Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas Graeff is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas Graeff.


Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2009

Plot and field scale soil moisture dynamics and subsurface wetness control on runoff generation in a headwater in the Ore Mountains

Erwin Zehe; Thomas Graeff; M. Morgner; Andreas Bauer; Axel Bronstert

Abstract. This study presents an application of an innovative sampling strategy to assess soil moisture dynamics in a headwater of the Weiseritz in the German eastern Ore Mountains. A grassland site and a forested site were instrumented with two Spatial TDR clusters (STDR) that consist of 39 and 32 coated TDR probes of 60 cm length. Distributed time series of vertically averaged soil moisture data from both sites/ensembles were analyzed by statistical and geostatistical methods. Spatial variability and the spatial mean at the forested site were larger than at the grassland site. Furthermore, clustering of TDR probes in combination with long-term monitoring allowed identification of average spatial covariance structures at the small field scale for different wetness states. The correlation length of soil water content as well as the sill to nugget ratio at the grassland site increased with increasing average wetness and but, in contrast, were constant at the forested site. As soil properties at both the forested and grassland sites are extremely variable, this suggests that the correlation structure at the forested site is dominated by the pattern of throughfall and interception. We also found a very strong correlation between antecedent soil moisture at the forested site and runoff coefficients of rainfall-runoff events observed at gauge Rehefeld. Antecedent soil moisture at the forest site explains 92% of the variability in the runoff coefficients. By combining these results with a recession analysis we derived a first conceptual model of the dominant runoff mechanisms operating in this catchment. Finally, we employed a physically based hydrological model to shed light on the controls of soil- and plant morphological parameters on soil average soil moisture at the forested site and the grassland site, respectively. A homogeneous soil setup allowed, after fine tuning of plant morphological parameters, most of the time unbiased predictions of the observed average soil conditions observed at both field sites. We conclude that the proposed sampling strategy of clustering TDR probes is suitable to assess unbiased average soil moisture dynamics in critical functional units, in this case the forested site, which is a much better predictor for event scale runoff formation than pre-event discharge. Long term monitoring of such critical landscape elements could maybe yield valuable information for flood warning in headwaters. We thus think that STDR provides a good intersect of the advantages of permanent sampling and spatially highly resolved soil moisture sampling using mobile rods.


Natural Hazards | 2012

Potentials and constraints of different types of soil moisture observations for flood simulations in headwater catchments

Axel Bronstert; Benjamin Creutzfeldt; Thomas Graeff; Irena Hajnsek; Maik Heistermann; Sibylle Itzerott; Thomas Jagdhuber; David Kneis; Erika Lück; Dominik E. Reusser; Erwin Zehe

Flood generation in mountainous headwater catchments is governed by rainfall intensities, by the spatial distribution of rainfall and by the state of the catchment prior to the rainfall, e.g. by the spatial pattern of the soil moisture, groundwater conditions and possibly snow. The work presented here explores the limits and potentials of measuring soil moisture with different methods and in different scales and their potential use for flood simulation. These measurements were obtained in 2007 and 2008 within a comprehensive multi-scale experiment in the Weisseritz headwater catchment in the Ore-Mountains, Germany. The following technologies have been applied jointly thermogravimetric method, frequency domain reflectometry (FDR) sensors, spatial time domain reflectometry (STDR) cluster, ground-penetrating radar (GPR), airborne polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (polarimetric SAR) and advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) based on the satellite Envisat. We present exemplary soil measurement results, with spatial scales ranging from point scale, via hillslope and field scale, to the catchment scale. Only the spatial TDR cluster was able to record continuous data. The other methods are limited to the date of over-flights (airplane and satellite) or measurement campaigns on the ground. For possible use in flood simulation, the observation of soil moisture at multiple scales has to be combined with suitable hydrological modelling, using the hydrological model WaSiM-ETH. Therefore, several simulation experiments have been conducted in order to test both the usability of the recorded soil moisture data and the suitability of a distributed hydrological model to make use of this information. The measurement results show that airborne-based and satellite-based systems in particular provide information on the near-surface spatial distribution. However, there are still a variety of limitations, such as the need for parallel ground measurements (Envisat ASAR), uncertainties in polarimetric decomposition techniques (polarimetric SAR), very limited information from remote sensing methods about vegetated surfaces and the non-availability of continuous measurements. The model experiments showed the importance of soil moisture as an initial condition for physically based flood modelling. However, the observed moisture data reflect the surface or near-surface soil moisture only. Hence, only saturated overland flow might be related to these data. Other flood generation processes influenced by catchment wetness in the subsurface such as subsurface storm flow or quick groundwater drainage cannot be assessed by these data. One has to acknowledge that, in spite of innovative measuring techniques on all spatial scales, soil moisture data for entire vegetated catchments are still today not operationally available. Therefore, observations of soil moisture should primarily be used to improve the quality of continuous, distributed hydrological catchment models that simulate the spatial distribution of moisture internally. Thus, when and where soil moisture data are available, they should be compared with their simulated equivalents in order to improve the parameter estimates and possibly the structure of the hydrological model.


Hydrological Processes | 2014

Storage‐discharge relationships at different catchment scales based on local high‐precision gravimetry

Benjamin Creutzfeldt; Peter Troch; Andreas Güntner; Ty P. A. Ferré; Thomas Graeff; Bruno Merz

In hydrology, the storage-discharge relationship is a fundamental catchment property. Understanding what controls this relationship is at the core of catchment science. To date, there are no direct methods to measure water storage at catchment scales (101–103 km2). In this study, we use direct measurements of terrestrial water storage dynamics by means of superconducting gravimetry in a small headwater catchment of the Regen River, Germany, to derive empirical storage-discharge relationships in nested catchments of increasing scale. Our results show that the local storage measurements are strongly related to streamflow dynamics at larger scales (> 100 km2; correlation coefficient = 0.78–0.81), but at small scale, no such relationship exists (~ 1 km2; correlation coefficients = −0.11). The geologic setting in the region can explain both the disconnection between local water storage and headwater runoff, and the connectivity between headwater storage and streams draining larger catchment areas. More research is required to understand what controls the form of the observed storage-discharge relationships at the catchment scale. This study demonstrates that high-precision gravimetry can provide new insights into the complex relationship between state and response of hydrological systems. Copyright


Journal of Geography in Higher Education | 2015

Immersive 3D Geovisualization in Higher Education.

Andrea Philips; Ariane Walz; Andreas Bergner; Thomas Graeff; Maik Heistermann; Sarah Kienzler; Oliver Korup; Torsten Lipp; Wolfgang Schwanghart; Gerold Zeilinger

In this study, we investigate how immersive 3D geovisualization can be used in higher education. Based on MacEachren and Kraaks geovisualization cube, we examine the usage of immersive 3D geovisualization and its usefulness in a research-based learning module on flood risk, called GEOSimulator. Results of a survey among participating students reveal benefits, such as better orientation in the study area, higher interactivity with the data, improved discourse among students and enhanced motivation through immersive 3D geovisualization. This suggests that immersive 3D visualization can effectively be used in higher education and that 3D CAVE settings enhance interactive learning between students.


Hydrological Processes | 2009

Process identification through rejection of model structures in a mid-mountainous rural catchment: observations of rainfall-runoff response, geophysical conditions and model inter-comparison.

Thomas Graeff; Erwin Zehe; Dominik E. Reusser; Erika Lück; Boris Schröder; Gerald Wenk; Hermann John; Axel Bronstert


Hydrological Processes | 2012

Predicting event response in a nested catchment with generalized linear models and a distributed watershed model

Thomas Graeff; Erwin Zehe; Theresa Blume; Till Francke; Boris Schröder


Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2010

A quality assessment of Spatial TDR soil moisture measurements in homogenous and heterogeneous media with laboratory experiments

Thomas Graeff; Erwin Zehe; Stefan Schlaeger; M. Morgner; Andreas Bauer; Rolf Becker; Benjamin Creutzfeldt; Axel Bronstert


Hydrology | 2016

Model-Based attribution of high-resolution streamflow trends in two alpine basins of Western Austria

Christoph Kormann; Axel Bronstert; Till Francke; Thomas Recknagel; Thomas Graeff


Supplement to: Jackisch, C et al. (in review): Soil moisture and matric potential - An open field comparison of sensor systems. Earth System Science Data Discussions | 2018

Soil moisture and matric potential - An open field comparison of sensor systems

Conrad Jackisch; Ines Andrä; Kai Germer; Katrin Schulz; Marcus Schiedung; Jaqueline Haller-Jans; Jonas Schneider; Julia Jaquemotte; Philipp Helmer; Leander Lotz; Thomas Graeff; Andreas Bauer; Irene Hahn; Martin Sanda; Monika Kumpan; Johann Dorner; Gerrit de Rooij; Stefan Wessel-Bothe; Lorenz Kottmann; Siegfried Schittenhelm; Wolfgang Durner


Archive | 2011

Investigation of hydrological threshold and hysteresis processes on two heterogeneous field sites in the Eastern Ore Mountains, Germany

Thomas Graeff; Axel Bronstert; Theresa Blume; Till Francke; Erwin Zehe

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas Graeff's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Erwin Zehe

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Boris Schröder

Braunschweig University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Conrad Jackisch

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dominik E. Reusser

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge