Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas M. Selden is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas M. Selden.


Journal of Public Economics | 1995

Stoking the Fires? Co2 Emissions and Economic Growth

Douglas Holtz-Eakin; Thomas M. Selden

Over the past decade, concern over potential global warming has focused attention on the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, and there is an active debate concerning the desirability of reducing emissions. At the heart of this debate is the future path of both greenhouse gas emissions and economic development among the nations. We use global panel data to estimate the relationship between per capita income and carbon dioxide emissions, and then use the estimated trajectories to forecast global emissions of CO2. The analysis yields four major results. First, the evidence suggests a diminishing marginal propensity to emit (MPE) CO2 as economies develop; a result masked in analyses that rely on cross-section data alone. Second, despite the diminishing MPE, our forecasts indicate that global emissions of CO2 will continue to grow at an annual rate of 1.8 percent. Third, continued growth stems from the fact that economic and population growth will be most rapid in the lower-income nations that have the highest MPE. For this reason, there will be an inevitable tension between policies to control greenhouse gas emissions and those toward the global distribution of income. Finally, our sensitivity analyses suggest that the pace of economic development does not dramatically alter the future annual or cumulative flow of CO2 emissions.


Journal of Health Economics | 1998

Health care expenditures and GDP: panel data unit root test results

Suzanne McCoskey; Thomas M. Selden

This short paper presents unit root test results for time series on per capita national health care expenditures and gross domestic product in the OECD. Unlike the country-by-country test used by [Hansen, P., King, A., 1996. The determinants of health care expenditure: A cointegration approach. J. Health Econ, 15, 127-137], the test we employ exploits the panel nature of the OECD data. Using this approach, we are able to reject the null hypothesis that these series contain unit roots. No single test is likely to be definitive in this rapidly-evolving area of econometric research; however, our results help to mitigate concern that panel data analyses of national health care expenditures are misspecified.


Health Economics | 1998

The impact of ownership type on nursing home outcomes

William D. Spector; Thomas M. Selden; Joel W. Cohen

This paper examines the sorting of residents between for-profit and nonprofit nursing homes and the health outcomes of those residents conditional on ownership type. Using data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey, we find evidence of systematic sorting of residents by ownership type, and significant effects of ownership type on outcomes. These results are broadly consistent with the hypothesis that for-profit and nonprofit homes exploit their informational advantages to differing extents in a market characterized by asymmetric information.


Medical Care | 2006

Access to care and utilization among children : Estimating the effects of public and private coverage

Thomas M. Selden; Julie L. Hudson

Objectives:We examine the relationship between health insurance coverage and childrens access to and utilization of medical care. Access measures we study are having a usual source of care (USC) and lacking a USC for financial or insurance reasons. We also examine indicators for ambulatory visits, well-child visits, dental visits, emergency room use, and inpatient hospital stays. Methods:We pool data from the first 7 years of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 1996 to 2002. Pooling yields a large sample of children, enabling us to analyze access and utilization using simple descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis, and instrumental variables estimation (IV). IV estimation is of particular interest given the possibility of bias caused by confounding factors (such as child health or parent attitudes) and measurement error in insurance coverage. We also compare estimates from IV linear probability models to estimates from IV probit with residual inclusion. Results:As previous studies have found, public and private coverage are both associated with large increases in access and utilization. Simple mean comparisons suggest that private coverage has a larger effect than does public coverage. Differences between public and private coverage are reduced (and often reversed) when we control for other characteristics of children and their families. IV coverage effect estimates from both linear probability and residual inclusion probit models are substantially greater than conventional estimates across a wide range of access and utilization measures. Conclusions:Despite concerns that conventional estimates overstate the impact of coverage on access and use, our results suggest that the reverse may be true. One explanation may be that conventional estimates are biased toward zero due to error in the reporting of insurance coverage. The magnitude of the coverage effects we find highlights the importance of reducing uninsurance among children.


Journal of Health Economics | 1999

Medical savings accounts: microsimulation results from a model with adverse selection

Daniel Zabinski; Thomas M. Selden; John F. Moeller; Jessica S. Banthin

This paper examines medical savings accounts combined with high-deductible catastrophic health plans (MSA/CHPs), exploring the possible consequences of making tax preferred MSA/CHPs available to the entire employment-related health insurance market. The paper uses microsimulation methods to examine the equilibrium effects of MSA/CHPs on health care and non-health care expenditures, tax revenues, insurance premiums, and exposure to risk. If MSA/CHPs are offered alongside comprehensive plans, biased MSA/CHP enrollment can lead to premium spirals that drive out comprehensive coverage. Our estimates also raise concerns about equity, insofar as those who stand to lose the most tend to be poorer and in families with infant children.


Inquiry | 2005

The Impact of SCHIP on Insurance Coverage of Children

Julie L. Hudson; Thomas M. Selden; Jessica S. Banthin

In this paper we use the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey between 1996 and 2002 to investigate the impact of the State Childrens Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) on insurance coverage for children. We explore a range of alternative estimation strategies, including instrumental variables and difference-in-trends models. We find that SCHIP had a significant impact in decreasing uninsurance and increasing public insurance for both children targeted by SCHIP and those eligible for Medicaid. With respect to changes in private coverage our results are less conclusive: some specifications resulted in no significant effect of SCHIP on private insurance coverage, while others showed significant decreases in private insurance. Associated estimates of SCHIP crowd-out had wide confidence intervals and were sensitive to estimation strategy.


Journal of Health Economics | 1993

Uncertainty and health care spending by the poor: The health capital model revisited

Thomas M. Selden

This short theoretical paper examines health care utilization by the poor in the context of Grossmans (1972) health capital model. Earlier work has shown that uncertainty can reduce the attractiveness to the poor of health capital investments. This paper demonstrates that uncertainty can also have precisely the opposite effect. That is, while there may be cases in which it is excessively risky for the poor to invest in their health, there may also be cases in which the poor can ill-afford the risks that arise from not making timely investments in their health.


Medicare & Medicaid Research Review | 2012

Reconciling Medical Expenditure Estimates from the MEPS and NHEA, 2007

Didem Bernard; Cathy A. Cowan; Thomas M. Selden; Liming Cai; Aaron Catlin; Stephen Heffler

OBJECTIVE Provide a comparison of health care expenditure estimates for 2007 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA). Reconciling these estimates serves two important purposes. First, it is an important quality assurance exercise for improving and ensuring the integrity of each sources estimates. Second, the reconciliation provides a consistent baseline of health expenditure data for policy simulations. Our results assist researchers to adjust MEPS to be consistent with the NHEA so that the projected costs as well as budgetary and tax implications of any policy change are consistent with national health spending estimates. DATA SOURCES The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the National Health Center for Health Statistics and the National Health Expenditures produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of the Actuary. RESULTS In this study, we focus on the personal health care (PHC) sector, which includes the goods and services rendered to treat or prevent a specific disease or condition in an individual. The official 2007 NHEA estimate for PHC spending is


Journal of Human Resources | 2009

The Impact of Increased Tax Subsidies on the Insurance Coverage of Self-Employed Families: Evidence from the 1996-2004 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Thomas M. Selden

1,915 billion and the MEPS estimate is


Medical Care | 2003

Health care expenditure burdens among elderly adults: 1987 and 1996

Thomas M. Selden; Jessica S. Banthin

1,126 billion. Adjusting the NHEA estimates for differences in underlying populations, covered services, and other measurement concepts reduces the NHEA estimate for 2007 to

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas M. Selden's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julie L. Hudson

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Didem M. Bernard

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Samuel H. Zuvekas

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. Edward Miller

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jessica Vistnes

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joel Ruhter

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Joel W. Cohen

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John F. Moeller

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge