Thomas M. Woodcock

Randomized clinical trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in previously treated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Three hundred twenty-five women with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast who had failed one prior chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced disease were randomized to receive 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone or 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks. Enrollment was closed on October 31, 1984, after 165 patients were randomized to mitoxantrone and 160 patients to doxorubicin. Patients randomized to the two treatment groups were compared for response rate, duration of response, time to progression or death, time to treatment failure (TTF), and survival. The response rate to mitoxantrone was 20.6%, to doxorubicin 29.3% (P = .07). The median response duration was 151 days for the mitoxantrone group and 126 days for the doxorubicin group (P = .16). The median TTF was 70 days in the mitoxantrone group and 104 days in the doxorubicin group (P = .36). The median survival of patients initially randomized to receive mitoxantrone was 273 days; for doxorubicin 268 days (P = .40). There were three responses among 77 patients crossed over to mitoxantrone after initial treatment with doxorubicin. The major dose-limiting toxicity for both drugs was leukopenia. There was significantly less severe and less frequent toxicity with mitoxantrone administration. Severe nausea and vomiting occurred in 9.5% of mitoxantrone patients and 25.3% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). The incidence of severe stomatitis and mucositis was 0.6% in the mitoxantrone group and 8.4% in the doxorubicin group (P = .001). Severe alopecia occurred in 5.1% of mitoxantrone patients and 61.0% of doxorubicin patients (P less than .001). A life-table comparison of the cumulative dose to the development of a cardiac event showed that mitoxantrone had significantly less cardiotoxicity than doxorubicin (P = .0005). This study demonstrates that mitoxantrone is active as a single agent in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Compared with doxorubicin it appears to be marginally less active and significantly less toxic. We conclude that mitoxantrone can be used alone or with other standard drugs to palliate the symptoms of metastatic breast cancer, especially in settings where drug toxicity is an important consideration.

Responsiveness of metastatic basal-cell carcinoma to chemotherapy. A case report

Basal cell carcinoma normally causes major morbidity only by direct extension of the tumor into adjacent tissues. Occasionally the tumor will metastasize to distant sites such as the lungs, the bones, regional lymph nodes, and the abdominal viscera. Over 100 cases of this disseminated disease are reported in the literature. Once a tumor has metastasized beyond the regional lymph nodes it is uniformly fatal. This article reports a case of basal cell carcinoma, metastatic to the lung, which was successfully treated with cisplatin. Three other cases treated similarly are reviewed, and the prospects for treatment of advanced basal cell carcinomas with chemotherapy are discussed.

High‐dose cisplatin in patients with advanced malignancies

A study was conducted to determine if cisplatin (CDDP) can be given at higher doses than usual, utilizing aggressive supportive measures. Twelve patients were entered into three dose levels of CDDP: level I, 180 mg/m2 given as a short infusion; level II, 220 mg/m2 also given as a short infusion; level III, 200 mg/m2 divided in five daily doses, each infused over 6 hours. In all cases, CDDP was dissolved and given in 250 ml of a 5% saline solution. For levels I and II, intravenous hydration with 200 to 250 ml/hour D51/2NS with potassium and magnesium supplements, was started 24 hours before therapy and continued for 3 to 4 days after, longer if nausea persisted. Mannitol was given before (25% solution, 50 ml bolus) and after (20% solution, 500 ml over 3 hours) CDDP. At level III hydration with the same intravenous (IV) fluids was begun the day before therapy and continued without interruption at 200 to 250 ml/hour for a minimum of 24 hours after the completion of the 5 days of chemotherapy. Each daily dose of CDDP was preceded by injection of mannitol (25% solution, 50 ml bolus) and accompanied by a 6‐hour infusion of 1000 ml 20% mannitol. Three patients received five CDDP courses at level I; 4 patients, seven courses at level II; and 5 patients, seven courses at level III. Ototoxicity was dose‐limiting in three patients at level II. Transient elevation of serum creatinine was seen following two courses at level I and two courses at level II. The renal impairment was asymptomatic in all cases; dialysis was not needed. At level II, leukocyte nadir counts between 1.0 and 2.0 × 103/mm3 were seen following two courses and between 2.0 and 3.0 × 103/mm3 following three courses. Platelet nadir counts below 50 × 103/mm3 were recorded after four courses and between 50 and 100 × 103/mm3 after one course. Nausea and vomiting occurred frequently, but were tolerable. At level III, myelosuppression was dose‐limiting. Nadir leukocyte counts between 1.0 and 2.0 × 103/mm3 followed four courses and between 2.0 and 3.0 followed one course. Nadir platelet counts below 50 × 103/mm3 were seen after three courses; two patients required prophylactic platelet transfusions. Nadirs between 50 and 100 × 103 platelets/mm3 followed three further courses. Ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity did not occur at level III. Responses were seen in all three dose levels in patients with prostate carcinoma, non‐small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma. It was concluded that CDDP at a dose of 200 mg/m2, divided in five daily fractions, is tolerable and can be introduced into Phase II trials.

A randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone with doxorubicin in patients with stage IV breast cancer

SummaryMitoxantrone (Novantrone®; dihydroxyanthracenedione) is an anthraquinone previously shown to be active in human breast cancer. It appears to have less toxicity than doxorubicin. Results of this phase II–III randomized cross-over trial to determine the relative efficacy and toxicity of mitoxantrone in comparison to doxorubicin, are presented. Patients with measurable, recurrent breast cancer with limited prior chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for metastatic disease, and who had not been exposed to prior doxorubicin, were randomized to receive either mitoxantrone or doxorubicin every three weeks with crossover on progression. Response rates, duration of remission, time to treatment failure, and drug toxicity, including cardiac toxicity evaluated with serial radionuclide angiocardiography, were evaluated. Differences in the response rates for the two groups were not statistically significant. Neither time to treatment failure nor duration of response are significantly different (p>0.05). With respect to toxicity, mitoxantrone treated patients consistently exhibited a lower incidence and less severe drug toxicity as compared to their doxorubicin-treated counterparts. Cardiac toxicity was carefully monitored and thus four patients on doxorubicin have had drug related congestive heart failure, as compared to none on mitoxantrone.In summary, mitoxantrone appears to be as active as doxorubicin in patients with stage IV breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy; however, mitoxantrone causes significantly less nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and alopecia at doses which induce equal or greater myelosuppression than doxorubicin, and appears to be less cardiotoxic.

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, premarin, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil in metastatic breast cancer

Complete remissions in patients with metastatic breast cancer using endocrine therapy or chemotherapy are infrequent. Breast tumors are known to be heterogeneous with respect to estrogen receptor status, and the low complete remission rate may be related to this biochemical heterogeneity. Based on laboratory experiments using human breast cancer cells in tissue culture, a phase II protocol was designed using tamoxifen, premarin, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil. Thus far, twenty-nine (29) patients have been entered into this study and twenty-five (25) are currently evaluable for response. Overall response rate was 72%, and 14 of 25 (56%) attained a complete remission. Toxicity was minimal. Median nadir white blood cell count was 5,800 and median nadir platelet count was 252,000. In summary, this combination chemo-hormonal therapy regimen is effective with a more than 50% complete remission rate and minimal toxicity.

Combination chemotherapy with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum and vinblastine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Twenty-seven patients (25 males and 2 females) with histologically confirmed, unresectable, or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer were entered on a combination chemotherapy protocol including cisplatinum and vinblastine sulfate (DDP)(VLB). Patients had to have measurable disease as defined by the presence of two clearly measurable perpendicular diameters, be untreated with either chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and give informed consent to be eligible for study entry. The median age was 57 yr and the median performance status was 70 (Karnofsky scale); 10 patients had epidermoid carcinoma, 9 adenocarcinoma, 4 large cell carcinoma, and 4 undifferentiated carcinoma. All patients had intrathoracic disease, 12 also had extrathoracic lymph node involvement, 8 bone involvement, 2 liver metastasis, and 2 central nervous system metastasis prior to beginning chemotherapy; 9 patients had involvement of one site, 12 of two sites, 5 of three sites, and 1 of four sites. Cisplatinum was given as a short intravenous infusion of 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 28, and then every 6 wk. Vinblastine was administered as an intravenous injection of 8 mg/m2 on days 1, 14, and 28, and then every 3 wk. Patients were evaluated prior to each course of cisplatinum. If progression occurred, therapy was discontinued. If stabilization or response was noted, then therapy was continued until intolerable toxicity or progression supervened. Every patient entered is considered evaluable for toxicity and response. There were no complete remissions; 14 patients achieved a partial response, 3 had a minimal response, 5 had stabilization of their disease, 1 had disease progression, and 4 are considered to have had drug deaths. Responses were seen after the first cisplatinum course in 13 patients and after the second in 1. Toxicities seen were universal nausea and vomiting; elevation of creatinine occurred in 6 patients, ranging from 2.1 to 14.6 mg/dl, and was clinically significant in 2 patients. Myelosuppression, with a leukocyte nadir of less than 3.0 X 10(9)l in 10 cases and platelet nadir of less than 100.0 X 10(9)l was seen in 5 cases and partial hearing deficit occurred in 2 patients. Median survival was 22 wk for the whole group (24 wk for the whole group if the 4 early drug deaths are excluded). Median survival was 26 wk for responding patients and 13 wk for nonresponding patients (remains the same if the early deaths are excluded from the latter group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Totally implantable venous access system for cyclic administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy

Utilization of the totally implantable infusion system provides a convenient, cost-effective, and safe administration technique for oncology patients who require cyclic or continuous intravenous medication. In addition, it provides an excellent conduit for blood withdrawal access. The efficacy of this technique abrogates the necessity for periodic replacement of subclavian lines and their associated complications and possibly represents an advantage over percutaneous Broviac and Hickman catheters and the attendant catheter-related sepsis associated with their use. The initial low incidence of complications and absence of catheter thrombosis with this implantable system suggests its superiority over percutaneous silicone catheter devices for bolus drug injection and the continuous infusion of chemotherapeutic agents. Cyclic or continuous infusion of hypertonic dextrose and amino acid solutions (total parenteral nutrition) with this system is being evaluated but cannot yet be recommended as being more advantageous than infusion with an implanted Hickman or Broviac catheter.

Methyl-CCNU, doxorubicin, and cis-diaminedichloroplatinum II in the management of recurrent and metastatic squamous carcinoma of the cervix

Twenty‐three patients with recurrent unresectable carcinoma of the cervix or distant metastasis at initial presentation were treated with methyl‐CCNU (175 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) on day 1 and Cis‐diaminedichloroplatinum II (90 mg/m2) on day 22 of a 42‐day treatment cycle. Twenty‐two patients had squamous carcinoma and 1 had adenosquamous carcinoma. There were two complete responses (CR), five partial responses (PR) (>50% tumor reduction, >3‐month duration), four patients with stable disease (<50% reduction, >3‐month duration), and 12 patients who had tumor progression. One CR has been maintained > 28 months, and the other >8 months. Total CR and PR was 7 of 23 (30.4%). Three responses occurred among 15 patients (20%) who had cancer primarily confined to the pelvis, while 4 of 8 patients (50%) with distant metastasis responded. During the initial 2 cycles of chemotherapy, 12 patients had myelosuppression, defined as a leukocytes <3000/mm3, granulocytes <1,000/mm3, or platelets <100,000/mm3. There were no treatment‐related deaths.

Long-term intravenous hydroxyurea infusions in patients with advanced cancer. A phase I trial

Background. Hydroxyurea is an S‐phase specific drug. Constant exposure of tumor cells with a low S‐phase fraction to the agent may result in improved cell kill. Because of its short half‐life, a continuous intravenous infusion may result in better tumor exposure than intake by mouth. The goal of this trial was to find the longest tolerable duration of a continued intravenous infusion of hydroxyurea (HU) given at escalating doses.

A Phase I Trial of Chlorambucil Administered in Short Pulses in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

We carried out a phase I trial with chlorambucil. Thirty patients with advanced cancer were entered in six dose levels: 36, 48, 60, 84, 108, and 144 mg/m2. The drug was given in six divided oral doses every 6 hours and the regimen was repeated every 3 weeks. The median age was 62 years (31-84), median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) 60 (40-90). All patients but one had received prior radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or both. Central nervous system toxicity was dose limiting, occurring in 5 of 6 patients at 144 mg/m2. It was characterized by transient seizures, hallucinations, lethargy, stupor, and coma. Metoclopramide was successful in controlling nausea and vomiting, which was severe if the antiemetic was not used. Leukopenia (3 patients) and thrombocytopenia (2 patients) were mild. One patient with colorectal carcinoma had a minor response, and two patients with non-small cell lung cancer had stable disease. A safe dose for phase II trials is 108 mg/m2 in six 6-hourly oral doses.