Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas J. McSweeney is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas J. McSweeney.


Journal of Legal History | 2016

Creating a Literature for the King's Courts in the Later Thirteenth Century: Hengham Magna, Fet Asaver, and Bracton

Thomas J. McSweeney

ABSTRACT The early common law produced a rich literature. This article examines two of the most popular legal treatises of the second half of the thirteenth century, Hengham Magna and Fet Asaver. It has long been recognized that these two treatises bear some relationship to each other. This article will attempt to establish that relationship, arguing that Hengham Magna and Fet Asaver were written by different people; that Fet Asaver borrows from Hengham Magna; and that the authors of both texts had independent access to the Bracton treatise. The article concludes by suggesting a new way to think about the legal literature of the later thirteenth century. It suggests that Hengham Magna and Fet Asaver do not represent a dramatic break with the earlier literature of the common law, as some scholars have suggested. They may instead represent an evolution of that literature to serve the needs of the practising bar.


Archive | 2013

Between England and France: A Cross-Channel Legal Culture in the Late Thirteenth Century

Thomas J. McSweeney

This chapter looks at the culture of legal treatise-writing as evidence that England and Normandy shared a common way of talking and writing about law, which they did not share with the rest of France, across the divide of 1204. The developments in legal writing that we see in English treatises decades after the Capetian conquest are mirrored in their Norman counterparts, suggesting that England and Normandy maintained contacts in the legal sphere for most of the thirteenth century. These legal treatises show us that, although separated politically, England and Normandy were part of a cross-Channel legal culture. The chapter treats another constitutional implication of Bracton , one that pervades the whole of the treatise. The Bracton author imports the substance of the Roman law of possession and property into his discussion of seisin and right. Keywords: Bracton ; cross-Channel legal culture; England; France; Normandy; Roman law; thirteenth century


Buffalo Law Review | 2012

Property Before Property: Romanizing the English Law of Land

Thomas J. McSweeney


Archive | 2014

Magna Carta and the Right to Trial by Jury

Thomas J. McSweeney


Archive | 2018

Fiction in the Code

Thomas J. McSweeney


Georgia State University law review | 2018

Fiction in the Code: Reading Legislation as Literature

Thomas J. McSweeney


William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal | 2016

Salvation by Statute: Magna Carta, Legislation, and the King's Soul

Thomas J. McSweeney


Archive | 2016

Book Review of The Oxford History of the Laws of England, Volume II

Thomas J. McSweeney


Law and History Review | 2016

John Hudson, The Oxford History of the Laws of England, Volume II: 871–1216 , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Pp. xxiii + 958.

Thomas J. McSweeney


Archive | 2015

300.00 cloth (ISBN 978-0-19-826030-1).

Thomas J. McSweeney; A. E. Dick Howard

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas J. McSweeney's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge