Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas Lemieux is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas Lemieux.


Econometrica | 1996

Labor Market Institutions and the Distribution of Wages, 1973-1992: A Semiparametric Approach

John DiNardo; Nicole M. Fortin; Thomas Lemieux

This paper provides evidence that the decline in the real value of the minimum wage and in the rate of unionization account for a significant share of the increase in wage inequality in the United States between 1979 and 1988. The role of the minimum wage is particularly important for women, while deunionization has the largest impact on men. The authors develop a semiparametric procedure that applies kernel density methods to appropriately weighted samples. The procedure provides a visually clear representation of where in the density of wages institutional and labor market forces exert the greatest impact. Copyright 1996 by The Econometric Society.


Journal of Health Economics | 2001

Alcohol, marijuana, and American youth: the unintended consequences of government regulation

John DiNardo; Thomas Lemieux

This paper analyzes the impact of increases in the minimum drinking age on the prevalence of alcohol and marijuana use among high school seniors. The empirical analysis is based on a large sample of students from 43 states over the years 1980-1989. We find that increases in the legal minimum drinking age did slightly reduce the prevalence of alcohol consumption. We also find, however, that increased legal minimum drinking ages had the unintended consequence of slightly increasing the prevalence of marijuana consumption. Estimates from a structural model suggest that this unintended consequence is attributable to standard substitution effects.


Archive | 2006

The “Mincer Equation” Thirty Years After Schooling, Experience, and Earnings

Thomas Lemieux

This paper evaluates the empirical performance of the standard Mincer earnings equation thirty years after the publication of Schooling, Experience and Earnings. Over this period, there has been a dramatic expansion in micro data and estimation techniques available to labor economists. How does the Mincer equation stand in light of these advances in empirical labor economics? Is it time to revise our benchmark model? On the basis of the existing literature and some new empirical estimates, I conclude that the Mincer equation remains an accurate benchmark for estimating wage determination equations provided that it is adjusted by (1) including a quartic function in potential experience instead of just a quadratic, (2) allowing for a quadratic term in years of schooling to capture the growing convexity in the relationship between schooling and wages, and (3) allowing for cohort effects to capture the dramatic growth in returns to schooling among cohorts born after 1950.


Journal of Human Resources | 1998

Rank Regressions, Wage Distributions and the Gender Gap.

Nicole M. Fortin; Thomas Lemieux

In this paper, we model the interactions between the distribution of male and female wages under the assumption that any change in the wage distribution of women must be offset by an opposite change in the wage distribution of men.


Canadian Journal of Economics | 2002

Decomposing Changes in Wage Distributions: A unified Approach

Thomas Lemieux

Over the last fifteen years, many researchers have attempted to explain the determinants and changes of wage inequality. I propose a simple procedure to decompose changes in the distribution of wages or in other distributions into three factors: changes in regression coefficients; the distribution of covariates, and residuals. The procedure requires only estimating standard OLS regressions augmented by a logit or probit model. It can be extended by modelling residuals as a function of unmeasured skills and skill prices. Two empirical examples showing how the procedure works in practice are considered. In the first example, sources of differences in the wage distribution in Alberta and British Columbia are considered; in the second, sources of change in overall wage inequality in the United States, 1973-99, are re-examined. Finally, the proposed procedure is compared with existing procedures.


Journal of Labor Economics | 1998

Estimating the Effects of Unions on Wage Inequality in a Panel Data Model with Comparative Advantage and Nonrandom Selection

Thomas Lemieux

This article considers the estimation of the structure of wages in union and nonunion sectors. It proposes an estimator that extends standard panel data techniques to the case in which the return to the permanent component of the error term is differently rewarded in the two sectors. The econometric model is used to estimate the effect of unions on both the level and the variance of wages in Canada. The findings indicate that unions increase the average wage of workers and compress the returns to observable measures of skill and to a time‐invariant unobservable measure of skill.


Industrial and Labor Relations Review | 1997

Diverging male wage inequality in the United States and Canada, 1981-1988: Do institutions explain the difference?

John DiNardo; Thomas Lemieux

The U.S. and Canadian economies have much in common, including similar collective bargaining structures. During the period 1981–88, however, although both countries witnessed a decline in the percentage of workers belonging to unions and an increase in hourly wage inequality, those changes were much more pronounced in the United States than in Canada. Using data on men in Canada and the United States in 1981 and 1988 (from the Labour Force Survey and supplements to the Current Population Survey), the authors study the effect of labor market institutions on changes in wage inequality by computing simple counterfactuals such as the distribution of wages that would prevail if all workers were paid according to the observed nonunion wage schedule. Their results suggest that much more severe declines in the unionization rate in the United States than in Canada account for two-thirds of the differential growth in wage inequality between the two countries.


Canadian Public Policy-analyse De Politiques | 2010

The Evolution of the Returns to Human Capital in Canada, 1980–2005

Brahim Boudarbat; Thomas Lemieux; W. Craig Riddell

Dans cet article, nous étudions l’évolution du rendement du capital humain au Canada de 1980 à 2005. La principale conclusion à laquelle nous arrivons – et qui s’oppose à celles d’études antérieures – est que les avantages associés à un niveau d’études plus élevé ont considérablement augmenté dans le temps chez les hommes; cette augmentation a été enregistrée en très grande partie d’abord au début des années 1980, puis après 1995. On observe le même phénomène chez les femmes, quoique de façon moins marquée. Par ailleurs, nous relevons une autre tendance non moins importante : après s’être accru pendant de nombreuses années, l’écart de salaires entre les travailleurs plus jeunes et les travailleurs plus âgés s’est stabilisé après 1995. Enfin, le fait d’avoir pris en considération « l’expérience de travail » dans nos analyses, et l’utilisation des données des recensements canadiens semblent expliquer les différences importantes entre nos résultats et ceux des études antérieures.


Canadian Journal of Economics | 2001

Education, Earnings, and the 'Canadian G.I. Bill'

Thomas Lemieux; David Card

Canadian Second World War veterans benefited from an extensive educational program similar to the U.S. G.I. Bill. Because of differences in military enlistment rates, however, a much lower fraction of Quebec men were eligible for these benefits than men from other provinces. Building on this fact, we analyse inter-cohort patterns of education and earnings for English-speaking men from Ontario, using French-speaking men from Quebec as a control group. We find that the instrumental variables estimates of the return to schooling are typically as big or bigger than the corresponding OLS estimates.


Canadian Public Policy-analyse De Politiques | 2012

Canadian Inequality: Recent Developments and Policy Options

Nicole M. Fortin; David A. Green; Thomas Lemieux; Kevin Milligan; W. Craig Riddell

Les inégalités de revenus ont fait l’objet d’inquiétudes de plus en plus marquées depuis quelque temps dans le monde. Toutefois, le débat s’est fait en des termes très généraux et a surtout porté sur le cas des États-Unis. On ne peut comprendre comment le Canada devrait réagir à cette situation sans présenter des faits et des chiffres clairs. Dans cet article, nous analysons les tendances des inégalités de revenus, et nous examinons en particulier le groupe constitué par le 1 % des citoyens ayant le revenu le plus élevé – celui dont il est le plus souvent question. Nous résumons ensuite les connaissances actuelles sur les causes des inégalités croissantes de revenus, dont la disparité salariale entre les sexes. Enfin, nous décrivons des politiques publiques qui permettraient de réduire ces inégalités – ou à tout le moins d’en ralentir l’aggravation.

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas Lemieux's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicole M. Fortin

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Card

National Bureau of Economic Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Craig Riddell

University of British Columbia

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John DiNardo

National Bureau of Economic Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Beaudry

National Bureau of Economic Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Bentley MacLeod

National Bureau of Economic Research

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge