Thomas J. Esposito

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Organ Injury Scale I: spleen, liver, and kidney, validation based on the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND This study attempts to validate the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scale (OIS) for spleen, liver, and kidney injuries using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). STUDY DESIGN All NTDB entries with Abbreviated Injury Scale codes for spleen, liver, and kidney were classified by OIS grade. Injuries were stratified either as an isolated intraabdominal organ injury or in combination with other abdominal injuries. Isolated abdominal solid organ injuries were additionally stratified by presence of severe head injury and survival past 24 hours. The patients in each grading category were analyzed for mortality, operative rate, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, and charges incurred. RESULTS There were 54,148 NTDB entries (2.7%) with Abbreviated Injury Scale-coded injuries to the spleen, liver, or kidney. In 35,897, this was an isolated abdominal solid organ injury. For patients in which the solid organ in question was not the sole abdominal injury, a statistically significant increase (p < or = 0.05) in mortality, organ-specific operative rate, and hospital charges was associated with increasing OIS grade; the exception was grade VI hepatic injuries. Hospital and ICU lengths of stay did not show substantial increase with increasing OIS grade. When isolated organ injuries were examined, there were statistically significant increases (p < or = 0.05) in all outcomes variables corresponding with increasing OIS grade. Severe head injury appears to influence mortality, but none of the other outcomes variables. Patients with other intraabdominal injuries had comparable quantitative outcomes results with the isolated abdominal organ injury groups for all OIS grades. CONCLUSIONS This study validates and quantifies outcomes reflective of increasing injury severity associated with increasing OIS grades for specific solid organ injuries alone, and in combination with other abdominal injuries.

Analysis of preventable trauma deaths and inappropriate trauma care in a rural state.

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the rate of preventable mortality and inappropriate care in cases of traumatic death occurring in a rural state. DESIGN This is a retrospective case review. MATERIALS AND METHODS Deaths attributed to mechanical trauma throughout the state and occurring between October 1, 1990 and September 30, 1991 were examined. All cases meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of physicians and nonphysicians representing the prehospital as well as hospital phases of care. Deaths were judged frankly preventable, possibly preventable, or nonpreventable. The care rendered in both preventable and nonpreventable cases was evaluated for appropriateness according to nationally accepted guidelines. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The overall preventable death rate was 13%. Among those patients treated at a hospital, the preventable death rate was 27%. The rate of inappropriate care was 33% overall and 60% in-hospital. The majority of inappropriate care occurred in the emergency department phase and was rendered by one or more members of the resuscitation team, including primary contact physicians and surgeons. Deficiencies were predominantly related to the management of the airway and chest injuries. CONCLUSIONS The rural preventable death rate from trauma is not dissimilar to that found in urban areas before the implementation of a trauma care system. Inappropriate care rendered in the emergency department related to airway and chest injury management occurs at a high rate. This seems to be the major contributor to preventable trauma deaths in rural locations. Education of emergency department primary care providers in basic principles of stabilization and initial treatment may be the most cost-effective method of reducing preventable deaths in the rural setting.

Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.

BACKGROUND The benefit of laparoscopic (LA) versus open (OA) appendectomy, particularly for complicated appendicitis, remains unclear. Our objectives were to assess 30-day outcomes after LA versus OA for acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis, determine the incidence of specific outcomes after appendectomy, and examine factors influencing the utilization and duration of the operative approach with multi-institutional clinical data. METHODS Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2005-2008), patients were identified who underwent emergency appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 participating hospitals. Regression models, which included propensity score adjustment to minimize the influence of treatment selection bias, were constructed. Models assessed the association between surgical approach (LA vs OA) and risk-adjusted overall morbidity, surgical site infection (SSI), serious morbidity, and serious morbidity/mortality, as well as individual complications in patients with acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis. The relationships between operative approach, operative duration, and extended duration of stay with hospital academic affiliation were also examined. RESULTS Of 32,683 patients, 24,969 (76.4%) underwent LA and 7,714 (23.6%) underwent OA. Patients who underwent OA were significantly older with more comorbidities compared with those who underwent LA. Patients treated with LA were less likely to experience an overall morbidity (4.5% vs 8.8%; odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.68) or a SSI (3.3% vs 6.7%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.65) but not a serious morbidity (2.6% vs 4.2%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01) or a serious morbidity/mortality (2.6% vs 4.3%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01) compared with those who underwent OA. All patients treated with LA were significantly less likely to develop individual infectious complications except for organ space SSI. Among patients with complicated appendicitis, organ space SSI was significantly more common after laparoscopic appendectomy (6.3% vs 4.8%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73). For all patients with acute appendicitis, those treated at academic-affiliated versus community hospitals were equally likely to undergo LA versus OA (77.0% vs 77.3%; P = .58). Operative duration at academic centers was significantly longer for both LA and OA (LA, 47 vs 38 minutes [P < .0001]; OA, 49 vs 44 minutes [P < .0001]). Median duration of stay after LA was 1 day at both academic-affiliated and community hospitals. CONCLUSION Within ACS NSQIP hospitals, LA is associated with lower overall morbidity in selected patients. However, patients with complicated appendicitis may have a greater risk of organ space SSI after LA. Academic affiliation does not seem to influence the operative approach. However, LA is associated with similar durations of stay but slightly greater operative times than OA at academic versus community hospitals.

Reappraisal of Emergency Room Thoracotomy in a Changing Environment

The efficacy of resuscitative emergency room thoracotomy (ERT), particularly in blunt injury, has been questioned. Wide application of the procedure may not be cost effective. The risk of exposure and lethal infection to medical personnel during ERT is considerable. For the past decade, the policy at this institution has been to perform ERT on all moribund patients sustaining penetrating torso injury and all patients sustaining blunt injury with any evidence of cardiac electrical activity. To evaluate whether such a liberal policy is currently justified, the charts of all patients undergoing ERT over a 4-year period were reviewed. One hundred twelve patients underwent ERT; 24 (21%) sustained penetrating injury, 88 (79%) blunt injury. The overall survival rate was 1.8%. Penetrating injury had a 4.2% survival and blunt injury 1.1%. No patients with CPR initiated at the scene and required throughout transport survived. In those patients with both blood pressure and spontaneous respirations present in the field, survival rate was 11.8%. Survival rate in patients manifesting sinus rhythm or ventricular fibrillation upon arrival at the ER was 6.4%. No survivors were noted among patients coming to the hospital with an idioventricular rhythm or asystole. The total hospital charges for patients undergoing ERT exceeded reimbursement by

Effect of a voluntary trauma system on preventable death and inappropriate care in a rural state.

59,565. Screening for HIV and hepatitis could be documented in only two patients; both were negative. Liberal performance of ERT has dismal results, incurs monetary loss, and affords a greater potential for exposure to lethal infection. Emergency room thoracotomy is justified only when vital signs or a resuscitatible cardiac rhythm are present in the field or ER and deteriorate shortly before thoracotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in the management of trauma patients: a preliminary assessment.

BACKGROUND This study compares the preventable death rate and the nature and degree of inappropriate care in a rural state before and after implementation of a voluntary trauma system. METHODS Deaths attributed to mechanical trauma occurring in the state of Montana between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, were retrospectively reviewed by a multidisciplinary panel of physicians and nonphysicians representing the hospital and prehospital phases of care. Deaths were judged frankly preventable, possibly preventable, and nonpreventable. Care rendered in all categories was evaluated for appropriateness according to nationally accepted guidelines. Results were then compared with an identical study conducted before implementation of a voluntary trauma system. Measures to ensure comparability of the two studies were taken. RESULTS Three hundred forty-seven (49%) of all trauma-related deaths met review criteria. The overall preventable death rate (PDR) was 8%. In those patients surviving to be treated at a hospital, the PDR was 15%. The overall rate of inappropriate care was 36%, 22% prehospital and 54% in-hospital. The majority of inappropriate care in all phases of care revolved around airway and chest injury management. The emergency department (ED) was the phase of care in which the majority of deficiencies were noted. In comparison with the results of the earlier study, PDR decreased (8% vs. 13%, p < 0.02). Adjusted rates of inappropriate care also showed a decrease (prehospital, 22% vs. 37%; ED, 40% vs. 68%; post-ED, 29% vs. 49%); however, the nature of deficiencies was the same. Population characteristics influencing interpanel reliability were similar for the two groups compared. Agreement on test cases presented to both panels was good (kappa statistic, 0.8). CONCLUSION Implementation of a voluntary trauma system has positive effects on PDR and inappropriate care. The degree and nature of inappropriate care remain a concern. Mandated and funded system policies may further influence care positively.

Traumatic lumbar hernia : case report and literature review

This study evaluated the role and advantages of diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) compared with diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) in 75 trauma patients who were prospectively studied with DL followed by DPL. Of these, 59 patients had blunt injuries and 16 stab wounds. Seventy patients (93%) had the procedures performed in the emergency department (ED); 41 (59%) of these were awake and under local anesthesia. Forty-two patients had negative DPL and DL results with no subsequent sequelae. Twenty-three patients had negative DPL results and abnormal DL results. Of these, 20 were managed nonsurgically, and three (DPL < 10,000 RBC) underwent surgery based solely on DL findings of diaphragmatic lacerations from stab wounds. These were repaired. All 23 had an uneventful course. Three patients had positive DPL and insignificant DL findings. Laparotomy and DL findings correlated. A splenectomy for iatrogenic injury unrelated to DL and two nontherapeutic laparotomies were performed. Seven patients demonstrated both positive DPL and significant DL findings, and all had therapeutic laparotomies. Management based on DL rather than DPL would potentially have improved care in 8% of cases (6 of 75). Reliance on DL improved care in 19% (3 of 16) of patients with stab wounds and possibly could have in 3% (2 of 59) of those with blunt injuries. Management using DL would have potentially improved care in 30% (3 of 10) of patients with positive DPL findings and 5% (3 of 65) with negative DPL findings. Diagnostic laparoscopy can be performed safely in stable patients under local anesthesia in the ED. It offers no advantage over DPL as a primary assessment tool in blunt trauma. It does have advantages in the management of stab wounds. Diagnostic laparoscopy has a role in redefining DPL criteria for laparotomy and, in selected patients, as an adjunct to DPL, allowing further diagnosis and potentially the treatment of injuries without laparotomy.

Blunt trauma during pregnancy : factors affecting fetal outcome

Lumbar hernia is an uncommon abdominal wall hernia. Acute abdominal wall hernias, particularly lumbar hernias, are a rare complication of trauma. We present a case of acute lumbar hernia as a direct effect of blunt abdominal trauma. Double-contrast CT scan detected herniation of bowel through an 8-cm right flank defect, which was surgically repaired with a prosthetic patch and omentopexy. In cases of acute traumatic lumbar hernia, immediate exploratory laparotomy with primary repair (when feasible) is recommended.

Ten year experience of burn, trauma, and combined burn/trauma injuries comparing outcomes.

During a 9 1/2-year period, 76 pregnant women who sustained blunt trauma were admitted to a level-I trauma center. Fetal outcome was ascertained in 59 patients (78%). Successful delivery was noted in 35 patients (46%). Eight patients (11%) elected to undergo abortion for nonmedical reasons. Sixteen patients (21%) sustained fetal loss, and 17 patients (22%) were lost to follow-up. The 51 patients who either delivered successfully or experienced a fetal loss were studied to determine the factors that affected fetal outcome. Variables analyzed included gestational age and maternal age, Glasgow Coma Scale score, serum bicarbonate level, pH, PCO2, PO2, blood pressure, heart rate, Injury Severity Score, and performance of surgery or diagnostic peritoneal lavage. Logistic regression analysis revealed that ISS (p less than 0.01) and admission serum bicarbonate level (p less than 0.02) have the most significant correlation with fetal outcome. No other variable exhibited a statistically significant influence on fetal outcome. This information documents that fetal demise is related to severity of maternal injury as characterized by ISS. A low serum bicarbonate level corresponds to maternal hypoperfusion and hypoxia, which may be otherwise unrecognized because of the normal physiologic changes occurring during pregnancy. Based on these findings, routine serum bicarbonate determination in all pregnant patients being evaluated for trauma is advocated. Performance of DPL and surgery do not have a significant association with fetal loss and therefore should not be withheld when indicated in a pregnant patient.

Neurosurgical Coverage: Essential, Desired, or Irrelevant for Good Patient Care and Trauma Center Status

BACKGROUND Percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn, inhalation injury (INH), and age all have been shown to be independent predictors of mortality in burn victims. Little is known regarding patients sustaining combined thermal and mechanical injuries in relation to either injury sustained in isolation or with regard to these variables. This descriptive study profiles the 10-year experience of a single American Burn Association/American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma and burn center and the treatment of this patient population. METHODS A retrospective review of all burn and trauma patients admitted between 1990 and 2000. Patients were divided into three groups; Burn only (B), Trauma only (T), and combined Burn/Trauma (B/T). Groups were compared with respect to age, TBSA burn, length of stay (LOS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), INH and mortality. These groups were then compared with B, T and B/T patients from the National Burn Repository (NBR) and National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). Students t test and chi tests were performed, as well as multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of mortality. p <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS Through our trauma registry, 24,093 patients were identified (T=22,284, B=1717 and B/T=92). When comparing B and T, there was no difference in age, LOS, ISS, or mortality to those patients in the NBR or NTDB. B/T patients showed significantly increased percentage with INH (B/T=44.5% versus 11%), increased LOS (B/T=18 days versus 13.7 B and 5.3 T) and increased mortality (B/T=28.3% versus 9.8% B and 4.3% T). B/T were also significantly older (B/T=40.1 years versus 31.0 B and 35.1 T). When these variables are compared with the NBR and the NTDB benchmarks, mortality (28.3% versus 11.6% NBR and 7.0% NTDB) and ISS (23 versus 11.7 NTDB) were significantly higher with no difference in age (40.1 versus 33.4 NTDB, 35.9 NBR), LOS (18 days versus 23.3 NBR) or TBSA (20.8% versus 19.5% NBR). Multiple logistic regression comparing TBSA, age, ISS and INH of survivors versus non-survivors identified only ISS as an independent predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION B combined with T presents a rare injury pattern that has a synergistic effect on mortality. Physicians and caregivers should be aware of a 2-3 fold increase in the incidence of INH in this population, and increased mortality despite similar TBSA burned when compared with patients with B as the sole mechanism; ISS appears to be an independent predictor of mortality in this combined injury pattern.