8) of diarrhoea deaths in children younger than 5 years. Interpretation The health burden of bacterial diarrhoeal pathogens is difficult to estimate. Despite existing prevention and treatment options, they remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Additional emphasis by public health officials is needed on a reduction in disease due to shigella and ETEC to reduce disease burden. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
JAMA Pediatrics | 2018
Christopher Troeger; Ibrahim Khalil; Puja C Rao; Shujin Cao; Brigette F. Blacker; Tahmeed Ahmed; George Armah; Julie E. Bines; Thomas G Brewer; Danny V. Colombara; Gagandeep Kang; Beth D. Kirkpatrick; Carl D. Kirkwood; Jason M. Mwenda; Umesh D. Parashar; William A. Petri; Mark S. Riddle; A. Duncan Steele; Robert L. Thompson; Judd L. Walson; John W. Sanders; Ali H. Mokdad; Christopher J. L. Murray; Simon I. Hay; Robert C Reiner
Importance Rotavirus infection is the global leading cause of diarrhea-associated morbidity and mortality among children younger than 5 years. Objectives To examine the extent of rotavirus infection among children younger than 5 years by country and the number of deaths averted because of the rotavirus vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants This report builds on findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016, a cross-sectional study that measured diarrheal diseases and their etiologic agents. Models were used to estimate burden in data-sparse locations. Exposure Diarrhea due to rotavirus infection. Main Outcomes and Measures Rotavirus-associated mortality and morbidity by country and year and averted deaths attributable to the rotavirus vaccine by country. Results Rotavirus infection was responsible for an estimated 128 500 deaths (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 104 500-155 600) among children younger than 5 years throughout the world in 2016, with 104 733 deaths occurring in sub-Saharan Africa (95% UI, 83 406-128 842). Rotavirus infection was responsible for more than 258 million episodes of diarrhea among children younger than 5 years in 2016 (95% UI, 193 million to 341 million), an incidence of 0.42 cases per child-year (95% UI, 0.30-0.53). Vaccine use is estimated to have averted more than 28 000 deaths (95% UI, 14 600-46 700) among children younger than 5 years, and expanded use of the rotavirus vaccine, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, could have prevented approximately 20% of all deaths attributable to diarrhea among children younger than 5 years. Conclusions and Relevance Rotavirus-associated mortality has decreased markedly over time in part because of the introduction of the rotavirus vaccine. This study suggests that prioritizing vaccine introduction and interventions to reduce diarrhea-associated morbidity and mortality is necessary in the continued global reduction of rotavirus infection.