Thomas H. Reiprich
University of Bonn
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas H. Reiprich.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2002
Thomas H. Reiprich; H. Böhringer
A new X-ray-selected and X-ray flux-limited galaxy cluster sample is presented. Based on the ROSAT All-Sky Survey, the 63 brightest clusters with galactic latitude |bII| ? 20? and flux fX(0.1-2.4keV) ? 2 ? 10-11ergss-1cm-2 have been compiled. Gravitational masses have been determined utilizing intracluster gas density profiles, derived mainly from ROSAT PSPC pointed observations, and gas temperatures, as published mainly from ASCA observations, assuming hydrostatic equilibrium. This sample and an extended sample of 106 galaxy clusters is used to establish the X-ray luminosity-gravitational mass relation. From the complete sample the galaxy cluster mass function is determined and used to constrain the mean cosmic matter density and the amplitude of mass fluctuations. Comparison to Press-Schechter type model mass functions in the framework of cold dark matter cosmological models and a Harrison-Zeldovich initial density fluctuation spectrum yields the constraints ?m = 0.12 and ?8 = 0.96 (90% c.l.). Various possible systematic uncertainties are quantified. Adding all identified systematic uncertainties to the statistical uncertainty in a worst-case fashion results in an upper limit ?m < 0.31. For comparison to previous results a relation ?8 = 0.43? is derived. The mass function is integrated to show that the contribution of mass bound within virialized cluster regions to the total matter density is small; i.e., ?cluster = 0.012 for cluster masses larger than 6.4 ? 1013 h M?.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2001
Jerry R. Peterson; Frederik Paerels; Jelle S. Kaastra; M. Arnaud; Thomas H. Reiprich; Andrew C. Fabian; R. F. Mushotzky; J. G. Jernigan; Irini Sakelliou
We present detailed spatially-resolved spectroscopy results of the observation of Abell 1835 using the European Photon Imaging Cameras (EPIC) and the Reflection Grating Spectrometers (RGS) on the XMM- Newton observatory. Abell 1835 is a luminous (10 46 ergs s 1 ), medium redshift (z =0 :2523), X-ray emitting cluster of galaxies. The observations support the interpretation that large amounts of cool gas are present in a multi-phase medium surrounded by a hot (kTe =8 :2 keV) outer envelope. We detect O VIII Ly and two Fe XXIV complexes in the RGS spectrum. The emission measure of the cool gas below kTe =2 :7 keV is much lower than expected from standard cooling-flow models, suggesting either a more complicated cooling process than simple isobaric radiative cooling or dierential cold absorption of the cooler gas.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2000
H. Böhringer; W. Voges; John P. Huchra; B. J. McLean; Riccardo Giacconi; P. Rosati; Richard Burg; J. Mader; Peter Schuecker; Dragan P. Simic; Stefanie Komossa; Thomas H. Reiprich; J. Retzlaff; J. Trumper
In the construction of an X-ray-selected sample of galaxy clusters for cosmological studies, we have assembled a sample of 495 X-ray sources found to show extended X-ray emission in the first processing of the ROSAT All-Sky Survey. The sample covers the celestial region with declination ? ? 0? and Galactic latitude |bII| ? 20? and comprises sources with a count rate ?0.06 counts s-1 and a source extent likelihood of L ? 7. In an optical follow-up identification program we find 378 (76%) of these sources to be clusters of galaxies.?????It was necessary to reanalyze the sources in this sample with a new X-ray source characterization technique to provide more precise values for the X-ray flux and source extent than obtained from the standard processing. This new method, termed growth curve analysis (GCA), has the advantage over previous methods in its ability to be robust, to be easy to model and to integrate into simulations, to provide diagnostic plots for visual inspection, and to make extensive use of the X-ray data. The source parameters obtained assist the source identification and provide more precise X-ray fluxes. This reanalysis is based on data from the more recent second processing of the ROSAT Survey. We present a catalog of the cluster sources with the X-ray properties obtained as well as a list of the previously flagged extended sources that are found to have a noncluster counterpart. We discuss the process of source identification from the combination of optical and X-ray data.?????To investigate the overall completeness of the cluster sample as a function of the X-ray flux limit, we extend the search for X-ray cluster sources to the data of the second processing of the ROSAT Survey for the northern sky region between 9h and 14h in right ascension. We include the search for X-ray emission of known clusters as well as a new investigation of extended X-ray sources. In the course of this search we find X-ray emission from 85 additional Abell clusters and 56 very probable cluster candidates among the newly found extended sources. A comparison of the X-ray cluster number counts of the NORAS sample with the ROSAT-ESO Flux-limited X-Ray (REFLEX) Cluster Survey results leads to an estimate of the completeness of the NORAS sample of ROSAT All-Sky Survey (RASS) I extended clusters of about 50% at an X-ray flux of FX(0.1-2.4 keV) = 3 ? 10-12 ergs s-1 cm-2. The estimated completeness achieved by adding the supplementary sample in the study area amounts to about 82% in comparison to REFLEX. The low completeness introduces an uncertainty in the use of the sample for cosmological statistical studies that will be cured with the completion of the continuing Northern ROSAT All-Sky (NORAS) Cluster Survey project.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2001
Alexis Finoguenov; Thomas H. Reiprich; H. Böhringer
We present results on the total mass and temperature determination using two samples of clusters of galaxies. One sample is constructed with emphasis on the completeness of the sample, while the advantage of the other is the use of the temperature profiles, derived with ASCA. We obtain remarkably similar fits to the
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2010
Daniel S. Hudson; R. Mittal; Thomas H. Reiprich; Paul E. J. Nulsen; Heinz Andernach; Craig L. Sarazin
M-T
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
Yong Chen; Thomas H. Reiprich; H. Böhringer; Yasushi Ikebe; Yu-Ying Zhang
relation for both samples, with the normalization and the slope significantly different from both prediction of self-similar collapse and hydrodynamical simulations. We discuss the origin of these discrepancies and also combine the X-ray mass with velocity dispersion measurements to provide a comparison with high-resolution dark matter simulations. Finally, we discuss the importance of a cluster formation epoch in the observed
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2001
F. Govoni; L. Feretti; G. Giovannini; H. Böhringer; Thomas H. Reiprich; M. Murgia
M-T
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2007
H. Böhringer; Peter Schuecker; G. W. Pratt; M. Arnaud; T. J. Ponman; J. H. Croston; Stefano Borgani; Richard G. Bower; Ulrich G. Briel; Chris A. Collins; Megan Donahue; W. Forman; Alexis Finoguenov; Margaret J. Geller; L. Guzzo; J. P. Henry; R. Kneissl; J. J. Mohr; Kyoko Matsushita; C. R. Mullis; Takaya Ohashi; D. Pierini; H. Quintana; Somak Raychaudhury; Thomas H. Reiprich; A. K. Romer; P. Rosati; Kivanc Sabirli; R. F. Temple; Pedro T. P. Viana
relation.
Astronomy and Astrophysics | 2009
R. Mittal; Daniel S. Hudson; Thomas H. Reiprich; T. E. Clarke
We use the largest complete sample of 64 galaxy clusters (HIghest X-ray FLUx Galaxy Cluster Sample) with available high-quality X-ray data from Chandra, and apply 16 cool-core diagnostics to them, some of them new. In order to identify the best parameter for characterizing cool-core clusters and quantify its relation to other parameters, we mainly use very high spatial resolution profiles of central gas density and temperature, and quantities derived from them. We also correlate optical properties of brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) with X-ray properties. To segregate cool core and non-cool-core clusters, we find that central cooling time, t cool , is the best parameter for low redshift clusters with high quality data, and that cuspiness is the best parameter for high redshift clusters. 72% of clusters in our sample have a cool core (t cool 50 h ―1 71 kpc) projected separation between their BCG and X-ray peak. In contrast, only two of the 56 clusters with a small separation between the BCG and X-ray peak (<50 h ―1 71 kpc) show large-scale radio emission. Based on this result, we argue that a large projected separation between the BCG and the X-ray peak is a good indicator of a major merger. The properties of weak cool-core clusters as an intermediate class of objects are discussed. Finally we describe individual properties of all 64 clusters in the sample.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2002
H. Böhringer; Chris A. Collins; L. Guzzo; Peter Schuecker; W. Voges; D. M. Neumann; Sabine Schindler; Guido Chincarini; S. De Grandi; R. G. Cruddace; A. C. Edge; Thomas H. Reiprich; P. A. Shaver
We present a statistical study of the occurrence and effects of the cooling cores in the clusters of galaxies in a flux-limited sample, HIFLUGCS, based on ROSAT and ASCA observations. About 49% of the clusters in this sample have a significant, classically-calculated cooling-flow, mass-deposition rate. The upper envelope of the derived mass-deposition rate is roughly proportional to the cluster mass, and the fraction of cooling core clusters is found to decrease with it. The cooling core clusters are found to have smaller core radii than non-cooling core clusters, while some non-cooling core clusters have high beta values (> 0.8). In the relation of the X-ray luminosity vs. the temperature and the mass, the cooling core clusters show a significantly higher normalization. A systematic correlation analysis, also involving relations of the gas mass and the total infrared luminosity, indicates that this bias is shown to be mostly due to an enhanced X-ray luminosity for cooling core clusters, while the other parameters, like temperature, mass, and gas mass may be less affected by the occurrence of a cooling core. These results may be explained by at least some of the non-cooling core clusters being in dynamically young states compared with cooling core clusters, and they may turn into cooling core clusters in a later evolutionary stage.