Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas N. Robinson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas N. Robinson.


Annals of Surgery | 2009

Postoperative Delirium in the Elderly : Risk Factors and Outcomes

Thomas N. Robinson; Christopher D. Raeburn; Zung Vu Tran; Erik M. Angles; Lisa A. Brenner; Marc Moss

Objective:The purpose of this study was to describe the natural history, identify risk factors, and determine outcomes for the development of postoperative delirium in the elderly. Background:Postoperative delirium is a common and deleterious complication in geriatric patients. Methods:Subjects older than 50 years scheduled for an operation requiring a postoperative intensive care unit admission were recruited. After preoperative informed written consent, enrolled subjects had baseline cognitive and functional assessments. Postoperatively, subjects were assessed daily for delirium using the confusion assessment method-intensive care unit. Patients were also followed for outcomes. Results:During the study period, 144 patients were enrolled before major abdominal (40%), thoracic (53%), or vascular (7%) operations. The overall incidence of delirium was 44% (64/144). The average time to onset of delirium was 2.1 ± 0.9 days and the mean duration of delirium was 4.0 ± 5.1 days. Several preoperative variables were associated with an increased risk of delirium including older age (P < 0.001), hypoalbuminemia (P < 0.001), impaired functional status (P < 0.001), pre-existing dementia (P < 0.001), and pre-existing comorbidities (P < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression model, pre-existing dementia remains the strongest risk factor for the development of postoperative delirium. Worse outcomes, including increased length of stay (P < 0.001), postdischarge institutionalization (P < 0.001), and 6 month mortality (P = 0.001), occurred in subjects who developed delirium. Conclusions:In the current study, delirium occurred in 44% of elderly patients after a major operation. Pre-existing cognitive dysfunction was the strongest predictor of the development of postoperative delirium. Outcomes, including an increased rate of 6 month mortality, were worse in patients who developed postoperative delirium.


Annals of Surgery | 2009

Redefining geriatric preoperative assessment using frailty, disability and co-morbidity.

Thomas N. Robinson; Ben Eiseman; Jeffrey I. Wallace; Skotti D. Church; Kim McFann; Shirley M. Pfister; Terra J. Sharp; Marc Moss

Objectives:(1) Determine the relationship of geriatric assessment markers to 6-month postoperative mortality in elderly patients. (2) Create a clinical prediction rule using geriatric markers from preoperative assessment. Background:Geriatric surgery patients have unique physiologic vulnerability requiring preoperative assessment beyond the traditional evaluation of older adults. The constellation of frailty, disability and comorbidity predict poor outcomes in elderly hospitalized patients. Methods:Prospectively, subjects ≥65 years undergoing a major operation requiring postoperative intensive care unit admission were enrolled. Preoperative geriatric assessments included: Mini-Cog Test (cognition), albumin, having fallen in the past 6-months, hematocrit, Katz Score (function), and Charlson Index (comorbidities). Outcome measures included 6-month mortality (primary) and postdischarge institutionalization (secondary). Results:One hundred ten subjects (age 74 ± 6 years) were studied. Six-month mortality was 15% (16/110). Preoperative markers related to 6-month mortality included: impaired cognition (P < 0.01), recent falls (P < 0.01), lower albumin (P < 0.01), greater anemia (P < 0.01), functional dependence (P < 0.01), and increased comorbidities (P < 0.01). Similar statistical relationships were found for all 6 markers and postdischarge institutionalization. Logistic regression identified any functional dependence (odds ratio 13.9) as the strongest predictor of 6-month mortality. Four or more markers in any one patient predicted 6-month mortality with a sensitivity of 81% (13/16) and specificity of 86% (81/94). Conclusions:Geriatric assessment markers for frailty, disability and comorbidity predict 6-month postoperative mortality and postdischarge institutionalization. The preoperative presence of ≥4 geriatric-specific markers has high sensitivity and specificity for 6-month mortality. Preoperative assessment using geriatric-specific markers is a substantial paradigm shift from the traditional preoperative evaluation of older adults.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2011

Accumulated Frailty Characteristics Predict Postoperative Discharge Institutionalization in the Geriatric Patient

Thomas N. Robinson; Jeffrey I. Wallace; Daniel S. Wu; Arek J. Wiktor; Lauren F. Pointer; Shirley M. Pfister; Terra J. Sharp; Mary J. Buckley; Marc Moss

BACKGROUND Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to health-related stressors and can be measured by summing the number of frailty characteristics present in an individual. Discharge institutionalization (rather than discharge to home) represents disease burden and functional dependence after hospitalization. Our aim was to determine the relationship between frailty and need for postoperative discharge institutionalization. STUDY DESIGN Subjects ≥ 65 years undergoing major elective operations requiring postoperative ICU admission were enrolled. Discharge institutionalization was defined as need for institutionalized care at hospital discharge. Fourteen preoperative frailty characteristics were measured in 6 domains: comorbidity burden, function, nutrition, cognition, geriatric syndromes, and extrinsic frailty. RESULTS A total of 223 subjects (mean age 73 ± 6 years) were studied. Discharge institutionalization occurred in 30% (n = 66). Frailty characteristics related to need for postoperative discharge institutionalization included: older age, Charlson index ≥ 3, hematocrit <35%, any functional dependence, up-and-go ≥ 15 seconds, albumin <3.4 mg/dL, Mini-Cog score ≤ 3, and having fallen within 6 months (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Multivariate logistic regression retained prolonged timed up-and-go (p < 0.0001) and any functional dependence (p < 0.0001) as the variables most closely related to need for discharge institutionalization. An increased number of frailty characteristics present in any one subject resulted in increased rate of discharge institutionalization. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 1 in 3 geriatric patients required discharge to an institutional care facility after major surgery. The frailty characteristics of prolonged up-and-go and any functional dependence were most closely related to the need for discharge institutionalization. Accumulation of a higher number of frailty characteristics in any one geriatric patient increased their risk of discharge institutionalization.


Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques | 2005

Major mesh-related complications following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

Thomas N. Robinson; J. H. Clarke; Jonathan A. Schoen; M. D. Walsh

Mesh material affects complications following hernia repair. Medical device reports on the use of surgical mesh for hernia repair were reviewed from the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Manufacturer User Facility Device Experience Database from January 1996 to September 2004. We analyzed 252 adverse event reports related to the use of surgical mesh for hernia repair. Adverse events included infection (42%, 107 reports), mechanical failure (18%, 46), pain (9%, 23), reaction (8%, 20), intestinal complications (7%, 18), adhesions (6%, 14), seroma (4%, 9), erosion (2%, 6), and other (4%, 9). Compared to all other mesh types, Sepra/polypropylene mesh had more mechanical failures (80 vs 14%, p < 0.05), biomaterial mesh had more reactions (57 vs 7%, p < 0.05), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)/polypropylene mesh had more intestinal complications (14 vs 7%, p < 0.05), and PTFE mesh tended to have more infections (75 vs 41% all other, p = 0.07). Death occurred in 2% (5). We conclude that specific mesh materials are related to specific complications.


American Journal of Surgery | 2011

Frailty predicts increased hospital and six-month healthcare cost following colorectal surgery in older adults.

Thomas N. Robinson; Daniel S. Wu; Gregory V. Stiegmann; Marc Moss

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of frailty and 6-month postoperative costs. METHODS Subjects aged ≥ 65 years undergoing elective colorectal operations were enrolled in a prospective observational study. Frailty was assessed by a validated measure of function, cognition, nutrition, comorbidity burden, and geriatric syndromes. Frailty was quantified by summing the number of positive characteristics in each subject. RESULTS Sixty subjects (mean age, 75 ± 8 years) were studied. Inpatient mortality was 2% (n = 1). Overall, 40% of subjects (n = 24) were considered nonfrail, 22% (n = 13) were prefrail, and 38% (n = 22) were frail. With advancing frailty, hospital costs increased (P < .001) and costs from discharge to 6-months increased (P < .001). Higher degrees of frailty were related to increased rates of discharge institutionalization (P < .001) and 30-day readmission (P = .044). CONCLUSIONS A simple, brief preoperative frailty assessment accurately forecasts increased surgical hospital costs and postdischarge to 6-month healthcare costs after colorectal operations in older adults.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2015

Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults: Best Practice Statement from the American Geriatrics Society

Sharon K. Inouye; Thomas N. Robinson; Caroline S. Blaum; Jan Busby-Whitehead; Malaz Boustani; Ara A. Chalian; Stacie Deiner; Donna M. Fick; Lisa C. Hutchison; Jason M. Johanning; Mark R. Katlic; James Kempton; Maura Kennedy; Eyal Y. Kimchi; C.Y. Ko; Jacqueline M. Leung; Melissa L. P. Mattison; Sanjay Mohanty; Arvind Nana; Dale M. Needham; Karin J. Neufeld; Holly E. Richter

Disclosure Information: Disclosures for the members of t Geriatrics Society Postoperative Delirium Panel are listed in Support: Supported by a grant from the John A Hartford Fou to the Geriatrics-for-Specialists Initiative of the American Geri (grant 2009-0079). This article is a supplement to the American Geriatrics Soci Practice Guidelines for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adu at the American College of Surgeons 100 Annual Clinic San Francisco, CA, October 2014.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2015

American Geriatrics Society abstracted clinical practice guideline for postoperative delirium in older adults

Mary Samuel; Sharon K. Inouye; Thomas N. Robinson; Caroline S. Blaum; Jan Busby-Whitehead; Malaz Boustani; Ara A. Chalian; Stacie Deiner; Donna M. Fick; Lisa C. Hutchison; Jason M. Johanning; Mark R. Katlic; James Kempton; Maura Kennedy; Eyal Y. Kimchi; C.Y. Ko; Jacqueline M. Leung; Melissa L. P. Mattison; Sanjay Mohanty; Arvind Nana; Dale M. Needham; Karin J. Neufeld; Holly E. Richter; Sue Radcliff; Christine Weston; Sneeha Patil; Gina Rocco; Jirong Yue; Susan E. Aiello; Marianna Drootin

The abstracted set of recommendations presented here provides essential guidance both on the prevention of postoperative delirium in older patients at risk of delirium and on the treatment of older surgical patients with delirium, and is based on the 2014 American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Guideline. The full version of the guideline, American Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adults is available at the website of the AGS. The overall aims of the study were twofold: first, to present nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that should be implemented perioperatively for the prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults; and second, to present nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions that should be implemented perioperatively for the treatment of postoperative delirium in older adults. Prevention recommendations focused on primary prevention (i.e., preventing delirium before it occurs) in patients who are at risk for postoperative delirium (e.g., those identified as moderate‐to‐high risk based on previous risk stratification models such as the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, Delirium: Diagnosis, Prevention and Management. Clinical Guideline 103; London (UK): 2010 July 29). For management of delirium, the goals of this guideline are to decrease delirium severity and duration, ensure patient safety and improve outcomes.


Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2010

Preoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Is Related to Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in the Elderly

Thomas N. Robinson; Daniel S. Wu; Lauren F. Pointer; Christina L. Dunn; Marc Moss

BACKGROUND Preoperative risk stratification is commonly performed by assessing end-organ function (such as cardiac and pulmonary) to define postoperative risk. Little is known about impaired preoperative cognition and outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of baseline impaired cognition on postoperative outcomes in geriatric surgery patients. STUDY DESIGN Subjects 65 years and older undergoing a planned elective operation requiring postoperative ICU admission were recruited prospectively. Preoperative baseline cognition was assessed using the validated Mini-Cog test. Impaired cognition was defined as a Mini-Cog score of ≤ 3. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method-ICU by a trained research team. Adverse outcomes were defined using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program definitions. RESULTS One hundred and eighty-six subjects were included, with a mean age of 73 ± 6 years. Eighty-two subjects (44%) had baseline impaired cognition. The impaired cognition group had the following unadjusted outcomes: increased incidence of 1 or more postoperative complications (41% vs 24%; p = 0.011), higher incidence of delirium (78% vs 37%; p < 0.001), longer hospital stays (15 ± 14 vs 9 ± 9 days; p = 0.001), higher rate of discharge institutionalization (42% vs 18%; p = 0.001), and higher 6-month mortality (13% vs 5%; p = 0.040). Adjusting for potential confounders determined by univariate analysis, logistic regression found impaired cognition was still associated with the occurrence of 1 or more postoperative complications (odds ratio = 2.401; 95% CI, 1.185-4.865; p = 0.015). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed higher mortality in the impaired cognition group (log-rank p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Baseline cognitive impairment in older adults undergoing major elective operations is related to adverse postoperative outcomes including increased complications, length of stay, and long-term mortality. Improved understanding of baseline cognition and surgical outcomes can aid surgical decision making in older adults.


Journal of the American Geriatrics Society | 2016

Antipsychotic Medication for Prevention and Treatment of Delirium in Hospitalized Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Karin J. Neufeld; Jirong Yue; Thomas N. Robinson; Sharon K. Inouye; Dale M. Needham

To evaluate the effectiveness of antipsychotic medications in preventing and treating delirium.


Annals of Surgery | 2013

Slower walking speed forecasts increased postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties.

Thomas N. Robinson; Daniel S. Wu; Angela Sauaia; Christina L. Dunn; Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley; Marc Moss; Greg V. Stiegmann; Csaba Gajdos; Joseph C. Cleveland; Sharon K. Inouye

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the Timed Up and Go test and postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality, and to compare the Timed Up and Go to the standard-of-care surgical risk calculators for prediction of postoperative complications. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, patients 65 years and older undergoing elective colorectal and cardiac operations with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The Timed Up and Go test was performed preoperatively. This timed test starts with the subject standing from a chair, walking 10 feet, returning to the chair, and ends after the subject sits. Timed Up and Go results were grouped as fast ⩽ 10 seconds, intermediate = 11–14 seconds, and slow ≥ 15 seconds. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the 3 Timed Up and Go groups to current standard-of-care surgical risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications. Results: This study included 272 subjects (mean age of 74 ± 6 years). Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased postoperative complications after colorectal (fast 13%, intermediate 29%, and slow 77%; P < 0.001) and cardiac (fast 11%, intermediate 26%, and slow 52%; P < 0.001) operations. Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased 1-year mortality following both colorectal (fast 3%, intermediate 10%, and slow 31%; P = 0.006) and cardiac (fast 2%, intermediate 3%, and slow 12%; P = 0.039) operations. Receiver operating characteristic area under curve of the Timed Up and Go and the risk calculators for the colorectal group was 0.775 (95% CI: 0.670–0.880) and 0.554 (95% CI: 0.499–0.609), and for the cardiac group was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.603–0.766) and 0.552 (95% CI: 0.477–0.626). Conclusions: Slower Timed Up and Go forecasted increased postoperative complications and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties. Regardless of operation performed, the Timed Up and Go compared favorably to the more complex risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications.

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas N. Robinson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward L. Jones

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas M. Overbey

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greg V. Stiegmann

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marc Moss

Anschutz Medical Campus

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Teresa S. Jones

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicole T. Townsend

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sharon K. Inouye

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Brandon C. Chapman

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge