Thomas Kuehlein

Factors associated with physical activity of patients with osteoarthritis of the lower limb

OBJECTIVE In patients with osteoarthritis (OA), moderate physical activity (PA) can reduce the progress of joint damage. PA is therefore an important target of in the non-surgical treatment of OA. To know about factors associated with PA can increase the success of interventions aiming at increasing PA. The aim of the study was to determine predictors of PA in patients suffering from OA to the hip or to the knee. METHODS In total, 1250 outpatients from 75 general practices were consecutively approached, 1021 returned questionnaires containing sociodemographic data, and short forms of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire to assess concomitant depression. A hierarchical stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with the IPAQ continuous score as dependent variable was performed. RESULTS Comparison of our findings with General population suggests that the overall PA of OA patients is decreased. Main predictors of PA were physical limitation to the lower body (beta = -0.179; P = 0.001), social contacts (P = -0.134; P < 0.001), pain (beta =-0.120; P = 0.001), age (beta = -0.110; P = 0.004) and the body mass index (beta =-0.043; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The findings emphasize the influence of physical as well as psychosocial factors on PA of patients with OA and should help to tailor future interventions more appropriately. Further research is needed to determine if these tailored interventions will result in better compliance and in increased PA.

Osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: a comparison of factors associated with physical activity

To assess factors associated with physical activity (PA) in a large sample of primary care patients, 1,250 outpatients from 75 general practices were approached consecutively. Of these, 1,021 (81.7%) returned short forms of the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) and the arthritis impact measurement scale (AIMS2-SF). In addition, the patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) was used to assess concomitant depression. A stepwise multiple linear regression analysis with the IPAQ score as dependent variable was performed separately for knee and hip patients. The impact of osteoarthritis (OA) on patients with an affected knee (594/58.2%) was more severe, as reflected in higher scores in the “symptom”, “lower body”, and “affect” scales of the AIMS2-SF (p < 0.01 for all). These patients were also less active than patients with OA to the hip (p = 0.02 for IPAQ score). Main predictors of PA [change in p(F) for all factors ≤0.001] in knee OA patients were physical limitation to the lower limb (R2 = 0.180), social network (R2 = 0.121), pain (R2 = 0.111), body mass index (R2 = 0.041), and age (R2 = 0.032). Predictors for OA at the hip (427/41.8%) differed slightly [change in p(F) for all factors ≤0.003): physical limitation to the lower limb (R2 = 0.162), pain (R2 = 0.131), PHQ-9 score (R2 = 0.092), social network (R2 = 0.078), and disease duration (R2 = 0.043). Our findings suggest that factors associated with PA differ depending on the localization of the OA. Our results may help to tailor future interventions more appropriately. Further research is needed to determine whether these tailored interventions will result in increased PA.

Antibiotic prescribing in general practice–the rhythm of the week: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES Overprescribing of antibiotics in primary care is a worldwide phenomenon. Prescriptions can be used to reduce the uncertainty inherent in general practice. We assumed a heightened prescribing rate on Fridays because of more uncertainty before the pending weekend. METHODS Cross-sectional study from a general practice research database with 102 140 patients of 32 practices in Germany. Prescribing rates of antibiotics on different days of the week were analysed. In order to evaluate the influence of the weekday within a multivariate setting, we used SAS PROC GENMOD. This procedure was parameterized accordingly to account for the cluster design of the study. RESULTS The prescribing rate of antibiotics on Fridays was 23.3% higher than the average of the other days of the working week (6.04% versus 4.90%, P < 0.0001). The significance of this finding was confirmed by the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS There is periodic fluctuation of antibiotic prescribing rates over the week. This cannot be explained by morbidity itself. Factors beyond biomedical indication are well known to influence prescribing patterns. These factors should not only be further explored, but also acknowledged when trying to reduce overprescribing.

Diuretics for hypertension – an inconsistency in primary care prescribing behaviour

Abstract Objective: Internationally there is an ongoing debate on diuretics as first-line therapy for most patients with hypertension. In spite of many arguments against them in antihypertensive monotherapy, the authors of the present study perceived them to be regularly prescribed in combination therapy in Germany. The study objective was to look for this discrepancy in prescribing reality as a contribution from clinical practice to an academic debate. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study in a yearly contact group (YCG; 1.7.2007–31.06.2008) was conducted based on data from a scientific network of 22 general practitioners in Germany. All patients with hypertension as diagnosed by their general practitioner were included. Antihypertensives were grouped according to the ATC classification. To assess for potential design effects by the given two-level setting, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were adjusted for clustering. Results: Hypertension had been diagnosed in 9.3% of the 58 852 patients. Of these, 21.6% received no antihypertensives. Of those who were treated, 30.6% (CI [28.6–32.6]) had monotherapy. In monotherapy, 8.6% (CI [7.1–10.2]) were prescribed some diuretic, 1.5% (CI [0.5–3.0]) received hydrochlorothiazide (HCT). Combination therapy was prescribed to 69.4% (CI [67.2–71.6]). These patients received some diuretic in 79.0% (CI [76.9–81.0]) of the cases, of which 80.8% (CI [78.5–83.1]) had a combination with HCT. HCT was prescribed in 76.2% (CI [73.5–78.9]) in fixed-dose formulations. Conclusion: In spite to the many arguments against them, leading to their almost complete disregard in monotherapy, thiazide-diuretics seem to be standard in combination therapy in Germany. This inconsistency can not be explained by the arguments of the current debate. Key limitations of the present study include the lack of ability to tell whether a given monotherapy is the first-line medication, the small sample size and the possible selection bias.