Thomas Popp
German Aerospace Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas Popp.
Remote Sensing | 2016
Thomas Popp; Gerrit de Leeuw; Christine Bingen; C. Brühl; Virginie Capelle; A. Chédin; Lieven Clarisse; Oleg Dubovik; R. G. Grainger; Jan Griesfeller; A. Heckel; Stefan Kinne; Lars Klüser; Miriam Kosmale; Pekka Kolmonen; Luca Lelli; Pavel Litvinov; Linlu Mei; Peter R. J. North; Simon Pinnock; Adam C. Povey; Charles Robert; Michael Schulz; Larisa Sogacheva; Kerstin Stebel; Deborah Stein Zweers; G. E. Thomas; L. G. Tilstra; Sophie Vandenbussche; Pepijn Veefkind
Producing a global and comprehensive description of atmospheric aerosols requires integration of ground-based, airborne, satellite and model datasets. Due to its complexity, aerosol monitoring requires the use of several data records with complementary information content. This paper describes the lessons learned while developing and qualifying algorithms to generate aerosol Climate Data Records (CDR) within the European Space Agency (ESA) Aerosol_cci project. An iterative algorithm development and evaluation cycle involving core users is applied. It begins with the application-specific refinement of user requirements, leading to algorithm development, dataset processing and independent validation followed by user evaluation. This cycle is demonstrated for a CDR of total Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) from two subsequent dual-view radiometers. Specific aspects of its applicability to other aerosol algorithms are illustrated with four complementary aerosol datasets. An important element in the development of aerosol CDRs is the inclusion of several algorithms evaluating the same data to benefit from various solutions to the ill-determined retrieval problem. The iterative approach has produced a 17-year AOD CDR, a 10-year stratospheric extinction profile CDR and a 35-year Absorbing Aerosol Index record. Further evolution cycles have been initiated for complementary datasets to provide insight into aerosol properties (i.e., dust aerosol, aerosol absorption).
Remote Sensing | 2018
Claire E. Bulgin; Christopher J. Merchant; Darren Ghent; Lars Klüser; Thomas Popp; Caroline Poulsen; Larisa Sogacheva
Clouds remain one of the largest sources of uncertainty in remote sensing of surface temperature in the infrared, but this uncertainty has not generally been quantified. We present a new approach to do so, applied here to the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR). We use an ensemble of cloud masks based on independent methodologies to investigate the magnitude of cloud detection uncertainties in area-average Land Surface Temperature (LST) retrieval. We find that at a grid resolution of 625 km 2 (commensurate with a 0.25 ∘ grid size at the tropics), cloud detection uncertainties are positively correlated with cloud-cover fraction in the cell and are larger during the day than at night. Daytime cloud detection uncertainties range between 2.5 K for clear-sky fractions of 10–20% and 1.03 K for clear-sky fractions of 90–100%. Corresponding night-time uncertainties are 1.6 K and 0.38 K, respectively. Cloud detection uncertainty shows a weaker positive correlation with the number of biomes present within a grid cell, used as a measure of heterogeneity in the background against which the cloud detection must operate (e.g., surface temperature, emissivity and reflectance). Uncertainty due to cloud detection errors is strongly dependent on the dominant land cover classification. We find cloud detection uncertainties of a magnitude of 1.95 K over permanent snow and ice, 1.2 K over open forest, 0.9–1 K over bare soils and 0.09 K over mosaic cropland, for a standardised clear-sky fraction of 74.2%. As the uncertainties arising from cloud detection errors are of a significant magnitude for many surface types and spatially heterogeneous where land classification varies rapidly, LST data producers are encouraged to quantify cloud-related uncertainties in gridded products.
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions | 2018
J. Christopher Kaiser; Johannes Hendricks; Mattia Righi; Patrick Jöckel; H. Tost; Konrad Kandler; Bernadett Weinzierl; Daniel Sauer; Katharina Heimerl; Joshua P. Schwarz; A. E. Perring; Thomas Popp
Recently, the aerosol microphysics submodel MADE3 (Modal Aerosol Dynamics model for Europe, adapted for global applications, third generation) was introduced as a successor to MADE and MADE-in. It includes nine aerosol species and nine lognormal modes to represent aerosol particles of three different mixing states throughout the aerosol size spectrum. Here, we describe the implementation of the most recent version of MADE3 into the ECHAM/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) general circulation model, including a detailed evaluation of a 10year aerosol simulation with MADE3 as part of EMAC. We compare simulation output to station network measurements of near-surface aerosol component mass concentrations, to airborne measurements of aerosol mass mixing ratio and number concentration vertical profiles, to groundbased and airborne measurements of particle size distributions, and to station network and satellite measurements of aerosol optical depth. Furthermore, we describe and apply a new evaluation method, which allows a comparison of model output to size-resolved electron microscopy measurements of particle composition. Although there are indications that fine-mode particle deposition may be underestimated by the model, we obtained satisfactory agreement with the observations. Remaining deviations are of similar size to those identified in other global aerosol model studies. Thus, MADE3 can be considered ready for application within EMAC. Due to its detailed representation of aerosol mixing state, it is especially useful for simulating wet and dry removal of aerosol particles, aerosol-induced formation of cloud droplets and ice crystals as well as aerosol–radiation interactions. Besides studies on these fundamental processes, we also plan to use MADE3 for a reassessment of the climate effects of anthropogenic aerosol perturbations.
Advances in Meteorology | 2017
Lars Klüser; Thomas Popp
Mineral dust and ice cloud observations from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) are used to assess the relationships between desert dust aerosols and ice clouds over the tropical Atlantic Ocean during the hurricane season 2008. Cloud property histograms are first adjusted for varying cloud top temperature or ice water path distributions with a Bayesian approach to account for meteorological constraints on the cloud variables. Then, histogram differences between dust load classes are used to describe the impact of dust load on cloud property statistics. The analysis of the histogram differences shows that ice crystal sizes are reduced with increasing aerosol load and ice cloud optical depth and ice water path are increased. The distributions of all three variables broaden and get less skewed in dusty environments. For ice crystal size the significant bimodality is reduced and the order of peaks is reversed. Moreover, it is shown that not only are distributions of ice cloud variables simply shifted linearly but also variance, skewness, and complexity of the cloud variable distributions are significantly affected. This implies that the whole cloud variable distributions have to be considered for indirect aerosol effects in any application for climate modelling.
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2017
Axel Lauer; Veronika Eyring; Mattia Righi; Michael Buchwitz; Pierre Defourny; Pierre Friedlingstein; Richard de Jeu; Gerrit de Leeuw; Alexander Loew; Christopher J. Merchant; Benjamin Müller; Thomas Popp; Maximilian Reuter; Stein Sandven; Daniel Senftleben; Martin Stengel; Michel Van Roozendael; Sabrina Wenzel; Ulrika Willén
Earth System Science Data | 2017
Christopher J. Merchant; Frank Paul; Thomas Popp; Michael Ablain; Sophie Bontemps; Pierre Defourny; Rainer Hollmann; Thomas Lavergne; A. Laeng; Gerrit de Leeuw; Jonathan Mittaz; Caroline Poulsen; Adam C. Povey; Max Reuter; Shubha Sathyendranath; Stein Sandven; V. F. Sofieva; W. Wagner
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Angela Benedetti; Jeffrey S. Reid; Alexander Baklanov; S. Basart; Olivier Boucher; Ian M. Brooks; M. E. Brooks; Peter R. Colarco; E. Cuevas; Arlindo da Silva; Francesca Di Giuseppe; Jeronimo Escribano; Johannes Flemming; N. Huneeus; Oriol Jorba; Stelios Kazadzis; Stefan Kinne; Peter Knippertz; P. Laj; John H. Marsham; Laurent Menut; Lucia Mona; Thomas Popp; Patricia K. Quinn; Samuel Rémy; T. Sekiyama; Taichu Y. Tanaka; Enric Terradellas; Alfred Wiedensohler
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2017
Christine Bingen; Charles Robert; Kerstin Stebel; C. Brühl; Jennifer Schallock; Filip Vanhellemont; N. Mateshvili; M. Höpfner; Thomas Trickl; John E. Barnes; Julien Jumelet; Jean-Paul Vernier; Thomas Popp; Gerrit de Leeuw; S. Pinnock
Archive | 2017
K. Stebel; Adam C. Povey; Thomas Popp; Virginie Capelle; Lieven Clarisse; A. Heckel; Stefan Kinne; Lars Klüser; Pekka Kolmonen; Gerrit de Leeuw; Peter R. J. North; S. Pinnock; Larisa Sogacheva; GarethM G.M. Thomas; Sophie Vandenbussche
Archive | 2017
Miriam Kosmale; Pekka Kolmonen; Thomas Popp