Thomas H. Helbich

Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis?

PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic quality of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging schemes with regard to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) accuracy, ADC precision, and DW imaging contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for different types of lesions and breast tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and written, informed consent were obtained. Fifty-one patients with histopathologic correlation or follow-up performed with a 3.0-T MR imager were included in this study. There were 112 regions of interest drawn in 24 malignant, 17 benign, 20 cystic, and 51 normal tissue regions. ADC maps were calculated for combinations of 10 b values (range, 0-1250 sec/mm(2)). Differences in ADC among tissue types were evaluated. The CNRs of lesions at DW imaging were compared for all b values. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess lesion differentiation. RESULTS ADCs calculated from b values of 50 and 850 sec/mm(2) were 0.99 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.18 (standard deviation), 1.47 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.21, 1.85 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.22, and 2.64 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec +/- 0.30 for malignant, benign, normal, and cystic tissues, respectively. An ADC threshold level of 1.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec allowed discrimination between malignant and benign lesions with a diagnostic accuracy of 95% (P < .001). ADC calculations performed with multiple b values were not significantly more precise than those performed with only two. We found an overestimation of ADC for maximum b values of up to 1000 sec/mm(2). The best CNR for tumors was identified at 850 sec/mm(2). CONCLUSION Optimum ADC determination and DW imaging quality at 3.0 T was found with a combined b value protocol of 50 and 850 sec/mm(2). This provided a high accuracy for differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors.

US-guided 14-gauge Core-Needle Breast Biopsy: Results of a Validation Study in 1352 Cases

PURPOSE To retrospectively determine the false-negative rate and the underestimation rate of ultrasonography (US)-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy (CNB) in nonpalpable lesions, with validation at surgical excision histologic examination and with stability during clinical and imaging follow-up. MATERIALS AND METHODS Informed consent was waived by the institutional review board for this retrospective review of 1352 cases. In 1061 cases, patients underwent surgical excision of lesions visible at US subsequent to US-guided 14-gauge CNB. Follow-up of another 291 benign lesions at US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic examination showed stability during clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 2 years. US and histologic findings were reviewed and compared for agreement. A false-negative finding was defined as pathologically proved cancer for which biopsy results were benign. The false-negative rate was defined as the proportion of all breast cancers with a diagnosis of benign disease at US-guided 14-gauge CNB. The underestimation rate was defined as an upgrade of a high-risk lesion at US-guided 14-gauge CNB to malignancy at surgery. RESULTS US 14-gauge CNB yielded 671 (63.2%) malignant, 86 (8.1%) high-risk, and 304 (28.7%) benign lesions. Each of the 291 benign lesions without surgery remained stable during follow-up. The agreement of US-guided 14-gauge CNB results, surgical excision findings, and follow-up results was 95.8% (kappa = 0.93). False-negative findings were encountered in 11 (0.8%) of 1352 cases, and the false-negative rate was 1.6% (11 of 671 malignancies). All false-negative findings were prospectively identified owing to discordance between imaging results and US-guided 14-gauge CNB histologic findings. The underestimation rate was 31.4%. CONCLUSION US-guided 14-gauge CNB is an alternative to surgical excision for assessing nonpalpable breast lesions.

BRCA1‐related breast cancer in Austrian breast and ovarian cancer families: Specific BRCA1 mutations and pathological characteristics

We identified 17 BRCA1mutations in 86 Austrian breast and ovarian cancer families (20%) that were screened for mutations by denaturing high‐performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and the protein<0B> <0R>truncation test (PTT). Eleven distinct mutations were detected, 4 of them (962del4, 2795del4, 3135del4 and L3376stop) not previously reported in families of non‐Austrian origin. In addition, 6 rare missense mutations (allele frequency < 1%) with unknown biological effects were identified. Four mutations occurred more than once in the Austrian population: 2795del4 (3 times), Cys61Gly (3 times) 5382insC (2 times) and Q1806stop (2 times). Haplotype analysis of the 4 recurrent mutations suggested a common ancestor for each of these. Thirty‐four breast cancer cases from 17 families with BRCA1 mutations were further analyzed. We observed a low median age of onset (39.5 years). Sixty‐eight percent of all BRCA1 breast cancer cases had negative axillary lymph nodes. This group showed a significant prevalence of a negative estrogen and progesterone receptor status and stage I tumors compared with an age‐related, node‐negative control group. The prevalence of grade III tumors was marginally significant . Survival analysis either with a control group matched for age (within 5 years), grade, histologic subtype and estrogen receptor status, or with an age‐related, node‐negative comparison group, showed no statistical difference. Int. J. Cancer 77:354–360, 1998.

Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures

The aim of the breast team is to obtain a definitive, nonoperative diagnosis of all potential breast abnormalities in a timely and cost-effective way. Percutaneous needle biopsy with its high sensitivity and specificity should now be standard practice, removing the need for open surgical biopsy or frozen section. For patients with cancer, needle biopsy provides a cost-effective and rapid way of providing not only a definitive diagnosis but prognostic information, allowing prompt discussion of treatment options, be they surgical or medical. Early removal of uncertainty also allows better psychosocial adjustment to the disease. Patients with benign conditions found either by themselves or as a result of population or opportunistic screening can be promptly reassured and discharged, removing the health care and psychological costs of surgical biopsy or repeated follow-up. Radiologists involved in breast imaging should ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out core biopsy and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) under all forms of image guidance. This paper provides guidelines on best practice for diagnostic interventional breast procedures and standards, against which all practitioners should audit themselves, from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.

Purpose:To develop a 3.0 Tesla breast imaging protocol that combines high temporal and spatial resolution three-dimensional MR sequences for quantitative time course and morphologic analysis of breast lesions. Materials and Methods:Thirty-four patients were included in the study (age range, 31–82; mean age, 54.3). The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The magnetic resonance imaging protocol included: a coronal T1-weighted volume-interpolated-breathhold-examination sequence, focused on high temporal resolution for optimal assessment of the contrast-enhancement behavior of lesions (SI 1.7 mm isotropic; TA 3.45 minutes for 17 measurements); a coronal T1-weighted turbo fast-low-angle-shot-three-dimensional sequence, with water-excitation and fat suppression, focused on high spatial resolution for morphologic analysis (SI 1 mm isotropic; TA 2 minutes); and a repeated coronal volume-interpolated-breathhold-examination sequence for detection of washout. Lesion size and morphology were assessed. Region-of-interests for suspicious areas were manually drawn and evaluated for contrast-enhancement behavior by plotting intensity courses against time. Sensitivity and specificity with a 95% confidence interval and the negative predictive value and positive predictive value were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed. The histopathological diagnoses were used as a standard of reference. Results:Fifty-five lesions were detected in 34 patients. All malignant breast lesions were identified correctly. There were 5 false-positive lesions. The sensitivity of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 3 T was 100%, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 90.6% to 100%. The specificity was 72.2%, with a 95% CI of 49.1% to 87.5%. The positive predictive value was 0.88 and the negative predictive value was 1. Diagnostic accuracy was 91% with a 95% CI of 80.4% to 96.1%. Conclusion:Our prospective study demonstrates that the presented 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol, comprising both high temporal and high spatial resolution, enables accurate detection and assessment of breast lesions.

Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MR Breast Examinations at 3.0 T

PURPOSE To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on standard single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in patients with breast cancer at 3.0 T. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-seven patients with 49 histopathologically verified lesions were included in this study. In all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters, was performed with a 3.0-T MR imager. Two independent readers visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, geometric distortions) were quantified. Regions of interest were drawn in all lesions (28 malignant, 21 benign) and in the normal breast parenchyma to investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on the basis of an ADC threshold of 1.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec. RESULTS Each reader found a higher diagnostic accuracy for readout-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging. The area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026). There was no significant difference in the ADC obtained by using either DW imaging method. Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P < .001). Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a factor of three. CONCLUSION DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast in the surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer. Experimental Design: In this prospective comparison study, women at high risk for breast cancer were offered annual surveillance examinations, consisting of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI, at a single tertiary care breast center. The sensitivity and specificity of each modality was based on the histopathologic evaluation of suspicious findings from all modalities plus the detected interval cancers. Results: Three hundred and twenty-seven women underwent 672 complete imaging rounds. Of a total of 28 detected cancers, 14 were detected by mammography, 12 by ultrasound, and 24 by MRI, which resulted in sensitivities of 50%, 42.9%, and 85.7%, respectively (P < 0.01). MRI detected not only significantly more invasive but also significantly more preinvasive cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ). Mammography, ultrasound, and MRI led to 25, 26, and 101 false-positive findings, which resulted in specificities of 98%, 98%, and 92%, respectively (P < 0.05). Thirty-five (35%) of these false-positive findings were atypical ductal hyperplasias, lesions considered to be of premalignant character. Nine (26%) of those were detected by mammography, 2 (6%) with ultrasound, and 32 (91%) with MRI (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Our results show that MRI of the breast improves the detection of invasive cancers, preinvasive cancers, and premalignant lesions in a high-risk population and should therefore become an integral part of breast cancer surveillance in these patients.

Triple-Modality Screening Trial for Familial Breast Cancer Underlines the Importance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Questions the Role of Mammography and Ultrasound Regardless of Patient Mutation Status, Age, and Breast Density

PURPOSE To evaluate the breast cancer screening efficacy of mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a high-risk population and in various population subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized comparison study, BRCA mutation carriers and women with a high familial risk (> 20% lifetime risk) for breast cancer were offered screening with mammography, ultrasound, and MRI every 12 months. Diagnostic performance was compared between individual modalities and their combinations. Further comparisons were based on subpopulations dichotomized by screening rounds, mutation status, age, and breast density. RESULTS There were 559 women with 1,365 complete imaging rounds included in this study. The sensitivity of MRI (90.0%) was significantly higher (P < .001) than that of mammography (37.5%) and ultrasound (37.5%). Of 40 cancers, 18 (45.0%) were detected by MRI alone. Two cancers were found by mammography alone (a ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS] with microinvasion and a DCIS with < 10-mm invasive areas). This did not lead to a significant increase of sensitivity compared with using MRI alone (P = .15). No cancers were detected by ultrasound alone. Similarly, of 14 DCISs, all were detected by MRI, whereas mammography and ultrasound each detected five DCISs (35.7%). Age, mutation status, and breast density had no influence on the sensitivity of MRI and did not affect the superiority of MRI over mammography and ultrasound. CONCLUSION MRI allows early detection of familial breast cancer regardless of patient age, breast density, or risk status. The added value of mammography is limited, and there is no added value of ultrasound in women undergoing MRI for screening.

Stereotactic and ultrasound-guided breast biopsy

Percutaneous imaging-guided needle biopsy has increasingly become an alternative to surgical biopsy for the histologic assessment of breast lesions. Percutaneous biopsy is faster, less invasive, and less expensive than surgical biopsy. Tissue acquisition is performed with automated core needles or directional vacuum-assisted biopsy probes. Guidance for percutaneous biopsy is usually provided by stereotaxis, ultrasound, and, more recently, under the guidance of MR imaging. Imaging guidance depends on lesion type and the results of diagnostic imaging studies. This article reviews indications, advantages, limitations, and controversial issues in percutaneous imaging-guided biopsy of breast lesions under stereotactic and ultrasound guidance. The potential for new research opportunities and directions is also discussed.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasingly used as a complementary diagnostic modality in breast imaging. The sensitivity of MR imaging of the breast for malignancy has consistently been reported to be excellent. The specificity has been rather variable. Study methods and imaging techniques are not standardized and there is still a great deal of uncertainty about MR imagings place in clinical practice. Nevertheless, radiologists should be familiar with the current technique and the varying MR appearance of breast tumors to improve the accuracy of this method. This paper reviews the techniques for breast MR imaging, the pathopysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors, and the current knowledge about detection and differentiation of breast tumors. In addition, future directions for breast MR imaging are discussed.